<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTS — The Future of Navy Motors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHANDRAPRAKASH</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-234125</link>
		<dc:creator>CHANDRAPRAKASH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-234125</guid>
		<description>Thats fantastic, that you have make a bigest HTS motor.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats fantastic, that you have make a bigest HTS motor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-158633</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-158633</guid>
		<description>Ok, thats all very interesting, but think of the tanks! I mean, Why not strap one of em big boys on the bottom of a tank an create a new kind of battle ship we would have people all over the world envying or great idea, might even make millions, so! I got the duck tape lets put her together!.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, thats all very interesting, but think of the tanks! I mean, Why not strap one of em big boys on the bottom of a tank an create a new kind of battle ship we would have people all over the world envying or great idea, might even make millions, so! I got the duck tape lets put her together!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sailorcarrcreek</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-158631</link>
		<dc:creator>sailorcarrcreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-158631</guid>
		<description>the savings will be substantial . nearly every aspect has been thought out . the high tech super conductor motors will give a combat effective and commercial shipping advantage . speed not sacrificed . less wt to transport . less storage room occupied . because of super conductivity - less energy required . less shipping transport fuel cost . technology upgrade marketable to friendly forces and trans global shipping enterprise . ya reckon we could raft the Big Sandy from Pike all the way to the Mississippi , my Huckleberry Friend ? the generators could feed off the motor and download to the capacitor and battery back up . the super conductor insulation should require less energy to transfer energy into work . noise level may be decreased . less maint.  for less parts . commercial spin off for the economy . military industrial relationships create more jobs . they produce R+D and make more revenues to pay for the government .
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the savings will be substantial . nearly every aspect has been thought out . the high tech super conductor motors will give a combat effective and commercial shipping advantage . speed not sacrificed . less wt to transport . less storage room occupied . because of super conductivity — less energy required . less shipping transport fuel cost . technology upgrade marketable to friendly forces and trans global shipping enterprise . ya reckon we could raft the Big Sandy from Pike all the way to the Mississippi , my Huckleberry Friend ? the generators could feed off the motor and download to the capacitor and battery back up . the super conductor insulation should require less energy to transfer energy into work . noise level may be decreased . less maint.  for less parts . commercial spin off for the economy . military industrial relationships create more jobs . they produce R+D and make more revenues to pay for the government .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanos</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-158630</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-158630</guid>
		<description>If they can make motors this way, then perhaps the obverse is true and they can make more efficient generators as well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they can make motors this way, then perhaps the obverse is true and they can make more efficient generators as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizzar</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-158629</link>
		<dc:creator>elizzar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-158629</guid>
		<description>hi there, think the highest temp. for superconductors at the moment is still about 80 degress kelvin, around liquid nitrogen temperature [i await to be corrected ;)]. a superconductor that could operate at &#039;room&#039; temperature would revolutionise far more than just ships - imagine electricity grids carrying power across countries without any loss, for instance (that&#039;d help the climate change gubbins!). the superconductors i have experience of are still very low temp, around 4 K, liquid helium cooled. cheers!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there, think the highest temp. for superconductors at the moment is still about 80 degress kelvin, around liquid nitrogen temperature [i await to be corrected ;)]. a superconductor that could operate at ‘room’ temperature would revolutionise far more than just ships — imagine electricity grids carrying power across countries without any loss, for instance (that’d help the climate change gubbins!). the superconductors i have experience of are still very low temp, around 4 K, liquid helium cooled. cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

