DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Politricks » General, Congressman Frank’s on Line One …

General, Congressman Frank’s on Line One …

General pace.jpg

NEWS RELEASES from the United States Department of Defense

A Statement From Gen. Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

“Yesterday, during a wide ranging interview with the Chicago Tribune Editorial Board, I was asked if I think the current policy as codified in U.S. Code, generally referred to as “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” should still hold.

“People have a wide range of opinions on this sensitive subject.The important thing to remember is that we have a policy in effect, and the Department of Defense has a statutory responsibility to implement that policy.

“I made two points in support of the policy during the interview.One, “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” allows individuals to serve this nation; and two, it does not make a judgment about the morality of individual acts.

“In expressing my support for the current policy, I also offered some personal opinions about moral conduct.

“I should have focused more on my support of the policy and less on my personal moral views.”

Or we could focus on this war going on …

– Ward

Share |

March 13th, 2007 | Politricks | 355530 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/03/13/general-congressman-franks-on-line-one/General%2C+Congressman+Frank%27s+on+Line+One+.+.+.2007-03-13+21%3A12%3A08murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « China Spends the Cash | PDW for the US Army? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. BT says:
    March 13, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    Gen. Pace is entitiles to his personal opinion, and therefore should not apologize. On the other hand, I do not support the current policy. It makes no sense to younger people, and therfore it will be changed after the older command structure departs. Anyone who makes it out of the battlefield alive earned the privilege to be, think, and say whatever they want.
    On a more pragamtic note, the US needs as many bodies as possible, for this 30 year campaign.

    Reply
  2. Kaltes says:
    March 13, 2007 at 6:11 pm

    I think the policy makes no sense to younger people, because younger people would want gays banned from the military entirely.
    I think the older people are the more tolerant ones.

    Reply
  3. Galls says:
    March 13, 2007 at 7:13 pm

    What is the reason that in the Military that there are facilities for both Men and Women? To keep the possibility of romantic relationships within a unit to a minimal. With the introduction of openly Gay men and Women into the military unit how do the administrative bodies prevent increasing the amount romantic relationships. Do they have the gay men share bunks with the straight women, or vise versa?

    Reply
  4. mike says:
    March 14, 2007 at 12:01 am

    Younger people want gays banned from the military entirely? Unless you’re writing from Iran… okay, or from Missouri… you need to get out more.

    Reply
  5. Big says:
    March 14, 2007 at 3:15 am

    Further proof that the US Armed Forces are not really on a war footing. The thing that is killing us is out of touch General Officers; maybe the Officer Corps in general. We are trying to fight the GWOT and people are worried about this stuff?
    Give me a break.

    Reply
  6. Stephen Trimble says:
    March 14, 2007 at 6:57 am

    Ok … here’s the what if?
    What if Pace means to go into politics, post-retirement?
    Maybe his stunt was calculated?
    I know it’s crazy, but what if?

    Reply
  7. Wembley says:
    March 14, 2007 at 8:35 am

    Clearly the military have a long way to go with dealing with homophobia, and until that’s resolved there will be all kinds of trouble.
    At a time when recruiting and retaining enough bodies is a real problem, this kind of thing has to be addressed.

    Reply
  8. Nanonymous says:
    March 14, 2007 at 9:14 am

    Out of touch with whom? The Armed Services? You might try asking around a barracks, wardroom, or dormitory (for the Air Force), and see what sort of responses “don’t ask, don’t tell” draws. My guess is that Pace’s opinion isn’t going to be all that different from the replies you get. Just less colorful.

    Reply
  9. TCM says:
    March 15, 2007 at 1:37 am

    General Pace is entitled to his own thoughts. However, when in a public position such as his, he is also obligated by duty and code to reserve his personal opinions and uphold the policies and values of the armed services. He has now offended at least 65,000 troops and many many more American Citizens!!! I call for his resignation as he has breeched his duty and postion with his own personal preferences. Under his leadership, people are not given an opportunity of fairness and he is leading others to ignorance and bigotry…I urge him to take responsibility and step aside. This is a SERIOUS MORALE ISSUE now!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  10. Dale says:
    March 15, 2007 at 5:42 am

    “Everyone has their own opinion” Until their opinion pisses you off! You people are such hipocrites, the general has spent his life fighting for what he believes. If he chooses to express his views openly that is his right. He and myself unlike most of you cry babies, fought for that right. If you don’t like what he said or has to say, change the channel or turn it off. I just happen to agree with him as do the other 85% of the free world. I will use my freedom to listen to him, you can use yours to not listen, or cry about it. Long live General Pace! Speak out! iT’S YOUR FREEDOM!!!!!!

    Reply
  11. Kenneth C. Sanborn says:
    March 15, 2007 at 6:33 am

    I am glad that we have a Commandant of the Marine Corps who can tell who not afraid to take a stand for what is right. Not is what politically correct. We need leaders like that, not ones who waffle like the majority of Congressman, Congresswomen and Senators.

    Reply
  12. Willie Smith says:
    March 15, 2007 at 7:11 pm

    The reporters should not have asked the question, if they were not ready for the response.

    Reply
  13. Arlene Ray says:
    March 15, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    Mr. Skinner, how can one possibly equate what the good general said to what the Nazis preached against the Jews? I suggest you read the One Book.

    Reply
  14. Robyn Walters says:
    March 17, 2007 at 11:57 am

    Mr, Haskins said, “…otherwise why would God have made man and woman!“
    I would ask him why God also made so many vriations on man and woman. Don’t forget that we have Klinefelter’s Syndrome, Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, Androgen Insensitivity, Mosaic Chromosome, and Turner’s Syndrome babies, not to mention those born with both male and emale gonads and genitalia. One or more in 2000 babies born do not belong to either the male or female category. Since God makes no mistakes, there must be a reaon for this and for gay babies. Hmmmmm. Let’d try Christ’s second commandment, shall we? Love your neighbor as yourself. It’s caled unconditional love.

    Reply
  15. Walter Hearin says:
    March 17, 2007 at 10:23 pm

    I work for the VA in the laboratory. We are working so short handed we can’t get the work done in a timely manner and be sides working under too much stress I am the patients are not receiving the quality of care they deserve. I don’t understand why, if we are spending upwards of 365 million dollars a day in Iraq, why we can’t get enough funding to hire more people to help with the work and care our veterans deserve.
    I suppose it will take a congressman’s family member to be effected before the money is put where it is needed.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      I have a good idea—when the cost per unit is first disclosed...
      BILL D
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      The men can only do so much, we need to stop...
      albert delaunay
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Not to hijack this thread and turn it into a...
      Kole
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      That first sentence should read...
      Moose
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      You could park an MLRS or HiMars on the...
      Moose
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Can the MLRS or HiMars system be...
      Robjack01
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Was not this PAM seeker the technology for...
      ripr
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      "Health Care bill would destroy what we can...
      JZizka
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      The Pentagon has acknowledged that climate change...
      JZizka
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Yes, let's ignore a thing that 90% of...
      gmanaz
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage