DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » Paki “Babur”

Paki “Babur”

babur-missile-web.jpg

Pakistan test fired a nuclear-​​capable cruise mis­sile today report­edly with stealth capa­bil­i­ties. The Hatf VII, or Babur as it is known in Pakistan mil­i­tary cir­cles, is a terrain-​​hugging, radar-​​avoiding cruise mis­sile, whose range has now been enhanced to 700 kilo­me­tres. It is a highly maneu­ver­able mis­sile with pin­point accu­racy, a Pakistani mil­i­tary state­ment said.

(Test Launch Video from August 2005)

The test comes as protests over the fir­ing of Pakistans supreme court chief jus­tice by the coun­trys leader, Pervez Musharraf, con­tinue to grow. The gen­er­als hold on power has always been ten­u­ous with al Qaeda-​​linked tribal groups in the west agi­tat­ing for a Taliban-​​style gov­ern­ment. So this lat­est mis­sile test could be an attempt to demon­strate his mil­i­tary prowess with angry crowds teem­ing in the streets.

This is the third test of the Hatf VII mis­sile since 2005, and with its rel­a­tively short range, its only a threat to neigh­bor­ing India. Given the rag­ing oppo­si­tion to Musharrafs rule, how­ever, a nuclear-​​tipped Babur in the hands of a fun­da­men­tal­ist gov­ern­ment could pose a major threat to U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan.

– Christian

Share |

March 22nd, 2007 | Nukes | 240021 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/03/22/paki-babur/Paki+%22Babur%222007-03-22+13%3A44%3A09Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Air Force Budget Challenge | Land-​​Based Phalanx Weapon System » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kaltes says:
    March 22, 2007 at 3:09 pm

    Since when does pak­istan have a nuclear war­head small enough and light enough to fit on that thing? Nuclear capa­ble isn’t really nuclear capa­ble if your nukes are too big to fit on it.

    Reply
  2. Bongob says:
    March 23, 2007 at 5:33 am

    I dont know if it’s a stan­dard American usage, but “Paki” is extremely offen­sive in British English — pretty much on a par with the N-​​word.

    Reply
  3. BC says:
    March 23, 2007 at 5:56 am

    These will defi­nately get into the hands of ter­ror­ist because much of their mil­i­tary sup­ports that cause. US threat if put on ship and launched for the sea to major port cities in USA.

    Reply
  4. Graskull says:
    March 23, 2007 at 7:07 am

    I dont know if it’s a stan­dard American usage, but “Paki” is extremely offen­sive in British English — pretty much on a par with the N-​​word.
    Here’s a test shot!! PAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANI
    AND IT’S FREE TOO

    Reply
  5. Graskull says:
    March 23, 2007 at 7:09 am

    I dont know if it’s a stan­dard American usage, but “Paki” is extremely offen­sive in British English — pretty much on a par with the N-​​word.
    Here’s a test shot!! PAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANIPAKISTANI
    AND IT’S FREE TOO

    Reply
  6. KC says:
    March 23, 2007 at 8:32 am

    If “Paki” is sim­il­iar to the N-​​word, what is “Jap”, “Kraut”, “Limy”? Then either don’t read the arti­cle, or turn off your com­puter, or just stay offline!!
    IUD’s are killing our U.S. men and women, if not maim­ing them for life! What, Sticks and stones, and IUDs will break bones, names are just words that if You ignore them will fade away like a bad song or music! Get real!!!

    Reply
  7. G-Dawg says:
    March 23, 2007 at 11:30 am

    Yep, the word Paki is really offen­sive, a proper racial slur

    Reply
  8. Jerry says:
    March 23, 2007 at 11:37 am

    Uh, from what I under­stand, the word “Paki” means some­thing like “holy” in the Pakistan lan­guage; hence, the name Paki-​​stan = Holy-​​land or some­thing like that. So really, it is a com­pli­ment if this is true.

    Reply
  9. Joel says:
    March 23, 2007 at 3:20 pm

    Ok good let’s take a dis­cus­sion on mil­i­tary news and let it degen­er­ate into a dis­cus­sion on racial sensitivities.

    Reply
  10. Tom says:
    March 23, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    Too F#$%in bad! The hell with polit­i­cal cor­rect­ness. Lets call a spade a spade. Isnt it a sham every­one is so thin skinned? It seems its ok to racilly slur a white guy but nobody else. Our politi­cians have done a fine job of sell­ing out our country.

    Reply
  11. G says:
    March 23, 2007 at 7:36 pm

    Actually the name Pakistan orig­i­nated from the names of 5 eth­nic groups. Punjab, Afghan, Kashmir,… etc (I don’t remem­ber the rest). “Paki” does not mean holy.

    Reply
  12. old sarge 47 says:
    March 23, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    Ok now we have good cause to put the big bank on sadams womd we know that he sent them out very speedy so nuke the puck

    Reply
  13. The corpsman says:
    March 24, 2007 at 2:14 am

    You peo­ple (mil­i­tary men­m­bers) aren’t exactly com­pre­hend­ing the mag­ni­tude of the sit­u­a­tion. This could basi­cally start a world war not too men­tion kill thou­sands of American lives in the process.……Who cares what Paki means.….….

    Reply
  14. mike says:
    March 24, 2007 at 2:10 pm

    oh nooooo, paki does not mean holy cuz pak­istan is not an holy land and the peo­ple in it are not sin­cere.
    paki means stub­bornees accord­ing to Albashir muhammudu.

    Reply
  15. Rock says:
    March 25, 2007 at 2:00 am

    Move the troops, the Afaganistani civil­ians, & the India civil­ians out of the range of dan­ger zones from the missles to begin to nue­tral­ize the threat. Then request the the Pakistani gov­ern­ment to move it’s cit­i­zens & itself out of Pakistan ASAP! Then give the Taliban a chance to sur­ren­der & offer them a choice to decline the use of their missles or risk a sim­u­lar fate on them if they do! Then respond with the force they choose to do! It is up to the Taliban to end this war once & for all!

    Reply
  16. Brian says:
    March 26, 2007 at 11:32 am

    Is Paki Babur the dis­tant cousin of Tiki Barber?

    Reply
  17. sultan says:
    November 1, 2007 at 4:15 am

    Pakistan mean a clean land where good peo­ple live
    pak is used in urdu for clean or good­ness
    istan mean land
    from pak = paki
    here paki mean clean from sins so if u call me paki i love it,
    sultan

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Sexing up the Headline
      a href="http://www.game4pow er.com">Buy wow...
      buy wow  gold
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage