DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ammo and Munitions » Earthquake Array Hits Deeper Than Nukes

Earthquake Array Hits Deeper Than Nukes

Attacking hard­ened and deeply buried tar­get is one of the Air Forces biggest chal­lenges. They are meet­ing this chal­lenge with a dev­as­tat­ing new approach: a focused under­ground shock­wave that amounts to an arti­fi­cial earth­quake.
At present the kinetic approach a.k.a. brute force is favored; the most pow­er­ful weapon in the inven­tory is the BLU-​​113, a 4,600 lb weapon with a thick steel cas­ing capa­ble of pierc­ing 22 feet of con­crete — or 100 feet of dirt — before explod­ing. There are plans to go even big­ger, with a mon­ster 30,000 lb Massive Ordnance Penetrator which would take the max­i­mum depth to 60 feet. Thats about as big as you can carry on a plane.
diggernew.jpg
Ive described Deep Digger here pre­vi­ously. Unlike ear­lier weapons this is an active pen­e­tra­tor, a bomb that actu­ally bur­rows into the ground by drilling a shaft with vol­leys from seven can­non. In a demon­stra­tion last year a Deep Digger pro­to­type pen­e­trated more than 30 feet of lime­stone. The mak­ers were tight-​​lipped about how much fur­ther it could go.
This pre­sen­ta­tion from David Burns of the Medium Caliber Weapons Systems Branch of ARDEC reveals much more about the weapon than pre­vi­ously released. In par­tic­u­lar, it is described as being able to dig down to 150 feet. Thats impres­sive on its own, but the Concept Of Operations in Slide 4 is stag­ger­ing: an array of 20 Deep Diggers would be det­o­nated together to pro­duce a shock­wave which will col­lapse all under­ground struc­tures to a depth of 300 feet over a 200-​​yard square area.
Compare this to this descrip­tion of the B61-​​11, the only bunker-​​busting nuclear bomb in the arsenal:

For a pen­e­tra­tion depth of three meters and a yield of 0.3 kilo­tons, the B61-​​11 could destroy a tar­get buried under roughly 15 meters [= 50 feet] of hard rock or con­crete. For the same pen­e­tra­tion depth and the max­i­mum yield of 340 kilo­tons, the destruc­tion depth would be roughly 70 meters [ =210 feet ] for a hard­ened target.

In other words, the Deep Digger array is more effec­tive than a 340-​​kiloton nuclear weapon opti­mised to attack under­ground tar­gets.
The secret is in effec­tively com­bin­ing 20 sep­a­rate explo­sions into a coher­ent pulse. This area has been researched for many years, in par­tic­u­lar in the 90s under the name of ACE, for Array of Conventional Explosives. It takes a phe­nom­e­nal amount of com­put­ing power to cal­cu­late the non-​​linear effects of mul­ti­ple explo­sions com­bin­ing in a three-​​dimensional vol­ume (which may not be homoge­nous), and new soft­ware tools were devel­oped for the job. In addi­tion, real-​​world test­ing is needed to val­i­date these mod­els hence exer­cises like the noto­ri­ous Divine Strake which involves a under­ground explo­sion of 700 tons of explo­sives.
The last I heard the Array Of Conventional Explosives had been axed, in favor of sim­pler and more straight­for­ward approaches, but Deep Digger has some key advan­tages over ear­lier weapons that make it more suit­able:
– Deep pen­e­tra­tion means that all of the blast goes into cre­at­ing an under­ground shock­wave, not just dig­ging a crater. For blast­ing rock, its basic that the charge need to be drilled to a depth to be effec­tive.
– Deep Digger para­chutes down to a soft land­ing before dig­ging in. Other bunker busters hit the ground very hard and expe­ri­ence a decel­er­a­tion tens of thou­sands of g’s. This affects their reli­a­bil­ity, and the loss of a few war­heads may make the whole array inef­fec­tive.
– Deep Digger may be able to maneu­ver under­ground, cor­rect­ing the con­fig­u­ra­tion of the array after it is in place.
And Deep Digger is only a first-​​generation active pen­e­tra­tor. Devices like General Dynamics Worm which Noah described last week may bur­row much more effec­tively.
Or course, bunkers can always be dug deeper. One British Cold War plan involved relo­cat­ing gov­ern­ment cen­tres to coal mines 5,000 feet under­ground. However, given that the Deep Digger array can col­lapse the entrance tun­nels to a depth of 300 feet, any such deep bunker may become a tomb from which the occu­pants will never escape.
More impor­tantly, such an array would make the vast major­ity of exist­ing bunkers obso­lete, or at any rate inse­cure. This would include nuclear facil­i­ties such as mis­sile siloes.
((Of course the idea is not new. In WWII Barnes-​​Wallis used the shock­waves from Grand Slam bombs to bring down German rail­way viaducts when stan­dard bombs proved inef­fec­tive. A Deep Digger array might also be used to cause the simul­ta­ne­ous col­lapse of blocks of sky­scrap­ers, or dams or other large struc­tures.))
Ive been advised that the Deep Digger pro­gram is under­go­ing a secu­rity review. If past expe­ri­ence is any­thing to go by, this means you wont be hear­ing any more news updates on the pro­gram.
Meanwhile, DARPA have started their Strategically Hardened Facility Defeat (SHFD) pro­gram which :

…seeks to lever­age recent advances in non-​​nuclear earth-​​penetrating tech­nolo­gies for the defeat of strate­gi­cally hard­ened tar­gets. System and tech­nol­ogy areas to be devel­oped in this pro­gram include: new pen­e­tra­tion tech­nolo­gies, robust self-​​contained aer­ial deploy­ment options, sens­ing and nav­i­ga­tion subsystems

This sounds like some­one is going to start throw­ing a heap of money at some­thing very much like Deep Digger. In the near future, dig­ging your­self into a hole is not going to offer any pro­tec­tion — and that could change a lot of things.
– David Hambling

Share |

November 23rd, 2006 | Ammo and Munitions | 228344 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/23/earthquake-array-hits-deeper-than-nukes/Earthquake+Array+Hits+Deeper+Than+Nukes2006-11-23+15%3A12%3A22jimmy_wu You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Aegis Turns 20 | DefenseTech From London » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. RTLM says:
    November 24, 2006 at 11:32 pm

    How is our remote para­chute guidence ?

    Reply
  2. David Hambling says:
    November 25, 2006 at 6:17 am

    Good. There are a num­ber of GPS-​​based para­chute sys­tems that will deliver a pay­load to within a few metres of the aim point.
    The para­chute deliv­ery con­cept is not new — other weapons like MOP and CLAWS also use it.

    Reply
  3. Rob Nelson says:
    November 27, 2006 at 1:24 pm

    I don’t see how this can pos­si­bly work.
    Back of the enve­lope esti­mate:
    Minimum energy required to frac­ture rock is ( yield strength ) x ( vol­ume of rock).
    Volume of rock is 200 yds x 200 yds x 100 yds = 3 x 10^6 m^3.
    Typical yield strength is 100–200 MPa (see plot on page 6)
    Thus, min­i­mum energy required is 100 MPa x 3 x 10^^6 m^3 = 3 x 10^14 Joules = 75 kilo­tons of high explo­sive equiv­a­lent.
    Largest con­ven­tional war­head in US arse­nal (MOAB) is about 20 tons of high explo­sive equiv­a­lent.
    If each of 20 deep dig­gers had 20 tons of high explo­sive, that would be equiv­a­lent to 400 tons = 0.4 kilo­tons.
    Thus, an array of 20 deep dig­gers has at most an explo­sive yield of 0.4/75= 0.005 (0.5%) of the explo­sive yield required to frac­ture that much rock.
    ==> It won’t work.

    Reply
  4. David Hambling says:
    November 27, 2006 at 4:57 pm

    Rob,
    I agree the effects seem mas­sive con­sid­er­ing the rel­a­tively mod­est amount of explo­sive. But these peo­ple are not idiots, and they have car­ried out a great deal of work on com­puter sim­u­la­tions and mod­el­ling. And they are not propos­ing to crum­ple all the rock, just col­lapse struc­tures inside it…my sus­pi­cion is that there may be some major non-​​linear effects being called into play here.

    Reply
  5. Mark says:
    November 29, 2006 at 10:01 am

    The trick is that you are not frac­tur­ing all of that rock. You are using the rock to carry the shock­wave from your explo­sion.
    In solid rock, no frac­tur­ing occurs because each vol­ume of rock has sur­round­ing rock to pass the shock­wave off to.
    When the shock­wave reaches a void (the bunker), the sides of the bunker fail, because they don’t have more rock to pass the shock­wave on to. Because the rock is unsup­ported on one side, the shock­wave causes the rock to bend enough that it fails.

    Reply
  6. HowlerMonkey says:
    November 29, 2006 at 12:02 pm

    I like how .3 kilo­tons becomes 340 kilo­tons.
    Brilliant.

    Reply
  7. Greg says:
    November 29, 2006 at 7:16 pm

    If they can tai­lor the energy wave to tar­get the res­o­nance of the mate­r­ial used to build or rein­force the under­ground tun­nels or main bunker, in the­ory the energy should pass through the sur­round­ing mate­r­ial and wreak havoc on the tar­get mate­ri­als.
    Another thought would be a con­cen­trated sonic weapon along the same prin­ci­ple.
    Locating the vent and other access points via advanced infrared and ther­mal imag­ing and clos­ing those up would be the other approach ver­sus any brute force method. Working on a locally placed sen­sor tech­nol­ogy or satel­lite mon­i­tor­ing in this regards I would think would be fruit­ful. Scan a region known for activ­ity, look for pat­tern changes, and the ingress and egress points should reveal themselves..then pay them a visit.

    Reply
  8. David Hambling says:
    November 30, 2006 at 4:09 pm

    HowlerMonkey — Yes, the B61-​​11 does have vari­able yield, and the .3 and 340 kt are the upper and lower lim­its — see -
    http://​www​.brook​.edu/​F​P​/​P​R​O​J​E​C​T​S​/​N​U​C​W​C​O​S​T​/​l​a​s​g​.​htm
    Greg — “Locating the vent and other access points via advanced infrared and ther­mal imag­ing and clos­ing those up would be the other approach ver­sus any brute force method. “
    – and there are also AFRL plans along these lines, ‘Watch This Space,’

    Reply
  9. MajorTarget says:
    November 30, 2006 at 10:43 pm

    Don’t for­get that a nuke, even placed on the earth’s sur­face, pro­duces a FIREBALL that “eats it way into the earth” as well as pro­duc­ing a pri­mary and many sec­ondary reflected waves in a “frac­ture zone” emi­nat­ing out­ward from the FIREBALL. Ground-​​coupling can occur @ min­i­mal pen­e­tra­tion depths and using sev­eral Nuclear Earth Penetrating Warheads using the same gen­eral the­ory as the EARTHQUAKE ARRAY would be much more effec­tive in meet­ing the desired “Target Destruction Requirements” placed upon Targeting & Weaponeering Officers by Senior Leaders.
    We should press-​​on full-​​speed with both Enhanced Conventional and Nuclear Earth Penetrator Weapons so we have a full spec­trum to use vice restrict­ing ourelves as we always do.

    Reply
  10. plasticdoc says:
    November 30, 2006 at 11:09 pm

    I won­dered if vents could be located by co2 detection,then send a sur­prise down the vents;tried to get the mes­sage and sev­eral oth­ers to DARPA when DOD asked for pub­lic ideas at the begin­ning of the war,but the web­site would only accept bids from manufacturers;after all what does a sur­geon know?

    Reply
  11. Peanut Gallery says:
    December 1, 2006 at 2:39 am

    I won­der if the mak­ers of the Deep Digger also make back scratchers…?

    Reply
  12. Paul in Eugene OR says:
    December 6, 2006 at 1:04 pm

    Truly impres­sive.
    Still no cure for cancer.

    Reply
  13. Cearietry says:
    December 13, 2007 at 2:29 am

    http://​www​.google​.com
    http://​www​.yahoo​.com
    http://​www​.msn​.com

    Reply
  14. stephen russell says:
    December 31, 2007 at 12:48 am

    Other app:
    Test CA for Early Quake warn­ing??
    Create Quake types??
    For Western US, Japan alone.
    Great Peace Dividend project.
    CA State Quake Testing Facility.
    Thanks DOD.

    Reply
  15. rf money says:
    August 2, 2008 at 12:10 am

    Due the emer­gence of RF, on the net­work lone me around a lot of like minded allies, let me alone lonely, wit­ness the heart began to beat the tem­per­a­ture up grad­u­ally. It is pre­cisely because of the exis­tence of these friends I love more RF. So I would like spend RF money in the game.

    Reply
  16. http://www.scions-of-fate.us says:
    August 5, 2008 at 11:53 pm

    I would estab­lish a strongest gang! I decide to buy hero coins on line.

    Reply
  17. Requiem Lant says:
    August 8, 2008 at 9:06 pm

    Requiem is Cyclone Studios’ sec­ond game, after Uprising, and is a dark peek into a far-​​flung world where the war between right­eous and mis­guided angels has spilled onto the doorstep of cheap Requiem Lant humanity.

    Reply
  18. buy 2moons dil says:
    August 15, 2008 at 10:24 pm

    Maybe this was the 2moons

    Reply
  19. cabal money says:
    August 15, 2008 at 10:27 pm

    But look the cabal money and the equip­ment, I had a lit­tle tear away, by my effort, in the game I already had a tall level, if now I give up the game, then I will lose the all things.

    Reply
  20. buy 2moons dil says:
    August 15, 2008 at 10:40 pm

    Maybe this was the 2moons

    Reply
  21. dofus gold says:
    August 15, 2008 at 11:21 pm

    At that time I do not know how to play this game, noth­ing to know, all things I will asked her, at the begin­ning we were very happy, we together to play and together to buy dofus gold but a long time after, she was not happy again

    Reply
  22. cheap eve isk says:
    August 15, 2008 at 11:27 pm

    But when I play it again, my mother told me that: if you play it again your effort will be waste, I think my mother words was right, I can not give up my effort so I leave the EVE but I think it was tem­po­rary. I gave up the friends

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Time to bring military clothing into the 21st century. I...
      bobbymike
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : But beam-riding isn't used by bombers...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      To the poster "Charles" : Part I :...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage