DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Pain Ray’s Burning Questions

Pain Ray’s Burning Questions

When con­tro­ver­sial new mil­i­tary tools are being rolled out, per­cep­tions often mat­ter more than real­ity. Take the Active Denial System, the millimeter-​​wave pain ray devel­oped by the Air Force. The weapon’s effects are now pretty well under­stood by mil­i­tary researchers. But for the aver­age per­son, it’s been nearly impos­si­ble to sort through the range of claims and counter-​​claims sur­round­ing the sys­tem. And these ques­tions could come back to haunt the American gov­ern­ment, if and when they ever deploy the sys­tem.
ads new.jpgI was pow­er­fully reminded of this by the recent case of Raul Castells.
Raul Castells is a con­tro­ver­sial social activist in Argentina. In 2004 he organ­ised a march on McDonalds ; in March 2006 he opened a com­mu­nity kitchen pro­vid­ing free food for poor peo­ple in Puerto Madero, a swish rede­vel­oped dock area. Located oppo­site the Hilton Hotel, it car­ried the slo­gan “We are fight­ing for an Argentina in which the dogs of the rich don’t eat bet­ter than the chil­dren of the poor”.
This behav­ior has angered some of his oppo­nents in Argentina.
On December 12th, Castells was in a scuf­fle with the police which resulted in his being hos­pi­talised with seri­ous burns over 20% of his body.
I was vic­tim of a new Police weapon, a type of flame thrower, said Castells (my trans­la­tion). In fact, he was not sure if it was a flamethrower,a giant lighter or some­thing else. Others claim that rub­ber bul­lets were fired at them after they went to help the burn­ing man.
The police dis­pute the account given by Castells and his fol­low­ers, say­ing that he was hit by a molo­tov cock­tail thrown by one of his own sup­port­ers.
The Buenosairean and Federal Police do not use flame throw­ers, said a police spokesman, rea­son­ably enough.
My first guess was that this was an acci­dent, and that Castells had been hit with pep­per spray which had been acci­den­tally ignited. Such sprays use a flam­ma­ble alco­hol base; non-​​flammable alter­na­tives have been rejected on grounds of safety, effec­tive­ness and envi­ron­men­tal dam­age. However, the police deny using pep­per spray in the encounter.
This leaves two com­pletely opposed ver­sions of what hap­pened. Who do you believe, the police or the pro­test­ers? While the days of the dirty war and crit­ics of the gov­ern­ment being ‘dis­ap­peared’ have long gone, the police are not uni­ver­sally trusted and offi­cers have been con­victed of extra-​​judicial exe­cu­tions of pro­test­ers as recently as 2002.
Im not sug­gest­ing that the Argentine police are covertly field-​​testing an Active Denial sys­tem (though a portable ver­sion for police use was under devel­op­ment, and the Argentine police are quite inno­v­a­tive, being the first to adopt the elec­tric cat­tle prod in the 1930s ). But when the ADS is employed, peo­ple will turn up on CNN claim­ing to be vic­tims, and show­ing off sun­burn, lep­rosy, blis­ters and every other skin con­di­tion ever seen. Who will you believe? More impor­tantly, who will the local pop­u­la­tion believe?
Dr Juergen Altmann sug­gests that pro­longed expo­sure would likely pro­duce high tem­per­a­tures result­ing in blis­ter­ing over the entire exposed sur­face of the body. Clearly there is a risk, but re-​​radiation of heat out­wards, and con­duc­tion of heat inwards will pre­vent the tem­per­a­ture from ris­ing indef­i­nitely. I have great respect for Dr Altmanns tech­ni­cal knowl­edge in mat­ters non­lethal, but the lack of this kind of injury dur­ing exten­sive test­ing leads me to sus­pect that the ADS is (rel­a­tively) safe.
Consider: if you step into warm sun from an air con­di­tioned room, in a few sec­onds your skin tem­per­a­ture shoots up sev­eral degrees. This does not mean the solar heat­ing will cause you to burst into flames if you remain for a few more min­utes.
But who is really right? Until ques­tions like this can be resolved, any deploy­ment of Active Denial tech­nol­ogy is going to be a polit­i­cal mine­field.
– David Hambling

Share |

February 5th, 2007 | Lasers and Ray Guns, Less-lethal | 345510 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/02/05/pain-rays-burning-questions/Pain+Ray%27s+Burning+Questions2007-02-05+15%3A45%3A33david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Chewbacca Arrested in Hollywood! | Dumber Bot = Happier Soldier » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nicholas Weaver says:
    February 5, 2007 at 11:10 am

    Two ques­tions:
    Did you get a chance to feel it dur­ing the recent demo day?
    Any luck on try­ing to get it as a real­ity show? I’m think­ing the Jackass crew would make great tar­gets. Or per­haps as part of the Surreal Life games or some­thing like that (noth­ing like nuk­ing a D-​​list celebrity for humor value).

    Reply
  2. Nicholas Weaver says:
    February 5, 2007 at 11:12 am

    Actually, one other pos­si­bil­ity for your TV idea:
    Try to get the Mythbusters to play with it. Imagine them try­ing to fry pigs, zap­ping each other, etc etc etc etc etc.

    Reply
  3. David Hambling says:
    February 5, 2007 at 3:17 pm

    I couldn’t make it to Georgia on short notice, so I missed the event. In any case, I am a lit­tle cyn­i­cal about staged events. (I guess we have all seen prod­ucts which worked won­der­fully in the demon­sta­tion, but when you try them your­self…)
    I have no doubt that the ADS will be com­pletely safe when used as directed in the sort of sce­nar­ios it is designed for.
    The big ques­tion is what hap­pens when it is used in a real envi­ron­ment with­out the con­trols and calm state of mind that pre­vail in a demon­stra­tion. It will prob­a­bly be safe and effec­tive — the USAF are not idiots and they have spent a lot of time, money and effort ensur­ing that it is. What the scep­tics like Dr Altmann would like to see is inde­pen­dent test­ing and a relase of more tech­ni­cal infor­ma­tion than the Air Force is likely to pro­vide.
    So until then, it will be like the Castells case: (alleged) victim’s word against (alleged) perpetrator.

    Reply
  4. Phoenix Insurgent says:
    February 5, 2007 at 5:11 pm

    Great blog, by the way. I check it almost every day.
    As for this new tech­nol­ogy, I want to point out that we should not for­get the polit­i­cal con­text in which it has been devel­oped and will be deployed: namely, global cap­i­tal­ism and the attempt by a small elite to dom­i­nate the planet and its peo­ples. So, it should be said that increased power and flex­i­bil­ity in the arse­nals of the police and mil­i­tary ought to be opposed because it increases the abil­ity of the rul­ing class to project its power and, there­fore, to achieve its goals. Focusing on the alleged reduced lethal­ity of the weapon obscures the goals of the class that devel­oped it.
    This tech­nol­ogy is woe­fully in need of broader debate than the main­stream media is capa­ble of pro­vid­ing. So, at the risk of awk­wardly pimp­ing my own work, I sug­gest this piece I wrote on the tech­nol­ogy at my own blog.
    All seri­ous­ness aside for a moment, I live in Phoenix and I have to won­der if this weapon will have any effect at all in the sum­mer (other than per­haps caus­ing a refresh­ing breeze)…
    The army’s non-​​lethal impe­ri­al­ism
    http://​phoenix​in​sur​gent​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​7​/​0​1​/​a​r​m​y​s​-​n​o​n​-​l​e​t​h​a​l​-​i​m​p​e​r​i​a​l​i​s​m​-​c​o​m​i​n​g​.​h​tml

    Reply
  5. Dr. Curiosity says:
    February 5, 2007 at 5:45 pm

    I find myself won­der­ing how well it would work in a “pulsed” mode, like the shock from an elec­tric fence. That might be enough of a warn­ing to get peo­ple to move out of an area while less­en­ing the over­all inten­sity of the pain they feel.
    Of course, this does to some extent rely on the how quickly the pain sen­sa­tion cycles through the ner­vous sys­tem. They might have to tweak the fre­quency and pulse width to find an effec­tive level.

    Reply
  6. stephen russell says:
    December 28, 2007 at 11:28 pm

    Use this on US Mexican bor­der & next major riot.
    Or use in Prison riots.
    Good TrialRun Test.
    We need some sys­tem like this any­place.
    Give it a longer range:800 yards.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage