DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » Bombs Over Afghanistan

Bombs Over Afghanistan

Today’s Times has a fascinating story out of Afghanistan. Well, more like above it, really. Reporter David Cloud hitched a ride on a “B-1 bomber orbit[ing] at 20,000 feet, responding to radio calls from American and Canadian troops who asked the plane to use its radar to watch for insurgent forces and to be prepared to drop bombs.“
B1 Bomber.jpg

The Air Force has conducted more than 2,000 airstrikes in Afghanistan over the past six months, a sharp increase in bombing that reflects the growing demand for American air cover since NATO has assumed a larger ground combat role, Air Force officials said…
The NATO forces are mostly operating without heavy armor or artillery support, and as Taliban resistance has continued, more air support has been used to compensate for the lightness of the units, Air Force officials said. Most of the strikes have come during close air support missions, where the bombers patrol the area and respond to calls from ground units in combat rather than performing planned strikes…
To carry out the heavier mission load, the Air Forces entire complement of B-1 bombers was shifted over the summer from the British air base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean to a Middle Eastern airfield closer to Afghanistan. The new basing arrangement shortens the flying time to Afghanistan by two hours, allowing bombers to remain overhead for longer periods between refueling by aerial tankers…
The 2,095 attacks by American aircraft since June is many times greater than the number of airstrikes in Iraq, where the terrain and nature of the conflict are less susceptible to bombing campaigns. There have been only 88 attacks by American aircraft in Iraq since June, according to Air Force figures. Unlike in Afghanistan, insurgents in Iraq are largely in urban areas and do not often mass in groups large enough to warrant use of airstrikes, Air Force commanders said.

I think we al know how effective close air support can be. But is it really a substitute for having fewer troops on the ground?

Share |

November 17th, 2006 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 226122 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/17/bombs-over-afghanistan/Bombs+Over+Afghanistan2006-11-17+20%3A53%3A23jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Kit Up! | Personal Copter, Lifespan-Chopper » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. BT says:
    November 17, 2006 at 4:54 pm

    SOF and air power is the correct strategy for Afghanistan. Using large numbers of conventional forces outside of large towns is stupid. Guerrilla warfare requires these types of tactics.

    Reply
  2. Trustbutverify says:
    November 17, 2006 at 5:18 pm

    Not to split hairs, but the B-1s are standing in for tube and direct-fire artillery, not ground troops.
    This is generally the time when someone should chime in about how a “B-767″ aircraft would do the job just as well; show-of-force (SOF in pilot slang) drawbacks aside, there’s certainly something to the idea. But you go to war with the military you have, and the ever-present Bone has been very popular with troops on the ground.

    Reply
  3. Noah Shachtman says:
    November 17, 2006 at 6:05 pm

    Fair enough, TBV.

    Reply
  4. Ric Locke says:
    November 18, 2006 at 11:30 pm

    A couple of years ago there was discussion of a concept that had target designators in the hands of the troops. The idea being that Pvt. Snuffy could aim his laser at a target, and a bomber high overhead would release a GBU-controlled bomb.
    In the final development of that, troops would go into action with weapons for self-protection plus what amounted to laser pointers. When they wanted to kill something, they’d call fire from the sky. Yes, I know, that’s taking it too far.
    This seems to me an idea worth development. Has more been done?
    Regards,
    Ric

    Reply
  5. Grepon says:
    November 19, 2006 at 2:51 pm

    A friend of mine is the weapons officer onboard a B-1, who did a few tours over Afghanistan out of Diego Garcia. The mission, indeed, was close ground support from 21K feet. Once over Afghanistan, he controlled the plane, and listened on chatter between ground forces. Forces on the ground would communicate map coordinates which he’d verify and translate back for checking purposes to GPS. He’d organize the bombing run accordingly, under ground forces command, much like the “laser pointer” model discussed above. This has been going on for years. The only new thing I see here is a better basing arrangement, and maybe a greater intensity of activity. The trip from Diego involved several in-flight refuelings along the way, and much fatique buildup with the crew. R&R on Diego is great, it’s a tropical island. Thing is the beaches are shark infested.

    Reply
  6. Allen Thomson says:
    November 19, 2006 at 4:26 pm

    One interesting point in the story is the rebasing from Diego Garcia to an undisclosed location in the Middle East. Al Udeid comes to mind, but are there other possibilities?
    It also occurs to me that any Middle East base is way closer to Iran than is Diego G, should things come to that.

    Reply
  7. Allen Thomson says:
    November 20, 2006 at 6:39 pm

    > Al Udeid comes to mind
    Yup. It does seem to be Al Udeid:
    http://www.airforcetimes.com/story.php?f=1–292925-2331598.php
    November 03, 2006
    Qatar base population hits 7,000
    Staff report
    Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is on its way to becoming one of the largest bases in the Air Force, and it’s looking more like a permanent base than a deployed location.
    [snip]
    Among the new arrivals are a B-1B Lancer bomber squadron, a reconnaissance aircraft ground relay station and a communications training squadron.
    [mas snip]

    Reply
  8. E J Laborde says:
    July 25, 2007 at 7:29 pm

    I would like to hear more about the 9th Bomber Squadron now based at Al Udeid

    Reply
  9. cheap gw gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:43 pm

    Together and he is not a very long time, but I feel very comfortable. He was sometime as a child, lovely, simple, not too many worries, likes a fish in a pure travel freely in the sea. He often took his only cheap GW gold send to me. His world simple, but he is happy.

    Reply
  10. cheap rf gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:50 pm

    During the time pass, my union was larger; my union members are very solidarity, when some people have difficult, we all go to help. I also remembered once a people

    Reply
  11. rohan money says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:54 pm

    I felt you seems not as me to your wife, you called me wife is very rarely, although you often send rohan money to me. Every time you ask me, as I am very happy. I really think you are me, just my own, I do not want you leave me. I am afraid you forget me. I slowly understand, sister and brother in law why they will love so painful, why sister in the final will be sad to leave.

    Reply
  12. cheap rappelz rupees says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:57 pm

    I recognized her is an occasional, When I was just upgrade and earn rappelz gold. She also just through, and she is a new player, she saw me my number is high. So she asked me how to play. And I said I was a bad people, I asked if did you not heard in this game. She said she heard, but she did not believe. I smiled. So I took her to play, I told her how to play, how to upgrade. And I apply a new number, I prepared to play with her, upgrade and earn cheap rappelz rupees together.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    • Author Steven Pressfield Blogs Afghan Visit With Gen. Mattis
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    Recent Comments
    • Chinese Navy Requires Supercruising Fighter
      j-11 warplane :...
      chinese warplanes
    • China’s Military Spending Slows
      shenyang fighter :...
      chinese warplanes
    • China’s Military Spending Slows
      chinese warplanes :...
      chinese warplanes
    • China’s Military Spending Slows
      chinese warplanes :...
      chinese warplanes
    • China’s Military Spending Slows
      chinese warplanes :...
      chinese warplanes
    • Chinese Cyber War Skirmish Revealed
      chinese warplanes :...
      chinese warplanes
    • Can the Russkis Build Their 5th Gen Fighter?
      sukhoi articles :...
      sukhoi articles
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      You realize of course the robbery rate is 50% higher in the UK...
      STemplar
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Given that the class hasn't even really been...
      STemplar
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      There are very few...
      Eugene Ellis
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage