DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » The Deadlies » The “Deadlies”: Atomic Automobile

The “Deadlies”: Atomic Automobile

In our competition to find “Deadlies” — technology which may be feasible but still looks like a really bad idea — there have been plenty of atomic nominations. In the 50’s and 60’s there were plans for nuclear powered ships, trains, aircraft, missiles and spaceships which have attracted nominations for the “Deadlies.” But nobody has mentioned the Atomic Automobile yet.
These days we’re a bit wary about nuclear power, but back in it’s heyday it was selling like (radioactive) hot cakes. Nuclear power was the future, it was cleaner than fossil fuels, endlessly abundant and so inexpensive that Lewis Strauss, Chairman of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, forecast that: “It is not too much to expect that our children will enjoy in their homes electrical energy too cheap to meter.“
Ford_Nucleon.jpg
Perhaps the original source of atomic bad ideas was the Atoms For Peace initiative, a deliberate attempt to turn nuclear power away from military uses and harness it in constructive ways. The intentions may have been good — or not. In Britain the public were persuaded that the Calder Hall atomic power plant would provide them with cheap energy, and it was not until 1961 that the government admitted that its main purpose was to manufacture plutonium for nuclear weapons. In the US, the government tried hard to convince people that atomic was good. (The full story is told in the chapter on Ultimate Power in my book Weapons Grade).
So the idea spread that everything which used power would be atomic in the future. The obvious end point of this is domestic atomic power for everyone. In 1940 Dr RM Langer, a physicist at Cal. Tech, predicted that home nuclear power plants for heating, lighting and electricity would arrive “in our own time,” and that a nuclear plant “the size of a typewriter” would power cars.
So when the Atomic Age really got under way in 1958 it was no surprise when the Ford Nucleon concept car was rolled out. This had the pasenger compartment placed well forward to keep away from the nuclear plant at the back. The company suggested that the Nucleon would travel 5,000 miles before needing to have the atomic core replaced at a charging station, the future equivalent of a gas station. Unsurprisingly enough, the car never went beyond concept stage.
Atomic car? You’ll be wanting the additional “radiation leak and massive area contamination” insurance cover for that, and maybe some lead-lined underwear. No, I think we should leave atomic-powered cars to Batman.
Got a nomination for the ‘Deadlies? Send us your idea by E-mail or post it here.
– David Hambling

Share |

November 24th, 2006 | The Deadlies | 228833 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/11/24/the-deadlies-atomic-automobile/The+%22Deadlies%22%3A+Atomic+Automobile2006-11-24+16%3A38%3A57jimmy_wu You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Pimp My Gunship — 1: Get Smart | Rapid Fire 11/24/06 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. pedestrian says:
    November 25, 2006 at 11:22 pm

    Would XFV-1 Sarmon be one of the Deadlies? :-D

    Reply
  2. Solomon says:
    November 27, 2006 at 12:45 pm

    i like this one! i’ll take two dozen!!

    Reply
  3. Automobile says:
    March 3, 2007 at 4:25 pm

    This site deals with the atomic automobile if u want more details about the automobiles please go below the website.
    automobile

    Reply
  4. Automobile says:
    March 3, 2007 at 4:26 pm

    This site deals with the atomic automobile if u want more details about the automobiles please go below the website.
    automobile

    Reply
  5. Automobile says:
    March 3, 2007 at 4:27 pm

    This site deals with the atomic automobile if u want more details about the automobiles please go below the website.
    automobile

    Reply
  6. Automobile says:
    March 3, 2007 at 4:29 pm

    This site deals with the atomic automobile if u want more details about the automobiles please go below the website.
    automobile

    Reply
  7. Mike says:
    January 29, 2008 at 12:03 am

    It’s such a shame to hide our head in the sands of history. The above article uses information noted as 1940, 1958, 1961… With advances reducing the computer from a city block to the size of a pizza should be compared to the technology available to control nuclear power. After all, our subs and carriers don’t glow in the dark nor do those sailors living on them…

    Reply
  8. free psp games says:
    July 24, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    what’s the difference between psp games and free psp games?!
    you tell me after visit this site: http://​pspgames247​.com

    Reply
  9. Requiem gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 6:59 pm

    My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

    Reply
  10. Requiem gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 7:01 pm

    My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

    Reply
  11. cheap 2moons gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 7:03 pm

    Therefore, I diligently practiced the level to promote, only then promote only then can help me to save many cheap 2moons gold.

    Reply
  12. buy Habbo gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:27 am

    Master, I am really very think of you, what a pity that we as if already parted forever. Now, I buy Habbo gold for your come back.

    Reply
  13. cheap Lord of the Rings Gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:29 am

    If your attitude to me can be slightly good, I will be having much happiness, although I only was 89 levels and I only have some cheap Lord of the Rings Gold.

    Reply
  14. cheap lastchaos gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:33 am

    The husband, for you, I will want to adjust myself diligently and I will make cheap lastchaos gold.

    Reply
  15. mabinogi money says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:36 am

    That is first time that I used the ice arrow, I was so excited, and in a week I got 4000 mabinogi money.

    Reply
  16. Tibia coins says:
    August 19, 2008 at 12:58 am

    One day, I read a article about Tibia Gold game. I was very dispirited and couldn’t help to give up Tibia coins.

    Reply
  17. buy sro gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 1:01 am

    If you’re wondering how to look out for bots, how to avoid them and what to do buy sro gold, you have come to the right place.

    Reply
  18. Silkroad gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 1:04 am

    Thanks for reading and hopefully there will be a lot more Silkroad gold where that came from!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      One means of defeating an enemy is to cripple...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      No–but is it necessary for the projected cost per...
      BILL D
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      One fighter for everyone failed once before. However, it may be...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Iagree that the stealth capabilities of the F22&F35...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Why would the Marines buy A-10s? They are a great...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I agree-I noted in other comments that the f16 &f15...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      You just keep it up there, you've shown your contempt...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      At a price of 135mil. ea our suspected future enemies...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The rest of the world must be laughing their asses off...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Got a program question for you Mac. What is the definition...
      TMB
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage