<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Baby’s First Afterburner</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Thursday</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/#comment-158177</link> <dc:creator>Thursday</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 16:11:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2387#comment-158177</guid> <description>The trick with unmanned jets is that, while they look good in theory, aircraft really aren&#039;t much more durable than pilots under stress, and a remote control system leaves your entire air force vulnerable to some clever joker with a jammer. This leaves AI systems, which begs the question; who do people trust more, pilots, or programmers? Every time people come up with a new weapon, they seem to expect it to be a panacea. Remember all the business back in the 60&#039;s about how missiles would make dogfighting obsolete? They said the same thing about the Eagle with its ginormous radar. Missiles are still evadable to this day, and eagle drivers still get in awkward knife fights with more agile F-16&#039;s that sneak under their radar. Stealth is going to make this game even harder for computers in the future. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trick with unmanned jets is that, while they look good in theory, aircraft really aren’t much more durable than pilots under stress, and a remote control system leaves your entire air force vulnerable to some clever joker with a jammer. This leaves AI systems, which begs the question; who do people trust more, pilots, or programmers?<br /> Every time people come up with a new weapon, they seem to expect it to be a panacea. Remember all the business back in the 60’s about how missiles would make dogfighting obsolete? They said the same thing about the Eagle with its ginormous radar. Missiles are still evadable to this day, and eagle drivers still get in awkward knife fights with more agile F-16’s that sneak under their radar. Stealth is going to make this game even harder for computers in the future.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WS</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/#comment-158176</link> <dc:creator>WS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 15:31:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2387#comment-158176</guid> <description>Actually there are a fair amount of people here in the Air Force, pilots included, who do want UAVs.  SECAF just released a letter (some media coverage) to that effect. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually there are a fair amount of people here in the Air Force, pilots included, who do want UAVs.  SECAF just released a letter (some media coverage) to that effect.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/#comment-158175</link> <dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:41:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2387#comment-158175</guid> <description>Actually, unmanned jets really aren&#039;t a USAF desire.  Remember the term &quot;fighter mafia&quot;?  The Air Force is run by pilots - they don&#039;t want to relegate themselves to the annals of history. The push for UAVs comes from those outside the Air Force. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, unmanned jets really aren’t a USAF desire.  Remember the term “fighter mafia”?  The Air Force is run by pilots — they don’t want to relegate themselves to the annals of history.<br /> The push for UAVs comes from those outside the Air Force.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/#comment-158174</link> <dc:creator>mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:12:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2387#comment-158174</guid> <description>Peter-- If I&#039;m not mistaken, since Mikoyan-Gurevich is involved, they&#039;re probably looking for a buyer for the 1.42/1.44/Flatiron/MiG-39/whatever it&#039;s called. It actually flew well before the F-35. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter–<br /> If I’m not mistaken, since Mikoyan-Gurevich is involved, they’re probably looking for a buyer for the 1.42/1.44/Flatiron/MiG-39/whatever it’s called. It actually flew well before the F-35.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Foreign.Boy</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/#comment-26308</link> <dc:creator>Foreign.Boy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:13:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2387#comment-26308</guid> <description>There is also nothing to stop them from making a &#039;simple&#039; robot that would just pull levers and push pedals.  A sort of &#039;retro fit&#039; unmanned air craft. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also nothing to stop them from making a ‘simple’ robot that would just pull levers and push pedals.  A sort of ‘retro fit’ unmanned air craft.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Foreign.Boy</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/#comment-158173</link> <dc:creator>Foreign.Boy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:11:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2387#comment-158173</guid> <description>The move to unmanned jets is referring to the fact that Jet technology (engine technology) is soon going to make it impossible for a normal man to survive.  Especially since they want to fly &#039;faster higher and more agile&#039;. Also from the desire to lessen casualties of highly trained pilots and the ability to fly longer sorties (just get up from your desk and go pee). This is mostly a USAF desire.  However, once this technology is in place, it&#039;ll become a new arms race. It&#039;s a frightening thought of Nuclear Laden Jets being controlled remotely.  I&#039;d hate to see a super smart hacker-terrorist gain control of a nuke and land it safely (and possibly invisible to radar &#039;stealth tech&#039;) without anyone having a chance to stop this from happening. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The move to unmanned jets is referring to the fact that Jet technology (engine technology) is soon going to make it impossible for a normal man to survive.  Especially since they want to fly ‘faster higher and more agile’.<br /> Also from the desire to lessen casualties of highly trained pilots and the ability to fly longer sorties (just get up from your desk and go pee).<br /> This is mostly a USAF desire.  However, once this technology is in place, it’ll become a new arms race.<br /> It’s a frightening thought of Nuclear Laden Jets being controlled remotely.  I’d hate to see a super smart hacker-terrorist gain control of a nuke and land it safely (and possibly invisible to radar ‘stealth tech’) without anyone having a chance to stop this from happening.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/15/babys-first-afterburner/#comment-158172</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:56:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2387#comment-158172</guid> <description>This article at DID was posted just a few days ago. India, Russia in Negotiations re: Next-Generation Fighter http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2007/03/india-russia-in-negotiations-re-nextgeneration-fighter/index.php There is a strong likelihood this will be a maned aircraft ,but I will be curious as to what its looks like. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article at DID was posted just a few days ago.<br /> India, Russia in Negotiations re: Next-Generation Fighter<br /> <a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2007/03/india-russia-in-negotiations-re-nextgeneration-fighter/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2007/03/india-russia-in-negotiations-re-nextgeneration-fighter/index.php</a><br /> There is a strong likelihood this will be a maned aircraft ‚but I will be curious as to what its looks like.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 710/714 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 03:25:51 -->
