DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » Iran Drone Stalks U.S. Carrier?

Iran Drone Stalks U.S. Carrier?

There’s sup­posed to be a pro­tec­tive bub­ble around American air­craft car­ri­ers, both on the sea, and in the air. Come too close, and you will get smoked.
295354778_256816d03c.jpgOr, at least, that’s the idea. But the Iranians are now claim­ing that they’ve punc­tured this bub­ble, with an robotic plane. Let’s hope that the footage is fake, as some are saying.

Iran’s Arabic lan­guage tele­vi­sion sta­tion broad­cast footage it claimed showed a US air­craft car­rier cruis­ing in Gulf waters it said was taken by an unmanned Iranian drone.
The brief minute-​​long film, which was shown on Al-​​Alam television’s evening news bul­letin, showed wob­bly aer­ial footage of an air­craft car­rier stacked with war planes as it sailed.
The television’s anchor said the film, the prop­erty of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guard, showed a ves­sel from “the US fleet in the Persian Gulf”.
“A source in the Revolutionary Guard said the drone car­ried out its mis­sion with­out US fighter pilots reach­ing it,” the tele­vi­sion said.
It said there were 10 such films taken by the drone which showed “more pre­cise infor­ma­tion and details about mil­i­tary equip­ment, for­eign forces, and their activ­i­ties in the Persian Gulf.“
The sta­tion did not name the ves­sel nor did it say when the footage was shot.
The broad­cast comes near the end of Iran’s lat­est 10-​​day war games, “Great Prophet II”, which mil­i­tary chiefs have said were aimed at show­ing off Iran’s defen­sive prowess and test­ing new mil­i­tary hardware. 

UPDATE 12:37 PM: “Iran is sus­tain­ing the insur­gency against British and American forces in Iraq by sup­ply­ing ter­ror­ists with weapons and cash,” accord­ing to the Daily Telegraph.

Share |

November 13th, 2006 | Drones | 224711 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/13/iran-drone-stalks-u-s-carrier/Iran+Drone+Stalks+U.S.+Carrier%3F2006-11-13+17%3A13%3A51jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 11/​13/​06 | Free the Wonks! » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Benjamin Fan says:
    November 13, 2006 at 12:43 pm

    I think it’s a fake.

    Reply
  2. cardoso says:
    November 13, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    I think the after the whole USS Vincennes case, peo­ple are not trig­ger happy in the US Navy. Also with the amount of air traf­fic in the region, MAYBE they could

    Reply
  3. Nicholas weaver says:
    November 13, 2006 at 2:25 pm

    Heck, make it out of ply­wood & cloth, with the engine in a metal box, and its pretty stealth if it is just on a pre­pro­grammed course.

    Reply
  4. DJ Elliott says:
    November 13, 2006 at 4:09 pm

    When you tran­sit the SoH you are in Iranian waters. Legaly the strait is inter­na­tional for tran­sit only. Oman and Iran legaly own those waters. You see land on either side when you pass the Musidon penin­sula (Oman).
    The video has the inter­fer­ence of the air search radar on it. That means a video recorder with­out proper EM insu­la­tion, prob­a­bly from a Helo.

    Reply
  5. Earl says:
    November 13, 2006 at 4:26 pm

    A com­plete video is avail­able here:
    http://​video​.google​.com/​v​i​d​e​o​g​v​p​/​I​r​a​n​i​a​n​d​r​o​n​e​s​p​i​n​g​U​S​a​.​g​v​p​?​d​o​c​i​d​=​-​3​2​4​2​9​4​8​4​1​7​2​7​6​2​3​684
    Some obser­va­tions:
    1. The hull num­ber which is promi­nently painted on the for­ward flight deck of American car­ri­ers is not vis­i­ble any­where in this video.
    2. In the upper right cor­ner of the full frame is a much smaller frame. This looks like it might be a mag­ni­fied image of a por­tion of the main frame.
    3. Later in the video, and air­craft can be clearly seen launch­ing from one of the waist cat­a­pults.
    4. Aircraft can be observed in flight in the near vicin­ity of the car­rier.
    5. A sur­face war­ship is vis­i­ble in the video but not iden­ti­fi­able because of the extremely poor res­o­lu­tion.
    We need some­one famil­iar with, ide­ally actively involved in, mod­ern car­rier oper­a­tions to eval­u­ate this video. It may be some­ones home movie, or an offi­cial video of an exer­cise.
    I doubt that the video is from an Iranian drone, although I do not have suf­fi­cient tech­ni­cal knowl­edge to assert claims about how good our radar cov­er­age is. Can Aegis detect a wooden drone hacked together from model air­plane parts?
    The ques­tion is then where did the Iranians get the video?

    Reply
  6. TZ says:
    November 13, 2006 at 7:45 pm

    Who cares?? They undoubtly were tran­sit­ing the straits where they could be observed from Iranian air­space any­ways, and you are not per­mit­ted to launch war­planes either while in tran­sit because that is tech­ni­cally a act of war. I am also will­ing to bet that “drone” was on everyone’s radar screen and locked up 10 ways to Sunday. If any­thing had gone down, it would have been smoked quicker than you could imag­ine. We can’t force them out of the sky– par­tic­u­lar­ily their own sky because it is tech­ni­cally inter­na­tional or Iranian waters, depend­ing where they are. So, the Iranians send up some kind of air­craft– label it a “drone” to make it all sexy and “high tech” and try to pro­voke a response by A) pro­vok­ing a defen­sive reac­tion, pos­si­bly one where they could pick up on our TTPs and B) then hail­ing it as a “Great Victory over the Great Satan” lit­tle bit of pro­pa­ganda. Standard bat­ing of the US really, and it goes along per­fectly with how the Iranians want to style them­selves. For all we know, the F-​​18 tail­ing it could have been edited out!!! But who cares? It means noth­ing– unless peo­ple make it out to in order to send a polit­i­cal mes­sage, which is the more inter­est­ing aspect of it.

    Reply
  7. bill says:
    November 15, 2006 at 8:57 am

    Asymmetric war­fare is some­thing that can­not be dis­missed, the smaller more agile oppo­nent always wins over the pon­der­ous mono­lith. Large car­ri­ers are obso­lete in real mod­ern war­fare; they are large tar­gets that are not eas­ily defended. Any future scaled-​​war involv­ing car­ri­ers fleets will dis­cover losses greater than expected.
    The use of cheap EMP(electro-magnetic pulse)weapons will also show much of the US mod­ern weapons sys­tems as defec­tive. Weapons guid­ance sytems can be eas­ily made redun­dant with sim­i­lar weapons tak­ing out satel­lite guid­ance, and all of this fairly cheaply (espe­cially when mea­sured against the very expen­sive US machine). Mobile lasers (like the one the Chinese recently used to dis­rupt a US satel­lite) are also fairly cheap by com­par­i­son.
    America can­not win a war against Iran, its pretty much that sim­ple. Iran is not a pushover like Iraq — a war which America hasn’t won yet, and is unlikely to.

    Reply
  8. Jack Trebac says:
    November 15, 2006 at 3:30 pm

    Bill,
    So the Iranians are tougher mil­i­tar­ily than the Iraqis. Okay. But come on Bill, say­ing we can’t win a war against Iran is idi­otic. We could bomb them into the stone ages WITH EASE, wipe out their entire pop­u­la­tion, and take their oil. FORTUNATELY saner minds are now in con­trol. There would be too much oppo­si­tion from the U.S. pop­u­la­tion, and push-​​back from other coun­tries. As far as Iraq goes, we should have never gone in, period. Reasoning was fab­ri­cated. We went in for the oil, period. There were much bet­ter ways of han­dling the sit­u­a­tion. That said, IMHO our strat­egy now should be to con­cen­trate solely on pro­tect­ing the oil fields, boost­ing oil pro­duc­tion which will gen­er­ate income for the Iraqi gov­ern­ment, have U.S. oil com­pa­nies dra­mat­i­cally increase oil explo­ration in west­ern Iraq, ship every drop of Iraqi oil to the U.S., and let the Shia and Sunnis duke it out in Bagdad. Sounds rude, but if they want to fight, let them fight. Andlet’s face it, oil is the rea­son we’re there, so let’s cut the crap and get what we came for.

    Reply
  9. Armed Spectator says:
    November 21, 2006 at 12:58 pm

    Quick PolSci les­son twimc
    Empires that do not inte­grate cul­tur­ally expe­ri­ence sab­o­tage, insur­gency (assy­met­ri­cal war­fare), inter­nal degra­da­tion, and gen­eral polit­i­cal and eco­nomic attri­tion until the rul­ing state is no longer able to sup­port a pres­ence in the con­quered states. This is pretty much a given. You absolutely must inte­grate. This means your sol­diers marry their women and open bor­ders need to be estab­lished. In this respect, assy­met­ri­cal war­fare ALWAYS wins.
    The alter­na­tives, which many peo­ple are naively sug­gest­ing, are to ANNIHILATE or ENSLAVE the con­quered peo­ple.
    Historically, enslave­ment has been accom­plished with only lim­ited suc­cess (even the ancient Hebrews revolted, and received var­i­ous ameni­ties from the Egyptians, and were known before and after their enslave­ment as a war­like myrmidon-​​like peo­ple). The “mod­ern” world also objects strongly to slav­ery, and mod­ern weapons in the hands of a native resis­tance make the entire idea imprac­ti­cal any­way.
    The other option (in the case of total war, that is), anni­hi­la­tion, is also nearly impos­si­ble, and again, has only been accom­plished with lim­ited suc­cess. While a nation or “pure” blood­line may be destroyed, the peo­ple them­selves are spread far across the Middle East. This is not just Iraq, Iran, Syria, etc… this is Babylon, Persia, the Ottoman Empire… these are fam­i­lies and com­mon his­to­ries spread from Africa to Tibet over thou­sands of years, and some­times they take each oth­ers’ side. We can­not NUKE the entire Mid-​​East. Nuking all of the pop­u­la­tion cen­ters in Afghanistan alone would con­t­a­m­i­nate the Earth for cen­turies. We can­not con­tinue to STEAL their oil when­ever we need it, because we turn more and more of that part of the world against us.
    Hate has been spread on both sides. This IS a snow­ball effect. The only way this is ever going to end is if enough peo­ple on both sides of the world say “enough” to our LEADERS and agree to dis­agree about reli­gion. Slowly but surely this planet is going to inte­grate any­way; we might as well try to do it with­out incin­er­at­ing each other.

    Reply
  10. stephen russell says:
    December 29, 2007 at 6:32 pm

    Now add some anti ship mis­siles to drone & ver­ify tar­get in Iran Hqs & NO car­rier.
    Time to rearm car­ri­ers or Find Tech SpyMole in the DoD send­ing secrets to Iran alone.
    Find the Spy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Time to bring military clothing into the 21st century. I...
      bobbymike
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage