Home » Sea » Ships and Subs » Taking on LockMart

Taking on LockMart

Coast Guard commandant Admiral Thad Allen has all but surrendered to critics whove been saying that the services sprawling $24-billion Deepwater modernization program is fatally flawed and rife with corruption, according to The New York Times:

We have been running some parts of the Coast Guard like a small business when we are a Fortune 500 company, Admiral Allen said in a speech on Tuesday to several hundred Coast Guard officials. We need to evolve with changing times. A new deputy commandant for mission support will oversee the design, acquisition and construction of new ships and aircraft and the maintenance of the fleet once they are built, functions that are now managed separately.

That will allow the Coast Guard to avoid giving so much authority for design and construction choices to contractors, like Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman, which renovated the first eight trouble-plagued ships in the Deepwater program.

The boats in question are the 123-foot Island-class patrol boats first fielded more than 15 years ago. Last year, former Lockheed Martin engineer Mike DeKort called out the firm for allegedly botching improvements to the boats communications. A report from the Coast Guard Inspector General this week confirms some of the flaws, including bad wiring and leaky system security.

The eight boats were withdrawn from service a couple months ago, causing a minor panic in a service that was already short of patrol boats as it awaits the introduction of two classes of brand-new boats over the next decade.

In an email on Tuesday, DeKort declared victory:

The ICGS [partnership between Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman] parties involved have demonstrated themselves to be incompetent and ethically, technically and professionally bankrupt. Also the IG told me very clearly that the CG and LM were not cooperating with their investigation. They could not get data they asked for or run re-tests they asked for.

But read the IG report carefully:

Aspects of the C4ISR equipment installed aboard the 123′ cutters do not meet the design standards set forth in the Deepwater contract. Specifically, two of the four areas of concern identified by the complainant were substantiated and are the result of the contractor not complying with the design standards identified in the Deepwater contract. For example, the contractor did not install low smoke cabling aboard the 123′ cutter, despite a Deepwater contract requirement that stated, all shipboard cable added as a result of the modification to the vessel shall be low smoke. The intent of this requirement was to eliminate the polyvinyl chloride jacket encasing the cables, which for years produced toxic fumes and dense smoke during shipboard fire. Additionally, the contractor installed C4ISR topside equipment aboard both the 123′ cutters and prosecutors, which either did not comply or was not tested to ensure compliance with specific environmental performance requirements outlined in the Deepwater contract.

Honestly, these are relatively minor complaints. And bear in mind that the boats were withdrawn from service due to hull buckling, not due to the problems DeKort pointed out. Before the buckling became apparent, the first couple modernized boats actually performed quite well, according to one former crewman, Master Chief Eric Gallett. He dismissed DeKorts allegations as missing the point. The boats major strengths were their networked computers.

As for the hull buckling these boats were designed to last 15 years. And they did. The Coast Guard ran into problems when it tried to keep the boats past their intended service life. Keeping an aged fleet afloat while awaiting new ships is one of the services major challenges, as I describe in the current issue of Defense Technology International:

At the Coast Guard Yard in southern Maryland, the [Deepwater] revolution seems a long way off, and the rust is right in your face. At this 108-year-old facility, the Coast Guards only government-owned shipyard, 400 workers commanded by Captain Steve Duca gut, repair then piece back together the services aging medium cutters and patrol boats, keeping them afloat and livable until they can be replaced with ships like Bertholf. Ducas is delicate work like surgery, he says. And its increasingly urgent. With more than 80 cutters larger than 100 feet, the Coast Guard has the worlds 12th-largest navy. But its fleet is, on average, around a quarter-century old, making it the 38th oldest of the worlds 40 largest navies. Deepwater has suffered delays. The last new ships and aircraft wont join the force for another two decades, several years later than originally planned. So an old fleet is just getting older.

Im not one to stand by defense contractors just for the Hell of it. When theyre wrong, theyre wrong. But in this case, Lockheed Martin is guilty only of minor crimes. But these crimes have been blown out of proportion by critics. The 123s worked just fine before their ancient hulls gave out. But when these hulls did give out, folks like DeKort saw an opportunity to attack the contractors. And thats just not fair.

David Axe, cross-posted at War Is Boring

Share |

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

springbored February 15, 2007 at 1:57 pm

Axe: You’re getting dull, dude….
One former crewguy says that the first 123s were GREAT! Yeah, well then why en, did “the first commissioned 123, the Matagorda, suffer cracks in its hull a day after arriving at its new home port of Key West, Fla., in September 2004. The structural problems resulted from sailing in 4-to-6 foot waves.”
But I hear their computers are awesome! They can link together and let each other know when they’re in port…or floundering…
Dude. You don’t mention that somebody decided to take an old ship and add a few feet to the hull. THAT’s what failed. If those old 110 hulls were maintained right, they’d have held together for a good long while.
Don’t buy into the “old” boat brigade…
Hmm….and isn’t it interesting that we’re seeing a cost explosion on the deepwater contract?
“Skinner’s office reported on Jan. 29 that the Coast Guard’s new, 418-foot National Security Cutter — the largest ship the service has ever commissioned and the cornerstone of its new fleet — suffers from design flaws that even when corrected will curtail its operating days by as much as 20 percent. The errors also helped nearly double the cost of the first two of eight planned vessels, from $517 million to about $1 billion, depending on negotiations and repairs ultimately required. None of the cutters has yet entered Coast Guard service.”
That’s worse than the LCS. Where’s the 90 day hold on this baby?

Reply

David Axe February 15, 2007 at 2:21 pm

Springbored,
Did you even bother reading the rest of the post? I addressed the hull problems. In fact, that was MY WHOLE POINT. Geez.

Reply

Aaron February 16, 2007 at 12:21 am

it sounds like the hull design is flawed and it allows rust to build up in isolated areas fatally weakening the hull.
bad design.

Reply

3nht2f97y1g February 16, 2007 at 12:23 am

The post says: “The 123s worked just fine before their ancient hulls gave out. But when these hulls did give out, folks like DeKort saw an opportunity to attack the contractors”
A commenter says: “You don’t mention that somebody decided to take an old ship and add a few feet to the hull. THAT’s what failed.”
This commenter read the whole post and thinks the other commenter has a good point, maybe a clarification by the blogger would help.

Reply

AvBizWiz February 16, 2007 at 5:57 am

Axe, you’re being silly. What happened to the 123-foot boats is not a “minor crime”, but one of the dumbest blunders I have yet come across in the defense industry, and that’s saying something. The coast guard took eight boats that worked perfectly fine and modified them in a way that ended up making all eight of them completely useless for anything but target practice.

Reply

knife February 16, 2007 at 11:48 am

Eh, who’s going to foot the bills, the Bush or Dicky? I’m up to my eyeballs in debts and taxes as it is and I don’t want to pay for something that I didn’t ask for or break.

Reply

ReformedCoasty February 16, 2007 at 12:58 pm

Come on, Axe. Your skipping some of DeKort’s key claims. You dont even mention that LM was installing equipment on the decks of these ships that werent rated for the conditions they were to face in the field like FLIR systems that cant handle tropical heat or polar cold (like in the straights or alaska where FLIR capabilities can be key to SAR ops. Also radios on zodiacs that are not rated for outdoor use. LM argues it didnt specifically say in the contract that they needed to use outdoor radios. Thats just stupid. They think these guys were going be patrolling a bath tub??
Cracking hulls are the best thing that could have happened or we never would have known how bad these ships were and never examined how bad future boats could be.

Reply

jack February 17, 2007 at 4:14 pm

The 123 footers were former 110 ft Island class boats with 13 ft extensions stuck on to add a boat ramp. The 110′s were struggling with integrity problems before Deepwater. Lengthening them without reinforcing them was going to cause problems. The extension was Lockheed’s idea as part of their Deepwater solution. They legitimately get to take the heat for it.

Reply

springbored February 17, 2007 at 10:34 pm

Thanks for readin’ ya’ll. Hey, Axe, do you have a thing for Lockheed products? They don’t pay you, do they?
Anyhow, one thing that worries me-a mite bit-is a sorta throw-away mention–in,,,I think the NY Times– about a screwup in the computer code used for the 123 design work. Haven’t gone back to confirm anything, but…if we can’t get the CAD software to function right….it’s embarassing.

Reply

Doc August 14, 2007 at 5:53 pm

The 110s were outstanding boats during their service life. They were designed to be a stop gap until the Heritage class WPBs were built, but those boats were cancelled. Even back in ’93, Farallon was having problems with hull plate because it was so thin.
The Coast Guard and Congress seem to want a jack of all trades WPB and have a champaign appetite on a beer budget. It’s a patrol boat for crying out loud. With the rate of technological advances we see today, why would you want a WPB for more than 15-20 years.
The 110s were the right boat at the right time. The CG would be well served to get today’s equivalent of the 110 off the shelf.

Reply

any June 3, 2009 at 10:22 pm

1.Cheap NBA Basketball Shoes,Authentic Quality,Special sale
2.New NBA Kobe shoes,Brand new In Box,100% Authentic,Save More than 38%
3.New NBA Basketball shoes ,100% Authentic,Save More than 38%

Reply

any June 3, 2009 at 10:23 pm

1.Cheap NBA Basketball Shoes,Authentic Quality,Special sale
2.New NBA Kobe shoes,Brand new In Box,100% Authentic,Save More than 38%
3.New NBA Basketball shoes ,100% Authentic,Save More than 38%

Reply

any June 3, 2009 at 10:23 pm

1.Cheap NBA Basketball Shoes,Authentic Quality,Special sale
2.New NBA Kobe shoes,Brand new In Box,100% Authentic,Save More than 38%
3.New NBA Basketball shoes ,100% Authentic,Save More than 38%

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: