<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Brits Win!  Brits Win!</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:44:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ric</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-60771</link> <dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:04:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-60771</guid> <description>Tony Blair anounced that the troops are being sent to reinforce afganistan - 1 fight at a time and we need to win the war there before we sort the mess the yanks made of Iraq and we have been there from the start.-Brit with 3 tours. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony Blair anounced that the troops are being sent to reinforce afganistan — 1 fight at a time and we need to win the war there before we sort the mess the yanks made of Iraq and we have been there from the start.-Brit with 3 tours.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lee Gibson</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-156767</link> <dc:creator>Lee Gibson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:57:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-156767</guid> <description>OK, I&#039;m behind on my doublethink. Discussing reductions in US troop strengths would embolden the enemy and is a strategy of defeat. Discussing reductions in British troop strengths is an acknowledgement that the mission is going great, and we&#039;ve pretty much already won. I&#039;m clearly not anywhere near smart enough to follow your reasoning there, Dick. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I’m behind on my doublethink.<br /> Discussing reductions in US troop strengths would embolden the enemy and is a strategy of defeat.<br /> Discussing reductions in British troop strengths is an acknowledgement that the mission is going great, and we’ve pretty much already won.<br /> I’m clearly not anywhere near smart enough to follow your reasoning there, Dick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phila</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-156766</link> <dc:creator>Phila</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-156766</guid> <description>&quot;You mean Bush was actually able to get Britain and Denmark to help in Iraq? I thought this whole thing was unilateral.&quot; If you want to call it a multilateral failure, or a multilateral disaster, you certainly can. For now, anyway. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“You mean Bush was actually able to get Britain and Denmark to help in Iraq? I thought this whole thing was unilateral.“<br /> If you want to call it a multilateral failure, or a multilateral disaster, you certainly can. For now, anyway.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Hague</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-60768</link> <dc:creator>The Hague</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 00:32:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-60768</guid> <description>Why don&#039;t they redeploy to other areas in Iraq? Help us get the job done quicker. Oh. Right. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don’t they redeploy to other areas in Iraq? Help us get the job done quicker.<br /> Oh. Right.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TB</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-156765</link> <dc:creator>TB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:32:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-156765</guid> <description>OK, Dick, if things are going so well for the Brits, then send them into Sadr City, they seem to be needed there. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Dick, if things are going so well for the Brits, then send them into Sadr City, they seem to be needed there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chris</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/02/21/brits-win-brits-win/#comment-60766</link> <dc:creator>chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:31:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3503#comment-60766</guid> <description>You mean Bush was actually able to get Britain and Denmark to help in Iraq?  I thought this whole thing was unilateral. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean Bush was actually able to get Britain and Denmark to help in Iraq?  I thought this whole thing was unilateral.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 699/703 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 00:01:52 -->
