DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Giant Blimp Deflated; Laser Jet Delayed

Giant Blimp Deflated; Laser Jet Delayed

The big weapons — the destroyers, the aircraft carriers, and the stealth jets — all emerged pretty much unscathed in the Pentagon’s latest budget. Some of the more bleeding-edge projects weren’t so lucky. Especially at the Missile Defense Agency, which took about a half-billion dollar hit for fiscal year 2008.
HAA_alt.jpgTake the High-Altitude Airship, for instance. Just a year ago, the Pentagon handed Lockheed a $150 million contract to build the missile-spotting dirigible. No, it wouldn’t be 25 times bigger than the Goodyear Blimp, as originally planned. Nor would it be powered by lasers. But it would still be built to “hover above the jet stream at an altitude of 65,000 feet for months at a time.” That is, if major advances in solar panels, fuel cells, aerodynamic controls, and flexible materials could be overcome.
Lockheed won’t get the chance any time soon, however. The High Altitude Airship “has been canceled due to funding constraints,” according to the Missile Defense Agency. But get too distraught, blimp-lovers; the budget for the Aerostat Joint Program Office just jumped from $243 million to $481 mil.
The Airborne Laser — the modified 747, meant to zap missiles as they take off — still gets more than $500 million in the new budget. But its first live-fire test has been delayed, again. Originally scheduled for 2002, the blast has now been rescheduled for 2009, Inside Defense notes. The Laser Jet’s alternative — the “Kinetic Energy Interceptor,” a non-explosive interceptor missile — has been pared back, as well. There’s no longer a “kill vehicle,” or warhead, part to the program, Defense News observes. Instead, the KEI has been tweaked, to become a “common booster” for all sorts of missile interceptions.
There’s much, much, much more in this budget to explore. Expect lots of posts in the week to come.

Share |

February 6th, 2007 | Lasers and Ray Guns, Missiles, Money Money Money, Planes, Copters, Blimps | 346611 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/02/06/giant-blimp-deflated-laser-jet-delayed/Giant+Blimp+Deflated%3B+Laser+Jet+Delayed2007-02-06+17%3A51%3A08hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Pentagon Sued Over Milblog-Monitoring | Undead “Warrior” (Updated) » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. RTLM says:
    February 6, 2007 at 10:25 pm

    It would be a big mistake to impede the ABL. In addition to the capability of taking out ballistic missiles in boost phase, I believe it also has the capability to damage satellites in low Earth orbit. The air to air potential is there too. Air to ground as well. This system has renewed strategic value.
    **Note to Sen. Carl (The Penguin) Levin.

    Reply
  2. Joe Keary says:
    February 9, 2007 at 9:28 am

    The MDA has a number of projects for the three phases of Ballistic Missile Defense, many of which are in development. Ones that are “proven” (like the Patriot PAC-3, early versions of which covered MY back over in OIF), Aegis Cruisers and THAAD need to be given the lions share of funding and made operational to counter a potential DPRK threat. Similarly, detection systems need to be “green lighted” to enable us to accurately detect potential missile launches. While the ABL is a promising project, they would be “too few, too far dispersed” to counter multiple launches. So, lets focus our efforts on the “best projects” and funnel the austere budget to those that show the best and fastest return on investment. With so many “Boots on the Ground” in OEF/OIF, and the challenges of this Budget, MDA needs to bite the bullet and select the best of the best, and defer the rest!

    Reply
  3. Terry McCarty says:
    February 9, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    If the Veteran’s community (United Veteran Organizations) could convince the Orange County Board of Supervisors (California) to hand over the Blimp Hangar at LTA (Tustin USMC Air Base) we would have a large enough Hangar to house and preform maintenance on these proposed Giant Blimps. They are 1000 foot long, 300 foot wide, and 18 stories high. We want to preserve it as they were erected in 1943 to support our coastal defense. This is the largest wooden structure still standing which was (until recently) was in the National Resistry of Historical Buildings, however the Department of the Navy allowed it to be removed due to local political pressures from the City of Tustin and the O.C. Board of Supervisors. They turned down our $400,000,000.00 in redevelopment plans for their own plans and developers. Not Veteran friendly!

    Reply
  4. Rod says:
    February 12, 2007 at 1:14 am

    Giant Blimp !! Someone Paid money to build a
    Giant Blimp !! I sure hope they get Fired! A Blimp is a World-War-1 weapon ! Maybe they want to bring-Back the Horse & Wagon Too ! Maybe they can use the Horse & Wagon to Pull the “Black Powder Cannon !! No wonder the USA is running out of money.

    Reply
  5. Neil Whitney says:
    February 13, 2007 at 8:09 am

    Just who in the hell are we 3 Billion dollars worth of worried about? North Korea? Iran? Certainly not!!! Russia?? Not any more!
    ANY — I repeat — ANY launch of nuclear bearing missles would be detected by current defense mechanisms and disposed of LONG before it reached our shores — or any NATO nation for that matter! Why aren’t we hlding on to those “pork barrel” funds for Vets and anti-terrorist policing and things that are really needed? Another ludicrous waste of tax bucks.
    I worked for the VA for 9 years, and we were subjected to program and staffing cuts like crazy! Just so the politicians with stock in Lockheed rtc. could retire rich? Where’s MY retirement “golden umbrella”?? BULL!!!!

    Reply
  6. John Albright says:
    February 13, 2007 at 12:43 pm

    So the first shot taken by a would be enemy is to knock out the blimp. Then what?
    So I guess the pentagon will spend another few hundred million to protect the blimp.
    Aren’t we the guys who managed to keep the old USSR in check with it’s thousands of war heads because of the threat of massive retaliation? The ‘cover-and-duck’ appeased the older generation. Pull it out, dust it off and sell it to the kids as the way to protect onesself from misssles.

    Reply
  7. Neil says:
    March 25, 2007 at 5:10 pm

    Just in case anyone comes here this late:
    What’s the story on the Navy’s pursuit of FEL (Free-electron laser) technology as a weapon ray?
    My friends at “JLab” need to know — jobs depend on it.

    Reply
  8. S. Bendin says:
    April 30, 2007 at 10:23 am

    The HAA is prospect project. And Russia try to part in such program.
    Defense airships in stratosphere have to belong countries from G8.
    By the way, HAA may use not only for the defense programme. For ex., such platform will be useful for telecom., altitude semi-space tourism, base for astronauts’ halfway landing and renew onboard team, extremal parachute jumping etc.
    I hope projects of HAA have to stay program for wide world scientist and technologiest prospective association for man’s benefit

    Reply
  9. Michael Thomas says:
    July 3, 2007 at 8:43 pm

    Medusa: Space Age Weapon
    http://​www​.p2pnet​.net/​s​t​o​r​y​/​1​2​661

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      From a national security perspective we should do all we can to keep...
      mike
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Please define what is "best". Boeings plane is cheaper and...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      F4 was origionally a Navy Fighter, so coming up with a...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The US Navy was right to bypass congress and develop the...
      Tony C
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The fly-away cost of a F-22 is between 130 and...
      The Norwegian
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I reckon that the J-10 would be a good bet. Y'all...
      Chimp
    • Raptor Down (58-40)
      This story never gets old. This plane was never meant to be this...
      DeepThinker
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      um… they already have them. Hunters and...
      Buongi
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Interesting, though, from my experience, many...
      Buongi
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Not completely true-remember the Navy can be very picky...
      Chops
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage