DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Pain Ray: Keep Waiting

Pain Ray: Keep Waiting

On Monday night, the Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Directorate told guys like David Hambling and me that we were welcome to come check out its microwave-ish pain ray — provided we could make it to the middle of Georgia on 36 hours’ notice. It wasn’t exactly the most serious offer, for fellows in London and in L.A. And it’s one of several reasons why I decided not to blog about the demonstration, when word about it hit the wires yesterday.
But New Scientist did pick up on one interesting tidbit: Theodore Barna, an assistant deputy undersecretary of defense for advanced systems and concepts told Reuters that “We expect the services to add it to their tool kit. And that could happen as early as 2010.” (Here’s a promo vid for the system.)

Three years from now, hunh? Well, we’ll see. For years and years, there have been promises that the pain ray (or “Active Denial System” if you prefer) was just about to be rolled out to the field. Thirteen months ago, for example, the 18th Military Police Brigade requested ADS “to help ‘suppress’ insurgent attacks and quell prison uprisings.” The head of the Army’s Rapid Equipping Force said, after nearly 10,000 trial shots, the system was good to go. $30 million was allocated to outfitting three fighting vehicles with pain rays.
But the military still can’t shake fears about ADS, as Hambling so ably noted last month. As Hambling put it, “the big problem is not with the technology, which seems to work fine. The problem is getting people to accept it. Everyone is still worried the millimeter-wave beam is going to give them cancer, melt their eyeballs or make them sterile.“
Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne didn’t help matters much when he suggested the pain ray should be zapping crowds here in the U.S. before it blasted any Iraqis.
Will Americans really be any more comfortable with that, a few years from now?

Share |

January 26th, 2007 | Lasers and Ray Guns | 342511 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/01/26/pain-ray-keep-waiting/Pain+Ray%3A+Keep+Waiting2007-01-26+08%3A16%3A52hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Next-Gen Ray Gun: Laser, Microwave Combo? | Rapid Fire 01/26/07 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Foreign.Boy says:
    January 26, 2007 at 1:20 am

    I’m not from the US so I say test on all the Americians you want :P

    Reply
  2. Evan says:
    January 26, 2007 at 8:25 am

    I officially volunteer to be an emergency DT correspondent next time you’re invited to a demonstration here in Georgia.

    Reply
  3. Allen Thomson says:
    January 26, 2007 at 9:59 am

    Isn’t this “pain ray” actually a heat ray? That is, it seems to produce pain not by neural induction or some such, but by straightforwardly heating up a very thin layer of epidermis.
    What happens if it’s kept trained on someone for more than the recommended length of time? Does it produce blisters or worse? If not, why not?

    Reply
  4. Chris says:
    January 26, 2007 at 10:59 am

    This is amazing stuff. There was an article about it in Navy Times.

    Reply
  5. Vincente says:
    January 26, 2007 at 11:05 am

    I was zapped by this thing at a convention last year, and I can tell you it works.
    As for the Wynne comment, this may sound cliche, but I was at the roundtable where he made those comments and I’m not going to say any names here, but a certain AP reporter took what he said and wrapped it around a pole of out of context. Unfortunately, this happens more often than I’d like to think it does.
    V

    Reply
  6. Macaca says:
    January 26, 2007 at 11:54 am

    Im still wondering what 10 minutes of full exposure to the pain ray will do to a human. If just a few seconds is enough to let most rioters disperse, what will 10 minutes do to somebody who cant run away because of him (for instance) being ducktaped to a pole?
    And if it heats the upper layer of your skin like they say, then what does it do to eyeballs? Call me skicko, but i’d also like to note the skin on the males scrotum is very thin.
    Im really not sure on this pain ray thing.. it can be very usefull, yes, but the potential for human suffering and a total publicity disaster is enormous. And dont say that wont happen: Abu-Grahib and some other cases show that in such big organisation as the military there’ll allways be some idiot who doesnt follow the rules.

    Reply
  7. Target says:
    January 27, 2007 at 11:04 am

    Ratheon is already selling these devices — Google Raytheon Silent Guardian to get their product descriptions and other reviews.
    These weapons threaten our freedom in the present as well as the future.
    Target at ElectronicElephants dot com

    Reply
  8. mags says:
    January 29, 2007 at 2:17 am

    Don

    Reply
  9. Marine says:
    May 3, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    I AM from the US, so I say test it on all the foreigners (Iraqis first) that we want.

    Reply
  10. anonymous says:
    July 30, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    This is a dual purpose weapon. Critical flluid cells and organs can be made the target to neutralize a person in civilian or military.

    Reply
  11. 800HighTech says:
    March 19, 2008 at 3:47 am

    Great device, lets hope the military can shake these fears regarding ADS and get controlling those rowdy crowds with ease.…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      You are senile. The...
      jaythehistorian
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      F-35 has not been canceled…The F-22 has. Alternate engine...
      Robert
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Is General Dynamics LCS still in the...
      Wildcard
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      NLOS-PAM is important to the LCS for some...
      Will
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Well, that's a lot more stable than any AV-8B...
      Cranky Observer
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Isn't this the reason why the Navy went with a...
      @Earlydawn
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      It's a reduction in spending compared with...
      gmanaz
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Perfect, just in time for the program's cancellation.
      John
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I don't doubt that...
      Wildcard
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      It looked like a Transformer at the end!
      Wes
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage