DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Broken Gear, Piling Up

Broken Gear, Piling Up

The Washington Post has a fas­ci­nat­ing report from the Anniston Army Depot, where “sprawl­ing lots of tanks and other armored vehi­cles are just the start of a huge back­log” of gear bro­ken by Iraq and Afghanistan.
061204_anniston_depot_hmed_10p.hmedium.jpg

“There’s stuff, stuff every­where,” Joan Gustafson, a depot offi­cial, said as she wheeled her brown Chevrolet van through a land­scape of rolling hills lined with armadas of mobile guns.
“There’s another field of M1s,” she said, motion­ing toward a swath of M1A1 Abrams tanks next to the wind­ing road. “We’re just wait­ing for some­one to tell us what to do with them…“
Equipment shipped back from Iraq is stack­ing up at all the Army depots: More than 530 M1 tanks, 220 M88 wreck­ers and 160 M113 armored per­son­nel car­ri­ers are sit­ting at Anniston. The Red River Army Depot in Texas has 700 Bradley Fighting Vehicles and 450 heavy and medium-​​weight trucks, while more than 1,000 Humvees are await­ing repair at the Letterkenny Army Depot in Pennsylvania.
Despite the work pil­ing up, the Army’s depots have been oper­at­ing at about half their capac­ity because of a lack of fund­ing for repairs. In the spring, a fund­ing gap caused Anniston and other depots to lose about a month’s worth of work…
Responding to urgent requests from the Army and Marine Corps, Congress approved an extra $23.8 bil­lion in October to replace worn-​​out equip­ment in fis­cal 2007. With the money, the Army plans to dou­ble the work­load at its depots, which will repair and upgrade 130,000 pieces in 2007, up from 63,000 last year. This will include a qua­dru­pling of the num­ber of tanks, Bradleys and other tracked vehi­cles over­hauled, from 1,000 to 4,000.
At Anniston, which will han­dle 1,800 com­bat vehi­cles in fis­cal 2007, a cav­ernous 250,000-square-foot repair shop is hum­ming as dam­aged tanks are rolled in one by one and dis­as­sem­bled with the help of giant cranes. Removing an M1 tank’s tur­ret alone takes a day and a half, and the entire over­haul requires 54 days and costs about $1 mil­lion, said Ted A. Law, the depot’s vehi­cle man­ager.
Earnest Linn, 58, a heavy-​​mobile-​​equipment mechanic who as of January will have worked at Anniston for 30 years, said that “it’s never been like this” since the end of the Vietnam War.

Share |

December 5th, 2006 | Ground Vehicles | 232536 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/12/05/broken-gear-piling-up/Broken+Gear%2C+Piling+Up2006-12-05+17%3A48%3A53jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Live-​​Blogging Gates | Gates’ China Choice » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Adotnet says:
    December 5, 2006 at 1:05 pm

    I wish we could buy one. Shame all the hulls get cut up.

    Reply
  2. campbell says:
    December 5, 2006 at 1:26 pm

    hmmmm.…..there no poten­tial cus­tomers for out­right sales of used equipment/​weapons? seems we could recoup some of their cost and get past the rebuild­ing of them as well.….…

    Reply
  3. Rumor says:
    December 5, 2006 at 1:59 pm

    Permanently disable/​remove the weapons sys­tems if you must, and I will buy a god­damn tank. Oh, yes.

    Reply
  4. mrnitropb says:
    December 5, 2006 at 3:43 pm

    they wont even sell used sur­plus hmmwvs, which is just stu­pid. they cut em up into peices, and to even reassem­ble on is illegal.

    Reply
  5. Sean says:
    December 5, 2006 at 4:44 pm

    crazy. Tom just linked this same arti­cle, won­der­ing if Gates will push to more fully fund the USA/​USMC/​SOF: http://​www​.thomaspm​bar​nett​.com/​w​e​b​l​o​g​/​2​0​0​6​/​1​2​/​w​i​l​l​_​g​a​t​e​s​_​f​u​n​d​_​t​h​e​_​s​y​s​a​d​m​i​n​.​h​tml

    Reply
  6. Adotnet says:
    December 5, 2006 at 7:36 pm

    The hmmwvs are no longer cut up.

    Reply
  7. Shameless says:
    December 5, 2006 at 9:40 pm

    Well how do you expect to make money repair­ing things, surely you will make more sell­ing a new M1 then you will replac­ing its tur­bine and employ­ing some­one to fit it. Who has shares in these com­pa­nies again? Im sure the stake­hold­ers are mak­ing a tidy profit of this lit­tle war.

    Reply
  8. Alton Cason says:
    December 5, 2006 at 11:04 pm

    ya know that’s funny. I used to work at Red River until july 06. We had HUNDREDS of good humvees lined up on the roads await­ing ship­ment. we had a big bill board about how we were 106% to 110% per­cent of our goals on other vehi­cles repaired too. I have been cross trained in the 4 dif­fer­ent ser­vices for mechan­i­cal, elec­tronic and weapon syh­stems repairs and all I did was ask for an ‘accom­mo­da­tion’. GUESS WHAT! one year later after being shuf­fled around the base from one mean­ing­less job to another with no accom­mo­da­tion, I gave up and took a dis­abil­ity retire­ment from civil ser­vice. Now I have a merit sys­tems pro­tec­tion board claim against the Army for fail­ing to accom­mo­date a Disabled Veteran and not giv­ing Veteran’s Preference for jobs there or any where else either. And your telling me that we have a lot of bro­ken vehi­cles cause we are out of money to fix them. Suggest you drive around the perime­ter at Red River, then ask the work­ers, not the managers.

    Reply
  9. Cranky Observer says:
    December 6, 2006 at 11:43 am

    Alton,
    Your course of action is clear: find a few oth­ers in the same sit­u­a­tion as your­self, hire a cou­ple of guys with strong backs out of high school shop classes, and set up an out­sourced mil­i­tary vehi­cle repair cor­po­ra­tion. Sit back while dol­lars roll in.
    You want cyn­i­cal? OK, set up a mil­i­tary vehi­cle repair _​consulting_​ cor­po­ra­tion and “advise” the DoD on how to repair their vehi­cles. That is where the really big bucks are being made.
    Cranky

    Reply
  10. Donald Turner says:
    December 15, 2006 at 10:09 pm

    When Loring AFB, ME. closed in Northern Maine the wise deci­sion mak­ers set up a Humvee repair busi­ness up there to set­tle some feath­ers and they trans­port 3 at a time by trac­tor trailer over 400 miles just to reach the south­ern maine state­line. Ane they won­der where the money goes. It is all polit­i­cal. Now they are clos­ing Brunswick NAS with a brand new hangar built for the future replace­ment for the P3 along with a brand new con­trol tower, tak­ing away the last active duty air­field in the Northeast. Thanks Congress!!

    Reply
  11. Tim says:
    December 16, 2006 at 4:48 am

    We have out­sourced just about ever­thing over­seas. Maybe the “it is too expen­sive to repair them” is just the lead in to send­ing the armored vehi­cles to China, india, east­ern Europe. etc. Cutting cost of labor is usu­ally the first step to save money. Better off. Just use ille­gal aliens, who will work for pen­nies on the dollar.Look at IT, and tech sup­port. It is cheaper to have afor­eign worker at 5$ aweek do the job. Case in point, Dell, Best Buy.……Call me syn­i­cal! But even when rod­ucts and repairs are done by non US com­pa­nies, the US com­pa­nies still take a good profit. Also Mexican Truck dri­vers, how is that help­ing US drivers.……

    Reply
  12. Dave says:
    December 16, 2006 at 5:24 am

    Please refer back to the com­ment deal­ing with the great state of Maine. The facil­ity at the old Air Base is the top rated repair facil­ity in the coun­try. They con­sis­tantly come in under bud­get and either early or on time com­ple­ta­tion of the sched­uled work load. The Reason: Their employ­ees. Mostly these are farm kids. They get up, do their chores, go to work, go home, do their chores then just start the cycle over. What we truly need are more of these kids at the other facil­i­ties that what to earn an hon­est days pay for an hon­est days work.

    Reply
  13. Chuck B says:
    December 16, 2006 at 7:36 am

    Sounds like a Bunch of Skepticts out there.. I have NEVER Rebuilt a tank.. or even cut one up… But it seems to me that if we can Rebuild them when they Reach the end of their use period.. The USA can Save a LOT of Money in the long Run… Let the Rebuild Lots Do their Job.. AND Pay them to do that!!!!!!!

    Reply
  14. Tom says:
    December 16, 2006 at 9:33 am

    We used to have plenty of highly skilled sol­diers at our National Guard facil­ity trained in fix­ing our vehi­cles. The main prob­lem was get­ting the parts. Vehicles would sit, lit­tle train­ing could take place, and sol­diers would get dis­cour­aged. I remem­ber when the Army actu­ally hired some Walmart peo­ple to share how they were able to keep their sup­ply lines efficient.

    Reply
  15. Dick Killeen says:
    December 16, 2006 at 12:48 pm

    Repair or not to repair that is the ques­tion!!!
    With so many vechi­cles need­ing repair and just sit­ting around it seems log­i­cal to get busy mak­ing repairs NOW, not later. And why are they still build­ing NEW vehi­cles while so many sit in need of repair ? It’s not a ques­tion of out sourc­ing or cheap labor, it’s using com­mon sense. Stop or pause the new con­struc­tion and rebuild, rebuild, and get the equip­ment back into action.
    If the vehi­cles were dri­ven into stor­age then it should be no big deal to check them over and esti­mate what needs to be done. Repair the eas­i­est ones firt and get the whole pro­gram rolling like a pro­duc­tion line.
    It’s time the gov­ern­ment stops wast­ing time and money and starts using com­mon sense and logic. Like Truman said … “The buck stops here” well lets start stop­ing the waste. Dick Killeen

    Reply
  16. George says:
    December 16, 2006 at 1:20 pm

    It is much cheaper to have a mil­i­tary tech­ni­cian pro­gram, to repair var­i­ous mil­i­tary equip­ment, than to con­tract it out.
    We send out sol­diers to the var­i­ous schools to learn to do the main­tance, then not have the level of main­tance in the fail­i­ties to do the job.

    Reply
  17. michael edward arentz says:
    December 16, 2006 at 5:21 pm

    I was a crew mem­ber on the m1a1 abrams tank.We were con­stantly doing pre­ven­tive maintenance,and repairs.I am also a mechanic and have done my time in junk yards.What they need to do is take the vehi­cles that doesn;t need a lot of repairs and fix them first.And fig­ure out which ones are only good for parts.Depending on the amount of dam­age it maybe quicker to use used parts as to wait for new ones.I would imag­ine some of the vehi­cles aren’t good for any­thing except for parts or recycling.

    Reply
  18. Jeffrey L. pope says:
    December 16, 2006 at 6:38 pm

    As a for­mer tank builder, the biggest prob­lem is that all the expe­ri­enced trained per­sonel for retro­fitting and rebuild­ing these var­i­ous mil­i­tary vehiciles,who built them new have been laid off per­manetly so the fat rich executive’s on the board of direc­tors could make horen­dus bonuses and salo­ries while out­sour­ce­ing. Is this what the US tax payer is allow­ing to hap­pen? I guess we are asleep at the switch!WAKE_UP!!!!

    Reply
  19. RamboC4 says:
    December 16, 2006 at 7:57 pm

    I got back from Iraq in April, I am in a National Guard Inantry unit (Maine), 14 of us were sent to Iraq to aug­ment another Maine National guard unit tasked with force pro­tec­tion. This unit was made of MAINTENENCE from Maine, Iowa and Washington. Only a hand­full were tur­ing wrenches. The rest were sit­ting in tow­ers (whis is what I did), and checked IDs at the DFAC, MWR and Gym. What a great use.

    Reply
  20. SFC Jones says:
    December 16, 2006 at 9:36 pm

    I rememe­ber dur­ing the first Gulf War we didn’t have these prob­lems, We formed a depot out­side Damman and fixed any­thing that came in, biggest prob­lem we had was when a bunch of civs left when the scuds started land­ing close by, But you know why they cut up the hum­mers is because of cert­ian parts are not allowed out in the real world, Hope the Dems do not pull fund­ing at Anniston, Red River, and Letterkenny Depot, These vehi­cles need to get out and sent back so we can win the war,

    Reply
  21. WickieB says:
    December 17, 2006 at 8:55 am

    And so it con­tin­ues, ” the dumb­ing down of America”. Call or write your polit­i­cal rep. & lets get this equip­ment repaired & back to our troops.

    Reply
  22. Tom says:
    December 17, 2006 at 3:49 pm

    the real prob­lem is we dont have enough Military per­son­nel in the field to fix these vehi­cle. We rely on Civs to repair. Problem , Civs arent wel­come in War Zone. Its nuts to send these vehi­cle out of the­ater for repairs. God help us if Iranian Revolutionary Guard come swarm­ing across the bor­der to help their Shita brothers.

    Reply
  23. college educated Grunt says:
    December 17, 2006 at 5:41 pm

    That is why we will get our ass kicked in a knock down drag out war! We have great toy’s, all the enemy is has to do is hold on for thirty to forty five days our weapons will break down. Since we don’t have the means to fix any­thing they will roll right over us! But atleast our cor­po­rate lead­ers and wall street our rich!

    Reply
  24. Dave says:
    December 17, 2006 at 11:02 pm

    Why not ask why these vehi­cles are break­ing down so much and so hard to fix in the first place? Do we Log Demo them dur­ring early devel­op­ment or do we wait till near the end of LRIP (Low rate pro­duc­tion)? Now look the cur­rent devel­op­men­tal pro­grams, will they be bet­ter? Will we thor­oughly test them to ensure they hold up to real bat­tle field con­di­tions? Will we hold the design­ers account­able if they do not? Will we invest the money nece­sary to ensure they are reli­able, and main­tain­able and invest in test­ing to ensure the equip­ment is up to snuff? It is hard to make the design more reli­able and main­tain­able after it is fielded. It has to be done dur­ing design.

    Reply
  25. salute3 says:
    December 18, 2006 at 1:11 am

    The main rea­son we have to send all the way back our dam­aged fight­ing vehi­cles from Iraq is that we do not have any allies to host our repair or reha­bil­i­ta­tions sta­tions in their soils. We claimed at first that these oper­a­tional adje­cent coun­tries fully sup­ported US efforts in Iraq but the truth is that these fuedal led states are not sup­ported by their own peo­ple and they only inter­est is to iso­late these war effort from their peo­ples. Any work­shops and for­ward repair bases estab­lished within their soils will be noti­fied by their own offi­cils to the insur­gents groups oper­at­ing in the vicin­ity. The insur­gents then will blow every­thing up the sky those heavy machines of war. We have to resort to these expen­sive and inef­fec­tive logis­tic sup­ply lines due to the war we are slog­ging in now are in actual facts stu­pid war.

    Reply
  26. Gunny Joe says:
    December 18, 2006 at 10:13 am

    he point you are miss­ing is that the BRAC in it’s infi­nite wis­dom decided to “scale” back Red River Army Depot in Texarkana and turn over all rebuilds to civi­lain com­pa­nies. When this Depot was run by the Army, their turn­around time for all sizes and types of vehi­cles was fan­tas­tic. BRAC decided every­thing would be done at Anniston and guess what, they can­not keep up. Let’s see, we cut the mil­i­tary to the bone, then we close the depots that do great work, over­load the oth­ers, and then we can’t fig­ure out why we don’t have what we need to fight a war. Looks like the “Peace Initiative” did not work out as expected.

    Reply
  27. Just a Joe says:
    December 18, 2006 at 2:59 pm

    In read­ing these com­ments, the won­der­ful gram­mar aside, does any­one remem­ber any­thing about “trans­for­ma­tion?” Many of the units that owned these tanks now walk or ride in Strykers. This depot is now the “home for mis­fit toys.“
    Totally agree with the BRAC statement.

    Reply
  28. Robert W Stone says:
    December 20, 2006 at 7:30 pm

    The rea­son why all the bro­ken machines are bro­ken is due to the 10 years of draw down and peace div­i­dend used to fund the 1992–1999 President legacy. The build up used all of the funds since 2000 to upgrade the forces and train those that are fight­ing now. War is ugly and to out­source repair­ing these sys­tems is crim­i­nal, not just Politically correct.

    Reply
  29. just me says:
    March 20, 2007 at 9:20 pm

    i think red river army depot is agreat place to work. What I have a prob­lem with is that we have pro­fes­sional peo­ple there that know what they are doing and build a bet­ter prod­uct and also pro­duce it on time with less peo­ple and time and less shifts UNLIKE BAE SYSTEMS in which the GOV. or MANAGEMENT at Red River who is giv­ing all the Bradley over­hauls to.

    Reply
  30. John C. says:
    April 6, 2007 at 5:59 am

    These could be related:
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​v​7​W​5​S​O​I​7​Z7U
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​D​S​R​4​2​m​A​u​q9E

    Reply
  31. Iraq_Resistance_Supporter says:
    May 16, 2007 at 11:32 am

    Earnest Linn, 58, a heavy-​​mobile-​​equipment mechanic who as of January will have worked at Anniston for 30 years, said that “it’s never been like this” since the end of the Vietnam War.
    Sure it’s never been like this what do you expected that these peo­ple will wel­come you?

    Reply
  32. sturdley says:
    November 21, 2007 at 1:17 am

    1500 M-​​1 Abrams tanks destroyed in Iraq! If the present admin­is­tra­tion wanted to sab­o­tage our armed forces, weaken our national defense, and move us, as a nation, closer to bank­ruptcy and col­lapse, they couldn’t have done a bet­ter job.
    We have great mil­i­tary peo­ple and great work­ers, but we sure need bet­ter national lead­er­ship.
    Is the “for­mer” Soviet Union mak­ing war against us by their Arab/​Iraqi/​Iranian prox­ies?
    sturdley

    Reply
  33. Chris says:
    January 14, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    That many tanks weren’t destroyed. All the vehi­cles that come back from the­atre have to be reman­u­fac­tured. Geez.

    Reply
  34. Q_Mech says:
    March 5, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    Life was so much bet­ter back in the good old days, before the war. We had all our tanks in one piece and were enjoy­ing “peace”. All we had to do was look the other way while the UN’s point­less sanc­tions killed over 500,000 chil­dren in Iraq.
    Ah, the glory days. It may have been bought at the cost of mur­der­ing vast num­bers of chil­dren, but at least we didn’t have to fix any tanks.

    Reply
  35. Henry Lackie says:
    March 30, 2009 at 8:14 pm

    My son just got out of the USMC. He was an Abrams Tank mech. How would he go about get­ting a job at Anniston. If that is pos­si­ble? Suggestions?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage