Comments on: Pain Beam Not Easily Foiled

By: owlwpexqxdi

owlwpexqxdi — Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:21:37 +0000

By: Tawaf

Tawaf — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:38:56 +0000

Dear AZE siedolr, it is good to have a siedolr like you….Now I know why those Swiss Guards in Vatican City, is called “loyal Swiss Guard regiment”.

By: Education Strategies

Education Strategies — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:33:17 +0000

You know, I have to tell you, I really savour this site and the great insight. I find it to be energizing and very educational. I wish there were more blogs like it. Anyway, I felt it was about time I posted a comment on Pain Beam Not Easily Foiled | Defense Tech — I just wanna tell you that you did a great job on this. Cheers dude!

By: Scottie Gorecki

Scottie Gorecki — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:08:53 +0000

I support anything that makes it simpler for users to acquire access to advanced web site functionality. Twitter oauth is relatively uncomplicated to implement and if the user is logged into twitter it is a one or two click procedure. The user feels safe not giving as well a great info along with the site owner has a brand new potential customer. Superior Posting!

By: cheris

cheris — Sun, 02 May 2010 10:59:53 +0000

retroreflection should sort it out :)

By: john

john — Tue, 18 Nov 2008 05:10:25 +0000

KATSESAMA, even though you are (nothing personal, no, really!) delusional beyond comprehension in your trust in the benevolence of our government and the ability of the public and media to restrain its evil activities, in this case you are still by and large correct about the deployment of the ADS unit as reported. That big hummer is not going into the streets of America, and making the general population hop around in the field of its particularly nasty tune without a bunch of people knowing about it.
That is not the worrisome issue here. When the other person mentioned “torture”, did you or anyone else seriously envision the hummer pulling up at the back of a prison in some southern state and doing their evil in the public eye?
DARPA and the JNLWP have teamed up with the DOJ and with this, developed various applications of this technology with some pretty nasty variations. 95 Ghz at a lower power level than the unit in this article simply causes discomfort, and that over long periods of time is torture. They have handheld units being used by DOJ personnel in our communities right now, they call it “surveillance” and they use it to drive out “undesirables”, not convicted of any criminal activity, and it’s perfectly legal under Bush’s new FBI guidelines for investigations.
Our government is full of bureaucrats that are out of control. Wake up, Pollyanna.

By: ellend2

ellend2 — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:03:56 +0000

Bush should be impeached. The use of
these weapons on Americans is clearly
in violation of their constitutional
rights. (California, please note what
is being done to you on the cover of the
February issue of Popular Science 2007).

By: Randall Flagg

Randall Flagg — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 21:03:36 +0000

Anybody who thinks this gadget won’t be used on prisoners strapped to tables is living in a dreamworld. It is the perfect torture device.

By: Dr. Love

Dr. Love — Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:39:11 +0000

“To clarify one concern, as I understand it running away would not make you a target for escalated force (like getting shot at); turning up in a tinfoil bodysuit might do.“
I think this pretty much sums it up. Unless you’re in a large unruly crowd, I don’t think you need worry about this system. It would seem less irritating than tear gas or a fire hose, and certainly less irritating than 7.62mm NATO.

By: Rayon

Rayon — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:30:53 +0000

Those of you stupid enough to believe this weapon is not destined for use in domestic crowd control situations need to study history a tad more thoroughly. This website might help.
http://www.gnn.tv/articles/2563/Rumsfeld_s_Guinea_Pigs