DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Eye on China » Satellite Killer’s Big Impact

Satellite Killer’s Big Impact

There’s been immediate fallout — both physical and political — from China’s satellite killer test.
Debris from the orbital collision has already been spotted, the M-T Milcom blog notes. “As of this writing NORAD has officially cataloged 32 objects… that now pollute a vital area of space (sun-synchronous polar orbit).” The picture to the right is of a few of ‘em.
sat_orbits005.jpg“There are over 125 satellites that operate in this portion of space,” the M-T blog observes. Those include reconnaissance satellites, like the Lacrosse and Advanced Keyhole orbiters, as well as weather-monitors, like the Defense Meteorological Satellites Program series. In other words, this test directly affects the American military’s ability look for terrorist hideouts, and survey a potential battlefield. These are not small matters. “Our space assets are the first asset on the scene,” GlobalSecurity.org’s John Pike tells the AP. “They are absolutely central to why we are a superpower — a signature component to America’s style of warfare.“
Frequent Defense Tech commenter Robot Economist, now with his own blog, warns that “this situation has the potential of becoming the next Katyusha rocket or IED problem for the United States.” Even the International Space Station could be at risk. That said, RE reminds us that “it is unlikely that [China’s] success… translates into any sort of immediately fieldable capability.”

If the spotty record of our ground-based missile interceptors demonstrate anything, it is the difficulty of intercepting even predictable space targets… [And] the Chinese had a pretty good handicap on this test.

Robert Farley sees the anti-satellite trial as “first and foremost… a deterrent move aimed at the United States.”

The US military isn’t completely dependent on spy satellites (in case of war, the Taiwan Straits would be overflown by enough spy and communications aircraft to make the satellites redundant), but destroying them is a way of chipping away at US capability, and thus indicating that China can inflict real costs in case of a US intervention in a militarized China-Taiwan dispute. The public way in which the Chinese have carried out this test, as well as earlier “blinding” tests, and the recent submarine-stalks-carrier debacle indicates to me that they’re as serious as possible about showing the US their capabilities, which is key to a deterrent strategy. Also, Chinese anti-satellite capabilities don’t have to be targeted against US military satellites; the Chinese may threaten commercial satellites as well, which would help to metastasize the costs of any US intervention.

No wonder, then, that governments around the world are protesting the move. With one exception, apparently: Russia. Arms Control Wonk notes…

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov commented to reporters that he has heard reports of the Chinese test, but thinks that the rumors are quite abstract and are exaggerated.
In an interview, vice-preseident of the Russian Academy of geopolitcal affairs, General Leonid Ivashov, said that he thinks the Chinese used Russian developments for making their antisatellite missiles.

How do you think this is going to play out? Speak up!
ALSO:
* China Tests Satellite Killer?
* China Space Attack: Unstoppable
* Beijing’s Next-Gen Sat Strike
* Why Did China Smack the Sat?
* China Sat-Killer Not Yet Weapons Grade?
* Who Ordered the Satellite Strike?

Share |

January 19th, 2007 | Eye on China, Space | 340048 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/01/19/satellite-killers-big-impact/Satellite+Killer%27s+Big+Impact2007-01-19+17%3A07%3A55hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 01/19/07 | Inside the Mind Control Conspiracy, Part II » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Rob says:
    January 19, 2007 at 12:30 pm

    How many more ‘tests’ do they have to conduct to successfully block an orbit?

    Reply
  2. Eric Hundman says:
    January 19, 2007 at 12:35 pm

    Are any readers competent to evaluate how much a new clump of debris ups the likelihood of a collision with existing satellites? I’d guess the likelihood is still pretty low, but I am no expert.

    Reply
  3. JH says:
    January 19, 2007 at 3:23 pm

    I say if some of this commie space trash damages or even kills something or someone American (Sat, Shuttle, Astronaut,) we places some real sanctions on them.

    Reply
  4. MinorRipper says:
    January 19, 2007 at 4:33 pm

    Wait a minute, I thought we (the USA) were the only ones in the world allowed to do stuff like this??!! I thought space belonged to us?
    http://​www​.minor​-ripper​.blogspot​.com

    Reply
  5. Stephen says:
    January 19, 2007 at 5:22 pm

    I unfortunately believe that these are small steps that will one day eventually lead us to go to war with china and also be a set up for the next world war.

    Reply
  6. Yeong says:
    January 19, 2007 at 5:23 pm

    Hey, just a high-tech warfare! Just watch which side got a better research lab and brain!! I would not bid any money on China in the long run.

    Reply
  7. Sean Collins says:
    January 19, 2007 at 6:20 pm

    All our enemies are now steppong forward. First it was North Korea followed by Iran with their nuclear programs and now China. They consider the U.S. to be so bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan that we will be unable to stop them. This war against terrorism is fixing to expand into a world war.

    Reply
  8. Spaceman Spiff says:
    January 19, 2007 at 6:49 pm

    What if the real purpose of the weapon turns out to be filling a much needed orbit with “test” debris, thus denying the U.S. unobstructed usage for the near future. Showering American spy satellites with “accidental” test debris could be very hard to pinpoint as an act of war.

    Reply
  9. Robot Economist says:
    January 19, 2007 at 8:02 pm

    Eric — In response to your question, I don’t think this test will make huge waves in low earth orbit.
    SPACETRACK has logged only 40 >10cm pieces so far, but the space geeks over at ACW have calculated there could be up to 800 >10cm pieces. Given that there already is an estimate 10,000 pieces of debris that size already out there in LEO, even this worst case scenario only represents an 8% increase in an already crowded sky.
    As for specific sat systems, FY-1C was in a pretty popular orbit, but it was too low to have a significant impact on the U.S.‘s GPS or Lacrosse constellations. I’m not really sure where most of our keyhole and optical imagery satellites are nowadays though.

    Reply
  10. Lee Terry says:
    January 19, 2007 at 10:12 pm

    The best defensive move is an offensive move. Knock out all their works they’ve put up, and tell the coniving theives to shut up..or put up.
    I’ve read official works from people in charge in China, what they plan to do with us within 5
    years.

    Reply
  11. no one in particular says:
    January 19, 2007 at 11:31 pm

    China’s multiple public statements about “weaponizing space”, and the lack of UN or international controls restricting the use of military force in space makes this episode even more intriguing. What if, for instance, the Chinese are seeking to prompt international attention and gain international support for restrictions to be placed against the use of military force against objects in orbit?

    Reply
  12. no one in particular says:
    January 19, 2007 at 11:35 pm

    for more: http://​cns​.miis​.edu/​r​e​s​e​a​r​c​h​/​s​p​a​c​e​/​c​h​i​n​a​/​a​r​m​s​.​htm

    Reply
  13. frank says:
    January 19, 2007 at 11:40 pm

    well everybody that has a gps and any other gadgets, better start remmebering how the oldfashion way.

    Reply
  14. Ken says:
    January 20, 2007 at 2:40 am

    JEFF: You are absolutely correct. I think Klinton should be tried as a traitor, but he will not get a conviction in the press like he would have if he had been a Conservative Republican. The Klintons are left over dope smoking flower children from the 60’s who think sharing sensitive info with our enemies levels the playing field, keeping our enemies from being insecure and thus more trigger happy. Sadly, this is the way many liberals think. They don’t understand the concept of peace through superior fire power. Klinton is a traitor egged on by his wild-eyed co-conspirator wife.

    Reply
  15. bob D. says:
    January 20, 2007 at 10:51 am

    I’m not scientifically astute enough to comment on the technological or military ramifications of this. I do know however, that this threatening technology was funded by the billions of dollars worth of “trinkets” the American consumer “junkies” buy from this very scary nation​.So Americans, keep buying this unneccessary bric-a-brac and someday you’ll be digging through the rubble that was once your home looking for it.

    Reply
  16. dumb and dumber says:
    January 20, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    I do not think there will be any more tests from China. A successful one is enough to bring the Us back to the negiotiation table for “restrictions” on “weaponizing space” (Bush has been refusing to cooperate with the world on this matter). In addition, I do think that China is a future strategic partner of the US, not an enemy.

    Reply
  17. S1to7 says:
    January 21, 2007 at 8:27 am

    See, full of Jealeous and Prejudice and selfish
    “say if some of this commie space trash damages or even kills something or someone American (Sat, Shuttle, Astronaut,) we places some real sanctions on them“
    “How many more ‘tests’ do they have to conduct to successfully block an orbit?”——Why don’t you ask the US government 20 years ago when they first carry out the satellite killing scheme.
    “Wait a minute, I thought we (the USA) were the only ones in the world allowed to do stuff like this??!! I thought space belonged to us?”———American think they are superior, and others only Apes.
    “I unfortunately believe that these are small steps that will one day eventually lead us to go to war with china and also be a set up for the next world war”——What makes you think China will start war? In the past, the European start WWI, Germen Italy and Japan Start WWII, now only US Start War. China, NEVER.
    .……
    .……
    .……
    .…… etc
    Please THINK!!

    Reply
  18. lh9 says:
    January 21, 2007 at 2:28 pm

    Our system is nothing after this test of China.
    The best thing we can do is work with China and don’t involve in the issue related with TainWan.

    Reply
  19. Sam's Club says:
    January 22, 2007 at 3:05 pm

    Hi Men, calm down. Nothing will happen and it is just a test—still at the low level. We, America, did much more than that.……

    Reply
  20. Luckynumber13 says:
    January 24, 2007 at 2:42 pm

    This is all very ridiculous. I enjoy browsing through news and reading the various sleght of hand delusions that we are fed through the media, but if any decently rational human being considers either China or America or their material wealth(ie satellites, weapons) our primary concern is sadly “disillusioned”.
    On the first note, American military technology renders our government the ability to manipulate and control any satellite in the sky. If China knocks out ours, we can simply take over theirs or any other for that matter. In fact, some of our most valuable “extraterrestrial” assets belong to other nations.
    Secondly, as described in the article, while our current active systems rely on satellites, our secondary systems are well designed to function in the absense of our current satellite system.
    Thirdly, our militry and even “nonmilitary” satellites possess active weapon systems to target and eliminate any stray debris that might threaten other satellites in orbit. The very fact that CHinas missils hit anything at all is evidence that the US Government allowed it to happen. Don’t forget that we excersise dominate power in almost every potential theatre of modern warfare. Nothing enters or leaves space without out our expressed permission or our “looking the other way.” IF the destroyed satellite DOES BY CHANCE bring down an AMerican satellite, then it will be a direct result of American acceptibilty.
    Fourth. Our entire global infrastructure is set up entirely contrary to what we are allowed to see. Our relationships with China, Russia, N. Korea, Europe, Iraq/middleeast, etc. have absolutely nothing to do with communism, Islamic fascism, or national factions fighting for global supremecy. This is strictly the conclusin of 100 years of regulated propaganda…a fact that can be proven thousands of times over in a thousand different arenas. Wake up world. The facts are crystal clear and written upon every aspect of our modern existence. Quit believing what they tell you and start believing what actually makes sense!!!
    Please feel free to email me or to either compare opinions or to further seek out the truth. I don’t have all the answers, but I damn sure don’t waste my time with all of the Lies.
    Remember the numbers 13, 12, 10,9, 11, 32, 33, 96, 666 and 18. You will see alot more of them in the future

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
    • Cancel Cyber Command
    • Rough Week for F-35
    • Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer (Part 3)
    Recent Comments
    • Multicam on the Loose
      The New Zealand SAS wear multicam in Afghanistan, their pictures...
      Pat Griffith
    • Rough Week for F-35
      Why don't we give congress and the senate a raise then they can...
      CHOPS
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Part 2 An excellent example is the habit of labling the JSF...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      An excellent example is the habit of labling the JSF program as...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      An excellent example is the habit of labling the JSF program as...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Part 2 An excellent example is the habit of labling the JSF...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Part 1 One of the problems with the 'whole story' is...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
      And that is exactly why Vietnam is now starting to...
      Tim
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Not to cavil, but the F-35 program cost will not breach the...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Re: Q1 thru Q4: Do you know if there's a paper trail to show...
      TMB
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage