DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Giant Blimp Deflated; Laser Jet Delayed

Giant Blimp Deflated; Laser Jet Delayed

The big weapons — the destroy­ers, the air­craft car­ri­ers, and the stealth jets — all emerged pretty much unscathed in the Pentagon’s lat­est bud­get. Some of the more bleeding-​​edge projects weren’t so lucky. Especially at the Missile Defense Agency, which took about a half-​​billion dol­lar hit for fis­cal year 2008.
HAA_alt.jpgTake the High-​​Altitude Airship, for instance. Just a year ago, the Pentagon handed Lockheed a $150 mil­lion con­tract to build the missile-​​spotting diri­gi­ble. No, it wouldn’t be 25 times big­ger than the Goodyear Blimp, as orig­i­nally planned. Nor would it be pow­ered by lasers. But it would still be built to “hover above the jet stream at an alti­tude of 65,000 feet for months at a time.” That is, if major advances in solar pan­els, fuel cells, aero­dy­namic con­trols, and flex­i­ble mate­ri­als could be over­come.
Lockheed won’t get the chance any time soon, how­ever. The High Altitude Airship “has been can­celed due to fund­ing con­straints,” accord­ing to the Missile Defense Agency. But get too dis­traught, blimp-​​lovers; the bud­get for the Aerostat Joint Program Office just jumped from $243 mil­lion to $481 mil.
The Airborne Laser — the mod­i­fied 747, meant to zap mis­siles as they take off — still gets more than $500 mil­lion in the new bud­get. But its first live-​​fire test has been delayed, again. Originally sched­uled for 2002, the blast has now been resched­uled for 2009, Inside Defense notes. The Laser Jet’s alter­na­tive — the “Kinetic Energy Interceptor,” a non-​​explosive inter­cep­tor mis­sile — has been pared back, as well. There’s no longer a “kill vehi­cle,” or war­head, part to the pro­gram, Defense News observes. Instead, the KEI has been tweaked, to become a “com­mon booster” for all sorts of mis­sile inter­cep­tions.
There’s much, much, much more in this bud­get to explore. Expect lots of posts in the week to come.

Share |

February 6th, 2007 | Lasers and Ray Guns, Missiles, Money Money Money, Planes, Copters, Blimps | 346611 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/02/06/giant-blimp-deflated-laser-jet-delayed/Giant+Blimp+Deflated%3B+Laser+Jet+Delayed2007-02-06+17%3A51%3A08hambling You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Pentagon Sued Over Milblog-​​Monitoring | Undead “Warrior” (Updated) » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. RTLM says:
    February 6, 2007 at 10:25 pm

    It would be a big mis­take to impede the ABL. In addi­tion to the capa­bil­ity of tak­ing out bal­lis­tic mis­siles in boost phase, I believe it also has the capa­bil­ity to dam­age satel­lites in low Earth orbit. The air to air poten­tial is there too. Air to ground as well. This sys­tem has renewed strate­gic value.
    **Note to Sen. Carl (The Penguin) Levin.

    Reply
  2. Joe Keary says:
    February 9, 2007 at 9:28 am

    The MDA has a num­ber of projects for the three phases of Ballistic Missile Defense, many of which are in devel­op­ment. Ones that are “proven” (like the Patriot PAC-​​3, early ver­sions of which cov­ered MY back over in OIF), Aegis Cruisers and THAAD need to be given the lions share of fund­ing and made oper­a­tional to counter a poten­tial DPRK threat. Similarly, detec­tion sys­tems need to be “green lighted” to enable us to accu­rately detect poten­tial mis­sile launches. While the ABL is a promis­ing project, they would be “too few, too far dis­persed” to counter mul­ti­ple launches. So, lets focus our efforts on the “best projects” and fun­nel the aus­tere bud­get to those that show the best and fastest return on invest­ment. With so many “Boots on the Ground” in OEF/​OIF, and the chal­lenges of this Budget, MDA needs to bite the bul­let and select the best of the best, and defer the rest!

    Reply
  3. Terry McCarty says:
    February 9, 2007 at 4:30 pm

    If the Veteran’s com­mu­nity (United Veteran Organizations) could con­vince the Orange County Board of Supervisors (California) to hand over the Blimp Hangar at LTA (Tustin USMC Air Base) we would have a large enough Hangar to house and pre­form main­te­nance on these pro­posed Giant Blimps. They are 1000 foot long, 300 foot wide, and 18 sto­ries high. We want to pre­serve it as they were erected in 1943 to sup­port our coastal defense. This is the largest wooden struc­ture still stand­ing which was (until recently) was in the National Resistry of Historical Buildings, how­ever the Department of the Navy allowed it to be removed due to local polit­i­cal pres­sures from the City of Tustin and the O.C. Board of Supervisors. They turned down our $400,000,000.00 in rede­vel­op­ment plans for their own plans and devel­op­ers. Not Veteran friendly!

    Reply
  4. Rod says:
    February 12, 2007 at 1:14 am

    Giant Blimp !! Someone Paid money to build a
    Giant Blimp !! I sure hope they get Fired! A Blimp is a World-​​War-​​1 weapon ! Maybe they want to bring-​​Back the Horse & Wagon Too ! Maybe they can use the Horse & Wagon to Pull the “Black Powder Cannon !! No won­der the USA is run­ning out of money.

    Reply
  5. Neil Whitney says:
    February 13, 2007 at 8:09 am

    Just who in the hell are we 3 Billion dol­lars worth of wor­ried about? North Korea? Iran? Certainly not!!! Russia?? Not any more!
    ANY — I repeat — ANY launch of nuclear bear­ing missles would be detected by cur­rent defense mech­a­nisms and dis­posed of LONG before it reached our shores — or any NATO nation for that mat­ter! Why aren’t we hld­ing on to those “pork bar­rel” funds for Vets and anti-​​terrorist polic­ing and things that are really needed? Another ludi­crous waste of tax bucks.
    I worked for the VA for 9 years, and we were sub­jected to pro­gram and staffing cuts like crazy! Just so the politi­cians with stock in Lockheed rtc. could retire rich? Where’s MY retire­ment “golden umbrella”?? BULL!!!!

    Reply
  6. John Albright says:
    February 13, 2007 at 12:43 pm

    So the first shot taken by a would be enemy is to knock out the blimp. Then what?
    So I guess the pen­ta­gon will spend another few hun­dred mil­lion to pro­tect the blimp.
    Aren’t we the guys who man­aged to keep the old USSR in check with it’s thou­sands of war heads because of the threat of mas­sive retal­i­a­tion? The ‘cover-​​and-​​duck’ appeased the older gen­er­a­tion. Pull it out, dust it off and sell it to the kids as the way to pro­tect ones­self from misssles.

    Reply
  7. Neil says:
    March 25, 2007 at 5:10 pm

    Just in case any­one comes here this late:
    What’s the story on the Navy’s pur­suit of FEL (Free-​​electron laser) tech­nol­ogy as a weapon ray?
    My friends at “JLab” need to know — jobs depend on it.

    Reply
  8. S. Bendin says:
    April 30, 2007 at 10:23 am

    The HAA is prospect project. And Russia try to part in such pro­gram.
    Defense air­ships in stratos­phere have to belong coun­tries from G8.
    By the way, HAA may use not only for the defense pro­gramme. For ex., such plat­form will be use­ful for tele­com., alti­tude semi-​​space tourism, base for astro­nauts’ halfway land­ing and renew onboard team, extremal para­chute jump­ing etc.
    I hope projects of HAA have to stay pro­gram for wide world sci­en­tist and tech­nolo­gi­est prospec­tive asso­ci­a­tion for man’s benefit

    Reply
  9. Michael Thomas says:
    July 3, 2007 at 8:43 pm

    Medusa: Space Age Weapon
    http://​www​.p2p​net​.net/​s​t​o​r​y​/​1​2​661

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage