DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Space » Pentagon’s Plans for “Space Control”

Pentagon’s Plans for “Space Control”

Long before the China launched its anti-satellite weapon, the U.S. military had an array of plans in place to research and develop technologies for combat in space. One of the best ways to track those plans is to check out the so-called budget “justification” documents the Defense Department puts out each year with its budget request to Congress.

space_fence.JPGMost of the money for space capabilities is in the Air Force budget, and space weapons funding now resides almost entirely in the “research, development, test and evaluation” portion of that budget. For those who want to follow along at home, the space-fight material is found in “Air Force RDT&E Volume II,” pages 567–577 and 879–896.

Those two sets of pages contain the budget numbers, descriptions and even schedules for the Air Force’s “Space Control Technology” and “Counterspace Systems” programs, respectively.

The Air Force requested $27 million for “Space Control Technology” R&D in fiscal year 2007, and $47 million for developing and acquiring the first “Counterspace Systems” that will deployed, such as the “Counter Satellite Communications System” and the “Rapid Identificaiton Detection and Reporting System,” or RAIDRS.

The Air Force documents define “Space Control Technology” as systems aimed at “Space Situational Awareness (SSA), Defensive Counterspace (DCS), and Offensive Counterspace (OCS).”

SSA includes “monitoring, detecting, identifying, tracking, assessing, verifying, categorizing, and characterizing, objects and events in space,” the documents state. “DCS includes defensive activities to protect U.S. and friendly space-systems assets, resources, and operations from enemy attempts to negate or interfere … [or] use U.S. space systems and services for purposes hostile to U.S. national security interests. OCS activities disrupt, deny, degrade or destroy space systems, or the information they provide, which may be used for purposes hostile to U.S. national security interests. Consistent with DOD policy, the negation efforts of this program currently focus on negation technologies which have temporary, localized, and reversible effects.”

While the Space Control Technology program funds early-stage research and technology development, the Counterspace Systems program “supports the conduct of critical planning, technology insertion, and system acquisition in support of Air Force space control systems and associated command and control development to meet current and future military space control needs.”

In other words, technologies that are nearing the point of deployment as weapon systems are funded in the Counterspace Systems program. That’s the section of the budget where you’ll find the Air Force’s plans for the three space weapons that are closest to becoming reality. Here’s what the Air Force says about the purposes of these specific systems, and when they’ll be operational:


Counter Satellite Communications System
: “… mobile/transportable counter satellite communications capabilities and associated command and control.… Includes architecture engineering, system hardware design and development, software design and integration, testing and procurement of capabilities to provide disruption of satellite communications signals in response to USSTRATCOM requirements.”

The budget documents indicate “first-generation” counter satellite communications capabilities are already in place, while the “second-generation” capability will be built by 2011.

Rapid Identification Detection and Reporting System (RAIDRS): ” … provide[s] attack warning, threat identification and characterization, and rapid mission impact assessments of U.S. space systems. This effort will investigate and implement the technical architecture, operational concept, support concept, training, verification (test), and deployment of a Rapid Attack Identification Detection and Reporting System (RAIDRS). Incremental capability deliveries are planned.”

“Spiral 1″ of RAIDRS will reach “initial operational capability” toward the end of this year, while “full operational capability” will occur at the beginning of 2010, according to the budget documents. Air Force contractors are scheduled to begin building “Spiral 2″ in 2011.

Offensive Counterspace Command and Control (OCS C2): “This effort supports the development of command and control and mission planning capabilities in support of the fielding and employment of Offensive Counterspace (OCS) Systems. It provides for the integration and development of collaborative tools to link deployable OCS systems with Joint Warfighting C2 systems and to enable integrated planning and execution of the OCS mission. Developed capabilities will be integrated into the Space C2 Weapon System / Combatant Commanders’ Integrated Command and Control System (CCIC2S).”

Delivery of the first OCS C2 capability will occur in 2008, according to the Air Force budget documents.

– Hampton Stephens, editor of World Politics Watch.
ALSO:
* China Tests Satellite Killer?
* China Space Attack: Unstoppable
* Beijing’s Next-Gen Sat Strike
* Satellite Killer’s Big Impact
* Why Did China Smack the Sat?
* Who Ordered the Satellite Strike?
* China Cops to Sat Kill

Share |

January 26th, 2007 | Space | 34283 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/01/26/pentagons-plans-for-space-control/Pentagon%27s+Plans+for+%22Space+Control%222007-01-26+21%3A54%3A08Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Iran’s “Sat Launch” No Sure Thing | Rapid Fire 01/27/07 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Is someone listening says:
    January 27, 2007 at 7:59 am

    As far As Afganistan intead of spraying the poppy fields why not genetically alter the poppy seed so that it will not produce at all and introduce that genetically modified poppy in the fields which is a factor that we can use in stopping the funding of terrorist and the Taliban if we are really serious about this. It would be a drop in the bucket.

    Reply
  2. Camp says:
    January 27, 2007 at 11:30 am

    What ever happened to the “Stealth Spy Satellite” & all of the hoopla Congress was having with it? Eh.. maybe it disappeared.
    “New Stealth Spy Satellite Debated on Hill“
    http://​www​.globalsecurity​.org/​o​r​g​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​4​/​0​4​1​2​1​1​-​m​i​s​t​y​.​htm

    Reply
  3. Brandon J says:
    January 28, 2007 at 1:41 pm

    I also read that Congress wasn’t too happy about the R&D price tag the Air Force recently asked for. The out-of-cycle expenses really turned some heads.
    ***Shame-less plug***
    I created a blog to help military members with their finances. I’m in the Air Force and wanted to help other military members out. I was wondering if we could exchange links. Thanks.
    Brandon J
    http://​moneyformilitary​.blogspot​.com or e-mail me at bjone6@gmail.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      My personal experience being on the ground in less...
      shark60
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      it wont make any differance what type...
      Roy M Brown
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Estimates on unit cost for new F-22s are at...
      Armchair Warlord
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Deal [;-)
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Hmmm. I suspect either: 1. It is raining/snowing...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Sorry, previous post meant to say the F16s were to be...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      There will be a reduced buy to save costs. That was...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      We shouldn't even be using STOVL fighters anymore....
      Sean
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes, but the 135 million price for the F35 factors in...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes because USAF logic says older is bad, no matter how...
      Why
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage