<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuke Missle Nixed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/03/08/nuke-missle-nixed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/08/nuke-missle-nixed/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:46:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategic Thinker</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/08/nuke-missle-nixed/#comment-61840</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategic Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3545#comment-61840</guid>
		<description>I just can&#039;t understand it.  Why doesn&#039;t the USAF just convert these missiles Conventional Advanced Cruise Missiles.  Why risk a pilot&#039;s life when we can upgrade a missile for a fraction of what it costs to build a new fighter?  Why not have this capability in our back pocket?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can’t understand it.  Why doesn’t the USAF just convert these missiles Conventional Advanced Cruise Missiles.  Why risk a pilot’s life when we can upgrade a missile for a fraction of what it costs to build a new fighter?  Why not have this capability in our back pocket?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/08/nuke-missle-nixed/#comment-157749</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3545#comment-157749</guid>
		<description>Hmm Strange, I was standing gaurd for a U2 jet when I wroked for the Feds as a police officer. I thought it was one of the coolest things to wach take off or better yet land. At WAFB they still have a picture of this bird at 60,000 someodd feet up and it took a picture of a dime on the runway. You caould see the dime as if it were blown up 5x&#039;s the size in your hand. incredible for that day in age of technology. Whats even better is that if they are gonna retire this bird, just imagine what is gonna replace it. I come from the days when the SR71BB was the baddest birf in the air. I can even recall Clinton re authorising a fleet of BB in the 90&#039;s.
Semper Fi
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm Strange, I was standing gaurd for a U2 jet when I wroked for the Feds as a police officer. I thought it was one of the coolest things to wach take off or better yet land. At WAFB they still have a picture of this bird at 60,000 someodd feet up and it took a picture of a dime on the runway. You caould see the dime as if it were blown up 5x’s the size in your hand. incredible for that day in age of technology. Whats even better is that if they are gonna retire this bird, just imagine what is gonna replace it. I come from the days when the SR71BB was the baddest birf in the air. I can even recall Clinton re authorising a fleet of BB in the 90’s.<br />
Semper Fi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emastro</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/08/nuke-missle-nixed/#comment-61838</link>
		<dc:creator>Emastro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 20:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3545#comment-61838</guid>
		<description>Why $6 billion?  All they had to do was take a normal cruise missile and give it a stealth skin.  So much money was wasted.
It was a good concept for WWIII- they would have gotten through to Moscow or Kiev when so many older cruise missiles would have been shot down.  But- those days are over.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why $6 billion?  All they had to do was take a normal cruise missile and give it a stealth skin.  So much money was wasted.<br />
It was a good concept for WWIII– they would have gotten through to Moscow or Kiev when so many older cruise missiles would have been shot down.  But– those days are over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Russell</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/08/nuke-missle-nixed/#comment-157748</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3545#comment-157748</guid>
		<description>Why scrap this missile type, scrap older types BUT this.
Add to naval ships offshore/??
Or from B1s, B52s stand off over Iran airspace.
Hello DoD.
Duh.
Fund this missile.
Big stick in Iran eyes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why scrap this missile type, scrap older types BUT this.<br />
Add to naval ships offshore/??<br />
Or from B1s, B52s stand off over Iran airspace.<br />
Hello DoD.<br />
Duh.<br />
Fund this missile.<br />
Big stick in Iran eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reefdiver</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/08/nuke-missle-nixed/#comment-61836</link>
		<dc:creator>reefdiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3545#comment-61836</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about this decision. Whats the specific justification for dropping this missile rather than older models?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m curious about this decision. Whats the specific justification for dropping this missile rather than older models?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrimX1</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/08/nuke-missle-nixed/#comment-157747</link>
		<dc:creator>GrimX1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3545#comment-157747</guid>
		<description>As a retired Air Launched Missile Maintainer I invested a considerable amount of my 20+ years working on the ACM.  While not the darling of the AF, the ACM brought a number of unique capabilities to the strategic table that will be hard and costly to replace.  My hats off to all worked to keep the ACM&#039;s flying!
&quot;Never Send A Pilot To Do A Robots Job!&quot;
GrimX1
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a retired Air Launched Missile Maintainer I invested a considerable amount of my 20+ years working on the ACM.  While not the darling of the AF, the ACM brought a number of unique capabilities to the strategic table that will be hard and costly to replace.  My hats off to all worked to keep the ACM’s flying!<br />
“Never Send A Pilot To Do A Robots Job!“<br />
GrimX1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

