DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » The Deadlies » “Deadlies” Nominee: Nuke Bazooka

“Deadlies” Nominee: Nuke Bazooka

Nominated by Steve Weintz
You can’t have a con­test to find the most haz­ardous equip­ment of all time with­out includ­ing the leg­endary Davy Crockett — the tripod-​​mounted, atomic artillery launcher that inspired Starship Troopers’ nuclear bazooka.
davy4.jpgThe Davy Crockett came in two fla­vors, 120mm and 155mm. Both used the same round — an itty-​​bitty nuclear war­head, with a yield equal to “only” 10 to 20 tons of TNT (about what took down the Alfred R. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City). Maximum range was 2.5 miles for the big­ger model, half that for the mini. Which meant that the Davy’s three-​​man crew would sur­vive the ini­tial atomic blast. If they fired the shell per­fectly, that is. Unfortunately, “both recoil­less rifles proved to have poor accu­racy in test­ing,” Wikipedia notes.
But even if the Davy’s crew man­aged to make it past the first few sec­onds of their weapon’s fir­ing, they still had to con­tend with the sub­se­quent radi­a­tion. The min­i­mum det­o­na­tion range for the Davy was 1000 feet. The prob­lem is, the explo­sion kicked off an “almost instantly lethal radi­a­tion dosage (in excess of 10,000 rem) within 500 feet (150 m), and a prob­a­bly fatal dose (around 600 rem) within a quar­ter mile (400 meters).“
The Davy Crockett’s war­heads were tested twice, in 1962. 2,100 of the things were man­u­fac­tured and deployed with American armed forces, until the Davy was retired in 1971.
Got an idea for a “Deadly?” E-​​mail or post your picks.

Share |

November 22nd, 2006 | The Deadlies | 227831 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/22/deadlies-nominee-nuke-bazooka/%22Deadlies%22+Nominee%3A+Nuke+Bazooka2006-11-22+15%3A22%3A34jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « “Deadlies” Nominee: Man Cannon | Rapid Fire 11/​22/​06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. m says:
    November 22, 2006 at 10:39 am

    From the linked arti­cle:
    “equiv­a­lent to 10 tons of TNT, or two to four times as pow­er­ful as the ammo­nium nitrate bomb which destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah fed­eral build­ing in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995″
    Two to four times the power, not equal to, what took down the building.

    Reply
  2. Haninah says:
    November 22, 2006 at 10:40 am

    Surely you’re jok­ing about “10 to 20 mil­lion tons of TNT”. The Davy Crockett had a yield of about 0.01 kilo­tons, or about 20 tons of high explo­sives equiv­a­lent (accord­ing to GlobalSecurity). “10 to 20 mil­lion tons” is 10–20 MT — big­ger than all but the biggest ther­monu­clear devices ever tested. And the OKC bomb was deliv­ered in a Ryder van, so it prob­a­bly was up to a ton of mate­r­ial at most, prob­a­bly about half a ton of HE equivalent.

    Reply
  3. Mike Jacobs says:
    November 22, 2006 at 10:46 am

    The Davy Crockett had a yield of 0.25 kilo­tons (250 tons) of TNT, not “10 to 20 mil­lion tons.” According to both the Nuclear Weapons Databook Volume I and US Nuclear Weapons: The Secret History by Chuck Hansen, the W54 Mark 2, used in the Davy Crockett had a yield “selec­table to 0.25 kt”. The Davy Crockett with the W54 was actu­ally fired in the Little Feller I test on July 17, 1962, from a ground mounted launcher and had a pro­grammed yield of 20 tons, det­o­nat­ing 20 feet above the ground 9,360 ft from the launch point.
    No, I would not like to have been on the fir­ing team for one of these, but it may well have been rel­a­tively safe when fired at a low enough yield setting.

    Reply
  4. Noah Shachtman says:
    November 22, 2006 at 11:52 am

    Okay, okay! It’s fixed!
    Sorry ’bout that, boys.
    nms

    Reply
  5. Brian says:
    November 22, 2006 at 2:13 pm

    The blast at the OKC bomb­ing was con­cen­trated, focused. The destruc­tion caused by the truck bomb was higher than the nor­mal explo­sives would cause with­out being shaped.

    Reply
  6. David Szucs says:
    November 22, 2006 at 2:37 pm

    Almost every instance of sta­tis­tics or per­for­mance fig­ures sited by this guy are wrong. Lets start with the only launcher was a jeep mounted 106mm recoil­less rifle no 120 no 155 yield was on the order of 200 tons of TNT for the war­head and at min­i­mum dis­tance the base surge not radi­a­tion was the threat to the crew. Rad dam­age was still con­sid­er­able but no where near the 10,000 Rem’s sited. Finally doc­trine called for use pri­mar­ily in Korea fired over hills or ridge lines to the reverse slope of which any­one who has every marched in Korea will swear there is no short­age. The same war­head was used for the Genie air to air mis­sile and the small atomic demo­li­tion muni­tion (SADM) back pack nuke.
    Other than blow­ing every sin­gle impor­tant fact about the weapon sys­tem I agree with the nom­i­na­tion.
    BTW a demiled exam­ple is at the Sandia Nuclear Museum in Sandia, NM.
    David Szucs

    Reply
  7. ankara nakliyat says:
    June 1, 2008 at 12:08 pm

    ankara nakliyat firmas?.

    Reply
  8. Hellgate gold says:
    August 1, 2008 at 10:06 pm

    You wanted to earn Hellgate London gold, you can go to earn, if you want not, you can too. Play game you must be very happy, if you angry, in real life has a lot of expe­ri­ence, so why should their spare time to relax, no one knows how the real you, so you can even have their own game of life, would not mind other peo­ple said. I think games like real­ity, life is your own vis­ited, good or bad, peo­ple can not par­tic­i­pate in.

    Reply
  9. http://www.buyageofconan.com says:
    August 5, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    Buycheap aoc gold , Therefore we’ve been mind­ful from the out­set to cre­ate a world which is true to Howard’s writ­ing. There is majesty in Hyboria but it’s of a mono­lithic, bru­tal and prim­i­tive kind — it cer­tainly isn’t “high fairie” where every­thing appears as though it was built only yes­ter­day and is devoid of context.”

    Reply
  10. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 9:09 am

    “equiv­a­lent to 10 tons of TNT, or two to four times as pow­er­ful as the ammo­nium nitrate bomb which destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah fed­eral build­ing in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995″
    Two to four times the power, not equal to, what took down the building.

    Reply
  11. Tibia money says:
    August 7, 2008 at 10:37 pm

    The fol­low­ing ben­e­fits are avail­able to Tibia money players:

    Reply
  12. Requiem Lant says:
    August 7, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    Now I talk about some­thing about the Avenging Angel Preview of Requiem Lant.

    Reply
  13. Requiem Lant says:
    August 7, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    Now I talk about some­thing about the Avenging Angel Preview of Requiem Lant.

    Reply
  14. David Howard says:
    May 5, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​u​s​e​r​/​W​T​C​n​u​c​l​e​a​r​d​e​m​o​l​i​t​ion

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage