<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brits Win!  Brits Win!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-60771</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-60771</guid>
		<description>Tony Blair anounced that the troops are being sent to reinforce afganistan - 1 fight at a time and we need to win the war there before we sort the mess the yanks made of Iraq and we have been there from the start.-Brit with 3 tours.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Blair anounced that the troops are being sent to reinforce afganistan — 1 fight at a time and we need to win the war there before we sort the mess the yanks made of Iraq and we have been there from the start.-Brit with 3 tours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Gibson</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-156767</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-156767</guid>
		<description>OK, I&#039;m behind on my doublethink.
Discussing reductions in US troop strengths would embolden the enemy and is a strategy of defeat.
Discussing reductions in British troop strengths is an acknowledgement that the mission is going great, and we&#039;ve pretty much already won.
I&#039;m clearly not anywhere near smart enough to follow your reasoning there, Dick.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I’m behind on my doublethink.<br />
Discussing reductions in US troop strengths would embolden the enemy and is a strategy of defeat.<br />
Discussing reductions in British troop strengths is an acknowledgement that the mission is going great, and we’ve pretty much already won.<br />
I’m clearly not anywhere near smart enough to follow your reasoning there, Dick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phila</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-156766</link>
		<dc:creator>Phila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-156766</guid>
		<description>&quot;You mean Bush was actually able to get Britain and Denmark to help in Iraq? I thought this whole thing was unilateral.&quot;
If you want to call it a multilateral failure, or a multilateral disaster, you certainly can. For now, anyway.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“You mean Bush was actually able to get Britain and Denmark to help in Iraq? I thought this whole thing was unilateral.“<br />
If you want to call it a multilateral failure, or a multilateral disaster, you certainly can. For now, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hague</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-60768</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-60768</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t they redeploy to other areas in Iraq? Help us get the job done quicker.
Oh. Right.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don’t they redeploy to other areas in Iraq? Help us get the job done quicker.<br />
Oh. Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TB</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-156765</link>
		<dc:creator>TB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-156765</guid>
		<description>OK, Dick, if things are going so well for the Brits, then send them into Sadr City, they seem to be needed there.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Dick, if things are going so well for the Brits, then send them into Sadr City, they seem to be needed there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-60766</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-60766</guid>
		<description>You mean Bush was actually able to get Britain and Denmark to help in Iraq?  I thought this whole thing was unilateral.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean Bush was actually able to get Britain and Denmark to help in Iraq?  I thought this whole thing was unilateral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

