DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » The Deadlies » The “Deadlies”: Killer Rocket Plane (Updated)

The “Deadlies”: Killer Rocket Plane (Updated)

Readers of my book, Weapons Grade will have seen the chap­ter on tech­nolo­gies which looked promis­ing at the time but which failed to deliver. Perhaps the most lethal exam­ple is the German WWII Me163 Komet, a rocket-​​powered inter­cep­tor which is surely a hot con­tender for The Deadlies.
komet.jpg
On paper it looked great; the first plane to break the 1,000 kph (625 mph) bar­rier, it seemed like the ideal weapon to take on Allied bomber for­ma­tions. It would be much too fast for the fighter escorts to stop.
In prac­tice it was the dead­liest plane ever built.
At the heart of the Komet was a rocket motor which mixed oxi­dis­ing agent (a hydro­gen per­ox­ide mix­ture known as T-​​stoff) and a fuel (hydrazine hydrate, methyl alco­hol, and water, called C-​​stoff). These were com­bined explo­sively. The small motor gen­er­ated 1,500kg of thrust for an air­craft that only weighed 1,900 Kg, twice the thrust-​​to-​​weight ratio of the Me262 jet fighter which was itself con­sid­ered awe­some for the time.
But it was the sheer vari­ety of ways that it could kill you that made the Komet unique.
– The con­trols tended to lock up, leav­ing the plane going in a straight line. If this hap­pened dur­ing the attack dive, the Komet could accel­er­ate to high speed and broke apart. Otherwise, it just ploughed into the ground like a thun­der­bolt.
– The exhaust plumb­ing could crack on take off. A leak into the cock­pit would fill the cock­pit with steam mak­ing vision impos­si­ble.
– T-​​stoff, con­cen­trated hydro­gen per­ox­ide, is a pow­er­ful cor­ro­sive and the pilot pilot sat between two tanks of it.
“One pilot did get dis­solved by T stoff flow­ing into the cock­pit after the air­craft crashed on take-​​off and inverted,” says DefenseTech reader Pat Flannery.
– The com­mon­est and cru­ellest prob­lem was the con­trolled explo­sion which drove it. The Komet had a skid rather than wheels, so land­ings were hard (many pilots suf­fered back injuries). If there was any fuel left in the tanks, the shock of land­ing could mix it sud­denly, and the return­ing hero would go up in a fire­ball.
Three hun­dred and sev­enty Komets were built; they shot down nine Allied bombers between them. About five per cent of the Komets were lost to Allied fire in the air; fif­teen per cent were lost due to prob­lems with the con­trols and hydraulics. The other eighty per cent were vic­tims of explo­sions.
No won­der pilots nick­named it The Devils Sled” — a fast ride straight to hell.
Can any­thing beat the Komet for the “Deadlies?” If you’ve got any ideas E-​​mail or post it here.
– David Hambling
Thanks to Pat Flannery for the corrections

Share |

November 23rd, 2006 | The Deadlies | 22859 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/23/the-deadlies-killer-rocket-plane-updated/The+%22Deadlies%22%3A+Killer+Rocket+Plane+%28Updated%292006-11-23+16%3A36%3A58jimmy_wu You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « DefenseTech From London | Fighting Shadows: Military Holograms » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. JQP says:
    November 23, 2006 at 10:36 am

    The test pilots and pilots http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​H​a​n​n​a​_​R​e​i​t​sch sure needed balls to fly the http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​M​e​s​s​e​r​s​c​h​m​i​t​t​_​M​e​_​163

    Reply
  2. Alex says:
    November 23, 2006 at 11:04 am

    Operation posed seri­ous prob­lems. The C-​​Stoff and T-​​Stoff tankers could not be allowed to come within half a kilo­me­tre of each other, so refu­elling and rearm­ing a squadron of Me163s was a fraught busi­ness to say the least. The flight line would be washed down by firetrucks between them.
    When you imag­ine that they had to han­dle ammu­ni­tion and oxy­gen cylin­ders at the same time, it’s incred­i­ble they didn’t man­age to blow up the whole airbase.

    Reply
  3. Coljoe says:
    November 24, 2006 at 4:04 am

    What about the manned rocket Bachem Ba 349 Natter?

    Reply
  4. vstress says:
    November 24, 2006 at 7:27 am

    It is the same fuel that was used in the X-​​15. Good info in the book writ­ten Milton Thompson (I think).

    Reply
  5. Cranky Observer says:
    November 27, 2006 at 12:53 pm

    I think you missed the mode where upon jet­ti­son­ing the take­off wheels they would bounch off the ground and hit the air­plane before it could gain alti­tude.
    All that said, it is a good thing IMHO that the Japanese never per­fected their ver­sion [1] — it would have made an excel­lent sui­cide air­plane against air or sea tar­gets.
    Cranky
    [1] Mitsubishi Ki-​​200 — one actu­ally sur­vives at the Planes of Fame in Chino.

    Reply
  6. CUTANGUS says:
    May 4, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    It’s an incred­i­bly com­plex and advanced achieve­ment by his day; The Luftwaffe dis­played a tech­nol­ogy in response to a vital neces­sity: the point-​​defense inter­cep­tor.
    The next step would be the VTOL inter­cep­tor, and the ulti­mate one, the rocket unmanned inter­cep­tor, also know as the guided anti-​​aircraft mis­sile. Both too late to change the fate of airwar.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No one is saying that christains never do violent things we do all faiths...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Hey look its zandor trying to make people think this is a hate site or...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It is sort of puzzeling that a room filled with highly trained US Army...
      Zandor
    • Keep it Simple
      Dear Big Daddy; Your last post is a laugh. You carried 100 lbs for 20 miles?...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage