DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ships and Subs » The Bat Boat

The Bat Boat

So, this is one we picked up from the been-there-done-that set over at Socnet.

Seems as if the Pentagons Office of Force Transformation has developed a space-age naval vessel using so-called M-Hull technology to provide a high-speed, low-draft insertion craft for special operators. Called Stiletto, the nearly 90 foot-long ship is built entirely out of carbon fiber, the biggest U.S. ship constructed with the lightweight material.

Stiletto.jpg

The secret to the design which looks more like the type of thing Batman would cruise down the Gotham City river is its hull form, which re-directs the bow wake to cushion the ride. At 40 knots for 500 nautical miles, that could make a big difference on your vertebrae. Manufacturer M-Ship Company says the Stiletto reduces crew shock by up to 50 percent.

But the sci-fi looking ship has its skeptics. Carbon fiber isnt exactly bullet-proof, and when youre inserting a team into enemy waters, ballistic restance is kind of important. The quad-screw propulsion system pumping out 1,650 horses is likely to sound like a B-52 coming in for a landing, and the lack of gun-mounts could concern special operators who rely on heavy firepower to overwhelm their enemy if it comes down to fisticuffs.

Its important to remember, however, that the transformation office is using the ship to experiment with and validate different technologies, tactics and configurations that could translate into future vessels fielded to special operations teams.

Check out an OFT briefing on the Stiletto here.

– Christian

Share |

March 7th, 2007 | Ships and Subs | 354344 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/03/07/the-bat-boat/The+Bat+Boat2007-03-07+20%3A19%3A23 You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « That Little Blue Dress | Army Future on Display » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Foreign.Boy says:
    March 7, 2007 at 5:18 pm

    Whatever happened to the ‘stealth ship’
    http://​www​.resonancepub​.com/​i​m​a​g​e​s​/​s​t​e​a​l​t​h​_​s​h​i​p​.​gif
    Some ideas work very well in the civilian world.. but unless they make titanium carbon-fiber, there is no way thise idea will get off the.… get out of the dock

    Reply
  2. Redtyder says:
    March 7, 2007 at 8:44 pm

    Ah yes — The Sea Shadow I believe it was called.
    Built by Lockheed Marine Division. Based on the F117 Nighthawk success in the Skunk Works.
    Faded away, it did.
    Marine Division had part of it’s Ops in Sunnyvale — AKA Silicon Valley and when the Wall came down it folded up too. But, not before they helped build the set for the Water World movie in Hawaii!
    Question is, of course, why do we need another iteration when our wars are with 12th century madmen in the sand? Or is it that we will send old Cuban refugees from the 1960’s to invade Cuba from Miami after FeeDell is gone?

    Reply
  3. Qball says:
    March 7, 2007 at 11:29 pm

    I agree. Less technolgy. More old school. DO you realize that the old Colt .45 and M-14 are coming back to the scene. M-14’s being reissued. Old tech works!
    Keep the good fight troops!
    Semper Fi

    Reply
  4. harveytherabbit says:
    March 8, 2007 at 3:06 am

    nano tubular weaved materials have 100 times the strength of steel. objects on sliding friction are faster than objects in contact with more direct friction . less friction = less resistance . more velocity = less resistance to acceleration . a refined radar deceiving deflective ( invisible ) aerodynamic platform structure gliding on a cushion of air is novel . the M formed under hull is where the nomenlecture of Bat Boat came from .

    Reply
  5. harveytherabbit says:
    March 8, 2007 at 3:16 am

    carbon nano tubular weaved materials are strong. more strong than an aluminium or steel hull. more light weight. cheaper to make the platform with. less energy to propel the boat due to its lessened weight load . more boyant upthrust on water surface . less draft . less drag . mass production = less difficult . just in time supply schedule less restrictive . manufacturing is less cost prohibitive.

    Reply
  6. Pinch says:
    March 8, 2007 at 8:06 am

    I wrote about this boat a few days ago on my blog. It is currently down at Norfolk and I posted a number of pictures that I took of it:
    http://​instapinch​.com/​?​p​=​323
    Cool little piece of work.

    Reply
  7. jc says:
    March 8, 2007 at 8:15 am

    In structural design the key element is usually stiffness hence carbon fiber is good.
    In the real world boring ill understood matters like impact strength can be important. Think of hitting a log at 40 knots which was a key factor in removing seaplanes from the equation, now think of a floating container.
    Physical data on composite strength is not that easy to obtain and izod or charpy results are a lot more difficult to obtain for carbon fiber because the people selling the stuff realize it is not a pretty picture.
    When you see a film of a racing car crash with some degree of integrity remaining you are seeing kevlar holding it together; The carbon fiber having very little impact strength is a fine dust of sharp needles (like asbestos) creating a health hazard for everyone.

    Reply
  8. Vstress says:
    March 8, 2007 at 11:41 am

    “In structural design the key element is usually stiffness hence carbon fiber is good“
    Was written by a person.
    This statement is wrong.
    Carbon fibre has very little stiffness. That is the biggest problem in it’s applicability. Otherwise everything would be built from it.
    It is also the problem in it’s design, as structures need to designed for carbon fibre use, with material directions being extremely important.
    A big question I have on this subject is the absorption rate of moisture into the carbon fibre. Hence I question the length of time this boat can be used, due to the corrosive sea atmosphere on the coatings that protect moisture ingress.
    PS. I’m a structural engineer for an aerospace company… I know a thing or two.

    Reply
  9. George Skinner says:
    March 8, 2007 at 4:20 pm

    Vstress,
    I think the stiffness being referred to is the high modulus of elasticity of the carbon fibre in the tensile direction. The anisotropy of the material is an important design factor, but it can also be a valuable asset when used properly. The problem with a lot of carbon fibre use is the tendency of designers to treat it as “black aluminum”, which turns the anisotropy into a disadvantage.
    As far as coatings & water resistance, I think it’s important to note that boats have been built out of fibreglass for decades. Carbon itself has got great corrosion resistance, which is why it’s the material of choice for fuel cell components. Impact resistance is another question, though — work boats tend to be built with aluminum or steel hulls rather than fibreglass for a reason!

    Reply
  10. jeff says:
    March 9, 2007 at 3:32 am

    carbon nano tubular materials? Not avail. as of yet! Coming soon.

    Reply
  11. JH says:
    March 9, 2007 at 4:04 am

    Welcome to last year DefenseTech!

    Reply
  12. Stephen Russell says:
    March 9, 2007 at 1:45 pm

    2 bad we cant Rent or charter one.
    Great use in a 007 movie.
    Love to see off So FL for counterdrug raids & Persian Gulf area.
    SE Asia area.
    Weapons to add:
    MiniGuns
    M60
    50 cal MG
    Mortars
    LAWS
    Stingers.
    20mm cannon.
    rocket pods
    EW array
    Gun lockers for crew.
    mini torpedoes.
    50mm cannon fwd???

    Reply
  13. Vstress says:
    March 12, 2007 at 12:55 pm

    Yeah, I agree, the person misunderstood the term modulus of elasticity and interpreted it as stiffness — don’t worry, I still did it in university, didn’t quite get it till I started working ; )
    Moisture absorption was a question I was interested in as carbon fibre naturally absorbs moisture (at least epoxy-carbon fibre composites). In manufacturing specs it has to have a limit to how much moisture it naturally absorbs.
    Just intrigued as aircraft have this problem… clearly a boat would be even more vulnerable.
    Also… corrosion resistance is very good, yes!
    But… you put metal into the equation (ie. a metal bracket that is bonded, or bolted to the composite) and it exacerbates any corrosion on the metal, due to the carbon fibre composites ability to retain water.
    It is a major problem in aerospace again… therefore I presume even more so with boats.
    Then again, maybe they have developed a method to prevent this absorption to a large degree.
    Would be cool to find out!

    Reply
  14. Lee Wahler says:
    March 29, 2007 at 3:30 am

    Where’s the beef? Or in the case of the Stiletto, where is the actual sea trials data. I have yet to see anything posted showing this craft peforms in the way is it is being hyped AT SEA!
    Sure the SEALs need a sea boat like this for insertion, but it must be able to operate effectively in the marine environment. Go fast and be steathly is NOT reason enough to buy more of these, yet some congress types want to throw money at M-Ship, why?

    Reply
  15. bracecast says:
    July 3, 2007 at 1:16 am

    I am in the orthopedics industry and am looking for information on a composite of titanium,carbon ‚and kevlar for making lightweight and extremely durable braces for patients who need them .the current technology uses polyeth or leather for containment and stainless steel for support,depending on the size of the supported limb these can weigh anywhere from 2.0 Kg to 7Kg,and in the higher weights they also require more effort to ambulate ‚a tough order for a person trying to recover from a traumatic event

    Reply
  16. Walter Schwall IV says:
    January 9, 2008 at 9:20 am

    I bet i put a hole in it. It seems to me that we sacrafice defense for speed and firepower for stealth. Mabye just mabye we need to create and develop a new material that is flexiable, moluible, and super dense/strong. mabye its just me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    Recent Comments
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      The men can only do so much, we need to stop...
      albert delaunay
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Not to hijack this thread and turn it into a...
      Kole
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      That first sentence should read...
      Moose
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      You could park an MLRS or HiMars on the...
      Moose
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Can the MLRS or HiMars system be...
      Robjack01
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Was not this PAM seeker the technology for...
      ripr
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      "Health Care bill would destroy what we can...
      JZizka
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      The Pentagon has acknowledged that climate change...
      JZizka
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Yes, let's ignore a thing that 90% of...
      gmanaz
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Again, Climate Change reares its ugly head. There...
      Carlos
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage