<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 12/19/06 (Updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2006/12/19/rapid-fire-121906-updated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/12/19/rapid-fire-121906-updated/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:37:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JH</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2006/12/19/rapid-fire-121906-updated/#comment-152780</link>
		<dc:creator>JH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2370#comment-152780</guid>
		<description>So was I the only one that noticed that the CSM pictured F-15&#039;s in it&#039;s AF story, and not F-16&#039;s like it says? (I already sent them an e-mail)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So was I the only one that noticed that the CSM pictured F-15’s in it’s AF story, and not F-16’s like it says? (I already sent them an e-mail)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

