DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Guns » Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel

Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel

If somebody wanted to really help the US Army, they would do something about those God awful M4 carbines that American troops are forced to endure.

This is a recurring theme in this blog, and I’m returning to it again because of yet more new information that sheds light on the problem with the Army’s standard-issue weapon for close-in fighting — which is exactly the kind of combat that is raging in Iraq and Afghanistan today.

M4-web.jpg

In a routine acquisition notice (see this link), a US Special Forces battalion based in Okinawa announced that it is buying 84 barrels for the Heckler & Koch HK416 assault rifle.

The HK barrels will be used to replace the barrels on their own M4s.

Why? Here’s what the notice says:

The 416 barrel “allows soldiers to replace the existing M4 upper receiver with an HK proprietary gas system that does not introduce propellant gases and the associated carbon fouling back into the weapon’s interior. This reduces operator cleaning time, and increases the reliability of the M4 Carbine, particularly in an environment in which sand and dust are prevalent. The elimination of the gas tube … means that the M4 will function normally even if the weapon is fired full of water without first being drained. There isn’t another company that offers these features in their products. It is a practical, versatile system.”

Translation: the M4 barrel is so unreliable that special operations forces units need to swap it out with a barrel from a different gun — and one that actually works in real combat conditions.

One solution is to simply swap out the barrel.

But here’s another good answer: trash the M4s and just buy HK416s!

Christian adds:

For an outstanding investigative report on this issue, check out my former colleague Matt Coxs article on the bureaucratic engine that is still preventing soldiers from getting what the best soldiers in the world say is the best weapon for the fight.

– Stephen Trimble

Share |

March 26th, 2007 | Guns | 2410112 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/03/26/special-forces-say-no-to-m4-barrel/Special+Forces+Say+%27No%27+to+M4+Barrel2007-03-26+21%3A40%3A48Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Afghan Sit-Rep | Surge = Training Op for Iraqis » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. adrianjaravata@yahoo.com.ph says:
    March 3, 2009 at 6:40 am

    i like H&K 416 rifle its accurate and reliable and durable in against water dust and heat thanks to H&K

    Reply
  2. adrianjaravata says:
    March 3, 2009 at 6:43 am

    H&K its durable against heat water and dust thanks H&K more power.

    Reply
  3. adrianjaravata says:
    March 3, 2009 at 6:45 am

    H&K its durable against heat water and dust thanks H&K more power.

    Reply
  4. Wm says:
    April 4, 2009 at 5:29 pm

    Just use the Barrett 6.8 Round and the H&K 416. Cost cheep and we need Rifels not Jets And Ships.And what does booming do? its on the ground and in the Mt. and caves they are in.Look at the boombs we droped in WWII and V.N. The Bang for the Buck was not good. It cost us lives as well, because the ground troops are left with out dated equipment. And In WWII they had the Tommy Gun and didn’t give it out for fear of Germans getting it and copying it.I guess they still fell that.I didn’t like the M-16 in Vien except for the weight.But it malfunctioned to often and had to fuss with it to often.

    Reply
  5. matt maynard says:
    July 3, 2009 at 8:52 am

    I like this rifle i just wish i had one myselfe for my home and to go out and just have fun with it on the shooting range. nice job men love it.

    Reply
  6. Azhari M. Babikir says:
    August 8, 2009 at 9:24 am

    Dear Sir,
    We would like to take this opportunity to introduce ourselves to your esteemed firm. Forr your kind information, we are a Kuwaiti group of companies. Our group is specialized in army, police, law enforcement security, special forces, land forces, and national guards logistics. At present we have big orders for your products and we are fully ready to promote and market your all products in Kuwait. Again, we do have urgent orders at present. Therefore, we would appreciate very much if you could feed back to us urgently about your interest to cooperate with us in Kuwait for our above-mentioned customers. If you feel like interested in, we are ready to send to you our orders soon. it is very helpful for us if you send to us urgently your electronic catalogues covering your all products. original catalogues could be sent to our below address urgently:-
    Attn: Mr. Azhari M. Babikir Executive Director
    Messers Mobk Group
    telephone Nos: 0096524729481/2
    Mobile No: 0096599554390
    Fax No: 0096524729480
    P.O.Box 363 Code 13004
    email address: azhari@mobkgroup.com
    info@mobkgroup.com
    Website: http://​www​.mobkgroup​.com
    Safat, Kuwait
    Awaiting for your reply urgently.
    Best regards
    Azhari M. Babikir
    Executive Director
    Mobk Group, Kuwait

    Reply
  7. Rlone says:
    August 27, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    I never trusted the m16/m4 while in. I kept it immaculate and it would still jam from time to time. Combat in the desert would be a nightmare. Give me an m14 with the EBR stock or the new Troy MCS stock anyday until the figure out what is next. I would have preferred an AK with some of the new accessories and attachments that are out today over at M16/ M4 based systems. I hope the next rifle is in 6.5 or 6.8 with a piston system for relaibilty. FN Scar, Bushy ACR, Robinson , HK416/417 or something like those. We need to give the ground pounders the best available.
    “Nunquam non Paratus”

    Reply
  8. jason says:
    October 12, 2009 at 7:05 am

    >(But here’s another good answer: trash the M4s and just buy HK416s!)it’s a damn shame this guy is a american! he sounds like a germany arms dealer ready to sell his country out at a blink of eye, hav’nt you got any american pride the m4 m16 is american icon you bum colt/armalite or any american gun maker can make the same gun but better i think than the 416

    Reply
  9. Brian says:
    November 8, 2009 at 12:02 am

    The first priority is to get a reliable weapon to our soldiers. The M16/M4 needs to go. You can keep that thing as clean as possible and lubed but it will still fail.
    The design is terribly old. Every other miltary has replaced their rifles in the 40 years since the M16 has been around. You’re telling me that there isn’t a better rifle in that time? The only reason we still have it is because that Colt and their congressional buddies have kept the cash cow going all this time.

    I don’t care if the weapon is made in Germany or in the USA as long as it is the best for our troops.

    Reply
  10. Joe says:
    November 30, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    Or the least expensive route would be to retrofit all of our M-16’s and M-4’s with Gas Pistons, since that is available today.

    Without changing the entire rifle system and round used, Gas Piston upgrade would be the most sound thing right now.

    Reply
  11. Team 6 Member says:
    December 3, 2009 at 11:17 pm

    I served 2 tours in Afghanistan in 2001 & 2002, and then served 5 tours back to back in Iraq from 203 thru 2008. Trust me when I say this, The M4 & M1‘6 are junk! I was fortunate to serve with Naval Special Warfare, and in 2004 I was allowed to use an HK-416 in 7.62x51mm Cal. The 416 functioned flawlessly every time! I jammed all the time with the M4, but I hardly had a jam with the 416! Plus, the 7.62 not only gave me knock down power, it gave me punch thru power, because I was able to shoot thru walls and kill my enemy who was trying to hide behind the concrete walls which line every house & village in Afghanistan & Iraq. The HK-416 IS the most effective weapon I have ever fought with.
    The upper echelon in the Pentagon needs to stop listening to bean counter analysts and start listening to the soldiers & sailors in the field that actually have to use the weapon they are issued. To this day, I will NEVER, pick up an M4 again. I will only deploy with an HK-416 in my hands, PERIOD!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C...
      Jim
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      With the exception of his Boeing Tanker blindspot ;-) ...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i heard recently that rules of engagement in...
      mad mike
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or...
      bduff509
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: But their advantage is reduced by daytime...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And to get back on topic…Don’t think...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: "shown your contempt for every service...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      135,000,000 $ each for a fighter aircraft that's...
      Joseph
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage