DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » Bombs Over Afghanistan

Bombs Over Afghanistan

Today’s Times has a fas­ci­nat­ing story out of Afghanistan. Well, more like above it, really. Reporter David Cloud hitched a ride on a “B-​​1 bomber orbit[ing] at 20,000 feet, respond­ing to radio calls from American and Canadian troops who asked the plane to use its radar to watch for insur­gent forces and to be pre­pared to drop bombs.“
B1 Bomber.jpg

The Air Force has con­ducted more than 2,000 airstrikes in Afghanistan over the past six months, a sharp increase in bomb­ing that reflects the grow­ing demand for American air cover since NATO has assumed a larger ground com­bat role, Air Force offi­cials said…
The NATO forces are mostly oper­at­ing with­out heavy armor or artillery sup­port, and as Taliban resis­tance has con­tin­ued, more air sup­port has been used to com­pen­sate for the light­ness of the units, Air Force offi­cials said. Most of the strikes have come dur­ing close air sup­port mis­sions, where the bombers patrol the area and respond to calls from ground units in com­bat rather than per­form­ing planned strikes…
To carry out the heav­ier mis­sion load, the Air Forces entire com­ple­ment of B-​​1 bombers was shifted over the sum­mer from the British air base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean to a Middle Eastern air­field closer to Afghanistan. The new bas­ing arrange­ment short­ens the fly­ing time to Afghanistan by two hours, allow­ing bombers to remain over­head for longer peri­ods between refu­el­ing by aer­ial tankers…
The 2,095 attacks by American air­craft since June is many times greater than the num­ber of airstrikes in Iraq, where the ter­rain and nature of the con­flict are less sus­cep­ti­ble to bomb­ing cam­paigns. There have been only 88 attacks by American air­craft in Iraq since June, accord­ing to Air Force fig­ures. Unlike in Afghanistan, insur­gents in Iraq are largely in urban areas and do not often mass in groups large enough to war­rant use of airstrikes, Air Force com­man­ders said.

I think we al know how effec­tive close air sup­port can be. But is it really a sub­sti­tute for hav­ing fewer troops on the ground?

Share |

November 17th, 2006 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 226122 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/17/bombs-over-afghanistan/Bombs+Over+Afghanistan2006-11-17+20%3A53%3A23jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Kit Up! | Personal Copter, Lifespan-​​Chopper » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. BT says:
    November 17, 2006 at 4:54 pm

    SOF and air power is the cor­rect strat­egy for Afghanistan. Using large num­bers of con­ven­tional forces out­side of large towns is stu­pid. Guerrilla war­fare requires these types of tactics.

    Reply
  2. Trustbutverify says:
    November 17, 2006 at 5:18 pm

    Not to split hairs, but the B-​​1s are stand­ing in for tube and direct-​​fire artillery, not ground troops.
    This is gen­er­ally the time when some­one should chime in about how a “B-​​767″ air­craft would do the job just as well; show-​​of-​​force (SOF in pilot slang) draw­backs aside, there’s cer­tainly some­thing to the idea. But you go to war with the mil­i­tary you have, and the ever-​​present Bone has been very pop­u­lar with troops on the ground.

    Reply
  3. Noah Shachtman says:
    November 17, 2006 at 6:05 pm

    Fair enough, TBV.

    Reply
  4. Ric Locke says:
    November 18, 2006 at 11:30 pm

    A cou­ple of years ago there was dis­cus­sion of a con­cept that had tar­get des­ig­na­tors in the hands of the troops. The idea being that Pvt. Snuffy could aim his laser at a tar­get, and a bomber high over­head would release a GBU-​​controlled bomb.
    In the final devel­op­ment of that, troops would go into action with weapons for self-​​protection plus what amounted to laser point­ers. When they wanted to kill some­thing, they’d call fire from the sky. Yes, I know, that’s tak­ing it too far.
    This seems to me an idea worth devel­op­ment. Has more been done?
    Regards,
    Ric

    Reply
  5. Grepon says:
    November 19, 2006 at 2:51 pm

    A friend of mine is the weapons offi­cer onboard a B-​​1, who did a few tours over Afghanistan out of Diego Garcia. The mis­sion, indeed, was close ground sup­port from 21K feet. Once over Afghanistan, he con­trolled the plane, and lis­tened on chat­ter between ground forces. Forces on the ground would com­mu­ni­cate map coor­di­nates which he’d ver­ify and trans­late back for check­ing pur­poses to GPS. He’d orga­nize the bomb­ing run accord­ingly, under ground forces com­mand, much like the “laser pointer” model dis­cussed above. This has been going on for years. The only new thing I see here is a bet­ter bas­ing arrange­ment, and maybe a greater inten­sity of activ­ity. The trip from Diego involved sev­eral in-​​flight refu­el­ings along the way, and much fatique buildup with the crew. R&R on Diego is great, it’s a trop­i­cal island. Thing is the beaches are shark infested.

    Reply
  6. Allen Thomson says:
    November 19, 2006 at 4:26 pm

    One inter­est­ing point in the story is the rebas­ing from Diego Garcia to an undis­closed loca­tion in the Middle East. Al Udeid comes to mind, but are there other pos­si­bil­i­ties?
    It also occurs to me that any Middle East base is way closer to Iran than is Diego G, should things come to that.

    Reply
  7. Allen Thomson says:
    November 20, 2006 at 6:39 pm

    > Al Udeid comes to mind
    Yup. It does seem to be Al Udeid:
    http://www.airforcetimes.com/story.php?f=1–292925-2331598.php
    November 03, 2006
    Qatar base pop­u­la­tion hits 7,000
    Staff report
    Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar is on its way to becom­ing one of the largest bases in the Air Force, and it’s look­ing more like a per­ma­nent base than a deployed loca­tion.
    [snip]
    Among the new arrivals are a B-​​1B Lancer bomber squadron, a recon­nais­sance air­craft ground relay sta­tion and a com­mu­ni­ca­tions train­ing squadron.
    [mas snip]

    Reply
  8. E J Laborde says:
    July 25, 2007 at 7:29 pm

    I would like to hear more about the 9th Bomber Squadron now based at Al Udeid

    Reply
  9. cheap gw gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:43 pm

    Together and he is not a very long time, but I feel very com­fort­able. He was some­time as a child, lovely, sim­ple, not too many wor­ries, likes a fish in a pure travel freely in the sea. He often took his only cheap GW gold send to me. His world sim­ple, but he is happy.

    Reply
  10. cheap rf gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:50 pm

    During the time pass, my union was larger; my union mem­bers are very sol­i­dar­ity, when some peo­ple have dif­fi­cult, we all go to help. I also remem­bered once a people

    Reply
  11. rohan money says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:54 pm

    I felt you seems not as me to your wife, you called me wife is very rarely, although you often send rohan money to me. Every time you ask me, as I am very happy. I really think you are me, just my own, I do not want you leave me. I am afraid you for­get me. I slowly under­stand, sis­ter and brother in law why they will love so painful, why sis­ter in the final will be sad to leave.

    Reply
  12. cheap rappelz rupees says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:57 pm

    I rec­og­nized her is an occa­sional, When I was just upgrade and earn rap­pelz gold. She also just through, and she is a new player, she saw me my num­ber is high. So she asked me how to play. And I said I was a bad peo­ple, I asked if did you not heard in this game. She said she heard, but she did not believe. I smiled. So I took her to play, I told her how to play, how to upgrade. And I apply a new num­ber, I pre­pared to play with her, upgrade and earn cheap rap­pelz rupees together.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage