DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Politricks » General, Congressman Frank’s on Line One …

General, Congressman Frank’s on Line One …

General pace.jpg

NEWS RELEASES from the United States Department of Defense

A Statement From Gen. Peter Pace, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

“Yesterday, dur­ing a wide rang­ing inter­view with the Chicago Tribune Editorial Board, I was asked if I think the cur­rent pol­icy as cod­i­fied in U.S. Code, gen­er­ally referred to as “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” should still hold.

“People have a wide range of opin­ions on this sen­si­tive subject.The impor­tant thing to remem­ber is that we have a pol­icy in effect, and the Department of Defense has a statu­tory respon­si­bil­ity to imple­ment that policy.

“I made two points in sup­port of the pol­icy dur­ing the interview.One, “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” allows indi­vid­u­als to serve this nation; and two, it does not make a judg­ment about the moral­ity of indi­vid­ual acts.

“In express­ing my sup­port for the cur­rent pol­icy, I also offered some per­sonal opin­ions about moral conduct.

“I should have focused more on my sup­port of the pol­icy and less on my per­sonal moral views.”

Or we could focus on this war going on …

– Ward

Share |

March 13th, 2007 | Politricks | 355530 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/03/13/general-congressman-franks-on-line-one/General%2C+Congressman+Frank%27s+on+Line+One+.+.+.2007-03-13+21%3A12%3A08murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « China Spends the Cash | PDW for the US Army? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. BT says:
    March 13, 2007 at 5:44 pm

    Gen. Pace is enti­tiles to his per­sonal opin­ion, and there­fore should not apol­o­gize. On the other hand, I do not sup­port the cur­rent pol­icy. It makes no sense to younger peo­ple, and ther­fore it will be changed after the older com­mand struc­ture departs. Anyone who makes it out of the bat­tle­field alive earned the priv­i­lege to be, think, and say what­ever they want.
    On a more pragamtic note, the US needs as many bod­ies as pos­si­ble, for this 30 year campaign.

    Reply
  2. Kaltes says:
    March 13, 2007 at 6:11 pm

    I think the pol­icy makes no sense to younger peo­ple, because younger peo­ple would want gays banned from the mil­i­tary entirely.
    I think the older peo­ple are the more tol­er­ant ones.

    Reply
  3. Galls says:
    March 13, 2007 at 7:13 pm

    What is the rea­son that in the Military that there are facil­i­ties for both Men and Women? To keep the pos­si­bil­ity of roman­tic rela­tion­ships within a unit to a min­i­mal. With the intro­duc­tion of openly Gay men and Women into the mil­i­tary unit how do the admin­is­tra­tive bod­ies pre­vent increas­ing the amount roman­tic rela­tion­ships. Do they have the gay men share bunks with the straight women, or vise versa?

    Reply
  4. mike says:
    March 14, 2007 at 12:01 am

    Younger peo­ple want gays banned from the mil­i­tary entirely? Unless you’re writ­ing from Iran… okay, or from Missouri… you need to get out more.

    Reply
  5. Big says:
    March 14, 2007 at 3:15 am

    Further proof that the US Armed Forces are not really on a war foot­ing. The thing that is killing us is out of touch General Officers; maybe the Officer Corps in gen­eral. We are try­ing to fight the GWOT and peo­ple are wor­ried about this stuff?
    Give me a break.

    Reply
  6. Stephen Trimble says:
    March 14, 2007 at 6:57 am

    Ok … here’s the what if?
    What if Pace means to go into pol­i­tics, post-​​retirement?
    Maybe his stunt was cal­cu­lated?
    I know it’s crazy, but what if?

    Reply
  7. Wembley says:
    March 14, 2007 at 8:35 am

    Clearly the mil­i­tary have a long way to go with deal­ing with homo­pho­bia, and until that’s resolved there will be all kinds of trou­ble.
    At a time when recruit­ing and retain­ing enough bod­ies is a real prob­lem, this kind of thing has to be addressed.

    Reply
  8. Nanonymous says:
    March 14, 2007 at 9:14 am

    Out of touch with whom? The Armed Services? You might try ask­ing around a bar­racks, ward­room, or dor­mi­tory (for the Air Force), and see what sort of responses “don’t ask, don’t tell” draws. My guess is that Pace’s opin­ion isn’t going to be all that dif­fer­ent from the replies you get. Just less colorful.

    Reply
  9. TCM says:
    March 15, 2007 at 1:37 am

    General Pace is enti­tled to his own thoughts. However, when in a pub­lic posi­tion such as his, he is also oblig­ated by duty and code to reserve his per­sonal opin­ions and uphold the poli­cies and val­ues of the armed ser­vices. He has now offended at least 65,000 troops and many many more American Citizens!!! I call for his res­ig­na­tion as he has breeched his duty and pos­tion with his own per­sonal pref­er­ences. Under his lead­er­ship, peo­ple are not given an oppor­tu­nity of fair­ness and he is lead­ing oth­ers to igno­rance and bigotry…I urge him to take respon­si­bil­ity and step aside. This is a SERIOUS MORALE ISSUE now!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  10. Dale says:
    March 15, 2007 at 5:42 am

    “Everyone has their own opin­ion” Until their opin­ion pisses you off! You peo­ple are such hip­ocrites, the gen­eral has spent his life fight­ing for what he believes. If he chooses to express his views openly that is his right. He and myself unlike most of you cry babies, fought for that right. If you don’t like what he said or has to say, change the chan­nel or turn it off. I just hap­pen to agree with him as do the other 85% of the free world. I will use my free­dom to lis­ten to him, you can use yours to not lis­ten, or cry about it. Long live General Pace! Speak out! iT’S YOUR FREEDOM!!!!!!

    Reply
  11. Kenneth C. Sanborn says:
    March 15, 2007 at 6:33 am

    I am glad that we have a Commandant of the Marine Corps who can tell who not afraid to take a stand for what is right. Not is what polit­i­cally cor­rect. We need lead­ers like that, not ones who waf­fle like the major­ity of Congressman, Congresswomen and Senators.

    Reply
  12. Willie Smith says:
    March 15, 2007 at 7:11 pm

    The reporters should not have asked the ques­tion, if they were not ready for the response.

    Reply
  13. Arlene Ray says:
    March 15, 2007 at 8:00 pm

    Mr. Skinner, how can one pos­si­bly equate what the good gen­eral said to what the Nazis preached against the Jews? I sug­gest you read the One Book.

    Reply
  14. Robyn Walters says:
    March 17, 2007 at 11:57 am

    Mr, Haskins said, “…oth­er­wise why would God have made man and woman!“
    I would ask him why God also made so many vri­a­tions on man and woman. Don’t for­get that we have Klinefelter’s Syndrome, Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia, Androgen Insensitivity, Mosaic Chromosome, and Turner’s Syndrome babies, not to men­tion those born with both male and emale gonads and gen­i­talia. One or more in 2000 babies born do not belong to either the male or female cat­e­gory. Since God makes no mis­takes, there must be a reaon for this and for gay babies. Hmmmmm. Let’d try Christ’s sec­ond com­mand­ment, shall we? Love your neigh­bor as your­self. It’s caled uncon­di­tional love.

    Reply
  15. Walter Hearin says:
    March 17, 2007 at 10:23 pm

    I work for the VA in the lab­o­ra­tory. We are work­ing so short handed we can’t get the work done in a timely man­ner and be sides work­ing under too much stress I am the patients are not receiv­ing the qual­ity of care they deserve. I don’t under­stand why, if we are spend­ing upwards of 365 mil­lion dol­lars a day in Iraq, why we can’t get enough fund­ing to hire more peo­ple to help with the work and care our vet­er­ans deserve.
    I sup­pose it will take a congressman’s fam­ily mem­ber to be effected before the money is put where it is needed.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage