DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Stray Trons » That Deaf, Dumb, and Blind Jet …

That Deaf, Dumb, and Blind Jet …

Tommy.jpg

A recent transpac crip­pled six F-​​22s as they made their way from Hawaii to Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan. The cul­prit: The International Date Line.

When the fight­ers crossed the line, all of their com­puter sys­tems went Tango Uniform — fuel sub­sys­tems, nav­i­ga­tion, and some of the comms.

We turn to CNN’s John Roberts and retired Maj. Gen. Don Shepperd for expert com­men­tary on the matter:

ROBERTS: Twenty five years from devel­op­ment to deploy­ment, the F-​​22 Raptor is the most advanced fight­ing machine in the air. But it was no match for a com­puter glitch that left six of them high above the Pacific Ocean, deaf, dumb and blind as they headed to their first deploy­ment. So what hap­pened? We turn to a man who’s at home in the cock­pit, Retired Air Force Major General Don Shepperd. Don, let me set the scene. These F-​​22s, eight of them, were headed from Hickam Air Force base in Hawaii to an Air Force base in Japan. They were approach­ing the inter­na­tional date line, pick it up from there. 

F22s.jpg

SHEPPERD: You got it right, John. You want every­thing to go right with your front­line fighter, $125, $135 mil­lion to copy. The F-​​22 Raptor is our front­line fighter, air defense, air supe­ri­or­ity. It also can drop bombs. It is stealthy. It’s fast and you want it all to go right on your first deploy­ment to the Pacific and it didn’t. At the inter­na­tional date line, whoops, all sys­tems dumped and when I say all sys­tems, I mean all sys­tems, their nav­i­ga­tion, part of their com­mu­ni­ca­tions, their fuel sys­tems. They were — they could have been in real trou­ble. They were with their tankers. The tankers — they tried to reset their sys­tems, couldn’t get them reset. The tankers brought them back to Hawaii. This could have been real seri­ous. It cer­tainly could have been real seri­ous if the weather had been bad. It turned out OK. It was fixed in 48 hours. It was a com­puter glitch in the mil­lions of lines of code, some­body made an error in a cou­ple lines of the code and every­thing goes.

ROBERTS: This is almost like the feared Y2K prob­lem that hap­pened to these air­craft. We should point out that com­put­ers con­trol almost every aspect of this air­craft, from their weapons sys­tems, to the flight con­trols and the com­put­ers absolutely went hay­wire, became useless.

SHEPPERD: Absolutely. When you think of air­planes from the old days, with cables and that type of thing and direct con­nec­tions between the sticks and the yolks and the con­trols, not that way any­more. Everything is by com­puter. When your com­put­ers go, your air­planes go. You have mul­ti­ple sys­tems. When they all dump at the same time, you can be in real trou­ble. Luckily this turned out OK.

ROBERTS: What would have hap­pened General Shepperd if these brand-​​new $120 mil­lion F-​​22s had been going into battle?

SHEPPERD: You would have been in real trou­ble in the mid­dle of com­bat. The good thing is that we found this out. Any time — before, you know, before we get into com­bat with an air­plane like this. Any time you intro­duce a new air­plane, you are going to find glitches and you are going to find things that go wrong. It hap­pens in our civil­ian air­lin­ers. You just don’t hear much about it but these things absolutely hap­pen. And luck­ily this time we found out about it before com­bat. We got it fixed with tiger teams in about 48 hours and the air­planes were fly­ing again, com­pleted their deploy­ment. But this could have been real seri­ous in combat.

ROBERTS: So basi­cally you had these advanced air — not just supe­ri­or­ity but air supremacy fight­ers that were in there, up there in the air, above the Pacific Ocean, not much more sophis­ti­cated than a lit­tle Cessna 152 only with a jet engine.

SHEPPERD: You got it. They are on a 12 to 15-​​hour flight from Hawaii to Okinawa, but all their sys­tems dumped. They needed help. Had they got­ten sep­a­rated from their tankers or had the weather been bad, they had no atti­tude ref­er­ence. They had no com­mu­ni­ca­tions or nav­i­ga­tion. They would have turned around and prob­a­bly could have found the Hawaiian Islands. But if the weather had been bad on approach, there could have been real trou­ble. Again, you get refu­el­ing from your tankers. You don’t run — you don’t get your­self where you run out of fuel. You always have enough fuel and refu­el­ing nine, 10, 11, 12 times on a flight like this where you can get some­where to land. But again, atti­tude ref­er­ence and nav­i­ga­tion are essen­tial as is com­mu­ni­ca­tion. In this case all of that was affected. It was a seri­ous problem.

ROBERTS: So the fact the com­put­ers run so much of the sys­tems on these air­craft, General Shepperd, is the — is the mil­i­tary at risk of over engi­neer­ing here so if they did have a prob­lem like that when they were going into a hos­tile sit­u­a­tion, they could be, as you said, repeat­edly in real trouble?

SHEPPERD: Well, you have redun­dant sys­tems but it’s just a fact of life in the mod­ern com­puter age. By the way John, you are going to have the same prob­lem com­ing up on your lap­top com­puter as we con­ferred from — from stan­dard time from day­light sav­ings time to stan­dard time. Your pro­gram — your com­puter is pro­grammed for one thing and we have changed the dates and you are going to have a prob­lem. It’s going to have to be dealt with.

ROBERTS: Do me a favor Don. Make sure I’m not on my lap­top com­puter when I’m fly­ing in an F-​​22 on that day.

SHEPPERD: Absolutely.

And make sure you don’t try to con­duct any strikes across the International Date Line. One side or the other, war plan­ners; one side or the other.

Full report at DailyTech.

– Ward

Share |

February 27th, 2007 | Stray Trons | 351732 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/02/27/that-deaf-dumb-and-blind-jet/That+Deaf%2C+Dumb%2C+and+Blind+Jet+.+.+.2007-02-27+21%3A51%3A19murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Obsessed with Vertical Lift? | God Slides Shuttle Launch to the Right » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. bigfoot says:
    February 27, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    What does it say about the defense con­trac­tor when a fighter plane that costs $135 mil­lion is crip­pled by the International Date Line? Was $28,000,000,000 in devel­op­ment costs and twenty years of devel­op­ment not enough?
    Lockie, you’re doing a heck of a job!

    Reply
  2. Moose says:
    February 27, 2007 at 5:38 pm

    Gotta agree with livio. Bugs are a fact of of life in the Info Age. Someone screwed up, and hope­fully they’ll check more care­fully in that area in the future. But all the planes kept fly­ing (speaks well of their redun­dancy that they did that with their soft­ware on the blink) and today they’re in Japan.

    Reply
  3. Cary M says:
    February 27, 2007 at 7:00 pm

    The F-​​22 Raptor has some­thing like 200 mil­lion lines of code, whereas an OS like Windows XP has some­thing in the neigh­bour­hood of 45 million…and we all know how sta­ble XP is ;) .
    Oh, and clearly, they never lost the “Whole Platform”, as the fly-​​by-​​wire sys­tems clearly func­tioned with­out a hitch, not to men­tion the entirely elec­tronic throt­tle and engine man­age­ment sys­tems, which obvi­ously rely on com­puter con­trolled atmos­pheric sen­sors and…well, you get the idea.

    Reply
  4. Foreign.Boy says:
    February 27, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    Cary M brings up a good point.
    I mean… as a nerd, I for­mat my com­puter once a year… while spring clean­ing. It’s just some­thing you do!
    Now… does that mean that the F-​​22 will need for­mat­ting after a year? Probably not… with more use.. the more often you need to re-​​install the OS.… so are they going to re-​​format every sorti? lol
    However, as a web pro­gram­mer, I cre­ate 100’s of unex­pected bugs all the time.. and often some get noted and for­got­ten as the dead­line crunch comes. “Gotta stay on bud­get”. I hon­estly thought that run­ning a Jet on soft­ware being a hor­ri­ble idea. What hap­pens if the “Motherboard” of the jet gets shot out? What’s the pio­let going to do to con­trol his plane!
    Honestly.. Stick with the Tomcat’s.. Send the F-22’s in for the anti-​​radar sorti’s and let the F-14’s/F-18’s do the rest…

    Reply
  5. bigfoot says:
    February 27, 2007 at 7:23 pm

    “The F-​​22 Raptor has some­thing like 200 mil­lion lines of code“
    Do you have a cita­tion for that? I just googled that and all ref­er­ences I’ve seen peg the num­ber of lines for the F-22’s soft­ware at 1.7 to 2 mil­lion. Sources included Strategypage and Boeing.
    Maybe it’s split­ting hairs, but it’s also ten times less of a problem.

    Reply
  6. Ward says:
    February 27, 2007 at 7:44 pm

    I agree with livio and Moose. The squadron (or who­ever the pros from Dover were) did a good job of rewrit­ing the code and get­ting the Raptors to press on. BUT … it’s rel­a­tively humor­ous that it hap­pened in the first place. Remember the unit cost of these pup­pies is $253 million.

    Reply
  7. sglover says:
    February 27, 2007 at 8:13 pm

    I just knew that this episode would bring out the “There’s no such thing as a bad weapons sys­tem” crowd, and that they’d be min­i­miz­ing the sig­nif­i­cance of the thing. They might want to ask them­selves — if some­thing like the International Date Line causes such headaches, what about gen­uine sur­prises?
    In the end it doesn’t really mat­ter much, because the F-​​22 white ele­phant is truly a solu­tion in search of a prob­lem. If their wings fell off in mid-​​air, it wouldn’t affect American secu­rity a jot.

    Reply
  8. Scott Free says:
    February 27, 2007 at 8:25 pm

    Oh, great. If we ever have to fight the Cylons, we are so screwed. I hope we have some Phantoms that are still operational.

    Reply
  9. Alex says:
    February 27, 2007 at 10:37 pm

    As a soft­ware engi­neer in the defense indus­try, I can pretty say for cer­tain that some­one is get­ting fired right about now.
    Nasty con­tracts let­ters are being writ­ten from the Air Force to Boeing.
    Software testers are find­ing the issue, and deter­min­ing how it slipped through.
    Systems Engineers will be look­ing through their require­ments and real­iz­ing that no one ever fig­ured that time might go backwards.

    Reply
  10. coxch says:
    February 28, 2007 at 7:02 am

    This is rich. I have been up since 3:30AM Eastern patch­ing hun­dreds of servers for the upcom­ing Daylight Saving Time change and I read this. I won­der if the on-​​board com­puter sys­tems on the F-22’s are patched for that changeover?

    Reply
  11. africanmuffia says:
    February 28, 2007 at 11:34 am

    It’s impos­si­ble to find all the bugs when test­ing any decent sized soft­ware. Even with com­mon data pro­cess­ing busi­ness apps, some bugs will only appear after users start using it. This is one such an exam­ple, the pro­gram­mer didn’t think of it, and when test­ing the Raptor no-​​one flew over the date line so the bug didn’t sur­face. So now they know about it and fixed it.
    The impor­tant thing is to have some man­ual backup, to at least stay above water (or in the air) then the cri­sis hits.

    Reply
  12. DS says:
    February 28, 2007 at 11:57 am

    Here’s a ques­tion. With an air­craft that is so depen­dant on com­puter sys­tems to oper­ate, what would hap­pen if a directed energy weapon were fired at it? Let’s say a mod­u­lated surge of elec­tric­ity through a cou­ple of ion­ized path­ways burned through the air by pow­er­ful lasers? Such a device has been in devel­op­ment for quite a while now. Would the Raptor be vul­ner­a­ble to this? I know it’s been shown to dis­able motor vehicles…

    Reply
  13. clea says:
    February 28, 2007 at 12:07 pm

    yoiks, when they fixed the code to move FORWARD through time — I hope they also fixed it for mov­ing BACKWARD through time. Otherwise the trip home FROM Japan TO Hawaii could be another doozie…

    Reply
  14. Tod Glenn says:
    February 28, 2007 at 2:38 pm

    Any bets the code is based on some­thing com­mer­cial. Maybe an MS prod­uct. Anyone remem­ber what hap­pened to the USS Yorktown? I’m just glad the fly by wire sys­tem wasn’t com­pro­mised or they would have neen in deep sierra.
    Military sys­tems need to be using pro­pri­etary, fault tol­er­ant code — not some off­shoot of a badly writ­ten com­mer­cial product.

    Reply
  15. Alex says:
    February 28, 2007 at 4:38 pm

    The F-​​22 code is def­i­nitely not based on com­mer­cial code.
    Most of it is writ­ten in ADA.
    http://​www​.stsc​.hill​.af​.mil/​C​r​o​s​s​t​a​l​k​/​2​0​0​0​/​0​5​/​m​o​o​d​y​.​h​tml

    Reply
  16. Dr. Curiosity says:
    February 28, 2007 at 4:59 pm

    It may be apoc­ryphal, but I once heard from an elec­tronic engi­neer­ing friend of a sim­i­lar bug in a guid­ance sys­tem, devel­oped in the east­ern part of the Southern Hemisphere, that didn’t work quite so well for the North American cus­tomers.
    The prob­lem was one of coor­di­nate sys­tems: When you’re used to get­ting pos­i­tive num­bers for South and East coords, and sud­den you’re get­ting every­thing in North and West, things don’t work so well. To get things resolved quickly, they effec­tively installed it back to front — i.e. invert­ing all the num­bers. No-one’s going to notice if a missile’s fly­ing upside down, right? :-)

    Reply
  17. Hey Skipper says:
    February 28, 2007 at 8:10 pm

    Ummm … doesn’t all avi­a­tion work off Zulu?
    It isn’t at all clear to me why the F-​​22 would care about the inter­na­tional date line, as it would be keep­ing time in Zulu.
    The rea­son­ably highly auto­mated jet I fly (MD-​​11) crosses the date line all the time, and it couldn’t care less, because all it knows is Z.

    Reply
  18. Thomas L. Nielsen says:
    March 1, 2007 at 2:58 am

    Giggle-giggle…snort…giggle.….MUAHA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HAAAAaaaa.…*cough-cough*. Oh dear, this has got to be one of the fun­ni­est sto­ries I’ve read in a very, very long time.
    I just knew this would hap­pen when I saw the “Intel Inside” sticker on the avion­ics bay access hatch.
    And the Royal Danish Air Force is look­ing into spend­ing my tax money on the JSF. I hope they go with Linux instead (or, so help us, DOS).
    Regards and all,
    Thomas L. Nielsen
    Denmark

    Reply
  19. Phred says:
    March 1, 2007 at 11:05 am

    Two mil­lion lines of hard real-​​time embed­ded code, this is not the stuff of triv­ial per­mu­ta­tions but still, as one com­menter said, they con­tin­ued to fly despite the glitch. Our mod­ern soci­ety is built on software–think about what we’re doing here com­ment­ing on a blog, this is 99% the result of soft­ware and 1% cop­per and silicon–your cool phone now has in excess of a mil­lion lines of code–and you still can’t get a sig­nal. Setting up soft­ware test is like­wise non-​​trivial and those who think this is funny ought to try account­ing for all pos­si­ble usage com­bi­na­tions for some triv­ial soft­ware based product…they might just find some humility.

    Reply
  20. Chuck says:
    March 1, 2007 at 3:10 pm

    I write ADA with my defence con­trac­tor. I find it odd that the sit­u­a­tion was not tested in their SWIL testing.

    Reply
  21. Armchair Jet Jock says:
    March 1, 2007 at 4:23 pm

    From the arti­cle:
    SHEPPERD: You got it. They are on a 12 to 15-​​hour flight from Hawaii to Okinawa, but all their sys­tems dumped.
    Hold On there pard­ner -
    Hickam to Kadena comes up as 4040 nau­ti­cal miles.
    Max speed for a KC-​​10 is a hair over 600mph,
    That comes out to 7 hours.
    Using the pub­lic num­bers, the f-22’s would have to refuel 5 times en route
    If the F-​​22 could super­cruise all the way, it would be only 3.5 hours.
    By the way, it doesn’t look like there’s such a thing as drop-​​tanks for an F-​​22

    Reply
  22. mattrmsf says:
    March 1, 2007 at 5:32 pm

    Not quite as bad as when the Hawker Typhoon entered ser­vice in 1941. Six of the brand new, rushed into ser­vice planes engaged German Focke-Wulf’s over the chan­nel. In the mid­dle of the fighter, five of the six Typhoons’ tails fell off in a high g turn. Without ejec­tion seats like they do today, the pilots never had a chance to get out against the tum­bling effect.
    Still, this Raptor biz seems weird. Anyone feel like they’re get­ting handed a bogus story from the higher ups?

    Reply
  23. Mike S says:
    March 1, 2007 at 5:58 pm

    You see what hap­pens when you let the bright young
    men in the think tanks dic­tate mil­i­tary equip­ment specs. Mac and his young men (who had never been
    in or near the mil­i­tary, let alone combat).….“airplanes don’t need machine guns, that style of fight­ing is over. The F-​​4 doesn’t need any­thing but rock­ets.” Sure.
    Well, we let the lit­tle men in again and you get the high techy stuff that amazes and amuses them and an air­craft the you can’t fly with­out a com­puter. When will we learn?

    Reply
  24. Karen Francis Henneberger says:
    March 3, 2007 at 9:24 pm

    As far as I’m con­cerned, I would have stopped with the inven­tion of the wheel, all we really need is a cart to haul our excess bag­gage around on
    we have way to much excess bag­gage and a note on those Iron cur­tains in offi­cials offices In Washington I think bright red vel­vet would be exquisite.

    Reply
  25. Kim says:
    March 13, 2007 at 7:53 pm

    I used to write test equip­ment soft­ware and firmware to test Avionics Defense sys­tems. This “coulda”, “shoulda” been tested thor­oughly before the jet went into the air. This is a fail­ure of their test team. They should have a sim­u­la­tion of those con­di­tions for the soft­ware and embed­ded soft­ware to “expe­ri­ence.” Crossing such loca­tions are known “events” for an avion­ics sys­tem.
    In addi­tion, I agree with one of the other respon­ders. There should be a back up, such as an auto­matic nav­i­ga­tional sys­tem that comes on– line (maybe some­thing like the Chelton Flight System or some­thing of that type that can be installed com­pletely inde­pen­dent of the rest of the sys­tem.) Of course I’m not sure what sys­tem they already have for backup in this jet.

    Reply
  26. ashleyarmygirl says:
    April 21, 2007 at 7:44 pm

    I LOVE THIS JET!!!!!!I WANT TO FLY IT WHEN I GO INTO THE MARINE CORPS!!!! I MISS HEREING THE SOUND OF IT WHEN I WATCH THE VIDEOS OF IT!!!!!!! THATS EXTREMLY CARZZZZZZZZZZZZZYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!111

    Reply
  27. David says:
    May 11, 2007 at 8:51 am

    There has never been deliv­ery of a new major mil­i­tary (or com­mer­cial) prod­uct like an air­plane, heli­copter, tank, ship, etc. that did not have some items to be improved, if not cor­rected. Actually, I am impressed that cor­rec­tion to the “mil­lions of line of code” was accom­plished in 48 hours. It is a lit­tle sad to see the world’s pre­mier fighter — truly fifth gen­er­a­tion — berated so heav­ily over an issue that could have had some con­se­quences, but didn’t. In all mock fights to date, F-​​22 air­craft have not lost a sin­gle fight, to any kind or quan­tity of competitor(s). What I see is com­mon in our soci­ety these days — blow off the over­whelm­ing good of an item (or event)and look/​dig for some­thing to crit­i­cize. Such is obvi­ous from the tone of ques­tions in the arti­cle as well as many comments.

    Reply
  28. WR says:
    April 24, 2008 at 10:03 am

    Mike S,
    “You see what hap­pens when you let the bright young men in the think tanks dic­tate mil­i­tary equip­ment specs. “
    Make that the few inept young men in think tanks as truly bright young men in think thanks or else­where would not for­get any essen­tial specs. Please think before mak­ing a rash com­ment like that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage