<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: HTS — The Future of Navy Motors</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: CHANDRAPRAKASH</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-234125</link> <dc:creator>CHANDRAPRAKASH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 18:35:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-234125</guid> <description>Thats fantastic, that you have make a bigest HTS motor. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats fantastic, that you have make a bigest HTS motor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charlie</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-158633</link> <dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:19:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-158633</guid> <description>Ok, thats all very interesting, but think of the tanks! I mean, Why not strap one of em big boys on the bottom of a tank an create a new kind of battle ship we would have people all over the world envying or great idea, might even make millions, so! I got the duck tape lets put her together!. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, thats all very interesting, but think of the tanks! I mean, Why not strap one of em big boys on the bottom of a tank an create a new kind of battle ship we would have people all over the world envying or great idea, might even make millions, so! I got the duck tape lets put her together!.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sailorcarrcreek</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-158631</link> <dc:creator>sailorcarrcreek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:36:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-158631</guid> <description>the savings will be substantial . nearly every aspect has been thought out . the high tech super conductor motors will give a combat effective and commercial shipping advantage . speed not sacrificed . less wt to transport . less storage room occupied . because of super conductivity - less energy required . less shipping transport fuel cost . technology upgrade marketable to friendly forces and trans global shipping enterprise . ya reckon we could raft the Big Sandy from Pike all the way to the Mississippi , my Huckleberry Friend ? the generators could feed off the motor and download to the capacitor and battery back up . the super conductor insulation should require less energy to transfer energy into work . noise level may be decreased . less maint.  for less parts . commercial spin off for the economy . military industrial relationships create more jobs . they produce R+D and make more revenues to pay for the government . </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the savings will be substantial . nearly every aspect has been thought out . the high tech super conductor motors will give a combat effective and commercial shipping advantage . speed not sacrificed . less wt to transport . less storage room occupied . because of super conductivity — less energy required . less shipping transport fuel cost . technology upgrade marketable to friendly forces and trans global shipping enterprise . ya reckon we could raft the Big Sandy from Pike all the way to the Mississippi , my Huckleberry Friend ? the generators could feed off the motor and download to the capacitor and battery back up . the super conductor insulation should require less energy to transfer energy into work . noise level may be decreased . less maint.  for less parts . commercial spin off for the economy . military industrial relationships create more jobs . they produce R+D and make more revenues to pay for the government .</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thanos</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-158630</link> <dc:creator>Thanos</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:34:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-158630</guid> <description>If they can make motors this way, then perhaps the obverse is true and they can make more efficient generators as well. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they can make motors this way, then perhaps the obverse is true and they can make more efficient generators as well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: elizzar</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/03/28/hts-the-future-of-navy-motors/#comment-158629</link> <dc:creator>elizzar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2413#comment-158629</guid> <description>hi there, think the highest temp. for superconductors at the moment is still about 80 degress kelvin, around liquid nitrogen temperature [i await to be corrected ;)]. a superconductor that could operate at &#039;room&#039; temperature would revolutionise far more than just ships - imagine electricity grids carrying power across countries without any loss, for instance (that&#039;d help the climate change gubbins!). the superconductors i have experience of are still very low temp, around 4 K, liquid helium cooled. cheers! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi there, think the highest temp. for superconductors at the moment is still about 80 degress kelvin, around liquid nitrogen temperature [i await to be corrected ;)]. a superconductor that could operate at ‘room’ temperature would revolutionise far more than just ships — imagine electricity grids carrying power across countries without any loss, for instance (that’d help the climate change gubbins!). the superconductors i have experience of are still very low temp, around 4 K, liquid helium cooled. cheers!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/6 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 691/691 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 03:56:00 -->
