One of the biggest homeland security nightmares is a nuke, smuggled aboard a shipping container. Today, port authorities “scan containers for illicit radioactive materials ashore,” New Scientist notes. But “to avoid delaying shipments… detectors generally have no longer than 1 minute to do their work, which is not always long enough.“
One possible solution, from MIT’s Richard Lanza: hide radiation detectors “inside ordinary shipping containers and sent [them] around the world with other cargo. These covert detectors would spot high-energy gamma rays given off by plutonium or HEU, which cannot easily be shielded.”
Lanza proposes using detectors consisting of inorganic crystal scintillators that emit photons when hit by gamma rays. Each emitted photon has a different energy level depending on the isotope the gamma rays come from, allowing the isotope to be identified.
Lanza has made a detector with an array of scintillators behind a mask pierced with holes. Gamma rays passing through a hole would excite one of the scintillators, causing it to emit a photon. He has shown that this can be used to generate an image of a radiation source, allowing the source to be located.
“The technology certainly has merit,” one radiation detection specialist, working for the government, tells Defense Tech. And “the Coast Guard, [along] with Customs and Border Patrol, has been considering the use of ‘sticky pagers’: small boxes that would clamp on a container out of, say, Antwerp, and would take a continuous 1-week reading of the contents of the container as it’s shipped across the ocean.”
Obviously, you’d be able to get a very good reading of the half of the container nearest the detector, but the minimum detectable activity might be pretty bad near the far side.
I don’t know of any specific “sticky pager” development programs going on within DHS [Department of Homeland Security] (including the Coast Guard) right now, but just because I don’t know about it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. There is interest, though — there were a few presentations on this type of thing (mostly out of LANL [Los Alamos]) at the winter meeting of the American Nuclear Society.
Our expert does have a small, geeky quibble with the New Scientist story, however. The article keeps talking about “U-232″ and how its radiation would “penetrate 22 metres of cargo on average.” First of all, U-232 isn’t really used in nuclear weapons — that’d be another isotope, U-235. And U-232’s penetration? More like 22 centimeters. Plus, New Scientist: note the spelling of “meters,” ok? That’s an American-built Internet you’re publishing to. We expect things to be spelled our way.
{ 18 comments… read them below or add one }
Given that New Scientist is based in London, I’d hardly expect them to have American spellings on meters. It’s like expecting the New York Times to have a cricket column. It seems to be an especially minor (and oddly US-centric) quibble when you take into account that the United States doesn’t even use the metric system, so it’s of little importance anyway.
Dude, it’s a joke. Relax.
Don’t you mean “Its an american built series of tubes you are publishing to”
The U-232 reference may not actually have been a typo. Of U-235, U-238, and U-232, the latter has been shown to be the easiest to detect in shielded nuclear materials.
While U-232 itself may not release penetrating gamma rays, one of its daughter (decay) products emits an extremely penetrating ray, which makes it relatively easy to detect compared to other nuclear materials. That said, in nuclear materials U-232 is not always present in large enough quantities to be detectable.
Another issue with detectors like this, however, is that many of the gamma rays emitted by nuclear materials are also produced by natural sources. For example, if I recall correctly bananas have the same gamma ray signature as some nuclear materials. The article makes no mention of software or other countermeasures to adress this problem.
This incidentally applies to the gamma ray frequency emitted by U-232 decay products — the same frequency is also present in natural background radiation. See http://www.nti.org/e_research/cnwm/overview/technical5.asp
According to this paper -
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006SPIE.6213E..12P
on “Comparison of shielded uranium passive gamma-ray detection methods”,
“The most detectable signal is the 2.614 MeV emission from U-232 contamination if present at a level greater than tens of parts per trillion. ”
And I think you’ll find this World Wide Web is the work of Tim Berners-Lee from this side of the pond, so that’ll be Metres spelled the correct way. :)
Sigh. The strong signature of U-232 comes from one of its eventual daughters, Thallium 208. Unfortunately, Thallium 208 is also a daughter of naturally occuring (and very common in welding rods, lantern mantles, and now valve seats in car engines) Thorium 232.
So, if you see the 2614 gamma, you can’t be sure if you’re looking at U-232 (unlikely) or Tl-208 (likely). There is other signal processing that has to occur to distinguish the two, and that relies on much lower energy gammas.
Because there were many people asked me that borrow some cronous gold to buy medicine.
So I take my all cheap kamas to help you, because it is unworthy much money.
Given that New Scientist is based in London, I’d hardly expect them to have American spellings on meters. It’s like expecting the New York Times to have a cricket column. It seems to be an especially minor (and oddly US-centric) quibble when you take into account that the United States doesn’t even use the metric system, so it’s of little importance anyway.
I want to forget you, but I cannot achieve, see the computer and I remember you, see my cheap imvu credits that I remember you once again.
Actually I hoped that other come to buy mabinogi gold for their hurts.
However, if it is also under the free name, charge the massive fee to blackmail us, let us buy Hellgate Palladium to continue this game, I will not play this game forever.
If your attitude to me can be slightly good, I will be having much happiness, although I only was 89 levels and I only have some cheap Lord of the Rings Gold
Master, I am really very think of you, what a pity that we as if already parted forever. Now, I buy Habbo gold for your come back.
you love life ?100 – – class happy line ?-007 ?
???you love life?????????????100?????????????? -????????-??????????????????????????????????????????class??????????????happy line??????????????????????-007?????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????
buy cheap nokia n95 experience without nokia mobile learning is better than learning without excperi-ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose headphones is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the apple touch past. http://www.leadsoftstore.com/