DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » Google Earth Tracks Nukes

Google Earth Tracks Nukes

The lovely Elizabeth and I spent the bet­ter part of the last week dri­ving across coun­try, to set up the win­ter Defense Tech HQ in Los Angeles. We didn’t real­ize how many nuclear weapons we passed along the way: the old war­heads at the Pantex facil­ity, just out­side Amarillo; the 1,914 dooms­day devices at Kirtland Air Force Base, in Albuquerque.
googleearthnuke3.JPGWhen we drive back in the Spring, we’ll know. Because the wonks at the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Federation of American Scientists have teamed up to make a Google Earth map of the nearly nearly 10,000 nuclear war­heads in the U.S. arse­nal.
The satel­lite map — drawn from this Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists study — “offers a fresh account­ing of the exten­sive U.S. nuclear inven­tory, and its dynamic graph­ics let site users ‘fly’ onscreen across a sprawl­ing net­work of mil­i­tary facil­i­ties in 12 states and in Europe,” a press release reads.

The researchers empha­size that none of the loca­tions is secret. All have been known for years to house nuclear weapons and are highly secure mil­i­tary facil­i­ties that do not pose a direct secu­rity risk to sur­round­ing com­mu­ni­ties…
The U.S. nuclear arse­nal cur­rently is housed at 18 mil­i­tary facil­i­ties in 12 states and six European coun­tries. The high­est con­cen­tra­tion is at the Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific in Bangor, Washington, which is home to more than 2,300 war­heads prob­a­bly the most nuclear weapons at any one site in the world. At any given moment, nearly half of these war­heads are aboard ballistic-​​missile sub­marines in the Pacific…
Over the past decade, the United States has removed nuclear weapons from three states California, Virginia and South Dakota and one for­eign coun­try, Greece. And dur­ing that time, the esti­mated num­ber of nuclear weapons in the U.S. stock­pile dropped from approx­i­mately 12,500 to just below 10,000. At its height, in the mid-​​1960s, the U.S. stock­pile boasted some 32,000 war­heads…
[Today], more than two-​​thirds of the war­heads are stored at bases for oper­a­tional bal­lis­tic mis­siles and bombers. Only about 28 per­cent of the war­heads have been moved to sep­a­rate stor­age facil­i­ties, such as the mas­sive under­ground vault at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico, which stores more than 1,900 war­heads the sec­ond largest cache in the arsenal. 

Hmmm… maybe we’ll take the Northern route home.

Share |

November 9th, 2006 | Nukes | 223625 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/09/google-earth-tracks-nukes/Google+Earth+Tracks+Nukes2006-11-09+20%3A35%3A44jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Joint Chiefs Want Big Changes for Iraq? | Homeland security after the midterms » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. anon_poster says:
    November 9, 2006 at 5:30 pm

    FYI: While review­ing this on Google Earth is cer­tainly nice, a very cool fea­ture that Google Maps intro­duced some time ago is the abil­ity to view Google Earth over­lays (.kmz files) on the web. Just paste the .kmz link into the search box, and it’s there in no time.
    Here’s the Google Maps view of the above file:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=http://www.nrdc.org/media/docs/061109.kmz&ie=UTF8&z=4&t=h&om=1

    Reply
  2. sokala says:
    November 9, 2006 at 11:51 pm

    Well, don’t come to far north on the trip back. You will know you have come too far north by the glow in Washintion state.

    Reply
  3. ted says:
    November 11, 2006 at 12:36 am

    Ellsworth and Grand Forks have none?
    Norfolk has none?
    Pearl Harbor?
    Nothing in California?

    Reply
  4. george tirebiter says:
    November 14, 2006 at 2:14 pm

    If you look at Nellis AFB, zoom into N36 15′ 18.9″ /​ W114 58′ 13.62″ and you will be look­ing at the roof of one of sev­eral under­ground bunkers. This is where the nuclear war­heads are stored. I know this because I used to work on the other side of the dou­ble elec­tric fence (in the min­i­mum secu­rity fed­eral prison camp that is now closed) and every now and then they would have “Bomb Movements” and we inmates all had to go indoors while they guarded the doors with M-​​16 car­ry­ing air force mem­bers. Sometimes the bombs would go to the base and fly away.. some­timees they would go out off base and drive away on citys streets. Most disturbing.

    Reply
  5. W says:
    November 17, 2006 at 7:50 am

    Question — Why doesn’t Google ma the nukes that are in China, Russia, North Korea, Lybia, etc, etc, etc? Why is always the US that these mon­sters try to tar­get? Yes Google is run by monsters(Defined as any­one that LIKES to see humans, includ­ing their own fam­i­lies) mur­dered? Since the United States is soooooo evil, why don’t we just go ahead and launch? Why does the United States have to be the one to ALWAYS have our peo­ple killed first?

    Reply
  6. Steven says:
    November 17, 2006 at 8:01 am

    LOL. Blame google? Google had noth­ing to do with it, it’s a plu­gin to Google Earth!
    “Because the wonks at the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Federation of American Scientists have teamed up to make a Google Earth map of the nearly nearly 10,000 nuclear war­heads in the U.S. arse­nal.“
    Blame the NRDC and FAS (the “wonks”)! And the Film Actors Guild too. FYI, China isn’t the US and doesn’t tell the world where their weapons are stored.

    Reply
  7. nothing new says:
    November 17, 2006 at 8:11 am

    Why blame Google? Because it’s a lot eas­ier to blame the big money-​​making cor­po­ra­tion than the lib­eral morons who cre­ate the problems.

    Reply
  8. Gary says:
    November 17, 2006 at 8:57 am

    All of this was made avail­able to the rus­sians and the rest of the UN fol­low­ing the cold war which there was an aggree­ment to over­see nuclear arms reduc­tion in both the United States and Russia. This has all been pub­lic knowl­edge since the late 1980s!!
    The first line of attack won’t be with the ICBMs in North America, but with the shell game of Nuclear sub­marines span­ning across the Atlantic and Pacific. I’d say that is enough to keep them at bay!!

    Reply
  9. anon says:
    November 17, 2006 at 9:01 am

    If you think for one sec­ond that China or Greenpeace is going to be able to mount a suc­cess­ful attack on any of our nuke stock­piles, you’re nuts. Also, the infor­ma­tion is pub­lic knowl­edge, the intel guys on the other side really don’t need google earth to know where Nellis AFB is

    Reply
  10. William says:
    November 17, 2006 at 9:10 am

    I under­stand the need for free speech, I under­stand the need for some peo­ple to dis­close class­fied infor­ma­tion, in a warped belief that they are doing good for the nation. Now, the dis­clos­ing of the loca­tion of all the bases that house our nukes, where is the logic in that. Granted, the “enemy nations,” such as China, Russia, France etc know where these silos are just as America knows where the silos are, that’s just proper intel gath­er­ing of the mil­i­tary nations. Yet, dis­clos­ing and map­ping it all on google so a ter­ror­ist who may not have gov­ern­men­tal resources can know decide where, when and how to cause a mas­sive explo­sion (if capa­ble of breech­ing secu­rity), where is the logic in that. This map is a direct threat to national secu­rity for all cit­i­zens, espe­cially those that towns and cities near these bases. This map has just given the ter­ror­ist more ammu­ni­tion to try and cre­ate a cat­a­strophic dis­as­ter. Now not only do we have to be fear­ful of the demo­c­ra­tic house try­ing to down­size the mil­i­tary if a demo­c­ra­tic pres­i­dent wins in 2008, God help us all, you know they will down size the mil­i­tary, have more leaks the a bro­ken toliet and these “secret” and “secure” bases will now be tar­geted by ass­holes (green peace folks, anti-​​American folks), ter­ror­ist and any nut job out there. The very nature of map­ping the silos is ter­ri­ble, shows the use of poor judge­ment and that no mat­ter how many degrees a per­son may receive in col­lege, they can still be a com­plete jack­ass by reveal­ing infor­ma­tion that is dan­ger­ous to the coun­try and to our fel­low cit­i­zens. Yet, what can one expect when peo­ple only care about them­selves and not the nation or their fel­low cit­i­zen. This map will come back and bite us in the ass, it takes only one crazed indi­vid­ual, one crazed “polit­i­cal lib­eral wing group…” it takes only one ter­ror­ist cell of brain­washed indi­vid­u­als to try and do harm to those bases. This map should not be allowed to be pub­lished, it should not be allowed to be viewed by the pub­lic, no mat­ter how “gen­eral knowl­edge” it may be.

    Reply
  11. Michael Gamble says:
    November 17, 2006 at 9:34 am

    I will blame Google. They are for the most part left lean­ing and any harm that could be done to this coun­try is good. How is it that Google missed all of our nukes abroad? Why don’t you tell peo­ple where they are that would be nice. Things are secret because they need to be. In the time of a real war the peo­ple at Google that released this infor­ma­tion would be jailed. Now the idiot ter­ror­ists know where our bombs are and they might just work on a way to get some. If they do I hope San Francisco gets one and not some American city.

    Reply
  12. anon_poster says:
    November 17, 2006 at 10:10 am

    okay!!! this is idiotic.…..yes, NATIONS may know where they are at, but ter­ror­ists use this type of info over­load against us!! now, a smart ter­ror­ist would google the nukes and loca­tions. then, he or she would then infil­trate the town, then per­haps kill and com­man­deer an ID card or what­ever to gain access.…..I agree with the above, that tings are secret because they NEED to be secret. SECRETS are so WE can KEEP an EDGE over our ENEMIES, not so we can stiff the American Public. I.E. Boston Tea Party was a SECRET affair/​operation. Do you think if the Brits knew about our fore­fa­thers secrets, we would be a nation today????? why do you think the ter­rror­ists try sooo hard to keep their oper­a­tions secret??? not for harm against their so-​​called peo­ple, but so their ENEMIES (WHICH, BY THE WAY FOR YOU LIBERALS OUT THERE, THE ENEMY OF THE TERRORIST IS US!!!) CANNOT gain infor­ma­tion and destroy the edge that THEIR SECRETS HOLD!! remem­ber 9/​11??? do you think if they did not keep their secrets that sit­u­a­tion would have hap­pened?? What this has done, is just put the sur­round­ing cit­i­zens of the town or city in jeop­ardy. you don’t nec­es­sar­ily need to break in full force with a frontal attack, just observe the peo­ple work­ing on post!!

    Reply
  13. Bigbucnad says:
    November 17, 2006 at 10:23 am

    Why would any ter­ror­ist care where our nukes are when they can buy what they want from Iran, India, of the old Soviet states. Note that there were NO nukes in the twin tow­ers.
    PS: Note to all you lib­eral haters out there, free speach also pro­tects your right to hate, as is so obvi­ous in these posts.

    Reply
  14. Intel?? says:
    November 17, 2006 at 11:37 am

    Hey, there may be some ordi­nance there or there may not. 10,000 sites may be the real info or not. Where the ordi­nance is today may not be were it is in the morn­ing. Somebody has the full time job to keep these muni­tions safe and I’m sure that there is no fear of them let­ting a pub­lic search tool reveal their cur­rent and real status.

    Reply
  15. John says:
    November 17, 2006 at 11:50 am

    I feel that the actions by google show­ing loca­tions and types of nukes bor­ders on trea­son. They took the time and effort to do this„ why? Does google want a rib­bon? Why doesnt google track the tal­iban or the insur­gents in iraq or tell Israel when the rock­ets have launched? Do some­thing good for America with your tech­nol­ogy instead of betray­ing sen­si­tive info to the world.
    The world doesnt need to know this info.

    Reply
  16. Common Sense says:
    November 17, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    Yeah, every­one should just relax. First off, this infor­ma­tion was already avail­able to the pub­lic via the FAS and NRDC. Secondly, there is no way that Google would be autho­rized to release this infor­ma­tion with­out first vet­ting it with US gov­ern­ment author­i­ties. Thirdly, any ter­ror­ist worth a grain of salt is going to have access to supe­rior intel­li­gence than Google Earth. What might be com­pro­mis­ing is George Tirebiter’s com­ment regard­ing actual oper­a­tional details at Nellis AFB. Why some­one would crit­i­cize the release of pur­port­edly “sen­si­tive” mate­r­ial while con­firm­ing its valid­ity is beyond me. There are much big­ger threats to national secu­rity than google earth, the FAS, or the NRDC. So please, just relax. The peo­ple that han­dle these things are pro­fes­sion­als, that’s why they have their jobs and you have yours.

    Reply
  17. Mark says:
    December 9, 2006 at 1:41 pm

    Break your LONG com­ments into para­graphs. It’s eas­ier to read.

    Reply
  18. mrs. k says:
    July 11, 2007 at 7:03 pm

    I am just a wife and mother who saw a tv arti­cle by pbs about a reporter who was able to walk into places that should have been secure to say the least. After look­ing on the inter­net i am shocked
    by the things you can find on here. If I could find it im sure a ter­ror­ist could. Don’t get me wrong i am not criti­siz­ing you for this. It has made me more aware of things that I did not know.
    I think more amer­i­cans should get there heads out of ther butts and do more to pro­tect our­selves. It doesn’t look like the gov­ern­ment is doing such a great job after all.

    Reply
  19. john says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:30 am

    i think you guys are all idiots. you seri­ously think that google earth knows the exact loca­tions of all of the united states’s nukes. hahaha you’re idiots

    Reply
  20. john says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:30 am

    i think you guys are all idiots. you seri­ously think that google earth knows the exact loca­tions of all of the united states’s nukes. hahaha you’re idiots

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Time to bring military clothing into the 21st century. I...
      bobbymike
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : But beam-riding isn't used by bombers...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      To the poster "Charles" : Part I :...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage