DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » New “X” Plane’s Twisty Wings

New “X” Plane’s Twisty Wings

The wings on the Air Force’s lat­est exper­i­men­tal “X” plane can’t stay on straight. And that’s a good thing.
EC02-0264-19.jpgThe X-​​53 — for­merly known as the “Active Aeroelastic Wing research vehi­cle,” or AAW — is pretty much your stan­dard /​A-​​18 fighter jet. Except its wings are flex­i­ble, twist­ing as the plane races through the air at tran­sonic speeds — and giv­ing the plane bet­ter maneu­ver­abil­ity, in the process.
Every plane’s wings bend a lit­tle, when air pres­sure hits ‘em. But that “aero­elas­tic effect” is usu­ally a bad thing for the air­craft, drag­ging it down. So, “tra­di­tion­ally, air vehi­cles have been designed with stiff geom­e­try in order to min­i­mize aero­elas­tic insta­bil­i­ties,” the Air Force notes.
The X-​​53, on the other hand, is built from the start to bend with the wind. Its flaps, ailerons, and actu­a­tors are repo­si­tioned, so that the air pres­sure bends the wing in a way that pro­vides lift, instead of drag. A thin­ner skin allows the outer wing pan­els to twist up to 5 degrees.
The idea, a NASA fact sheet observes, dates back to the ear­li­est days of flight.

When Orville Wright first took to the air on Dec. 17, 1903, he didn’t have ailerons or flaps to con­trol his air­plane. Instead, the Wright broth­ers had cho­sen to twist or “warp” the wingtips of their craft in order to con­trol its rolling or bank­ing motion. Rather than using one of the craft’s two con­trol sticks to make the wingtips twist, they had devised a “sad­dle” in which the pilot lay. Cables con­nected the sad­dle to the tips of both wings. By mov­ing his hips from side-​​to-​​side, the pilot warped the wingtips either up or down, pro­vid­ing the nec­es­sary con­trol for the Wright Flyer to make turns.

The X-​​53 — a coop­er­a­tive effort between the Air Force Research Lab, NASA, and Boeing’s Phantom Works, in the works since the begin­ning of the decade — should give engi­neers “more free­dom in design­ing more effi­cient, thin­ner, higher aspect-​​ratio wings for future high-​​performance air­craft while reduc­ing the struc­tural weight of the wings by 10 to 20 per cent,” NASA says. “This will allow increased fuel effi­ciency or pay­load capa­bil­ity, along with poten­tially reduced radar sig­na­ture. The tech­nol­ogy also has appli­ca­tion to a vari­ety of other future air­craft, such as high-​​altitude, long-​​endurance unmanned air­craft, trans­ports, and air­lin­ers.“
(Big ups: AF Daily Report)

Share |

December 18th, 2006 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 236724 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2006/12/18/new-x-planes-twisty-wings/New+%22X%22+Plane%27s+Twisty+Wings2006-12-18+17%3A48%3A47jason You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 12/​18/​06 (Updated) | Rapid Fire 12/​19/​06 (Updated) » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. TechSay says:
    December 18, 2006 at 8:22 pm

    Great new tech­nol­ogy. I can­not wait to see a new propul­sion system.

    Reply
  2. C-Low says:
    December 18, 2006 at 9:53 pm

    This tech­nol­ogy has the prospect of tru­ley being rev­o­lu­tion­ary. I may not look very rev­o­lu­tion­ary no fancy stats like a new prop­ul­tion sys­tem to look at no fancy X plane. Don’t be fooled imag­ine a plane were the entire body changes from say straight wing to swept or lift­ing body to areo spike hell to for­ward swept for close menuev­er­ing.
    A true one plane that is tai­lor made for every sit­u­a­tion from high slow low slow high fast low fast between. Damm

    Reply
  3. Aeroengineer says:
    December 19, 2006 at 12:17 am

    There is noth­ing rev­o­lu­tion­ary about the X-​​53. It’s wings just aren’t designed stiff enough and the flight con­trol sys­tem takes advan­tage of that to aid in it’s maneu­ver­abil­ity.
    If any­one thinks this means we are on the verge of planes “mor­ph­ing” and chang­ing con­fig­u­ra­tion in flight they are kid­ding them­selves.
    From what I under­stand the ini­tial F-18’s wings exhib­ited this char­ac­ter­is­tic but they went back and stiff­ened up the wing thereby fix­ing the “problem.”

    Reply
  4. soccorbrain says:
    December 29, 2006 at 6:18 am

    if there is a com­puter bug ; hope­fully the pilot will able to take the stick to con­trol the X twisty winged craft. if the sta­bi­lizer , air flaps or the wing fails ; maybe the craft could morph in adjust­ment to save the air­craft. the twisty wings can morph to gain more lift and to be pro­duce drag. the jet fit­ted with S U 35 type flank­ing noz­zles could add to the advan­tage. w w w.ww2.aircraft.net is a curi­ous fly boy website.

    Reply
  5. N. R. Glenn says:
    December 29, 2006 at 12:46 pm

    Now, if we can just make it hover, too, we’ll have a mechan­i­cal ver­sion of the hummingbird!

    Reply
  6. Billy M. says:
    December 30, 2006 at 12:47 pm

    Gotta love tech­nol­ogy. My main con­cerns are the free­dom of oper­a­tion of our strate­gic offi­cers and are our tac­ti­cal offi­cers get­ting what they need in Iraq for their men and women?
    God bless and Happy New Year.
    Billy M.

    Reply
  7. Mike says:
    January 29, 2007 at 9:49 am

    Just look at B-​​52 wings in flight, if you want to see some real flex and flap.

    Reply
  8. Washington State DUI says:
    January 31, 2007 at 8:28 pm

    That is some crazy stuff. I use baked beans for a propul­sion system.

    Reply
  9. stephen russell says:
    December 31, 2007 at 11:21 pm

    If It can save Fuel & Time, Yes.

    Reply
  10. iro zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:47 pm

    95 lev­els, to me this had been a friend of the peo­ple around, the new ser­vice first hand the hand of a per­son to man­u­ally 95, it is really dif­fi­cult for my them­selves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

    Reply
  11. buy rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:51 pm

    Leave for three years, I have quite repeat­edly returned to the Rappelz game. I con­tinue for good equip­ment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the orig­i­nal is the lack of a per­son accom­pa­ny­ing me.

    Reply
  12. rf money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    So I know my par­adise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a vari­ety of rea­sons, and the sum­mer of cake, magic rab­bit, blue shocks, such as sev­eral friends built a new coun­cil: Return of the King. And I rec­og­nized the beier­tuo broth­er­hood. As the help of this friends and will help in grow­ing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new pres­i­dent rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively par­tic­i­pated in the mine war­fare, win­ning glory for the fam­ily. Later, because a num­ber of rea­sons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.

    Reply
  13. buy goonzu gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:00 pm

    It is wind out­side the win­dow, and I numb­ness under the key­board, watch­ing the com­puter screen in a daze, rem­i­nis­cent of the past acid sweet, think of all peo­ple cry. In this long Goonzu road, who join me through? The game the same as real­ity, it also need friends, need a pater­nity can go with own peo­ple. I spent some money to buy goonzu gold, so I can find to find together with in the other half Goonzu down and even­tu­ally found noth­ing, I despair, I gave up, I sad, and I cry.

    Reply
  14. Guild Wars Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:04 pm

    One day, I was killed by other peo­ple, I told my brother, and I was dead. My brother said he come to help me. I said that peo­ple were very ter­ri­ble, he had a lot of equip­ment, and I think he must be hav­ing much Guild Wars Gold. Mt brother said, no mat­ter, he find friends come to help me. In this way, I rec­og­nized him.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Sexing up the Headline
      a href="http://www.game4pow er.com">Buy wow...
      buy wow  gold
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage