DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cammo Green » Military Going Green… But Chugging Oil

Military Going Green… But Chugging Oil

The Wall Street Journal takes a tour today of the Pentagon’s clean energy plans. It’s a fair and balanced piece — in the old, pre-Murdoch sense of the term. And it throws some needed cold water on a (slightly over-) enthusiastic essay I wrote for the current issue of Good magazine. In it, I get all rosy-glasses, counting off the military’s alt-power projects:
10-1.jpg

In September 2005, the federal government decreed that 7.5 percent of its power should come from renewable sources by 2013. The Pentagon is already there [and is headed towards 25 percent renewables by 2025]… In sunny San Diego, California, Naval Base Coronado’s solar power is saving the annual equivalent of 6,000 barrels of oil. Wind turbines help Warren Air Force Base in gusty Wyoming, keeping 4,866 tons of carbon dioxide emissions from escaping into the atmosphere per year. Then there are the nine military bases that are powered geothermally, by the heat of the earth. California’s Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake kicks off 270 megawatts of electricity, keeping lights turned on as far away as Los Angeles.

True, true. But while clean power is nice, the Journal notes, it’s small potatoes compared to the oil, gas, and jet fuel the Defense Department guzles:

In the past 20 years, [the military] has cut energy use at facilities 28%. Still, oil accounts for roughly 75% of total energy use. The military’s focus has been on saving power — also a laudable goal, critics say, but not an answer to dependence on oil…
The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq have increased military fuel use by as much as 56,000 barrels a day. In addition, the military’s improved ability to deploy troops to battlefields comes at the cost of increased fuel use: today, more than half of the fuel consumed in combat theaters is used not by front-line soldiers but by supply convoy… The military uses fuel at twice the rate it did in the first Persian Gulf War and four times the rate it did in the Second World War.

Bottom line: It ain’t easy, getting to green.
UPDATE 5:10 PM: “The Air Force last month successfully demonstrated how hydrogen fuel cells could one day be used for generating power at forward operating bases and remote locations to help reduce the dependence of U.S. forces on local energy sources and foreign oil,” Inside Defense reports.

During the Dec. 14 test, officials from the services Advanced Power Technology Office studied how well a newly developed hydrogen fuel cell called the Multipurpose Electric Power System could provide electricity to halogen lights, comparing the results to the performance of a diesel generator now used in theater…
The demonstration was the latest in a series of tests under the offices tent city initiative, which examines new alternative energy technologies that may one day help U.S. forces in theater power equipment more efficiently.

UPDATE 01/10/07 11:38 AM: Last week, Defense News had an even deeper look at the military’s alt-fuel and alt-power conundrum.

With fuel prices escalating, Rep. Roscoe Bartlett, R-Md., is urging the Navy to go all-nuclear.
For now, only submarines and aircraft carriers are propelled by nuclear power. Thats about 80 of the Navys 286 ships. But Bartlett, who chaired the House Armed Services projection forces subcommittee, says its time for the nuclear Navy to grow. The line has already been crossed for big-deck amphibious ships, Bartlett said.
When oil hit $60 a barrel, it became more expensive to operate amphibs on oil than it would be on nuclear power, he said.
And we will shortly cross the line for cruisers, Bartlett said.
The Navy calculates that nuclear power becomes economical for cruisers after oil costs $80 a barrel, and for destroyers when oil costs about $205 a barrel.
But…cost is a major roadblock for nuclear-powered ships… Nuclear propulsion systems would add several hundred million dollars to each ship. The timing is not good. Congress is already distressed about escalating shipbuilding costs. Once they see the numbers, it will be very hard to convince them to go all-nuclear, he said…
[In the meantime,] the Navy also taking [smaller] steps to reduce energy consumption. It has installed bulbous bows and stern flaps on some of its ships. Each of these increases fuel efficiency by a few percentage points, according to John Young, the Pentagons director of research and engineering.
The Navy also is considering applying coatings to ship propellers to potentially get 4 or 5 percent savings in fuel efficiency and possibly some reductions in maintenance, Young told the House Armed Services Committee in September. It looks like it pays for itself in no more than about a year.

Share |

January 9th, 2007 | Cammo Green | 335645 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/01/09/military-going-green-but-chugging-oil/Military+Going+Green...+But+Chugging+Oil2007-01-09+21%3A10%3A00hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 01/09/07 (Updated) | Second Nork Nuke Test Coming? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Murc says:
    January 9, 2007 at 8:35 pm

    It looks like th US military is doing a good job going green.
    But yeah…its obvious there still oil chuggers…if you build a building, you can put a solar field next to it, or a wind turbines…but there really isn’t any portable power device on the market. All electric just aint happening, because of many reasons like not allways having a place to plug it in at, and rechage time.
    So over all, there doing good. I believe the army is still in the process of picking the HUMVEE replacement…what ever it is, it will be more efficient…so we will see a noticable decline in a couple years when they are in production.

    Reply
  2. Pigou Club says:
    January 10, 2007 at 8:55 am

    These are just small steps. Without some serious action by the government there will be no big change.

    Reply
  3. Rich says:
    January 10, 2007 at 11:44 pm

    There are fuel additives on the market that could actually save the military a great deal of money, improving fuel efficiency while cutting emissions. Fuel$AVER, inc. markets such a product that improves fuel economy on average 8% to 12% (based on over a billion fleet miles). It works in all internal combustion engines (gas or diesel) from 2-cycle engines to ships and locomotives. With potential millions of dollars in savings, it would save a lot of tax dollars and oil!

    Reply
  4. bill says:
    January 12, 2007 at 9:43 am

    I have nt read anything ragrding air force test of b52 flying on 50% jet fuel produced from coal and burning 90% cleaner. Since we have more coal than Saudi has oil what are we waiting for.

    Reply
  5. JMMC62 says:
    January 19, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    Guess its time. If your a history buff or have access to a remaining WW II AAF vet ask about the 1943–44 bombing raids on Hitler’s synthetic fuel production. It is interesting… accounted for 67% of their fuel for the war. I wonder why our industry people testified how it would take years and millions of dollars for us to figure out how to do it? The big bonus checks they got for figuring out how to stickit to the people these last few years would probably have been enough to both figure it out and build the plants.

    Reply
  6. Dan says:
    March 13, 2007 at 4:14 pm

    Its good that the military is getting more ‘green’ or ‘clean’ or however you want to call it. Its great that they’re setting the example.

    Reply
  7. Mastro says:
    May 24, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    There will be a big improvement when the Army replaces its current vehicles with hybrids in the FCS.
    As for Nuke ships– well the initial cost is high, some countries don’t like having a floating Chernoble pull into port, and disposal costs are high.
    Then there is the terrorist problem. The Cole is about the same size as the last generation of nuclear cruisers– ripping a hole in one could cause some major problems.

    Reply
  8. edrg says:
    June 11, 2008 at 10:43 am

    ?????
    ???????
    ?????????
    ??????????????
    Alderley Edge Hockey Club
    L1011 Corporation
    Asbury United Methodist Church
    Pension Alexandra
    Advanced SCADA and Telemetering
    AFA Dot First Aid & Safety
    83 London Signal Squadron
    Absolutecents​.net
    Three Journeys Left
    Adolescent Health Associates
    Adkins Motorsports
    1st​-MP​.com
    Abridge Insurance Services
    Best Western Terrace Inn

    Reply
  9. ro zeny says:
    August 1, 2008 at 11:42 pm

    I played RO that I used the first account was a girl number of wave, a knight. The number also has a little ro zeny. I still remember that the world has just stepped into the RO; I stood the door of Pulongdela South, I even have my own way can not see, I looked at the lawn in front of do not know how to operate. At that time, wave on the line, he stood outside and said: come out, come out to see, use a mouse.

    Reply
  10. Requiem Lant says:
    August 5, 2008 at 3:48 am

    In order to play the Requiem, I bought much Requiem Lant, it spend me much money.

    Reply
  11. cheap 2moons gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 3:50 am

    Therefore, I diligently practiced the level to promote, only then promote only then can help me to save many cheap 2moons gold.

    Reply
  12. Shaiya gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 3:38 am

    Threemans, one of the Thelaiosisians had suggested to the Goddess that creating two more Shaiya gold races, the Nordein and the Dumianas, would dramatically help aid the progression of prosperity in Teos. Soon after, with the help of Threemas, the Nordein and Dumianas were created.

    Reply
  13. Habbo Coins says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:04 am

    Perhaps that I should not accept your gift and your Habbo Coins.

    Reply
  14. Lord Of The Rings Gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:07 am

    For in the game I can have a family, I was go all out to work make Lord Of The Rings Gold, so long as there were the methods which could make money I has tried.

    Reply
  15. lastchaos money says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:09 am

    You said that who dares to annoy me and you will look for him to PK, and make him lose his all lastchaos money.

    Reply
  16. buy hero gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:10 am

    I loused around by myself for several days in Jiu Long Mountain, felt a little lonely suddenly, so I buy hero gold to play with higher players and then started the crazy add somebody as a good friend.

    Reply
  17. mabinogi gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:11 am

    So I spent some mabinogi gold to study. After school study the lovable gray wolf became collapses at the first blow.

    Reply
  18. flyff money says:
    August 15, 2008 at 8:35 pm

    After a few days, with the classmate help slowly I can earn the flyff money in the game, beginning has a little understand for the game.

    Reply
  19. Archlord money says:
    August 15, 2008 at 8:38 pm

    he did not know how to do could let the girl no longer apartness. So he decided to spend much more money to buy the Archlord money for the girl.

    Reply
  20. fiesta money says:
    August 15, 2008 at 8:44 pm

    friends are all admired us. I already did not know in this half a year, he spends how much money to buy the fiesta money for me, I only know that he was very love me, I also very love he too.

    Reply
  21. Metin2 gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 12:46 am

    Of course the Metin2 yang can bring funs. I believed that you will love this Metin2 gold new game.

    Reply
  22. Buy metin2 gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 12:48 am

    If you want to Buy metin2 gold you can go to the company. I hope that we will become good friends in the Cheap metin2 gold game.

    Reply
  23. Chris Moline, LEED AP says:
    August 28, 2009 at 9:12 am

    Why focus on the oil-chugging past and criticize what’s happening? Every barrel saved is a few less dollars finding their way to wahabist-loving sheikhs and mullahs.
    Go green for tactical reasons!
    Semper Fi
    TacticallyGreen​.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Blog Note
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      …FER CRYING OUT LOUD….JUST BRING BACK...
      Sandy
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      How does this get us closer to giant humanoid battle...
      Alex`
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The real issue is not what type of plane but trying...
      Bill
    • Paris Hilton: Patriot
      Omg! You can find her pictures and video here...
      WebWarez
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Marine Air Light? Wait…don't they...
      LtCol Ben
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Except its really not that stealthy… The...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Is an F-22 capable of landing even on a big deck carrier,...
      joe
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      From a national security perspective we should do all we can to keep...
      mike
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Please define what is "best". Boeings plane is cheaper and...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      F4 was origionally a Navy Fighter, so coming up with a...
      Curt
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage