DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Trimble on the Case » Aerial Common Sensor Reborn

Aerial Common Sensor Reborn

ACS-logo.jpg

You might think the Army would still be shy over publicity for the Aerial Common Sensor (ACS, for short).

Some of you will recall that ACS was the acquisition program that got cancelled in January 2006 in a most embarrassing fashion. Somehow, Lockheed Martin promised the Army that they could squeeze a 20,000-pound sensor on an aircraft with only 14,000lbs of extra room and the Army bought it.

There were lots of reasons and justifications given for the oversight, but, really, it was just a dumb mistake. The army threw away $200 million and five years of wasted time.

So it was a bit surprising this week to see ACS back in an Army news release.

Of course, the need remains to replace the Armys RC-7 and RC-12 with a spy aircraft built after the Apple IIe computer generation. (The Navys need to replace the EP-3 also lurks in the background, but they have other options than ACS.)

So, for the Army, the need remains, but so does the question: How?

The ACS is supposed to be a platform that can see all and hear all. In the intelligence world, that means you need a very sophisticated TV camera and an antenna receiver that can pick up everything from a high-bandwidth fire control radar system to a low-bandwidth cell phone held by the trigger-man of an improvised explosive device.

That is asking a lot for any one sensor to do.

With so many competing demands for cash, a next-generation spy aircraft may not be at the top of the Armys budget priority list.

Look for the Army to start cheap with an off-the-shelf sensor. One candidate often floated in industry circles is Northrop Grummans Airborne Signals Intelligence Payload (ASIP). It is already flying aboard the U-2 spy plane and is selected for two unmanned aircraft the RQ-4 Global Hawk and MQ-9B Predator.

The TV camera — also known in the military as a charge-coupled device — may be added to this system, or that part of the payload could be outsourced to another unmanned aircraft, such as the armys RQ-7 Shadow or MQ-12 Warrior.

– Stephen Trimble

Share |

April 2nd, 2007 | Trimble on the Case | 242315 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/aerial-common-sensor-reborn/Aerial+Common+Sensor+Reborn2007-04-02+15%3A11%3A54Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The General Speaks | “Roger, ball, Drone. You’re high …” » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Hellgate London Palladium says:
    August 1, 2008 at 11:28 pm

    Look at everything everyone has a different attitude, I treat this game has its own state of mind.
    Other players to me how, I will to them how. They send me Hellgate London Palladium, I will send them too. Also played for a long time was not just playing games to one point as a trivial matter to angry. What I will take the short view, too many games like the reality of right and wrong as the real and practical.

    Reply
  2. mabinogi gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 12:09 am

    Even this pathetic pharmaceutical division, produced the drug have to give, make a paste of money, I would like to be a soldier diverted?As I will get more mabinogi gold and mabinogi money.

    Reply
  3. Sword of the New World money says:
    August 8, 2008 at 3:19 am

    Sword of the New World money: Granado Espada, boasts a number of interesting features I was dying to check out. The first is that you are in control of not one avatar, but three.

    Reply
  4. Archlord money says:
    August 15, 2008 at 7:53 pm

    he did not know how to do could let the girl no longer apartness. So he decided to spend much more money to buy the Archlord money for the girl.

    Reply
  5. fiesta money says:
    August 15, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    friends are all admired us. I already did not know in this half a year, he spends how much money to buy the fiesta money for me, I only know that he was very love me, I also very love he too.

    Reply
  6. 2moons gold says:
    August 15, 2008 at 8:10 pm

    People often said the boyfriend in order to the girlfriend can spend much money to let the girlfriend happy, so now in the game many players spend much money to bought the 2moons gold then send them to their game girlfriend. So in the game I was very admire my friends, they can did many things for their girlfriend, some time they let me affect.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    Recent Comments
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      oops my mistake.. we only had 81mm and 60mm there.. not...
      Jobu
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      HEY! thats my old unit! 1-32 INF Alpha Company… that...
      Jobu
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      "An increase from 50 million to 95 million is not a 50%...
      Bill R
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Don’t Harpoons cost around...
      Wildcard
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      Yea, just have a couple patrol the road – at night...
      Andrew
    • New F-35B Hover Video
      This is supposed to be exciting, that something Harrier has done for...
      DavidB
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      ….seriously, LCS has only a deck gun?...
      CJ-
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Shows you how fucked up the US military...
      CJ-
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      20ft in draft is huge. But I see so people saying as...
      nraddin
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      How about get rid of the 57mm gun in...
      STemplar
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage