DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » Second Nork Nuke Test Coming?

Second Nork Nuke Test Coming?

mushroom_cloud2a.JPGI was skep­ti­cal when I heard the news last week, that “senior defense offi­cials” now think North Korea has “put every­thing in place to con­duct a [sec­ond nuclear] test with­out any notice or warn­ing.” After all, wasn’t the first Nork test a total dud?
But the wonks over at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies are warn­ing us: believe the hype.

In early December 2006, intel­li­gence sources indi­cated activ­i­ties were under­way at the Mount Mantap nuclear test site near the vil­lage of Punggye-​​ri in North Hamgyŏng Province. The activ­i­ties were first dis­closed by South Korean National Assemblyman Chŏng Hyŏng-​​gŭn of the Grand National Party (GNP or Hannaradang) on December 21. Chŏngs dis­clo­sure fol­lowed South Korean Defense Minister Kim Chang-​​sus December 15th admo­ni­tion to 30 senior mil­i­tary com­man­ders to be thor­oughly pre­pared to counter the pos­si­bil­ity of a sec­ond or third nuclear test by North Korea. According to National Assemblyman Chong, North Korea had pre­pared two tun­nels under Mount Mantap, and the October 9, 2006 test was con­ducted in a tun­nel on the east­ern side of the moun­tain while recent activ­i­ties have been at the west­ern tun­nel. According to a South Korean gov­ern­ment source, the move­ment of peo­ple and vehi­cles has been detected at the site, and the activ­i­ties are sim­i­lar to those that pre­ceded the first test.
National Assemblyman Chong revealed that in December 2006 an uniden­ti­fied object was moved to the west­ern tun­nel entrance and up to 15 peo­ple were observed mov­ing about the area. Chong said that the North Koreans were seen con­struct­ing a tem­po­rary build­ing 10 meters from the tun­nel entrance and it is very likely the North Koreans were prepar­ing the tun­nel for a nuclear test. Chong also claimed that after the October 9th test in the east­ern tun­nel, the North Koreans removed the three tem­po­rary sup­port build­ings near that tun­nel entrance and exca­vated and sub­se­quently filled in a 95-​​meter long ditch between the build­ings and the tun­nel, which indi­cates they could be prepar­ing the east­ern tun­nel for a future test as well.

Share |

January 9th, 2007 | Nukes | 335728 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/01/09/second-nork-nuke-test-coming/Second+Nork+Nuke+Test+Coming%3F2007-01-09+21%3A54%3A50hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Military Going Green… But Chugging Oil | Rapid Fire 01/​10/​07 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Robot.Economist says:
    January 10, 2007 at 9:43 am

    I’m not famil­iar with National Assemblyman Chong’s cred­i­bil­ity specif­i­cally, but con­ser­v­a­tive South Korean leg­is­la­tors from the GNP are known for fre­quently hyper­ven­ti­lat­ing about the North.
    It would be more inter­est­ing to see whether the opin­ions of the U.S. intel com­mu­nity con­verge around a test or no test conclusion.

    Reply
  2. Nicholas Weaver says:
    January 10, 2007 at 10:21 am

    Arms Control Wonk had a great line…
    During the Clinton Era, when North Korea didn’t have much fis­sile mate­r­ial…
    “What should the response be if North Korea tests a nuke?“
    “Tell them to test the other one.”

    Reply
  3. Phil Lowder says:
    January 12, 2007 at 1:13 am

    The UN and every­one else are allow­ing the north to con­duct such test­ing. Duds or suc­cess, either way the north knows the US can’t do a thing to stop them when China and other Countries alike are stalling with sanc­tions. Just like Iraq, we give them way too much time to com­plete tests or hide WMD’s. It’s time the US thinks about with­drawl­ing from this chicken shit UN and take mat­ters into our on hands.

    Reply
  4. CW says:
    January 12, 2007 at 2:49 am

    As a vet­eran of the Vietnam war, some of us won­dered if Russia or China would sup­ply Hanoi with a nuke. That was dur­ing TET.
    If Canada, was our enemy, and began test­ing nukes, I think we’d rspond the same way as South Korea .… I am a child of pre Korea, does any­one remem­ber the fear, drills at schools, and bomb shel­ters while we waited for the Russians to air mail just one nuke?
    As any sol­dier will tell you, espe­cially a com­bat vet, a weapon in the right hands will be used, and used for the sole pur­pose of killing you. Unlike the Chineese and the Russians we never put our weaponry on parade to dis­play to the world what we have, and that’s what North Korea is doing now, mak­ing sure the world knows that they have the capa­bil­ity, and maybe, just maybe the slight of hand of a “dud”, is what we were sup­posed to see, while a work­ing arse­nal from China sits and waits for the right mood.

    Reply
  5. Steven says:
    January 12, 2007 at 2:50 am

    It is in my opin­ion that we have unfin­ished busi­ness with North Korea. if it has been deter­mined that they do indeed have the capa­bil­i­ties to make and launch a nuclear weapon from North Korea to ay where in the world then we have an oblig­a­tion to our own pop­u­las to use what ever means nesse­cary to erad­i­cate the enemy. like wise with Iraq we shouldve gone in to con­quer. If we havent learned one thing from this war it this we are fight­ing ideas, reli­gious prej­u­dice, and more than just the Iraqi peo­ple , the sur­round­ing coun­tries have found a way to try to demor­alise our mil­i­tary by putting the fear of these insur­gences in the mix. my opin­ion is to con­quer first dont give power back to a nation who con­sid­ers you the enemy, the infi­del, any­way. my broth­ers and fel­low coun­try­mens blood is being spilled on a daily basis. lets just pray that in the future their blodd didnt spill in vain !!!!!

    Reply
  6. dave says:
    January 12, 2007 at 3:55 am

    Stalling at the UN? how can you say that, dont you watch the news? there’s no stalling! China is vio­lat­ing the sanc­tions on Iran by devel­op­ing gas fields and sup­pling money, could that be includ­ing arms for defense of those fields too!
    That’s not stalling! I hate to say this, and I am a RVN vet, but I think we should just pull our troops back, and just retal­i­ate with com­plete eco­nomic destruc­tion on on these coun­tries that want to destroy us or their neigh­bors. The UN is a use­less waste of US Funds.

    Reply
  7. James Belknap says:
    January 12, 2007 at 6:38 am

    Iraq, needs to be taken care of once and for all. We need to go in with a lot more troops as in another 100,000 and take of busi­ness and then get on with busi­ness. The NEWS was great to hear we are increas­ing the strength of the ser­vices again. Now we need to con­tinue with the strength, not reduce! President Bush is doing the right thing!

    Reply
  8. Richard J Reed says:
    January 12, 2007 at 8:02 am

    The American Fighting Man (or Women) knows only one way to fight a war’ “Hit Hard and Fast, Go thru the oppo­nent, Grab the lead­er­ship by the neck and say YOUR THRU”. Every time the polit­i­cans
    try to “Settle” the con­flict it’s failed. Recent Example “Desert Storm” (Sadam should have been taken out then)Result? 10 years later we had to fin­ish the job. Next: Korea (Police Action? My.…Eye) Political Settlement? Result: Nukes! and May I remind you that N Korea DOSE NOT have a his­tory of keep­ing thier weapons to them­selves.
    and Don’t get Me started on Nam.
    Message to the politi­cians :If you pick a fight and send us in, STAY OUT OF IT! WE will call you when its over.
    To Quote MacArthur :How do you Bomb half a Bridge?

    Reply
  9. Frenchiet says:
    January 12, 2007 at 8:04 am

    Have you folks lost your col­lec­tive minds??? I have a total of five years spread out across three tours in the Army in the Republic of Korea and let’s get one thing straight.
    First on the atti­tude of South Korean pop­u­lous in gen­eral. Yes, there are demon­stra­tions against us, just like there are vir­tu­ally every­where else in the world and yes they get all the media atten­tion the the world can muster. Having said that, I equate these demon­stra­tion to the media cov­er­age over in Iraq (i.e., show the pub­lic the death and destruc­tion — it sells papers).
    Just for once, I would love to see the mass media show us the entire story; in Iraq — the embrace of the gen­eral pop­u­la­tion; the rebuild­ing of the roads, elec­tric­ity grid, health care sys­tems, the edu­ca­tion sys­tem. In Korea, the gen­eral love and admi­ra­tion that the Korean peo­ple have for us Americans. I have trav­elled to vir­tu­ally every part of South Korea and have never found any­thing but gen­eral accep­tance from these folks. I’ve dined with them, I’ve been brought into their house, I’ve been truly taken in by these peo­ple and no I’m not talk­ing about the local busi­ness­men out­side of the mil­i­tary instal­la­tions try­ing to hawk their wares, I’m talk­ing about the coun­try folk, the peo­ple through­out the coun­try.
    I equate the demon­stra­tions (In South Korea) sim­i­lar to what we saw in our own great coun­try dur­ing the Vietnam War — there are a few vocal (pri­mar­illy) col­lege kids stand­ing up and shout­ing — it gives them a feel­ing of inde­pen­dance. Yes, there was recently some demon­stra­tion in Pyongteak, where the U.S. is mov­ing their head­quar­ters, but once again, these were pri­mar­illy led by a few rad­i­cal, that bussed in and NOT the gen­eral pop­u­lous in Pyongteak.
    As for all out war with the North — folks this is NOT Iraq and it’s not the desert. This is very moun­tain­ous ter­rain and we’d not be able to sim­ply go in and car­pet bomb them into sub­mis­sion. North Korea has spent lit­er­ally decades build­ing an exten­sive tun­nel sys­tem through­out those moun­tains…
    Does any­one remem­ber Bora Bora??? Our best and bright­est were unable to find and stop Osama bin Ladin there, why would you think it would be any eas­ier to find an enemy in the moun­tains of North Korea?
    Now, you cou­ple that with the resis­tance of a truly brain­washed peo­ple — Kim (and his father) have been in power for more than fifty years and dur­ing that entire time, the peo­ple of North Korea have been fed the lies, lies and more lies about the how great the North Korean lead­er­ship is and how ter­ri­ble the U.S. is and how/​why the U.S. is the cause of the dis­mal life they lead. EVERYTHING they hear is through the North Korean media and fil­tered by the North Korean gov­ern­ment. If you think that Shiite in Northern Iraq are prob­lem­atic, you ain’t seen nothin’ com­pared to what we would likely face in North Korea.
    Finally, the death and destruc­tion in the event of all out war with North Korea would be unlike any­thing this world has seen, prob­a­bly at least since WWII and very pos­si­ble unpar­elled in the world his­tory. Seoul, (South) Korea is the sec­ond largest city in the world, with nearly 23 mil­lion peo­ple liv­ing in the greater metro area. Seoul also hap­pens to be just 30 mile South of the North Korea and well within artillary strik­ing dis­tance from the North. The reign of hell that would fall down on Seoul would result in a casu­alty rate unlike any­thing the world has every expe­ri­enced — sim­ply unac­cept­able.
    If noth­ing else can be said about Kim Jung Il, the man is extremely intel­li­gent. I truly believe he would never attack (South Korea) unpro­voked — he has got to know that it would end his reign and cost him every­thing if he every attempted any­thing like that. However, if we were to make a pre-​​emptive strike, he’d have noth­ing to lose.
    All of the retoric (com­ing out of North Korea) that we see today is an attempt to bring his name to the fore­front of the World’s pop­u­lous. Iraq has been get­ting all the atten­tion and he sim­ply wants his share of the spot­light. It’s sort of like, “Hey don’t for­get about me.” type of syn­drome.
    Kim Jung Il is all about the spot­light… He can­not be in the spot­light if he is not in power and he has to know that if he attempted any­thing offen­sive on the Korean pen­nisula (or else­where) it would ulti­mately mean the end of his rule — he will not let that hap­pen!!!! If on the oth­er­hand, he truly felt that he was in dan­ger of los­ing his power due to a pre-​​emptive strike on our part, he would have noth­ing to lose and most assuredly would want to go out in such a man­ner that would ensure that his name lived in the History book for­ever and unlease a bar­rage against Seoul that would cre­ate a destruc­tion unlike any­thing the world has ever seen once again, unac­cept­able.
    Bottomline — In this par­tic­u­lar case, the ends sim­ply do NOT jus­tify war on the Korea Pennisula.

    Reply
  10. Kenneth Hinckley says:
    January 12, 2007 at 9:10 am

    The “cut and run” tac­tics by both sides of the aisle in Congress is more sick­en­ing then usual. they send President Bush is “wounded” and even his own party (my party)is quick to loathe him, so they can cat­a­pult over his dead body.
    These same peo­ple would have mocked President Lincoln in the Civil War. His war polices were total fail­ures for years…the dead in the hun­dreds of thou­sands, with no end in sight. It took years for the “enemy” to be defeated…and only due to Lincoln’s dogged determination.…irregardless of the polit­i­cal cost. He was reelected…but only after sev­eral mil­i­tary vic­to­ries just prior to the elec­tion.
    President Bush knows the threat…and if the truth be known…has put poli­cies in place which have prob­a­bly already saved all our lives, more then once. Sure he has made mis­takes in Iraq…Lincoln did in his war.
    The “Vietnam Syndrome” is ram­pant now…and if allowed to pros­per, will cost us this war on ter­ror, and our lives.
    The press and the politi­cians make me sick. John McCain is the only Senator who has the guts, expe­ri­ence, and for­ti­tude to tell it like it is, no mat­ter if it costs him his run at the Presidency. He is more inter­ested in sav­ing the nation.…and the world.
    kenneth.​hinckley@​us.​army.​mil SGM/​USA

    Reply
  11. cory says:
    January 12, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    excuse me mr dan ross, remem­ber that time we flew their air­planes into their build­ings and killed thou­sands of our own people…wait taht was al-​​qaeda and sad­dam. and thanks to the united states mil­i­tary the rest of the world can sleep a lit­tle bet­ter at night know­ing that there are still those who have the balls to fight for your free­dom to stay stu­pid stuff like that. we are the bul­lies? we took out an evil dic­ta­tor and tried to install a democ­racy, it was their choice to not accept our help. and sir they still have elec­tric­ity and and even more rights now than they ever did. If you would open up your eyes you would real­ize that most of this insur­gents are for­mer fedeyeen(sp?) or come from coun­tries such as iran or syria. and in due time they will get what is com­ing to them. President Bush as made the cor­rect deci­sion in increas­ing troops. People are wanted a with­drawal and what they dont real­ize is this as been hap­pen­ing the past 2 years. this time last year there was nearly 150000 troops in iraq. with the new rein­force­ments of 21500 our num­ber of sol­diers in iraq still will not break 150000. that shows that the demo­c­rat plan of pulling out troops has not worked and will not work. As long as our sol­diers are vol­un­teer­ing to fight we will con­tinue our pres­ence in iraq until the job is done, and it will end in favor of the United States of America. Mess witht he best and die like the rest. hooah

    Reply
  12. drew says:
    January 12, 2007 at 2:28 pm

    It is inter­est­ing to see how diverse our responses are to what hap­pens around the world and how it may apply to us, take a look around peo­ple, WE ARE THE LAST SUPER POWER!!!! There will always be that 10% that hate us because we are strong and they will do what­ever they can to inflict pain upon those that our mil­i­tary pro­tects. We are not invin­ci­ble though and that is where preimp­tive stikes are in the best inter­est of national and global secu­rity. Iraq will sur­vive, they have been sur­viv­ing for eons with­out our help, and korea will sur­vive and rebuild after we end their nuke pro­gram. If you are igno­rant enough to belives that their nuke tests are for the bet­ter­ment of their coun­tries resources and power struc­ture, you are an idiot. I have cov­ered many of the post­ings writ­ten here and i belive that with extreme power comes extreme reson­si­bil­ity. It is our reson­si­bil­ity to ensure the secu­rity of our­selves first before we can reach out and help oth­ers around the globe. We as a peo­ple must no longer slink softly in our blan­ket of free­dom pro­vided by the blood of our troops, but stand tall and sup­port those that have vol­un­teered to go to war so that we may enjoy the lib­er­ties we take for granted every­day.
    SEMPER FI, DO OR DIE!!!!

    Reply
  13. Coop says:
    January 12, 2007 at 3:07 pm

    Bottom line is that the nuclear genie is out of the bot­tle and has been for more than forty years. It’s just that this time a sworn enemy of the U.S. has rubbed the lamp. Iran, too, will soon rub the lamp.
    So let’s decide now: are we going to do WHATEVER it takes (and I mean what­ever — if you’re squea­mish go home) to keep the nuclear genie from get­ting out again or not? If are pre­pared to do what­ever it takes then ENOUGH already — let’s rock-​​n-​​roll; if no then let’s shut up and pre­pare for the con­se­quences.
    Moshe ben Maimon once said some­thing to the effect of “the fear of a wrong deci­sion is prefer­able to the ter­ror of inde­ci­sion”.
    Coop

    Reply
  14. JD says:
    January 12, 2007 at 3:30 pm

    To Mr Dan Ross
    You need to get right on down to your local men­tal health provider, and tell them you have seri­ous issues. This has noth­ing to do with your post, I went to your web­site. I beleive you may be schiz­o­phrenic or para­noid with delu­sional properties(SIC?). JMHO.

    Reply
  15. Marty Walyor says:
    January 12, 2007 at 3:47 pm

    Weakness is the root of Defeat, Remember that. History proves that a with­drawl only means sur­ren­der, and you can’t fight a polit­i­caly cor­rect war. Take Viet Nam or what about the Korean war. We are STILL at war with North Korea and it’s sixty years later, we are still talk­ing about going back to fin­ish the job. You think a with­drawl from Iraq is going to be any dif­fer­ent. We have been back there twice now, are we going to go for a third.
    Don’t for­get we need a base there to counter Syria and Iran, since we pulled out of Saudi Arabia. And Don’t let the peace mon­gers BS you.
    Egypt, Turkey, the UAE, Jorden the Saudies as well as Isreal are all shiv­er­ing in their boots about Iran get­ting the bomb, they just don’t want to show their hands until they know that we will be there for them.
    That is why we have Iran sur­rounded on both sides with our bases in Afganistan and Iraq. What we do in Iraq will set the tone for our rela­tions with all coun­tries it the rea­gion. So we bet­ter think about why we need to be there.

    Reply
  16. William McBurney says:
    January 13, 2007 at 12:37 am

    Mike has it absolutely right. I am a vet of the Korean war as well as a nuclear weapons expert with 10 years in the field. We must halt Iran and North Korea in their per­fec­tion of nuclear weapons. If not Iraq, Where? If not now, when? If no by force, how? If we just keep giv­ing in, who are we going to blame when we lose a city with a half mil­lion peo­ple? It is inevitable that we will lose a city because we are not and will not be able to defend our­selves against a plane with a sui­ci­dal crew, with a nuke in their cargo bay. The islamist jihad will con­tinue to spend their worth­less lives com­mit­ting sui­cide attempt­ing to hit us with telling blows. North Korea con­tin­ues to be run by mad­men after we failed to bomb them out of exis­tance 53 years ago. Truman was wrong in his bat­tle with MacArthur! Fight wars to win like WWII, not by pub­lic opin­ion sold us by newsper­sons who got their degrees from schools run by the “anti­war” draft dodgers that spat on ser­vice­men dur­ing the Vietnam days.

    Reply
  17. The Flanman says:
    January 13, 2007 at 11:38 am

    It is time to throw polit­i­cal cor­rect­ness right into the garbage. If it walks like ter­ror­ist, talks like a ter­ror­ist, and acts like a ter­ror­ist, than it is a ter­ror­ist.
    We here in this great nation (USA) need to start to under­stand that these rad­i­cal ide­olo­gies around the globe, and within, are a huge threat. We need to elim­i­nate them before they elim­i­nate us. “THEY WANT TO KILL US” as they out­spo­kenly dis­play. Do not think for one moment that these peo­ple are not within our bor­ders act­ing as they like us and and want to enjoy our way of life.
    Again, we need to throw out polit­i­cal cor­rect­ness and quit being nice. We need to stop let­ting these peo­ple come into our coun­try to uti­lize our resources and ben­e­fits. We need to kick them all out or put them into camps like we did to the Japanese in WWII.
    As for N. Korea, I think we need to try to enforce sanc­tions and the like before resort­ing to mil­i­tary action.
    As for IRAQ, I have had mixed emo­tions, but even as a demo­c­rat I think Bush is on the right track. We need to increase troops and fight them in their region of the world. This, at least keeps the enemy over there for the most part. When the insur­gency from neigh­bor­ing coun­tries come to fight our troops in Iraq, then we can elim­i­nate them there and not have to worry about them com­ing on our soil.
    Spoken my peace, USN Gulf Vet

    Reply
  18. Cyrus35 says:
    January 13, 2007 at 10:06 pm

    Coop,
    Sworn ene­mies of the United States have had nuclear weapons since the 60s. The Soviet Union is a sworn enemy (and they are NOT “for­mer;” read New Lies for Old and The Perestroika Deception, both by for­mer KGB agent Anatoliy Golitsyn), and so is Red China

    Reply
  19. al says:
    January 13, 2007 at 10:37 pm

    I’d humbly sub­mit that war is not the answer to every­thing. I say let them have a bomb, so what. No one has used one but us. As for “mani­acs who’d do any­thing to attack us”, WE attacked them, they didn’t attack us; WE named North Korea as an enemy, they didn’t name us; WE threaten Syria and Iran, they didn’t threaten us. Thank Almighty God that we are run­ning out of money to bomb third world vil­lages– all that remains is our descent into fas­cism, which com­ments on this thread indi­cate is not far, and we can self destruct instead of dam­ag­ing the poor of the earth.

    Reply
  20. Mark USN 83-95 says:
    January 14, 2007 at 2:23 am

    There is an eas­ier way to solve the worlds prob­lems.
    Muslim males should be ster­il­ized. If done dis­creetly (by means of intro­duc­tion via water or food sources, then by the time they find out their pop­u­la­tion will already be in jeop­ardy.
    As for North Korea, sim­ply nuke their “nuclear moun­tain” and show them what a real nuke will do while simul­ta­ne­ously nuk­ing their nuclear facil­i­ties.
    Simultaneously, allow Israel to destroy Iran’s facil­i­ties with nuke bunker busters.
    Five min­utes later make a speech at the UN.
    Nip it in the bud now. Let’s not spend another dime on pol­i­tics and sol­diers lives. Let’s take it to them hard, quick and effec­tive.
    Let’s end this.

    Reply
  21. fhsmct says:
    January 14, 2007 at 7:03 am

    Okay, we’ve known all along that cer­tain coun­tries have had or were close to hav­ing nuclear weapons capa­bil­i­ties. Anyone who claims oth­er­wise is either walk­ing around with blind­ers on or has their head stuck deep in the sand doing their best Ostrich imi­ta­tion.
    What did we (the US) do? Attack the coun­try that we dang well knew DID NOT have same.
    And for peo­ple to con­tinue to post claims that Iraq had some­thing to do with 9–11 is ludi­crious. They had about as much to do with the events of that day as they had a cred­i­ble WMD arse­nal.
    I’ll never be one to say that Hussein was a saint but there are other coun­tries in that region of the world (as well as North Korea) that fit the descrip­tion for why we invade Iraq but we did not take them on.
    Instead, we invaded the coun­try that, as our proxy, fought a pro­tracted war with Iran …

    Reply
  22. Gerald says:
    January 15, 2007 at 4:36 pm

    Hey Al–
    They have proven they don’t need a bomb to slaugh­ter inno­cents. They fly air­planes into build­ings and blow up peo­ple who have never harmed them. Fascists? Please read the dic­tio­nary! Fascist force a cer­tain way of life and value on oth­ers. America has been a land of tol­er­ance; the mid east is as fas­cist as they get. Don’t believe the way I do? I cut off your head! Your wife doesn’t cover her­self? Cut her head off! Women should not be edu­cated. Women can­not be given ade­quate health care for reili­gious rea­sons.
    They prey on the weak minded and poor, promis­ing a heaven they will never expe­ri­ence. When was the last time a Muslim orga­ni­za­tion helped with relief for a dis­as­ter, par­til­cu­larly one in the US? NEVER. How many mil­lions of peo­ple have we helped over the years with human­i­tar­ian aid, money and health care when pos­si­ble? COUNTLESS. The only resem­b­lence to fas­cism our ops in Iraq have is that we will do what we have to ensure our lib­er­ties are not com­pro­mised by some lunatic.
    Give peace a chance, then kill them all and let God sort them out

    Reply
  23. Rick says:
    February 5, 2007 at 11:07 pm

    Personally, my prefer­ance is if these coun­tries really want a nuke mis­sile, let’s send them one or two if we feel a sec­ond one is needed. AIR MAIL!!SPECIAL DELIVERY!! RUSH
    If we really want to open the doors of diplo­macy we should offer the unre­spon­sive scroundels the oppor­tu­nity to recieve the ulti­mate they desire.
    As for Iraq, years late, and 500 100lb shells of mus­tard and blis­ter agent chem­i­cal agents sounds like WMDs to me.
    Has any­one yet come up with the cargo of heavy­loaded trains in the mid­dle of the night into Syria? (As our troops entered the other end of the coun­try)
    Diplomacy is dead if we don’t show a strong hand. Offer a weak limp wristed hand, and they will dis­dain the offer and tromp all over it given the chance.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Sexing up the Headline
      a href="http://www.game4pow er.com">Buy wow...
      buy wow  gold
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage