DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » Google Earth Tracks Nukes

Google Earth Tracks Nukes

The lovely Elizabeth and I spent the better part of the last week driving across country, to set up the winter Defense Tech HQ in Los Angeles. We didn’t realize how many nuclear weapons we passed along the way: the old warheads at the Pantex facility, just outside Amarillo; the 1,914 doomsday devices at Kirtland Air Force Base, in Albuquerque.
googleearthnuke3.JPGWhen we drive back in the Spring, we’ll know. Because the wonks at the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Federation of American Scientists have teamed up to make a Google Earth map of the nearly nearly 10,000 nuclear warheads in the U.S. arsenal.
The satellite map — drawn from this Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists study — “offers a fresh accounting of the extensive U.S. nuclear inventory, and its dynamic graphics let site users ‘fly’ onscreen across a sprawling network of military facilities in 12 states and in Europe,” a press release reads.

The researchers emphasize that none of the locations is secret. All have been known for years to house nuclear weapons and are highly secure military facilities that do not pose a direct security risk to surrounding communities…
The U.S. nuclear arsenal currently is housed at 18 military facilities in 12 states and six European countries. The highest concentration is at the Strategic Weapons Facility Pacific in Bangor, Washington, which is home to more than 2,300 warheads probably the most nuclear weapons at any one site in the world. At any given moment, nearly half of these warheads are aboard ballistic-missile submarines in the Pacific…
Over the past decade, the United States has removed nuclear weapons from three states California, Virginia and South Dakota and one foreign country, Greece. And during that time, the estimated number of nuclear weapons in the U.S. stockpile dropped from approximately 12,500 to just below 10,000. At its height, in the mid-1960s, the U.S. stockpile boasted some 32,000 warheads…
[Today], more than two-thirds of the warheads are stored at bases for operational ballistic missiles and bombers. Only about 28 percent of the warheads have been moved to separate storage facilities, such as the massive underground vault at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico, which stores more than 1,900 warheads the second largest cache in the arsenal.

Hmmm… maybe we’ll take the Northern route home.

Share |

November 9th, 2006 | Nukes | 223625 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/09/google-earth-tracks-nukes/Google+Earth+Tracks+Nukes2006-11-09+20%3A35%3A44jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Joint Chiefs Want Big Changes for Iraq? | Homeland security after the midterms » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. anon_poster says:
    November 9, 2006 at 5:30 pm

    FYI: While reviewing this on Google Earth is certainly nice, a very cool feature that Google Maps introduced some time ago is the ability to view Google Earth overlays (.kmz files) on the web. Just paste the .kmz link into the search box, and it’s there in no time.
    Here’s the Google Maps view of the above file:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=http://www.nrdc.org/media/docs/061109.kmz&ie=UTF8&z=4&t=h&om=1

    Reply
  2. sokala says:
    November 9, 2006 at 11:51 pm

    Well, don’t come to far north on the trip back. You will know you have come too far north by the glow in Washintion state.

    Reply
  3. ted says:
    November 11, 2006 at 12:36 am

    Ellsworth and Grand Forks have none?
    Norfolk has none?
    Pearl Harbor?
    Nothing in California?

    Reply
  4. george tirebiter says:
    November 14, 2006 at 2:14 pm

    If you look at Nellis AFB, zoom into N36 15′ 18.9″ / W114 58′ 13.62″ and you will be looking at the roof of one of several underground bunkers. This is where the nuclear warheads are stored. I know this because I used to work on the other side of the double electric fence (in the minimum security federal prison camp that is now closed) and every now and then they would have “Bomb Movements” and we inmates all had to go indoors while they guarded the doors with M-16 carrying air force members. Sometimes the bombs would go to the base and fly away.. sometimees they would go out off base and drive away on citys streets. Most disturbing.

    Reply
  5. W says:
    November 17, 2006 at 7:50 am

    Question — Why doesn’t Google ma the nukes that are in China, Russia, North Korea, Lybia, etc, etc, etc? Why is always the US that these monsters try to target? Yes Google is run by monsters(Defined as anyone that LIKES to see humans, including their own families) murdered? Since the United States is soooooo evil, why don’t we just go ahead and launch? Why does the United States have to be the one to ALWAYS have our people killed first?

    Reply
  6. Steven says:
    November 17, 2006 at 8:01 am

    LOL. Blame google? Google had nothing to do with it, it’s a plugin to Google Earth!
    “Because the wonks at the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Federation of American Scientists have teamed up to make a Google Earth map of the nearly nearly 10,000 nuclear warheads in the U.S. arsenal.“
    Blame the NRDC and FAS (the “wonks”)! And the Film Actors Guild too. FYI, China isn’t the US and doesn’t tell the world where their weapons are stored.

    Reply
  7. nothing new says:
    November 17, 2006 at 8:11 am

    Why blame Google? Because it’s a lot easier to blame the big money-making corporation than the liberal morons who create the problems.

    Reply
  8. Gary says:
    November 17, 2006 at 8:57 am

    All of this was made available to the russians and the rest of the UN following the cold war which there was an aggreement to oversee nuclear arms reduction in both the United States and Russia. This has all been public knowledge since the late 1980s!!
    The first line of attack won’t be with the ICBMs in North America, but with the shell game of Nuclear submarines spanning across the Atlantic and Pacific. I’d say that is enough to keep them at bay!!

    Reply
  9. anon says:
    November 17, 2006 at 9:01 am

    If you think for one second that China or Greenpeace is going to be able to mount a successful attack on any of our nuke stockpiles, you’re nuts. Also, the information is public knowledge, the intel guys on the other side really don’t need google earth to know where Nellis AFB is

    Reply
  10. William says:
    November 17, 2006 at 9:10 am

    I understand the need for free speech, I understand the need for some people to disclose classfied information, in a warped belief that they are doing good for the nation. Now, the disclosing of the location of all the bases that house our nukes, where is the logic in that. Granted, the “enemy nations,” such as China, Russia, France etc know where these silos are just as America knows where the silos are, that’s just proper intel gathering of the military nations. Yet, disclosing and mapping it all on google so a terrorist who may not have governmental resources can know decide where, when and how to cause a massive explosion (if capable of breeching security), where is the logic in that. This map is a direct threat to national security for all citizens, especially those that towns and cities near these bases. This map has just given the terrorist more ammunition to try and create a catastrophic disaster. Now not only do we have to be fearful of the democratic house trying to downsize the military if a democratic president wins in 2008, God help us all, you know they will down size the military, have more leaks the a broken toliet and these “secret” and “secure” bases will now be targeted by assholes (green peace folks, anti-American folks), terrorist and any nut job out there. The very nature of mapping the silos is terrible, shows the use of poor judgement and that no matter how many degrees a person may receive in college, they can still be a complete jackass by revealing information that is dangerous to the country and to our fellow citizens. Yet, what can one expect when people only care about themselves and not the nation or their fellow citizen. This map will come back and bite us in the ass, it takes only one crazed individual, one crazed “political liberal wing group…” it takes only one terrorist cell of brainwashed individuals to try and do harm to those bases. This map should not be allowed to be published, it should not be allowed to be viewed by the public, no matter how “general knowledge” it may be.

    Reply
  11. Michael Gamble says:
    November 17, 2006 at 9:34 am

    I will blame Google. They are for the most part left leaning and any harm that could be done to this country is good. How is it that Google missed all of our nukes abroad? Why don’t you tell people where they are that would be nice. Things are secret because they need to be. In the time of a real war the people at Google that released this information would be jailed. Now the idiot terrorists know where our bombs are and they might just work on a way to get some. If they do I hope San Francisco gets one and not some American city.

    Reply
  12. anon_poster says:
    November 17, 2006 at 10:10 am

    okay!!! this is idiotic.…..yes, NATIONS may know where they are at, but terrorists use this type of info overload against us!! now, a smart terrorist would google the nukes and locations. then, he or she would then infiltrate the town, then perhaps kill and commandeer an ID card or whatever to gain access.…..I agree with the above, that tings are secret because they NEED to be secret. SECRETS are so WE can KEEP an EDGE over our ENEMIES, not so we can stiff the American Public. I.E. Boston Tea Party was a SECRET affair/operation. Do you think if the Brits knew about our forefathers secrets, we would be a nation today????? why do you think the terrrorists try sooo hard to keep their operations secret??? not for harm against their so-called people, but so their ENEMIES (WHICH, BY THE WAY FOR YOU LIBERALS OUT THERE, THE ENEMY OF THE TERRORIST IS US!!!) CANNOT gain information and destroy the edge that THEIR SECRETS HOLD!! remember 9/11??? do you think if they did not keep their secrets that situation would have happened?? What this has done, is just put the surrounding citizens of the town or city in jeopardy. you don’t necessarily need to break in full force with a frontal attack, just observe the people working on post!!

    Reply
  13. Bigbucnad says:
    November 17, 2006 at 10:23 am

    Why would any terrorist care where our nukes are when they can buy what they want from Iran, India, of the old Soviet states. Note that there were NO nukes in the twin towers.
    PS: Note to all you liberal haters out there, free speach also protects your right to hate, as is so obvious in these posts.

    Reply
  14. Intel?? says:
    November 17, 2006 at 11:37 am

    Hey, there may be some ordinance there or there may not. 10,000 sites may be the real info or not. Where the ordinance is today may not be were it is in the morning. Somebody has the full time job to keep these munitions safe and I’m sure that there is no fear of them letting a public search tool reveal their current and real status.

    Reply
  15. John says:
    November 17, 2006 at 11:50 am

    I feel that the actions by google showing locations and types of nukes borders on treason. They took the time and effort to do this„ why? Does google want a ribbon? Why doesnt google track the taliban or the insurgents in iraq or tell Israel when the rockets have launched? Do something good for America with your technology instead of betraying sensitive info to the world.
    The world doesnt need to know this info.

    Reply
  16. Common Sense says:
    November 17, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    Yeah, everyone should just relax. First off, this information was already available to the public via the FAS and NRDC. Secondly, there is no way that Google would be authorized to release this information without first vetting it with US government authorities. Thirdly, any terrorist worth a grain of salt is going to have access to superior intelligence than Google Earth. What might be compromising is George Tirebiter’s comment regarding actual operational details at Nellis AFB. Why someone would criticize the release of purportedly “sensitive” material while confirming its validity is beyond me. There are much bigger threats to national security than google earth, the FAS, or the NRDC. So please, just relax. The people that handle these things are professionals, that’s why they have their jobs and you have yours.

    Reply
  17. Mark says:
    December 9, 2006 at 1:41 pm

    Break your LONG comments into paragraphs. It’s easier to read.

    Reply
  18. mrs. k says:
    July 11, 2007 at 7:03 pm

    I am just a wife and mother who saw a tv article by pbs about a reporter who was able to walk into places that should have been secure to say the least. After looking on the internet i am shocked
    by the things you can find on here. If I could find it im sure a terrorist could. Don’t get me wrong i am not critisizing you for this. It has made me more aware of things that I did not know.
    I think more americans should get there heads out of ther butts and do more to protect ourselves. It doesn’t look like the government is doing such a great job after all.

    Reply
  19. john says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:30 am

    i think you guys are all idiots. you seriously think that google earth knows the exact locations of all of the united states’s nukes. hahaha you’re idiots

    Reply
  20. john says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:30 am

    i think you guys are all idiots. you seriously think that google earth knows the exact locations of all of the united states’s nukes. hahaha you’re idiots

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Lockheed and Boeing: working both ends of a bent over taxpayer....
      John
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Actual costs of the F-22 are now down to about $110M per...
      Dan
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      We need to put an end to the defense contractor corporate...
      John
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      I beg to differ about mortar being more...
      Gunnery Instructor
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      The cost would likely (eventually) be much less...
      Gunnery Instr
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Ridiculous. Thanks goodness that F22 line hasn't...
      Robert
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      …or the Army and Marines could just develop...
      czech_6
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      "The 'Army' (as euphemism for...
      czech_6
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I'm going to stick with my previous statements...
      Vertigo
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      wow, i better pick up some shares in Lockheed Martin...
      czech_6
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage