DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » War Update » Changing of the Guard

Changing of the Guard

Last Friday, 16 March, 2007 saw Admiral William “Fox” Fallon take over command of CENTCOM from General John Abizaid at a change of command ceremony held at MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa, Fla.
fallon.jpg
These sorts of changes of command happen all the time in the military, at every level in the chain of command. What is special about this one, however, is that a Navy admiral is taking the helm over a traditionally Army or Marine-focused unified regional command.
What is really unique about this is that it is evidence that the Navy, long considered an outsider in the Joint arena, has finally “made it” — has finally “changed” (transformed?) enough from a platform-centric, open-ocean war-at-sea protect-the-sea-lanes-of-communication entity to one that is integrated with the other combat services to provide a broad spectrum of battlespace operations. This is a good thing, and Carl von Clausewitz is smiling, wherever he is.
U.S. Army photo by Spc. Patrick A Ziegler (RELEASED)
–Pinch Paisley, crossposted with more at the Instapinch

Share |

March 18th, 2007 | War Update | 23905 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/03/18/changing-of-the-guard/Changing+of+the+Guard2007-03-18+11%3A33%3A53david_axe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Commandant Says “There is Going to Be a Crash” | The Sunday Paper’s Comix Page » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Solomon says:
    March 18, 2007 at 8:44 am

    That’s a pretty big bone to toss the Navy’s way! I don’t think you can say that any branch has fully adopted Rumsfeld’s vision of integration. Several other pundits stated that this change of command had more to do with potential hostilities with IRAN, not with the current combat situation in Iraq. If you will note, General P has the ear of the SecDef and the President. In all reality he is running that operation and the CentCom commander will be focusing elsewhere (again Iran, Africa and other areas of the Middle East…)

    Reply
  2. Anonymouse says:
    March 18, 2007 at 9:02 am

    Or the Navy hasn’t changed at all, but today’s top-down obsession with making everything a “joint” operation has catapulted someone without sufficient experience or expertise into an important billet.
    Which is what most people I know in the military think…

    Reply
  3. Jason says:
    March 19, 2007 at 8:23 am

    “What is really unique about this is that it is evidence that the Navy, long considered an outsider in the Joint arena, has finally “made it” — has finally “changed” (transformed?) enough from a platform-centric, open-ocean war-at-sea protect-the-sea-lanes-of-communication entity to one that is integrated with the other combat services to provide a broad spectrum of battlespace operations.“
    Oh cut the crap. The Navy never changes its position or attitude, it expects everyone else to work around it. I’ve never seen a Navy position on an issue that was “joint.” Fallon was put in there so that he could threaten Iran with carrier task forces. Every statement he’s made addresses his intent to address the “strategic” issues of the region and not the military aspects of the two wars in theater.
    When the PACOM top position goes to a ground commander, I’ll believe that the DOD chooses commanders based on their skillsets and not on service parochialism. Until then, don’t make this out to be something it isn’t — it’s just politics.

    Reply
  4. Melissa says:
    October 17, 2007 at 2:14 am

    I appreciate that you keep your site going and allow comments. To me feedback is an interesting part of a website.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      One means of defeating an enemy is to cripple...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      No–but is it necessary for the projected cost per...
      BILL D
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      One fighter for everyone failed once before. However, it may be...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Iagree that the stealth capabilities of the F22&F35...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Why would the Marines buy A-10s? They are a great...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I agree-I noted in other comments that the f16 &f15...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      You just keep it up there, you've shown your contempt...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      At a price of 135mil. ea our suspected future enemies...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The rest of the world must be laughing their asses off...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Got a program question for you Mac. What is the definition...
      TMB
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage