DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Guns » PDW for the US Army?

PDW for the US Army?

Brickmuppet notes that the US Army seems to be qui­etly look­ing at the per­sonal defense weapon (PDW) concept:

A report in today’s Jane’s Defence Weekly quotes Brigadier General Mark Brown, the head of the US Army’s ‘Programme Executive Office — Soldier’ and com­mand­ing gen­eral of the Natick Soldier Centre in Massachusetts, as say­ing that the US Army is look­ing to acquire a new per­sonal defence weapon: a com­pact, medium-​​powered firearm for issue to vehi­cle crews.
He stated that the new weapon will be “larger than a pis­tol and smaller than a car­bine” and would be employed by per­son­nel not pri­mar­ily engaged in infantry com­bat. He said: “When you get all your sol­diers geared up in an upar­moured Humvee, there’s not a lot of room”.
A for­mal require­ment for the PDW is being devel­oped by the Army’s main infantry cen­tre at Fort Benning. The small arms cen­tre at Picatinny Arsenal would be tasked to over­see the pro­cure­ment.
General Brown said that at this point the ser­vice has only a “gen­er­alised require­ment” for a PDW. The report says it is too early to know whether the Army would pre­fer an off-​​the-​​shelf weapon or a devel­op­men­tal item.

xm8_pdw.jpg

XM8’s PDW model

Of course, every­one is going to have an opin­ion on this one. HK MP7? FN P90? Knight’s Armament PDW? How about the Bushmaster Armpistol? Or even a pump-​​action 5.56 pis­tol? Maybe reis­sue the M1 Carbine?
Murdoc says “None of the above”. This ain’t gonna hap­pen.
A major prob­lem is that 9mm-​​based sub­ma­chine­guns aren’t going to be effec­tive against any­one with any armor, and .45 SMGs won’t be a whole lot bet­ter. Two truly promis­ing lit­tle weapons, the MP7 and the P90, use new odd­ball ammu­ni­tion and are built across the pond.
I think this is going to wal­low around for a while. Then they’ll pick either the MP7, the P90, or a snub-​​barreled M4 and begin devel­op­ment. After a year or two, and a gazil­lion dol­lars (or two), the pro­gram will be can­celed and they’ll just issue every­one either a 9mm pis­tol or an M4. Which is what they’re doing today.
Incidentally, the XM8 assault rifle had a nifty lit­tle PDW ver­sion. That pro­gram wal­lowed around for a while and then died qui­etly. As will this one.
Call me cyn­i­cal (or even bit­ter), and I’m totally shoot­ing from the hip on this one, but I will believe this has a chance when the order for the first 100,000 is issued.
UPDATE: A com­ment over on my site was too good to not post here:

A hun­dred years from now, when we are fight­ing bat­tles on Mars, our troops will be car­ry­ing M16’s and M9’s and bitch­ing that they jam in the Martian dust.

And I thought I was cyn­i­cal…
–cross-​​posted by Murdoc

Share |

March 13th, 2007 | Guns | 355662 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/03/13/pdw-for-the-us-army/PDW+for+the+US+Army%3F2007-03-14+03%3A24%3A31paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « General, Congressman Frank’s on Line One … | The War We’re In » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. LtCurry says:
    July 5, 2008 at 9:45 pm

    So youre sayign make a 7.62 casign out of 6061 t-​​6 alu­minum, and com­press the cham­ber to help the round from explod­ing in the breech? Anythign else would be way to expen­sive, and or heavy. tita­nium, coramite, 17–4 stain­less stamped, every­t­ing would make a sin­gle bul­let cost more than $2.00 a piece. brass is goign to be used untill we find some exotic mate­r­ial tha is easy to make and process, or re-​​design the firearm from the groudn up, as in elec­tri­cal pusle, as proven, or other means as in tran­sis­tor pow­ered and co2 laser. If we coudl design a cheap shit amer­i­can US-​​08, like the ak-​​47, with a qual­ity bar­rel i would be happy. I love my M-​​16, M-​​4, m-​​14, m1, ar-​​15, p-​​90, mp-​​5. But if some­thing is bet­ter, and made fast, deal with the fire­power we have. The M-​​16 was made to pen­e­trate kevlar at 200 to 300 meters. The M-​​14 is a shorter stick, the roudn was never emant to be used in 20 ft engage­ments. we need to go back to Hollow points and not FMJ’s for close com­bat. Screw the rules of engage­ment. They behead us with swiss army knives if cap­tured. So what it a frag­men­ta­tion round causes a litle more pain before achmed expires.

    Reply
  2. Barbara R. Benson says:
    February 23, 2009 at 11:15 pm

    Weight Lifting for Beginners — Weight lift­ing wrist straps for begin­ners
    When start­ing to train, some­times it is nec­es­sary for begin­ners to know that there are nec­es­sary items to get, and these items are needed in order to get a good work out going on if you are get­ting into build­ing up. And what is this gear good for? Well, non other than to make you built up faster and to pro­tect your body from suf­fer­ing unnec­es­sary injuries, in other words, this is equip­ment not only for begin­ners, but for all peo­ple who are into lift­ing weights, to use such prod­ucts as Weight lift­ing wrist straps. It doesn

    Reply
  3. Pam Toll says:
    May 5, 2009 at 2:29 pm

    I was read­ing this arti­cle on the Illumnati which is an under­ground group. They had a retired British Intelligence direc­tor quoted as say­ing” Any pro­fes­sional intel­li­gent agent knows there is no such thing as a group known as Al Queda as a ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion, but its a Devil to pro­duce thru the media to get the pub­lic to believe they have iden­ti­fied the source or tar­get of ter­ror­ism.“
    I was won­der­ing if it is true, that Alquada is not an actual ter­ror orga­ni­za­tion, but fab­ri­cated by the FBI AND OR US MILITARY. I am not say­ing that there are not known ter­ror groups. But theyre struc­ture and recruit­ing prac­tices can be iden­ti­fied. The Template of events of which peo­ple are rounded up into these under­ground groups which could be con­strued as crim­i­nal ‚left wing, dam­ag­ing to the infra­struc­ture in their activ­i­ties, which in fact is the US def­i­n­i­tion of terrorism..“Damage to the infra­struc­ture” as opposed to blow­ing up SUVs and steal­ing stuff.
    Where can the iden­ti­fi­able sources of a ter­ror cell abroad, much less in the USA proper be iden­ti­fied, but not labled as an ALQUADA cell?
    Are newer under­ground groups for­mu­lat­ing call­ing them­selves some­thing Different.. even if they for­mu­late on a sim­i­lar basis that Suicide bombers and loy­al­sts are rounded up from forgein coun­tries.
    I have seen and noted the com­mon ele­ment between the US ter­ror groups, yet named and Forgein ter­ror groups is that they solicit peo­ple who are down and not accepted within the whole of soci­ety and POSITIVELY REINFORCE NEGATIVE BEHAVIORS to encour­age per­sons to SPY on and under­mind the govt, dam­age, steal, infil­trate, rob, kid­nap, abuse , tor­ture , use of mod­er­ate home­made chem­i­cal weaponry and MAJOR INTERNET AND INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE dam­age and insur­gency. The pro­pa­ganda found on cred­i­ble well known pop­u­lar web­sites, and the false news and enter­tain­ment sto­ries fil­tered in , and bad, cor­rupt bank­ing, stock mar­ket , credit card, mort­gage and other such finan­cial tam­per­ing and adjust­ments is cause for ALARM that we are under a ter­ror attack in the USA , as well as around the world. Our author­i­ties have not done enough to iden­tify this level of hack­ing as acts of ter­ror­ism as it could be actu­ally defined. Laws do not make for prompt, effi­cient or well under­stood law enforce­ment inves­ti­ga­tions. The line is not clear where the cops stop and the Military begins. There is still a total lack of coor­di­na­tion in such mat­ters, and wit­nesses cred­i­bil­ity are attacked as fever­ishly as the WORLD TRADE CENTERS WERE.
    Something must be done to alert the gen­eral pub­lic and to con­trol and stop these under­ground activ­i­ties which seem widely ignored by the State and local authorities.

    Reply
  4. Pam Toll says:
    May 5, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    I was read­ing this arti­cle on the Illumnati which is an under­ground group. They had a retired British Intelligence direc­tor quoted as say­ing” Any pro­fes­sional intel­li­gent agent knows there is no such thing as a group known as Al Queda as a ter­ror­ist orga­ni­za­tion, but its a Devil to pro­duce thru the media to get the pub­lic to believe they have iden­ti­fied the source or tar­get of ter­ror­ism.“
    I was won­der­ing if it is true, that Alquada is not an actual ter­ror orga­ni­za­tion, but fab­ri­cated by the FBI AND OR US MILITARY. I am not say­ing that there are not known ter­ror groups. But theyre struc­ture and recruit­ing prac­tices can be iden­ti­fied. The Template of events of which peo­ple are rounded up into these under­ground groups which could be con­strued as crim­i­nal ‚left wing, dam­ag­ing to the infra­struc­ture in their activ­i­ties, which in fact is the US def­i­n­i­tion of terrorism..“Damage to the infra­struc­ture” as opposed to blow­ing up SUVs and steal­ing stuff.
    Where can the iden­ti­fi­able sources of a ter­ror cell abroad, much less in the USA proper be iden­ti­fied, but not labled as an ALQUADA cell?
    Are newer under­ground groups for­mu­lat­ing call­ing them­selves some­thing Different.. even if they for­mu­late on a sim­i­lar basis that Suicide bombers and loy­al­sts are rounded up from forgein coun­tries.
    I have seen and noted the com­mon ele­ment between the US ter­ror groups, yet named and Forgein ter­ror groups is that they solicit peo­ple who are down and not accepted within the whole of soci­ety and POSITIVELY REINFORCE NEGATIVE BEHAVIORS to encour­age per­sons to SPY on and under­mind the govt, dam­age, steal, infil­trate, rob, kid­nap, abuse , tor­ture , use of mod­er­ate home­made chem­i­cal weaponry and MAJOR INTERNET AND INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE dam­age and insur­gency. The pro­pa­ganda found on cred­i­ble well known pop­u­lar web­sites, and the false news and enter­tain­ment sto­ries fil­tered in , and bad, cor­rupt bank­ing, stock mar­ket , credit card, mort­gage and other such finan­cial tam­per­ing and adjust­ments is cause for ALARM that we are under a ter­ror attack in the USA , as well as around the world. Our author­i­ties have not done enough to iden­tify this level of hack­ing as acts of ter­ror­ism as it could be actu­ally defined. Laws do not make for prompt, effi­cient or well under­stood law enforce­ment inves­ti­ga­tions. The line is not clear where the cops stop and the Military begins. There is still a total lack of coor­di­na­tion in such mat­ters, and wit­nesses cred­i­bil­ity are attacked as fever­ishly as the WORLD TRADE CENTERS WERE.
    Something must be done to alert the gen­eral pub­lic and to con­trol and stop these under­ground activ­i­ties which seem widely ignored by the State and local authorities.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
      Awesome. Now to be a *real* military contract we have to spend $40...
      jmatt
    • Keep it Simple
      Anybody who went to basic training will never forget about weight. Like...
      Big Daddy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      It had been a while since I came by the site- and now I...
      Mod
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      In DTI this article is credited to Sharon...
      Wembley
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Jews wasn't a threat for anyone, that's why this was a tragedie
      A.g.
    • Quick-Deploy 120mm Mortar
      The 120 is mounted in the back of a mortar track and...
      SSG Knapp 11C3O
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I am a New Yorker, and have seen the holes in the ground where...
      Sam
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "This is not the first Muslim soldier to commit treason against his...
      Sam
    • Time to Pull the Plug
      4. The Iraqi Rebels went underground to penetrate OUR and...
      Osher Doctorow
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage