<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Roger, ball, Drone.  You’re high …”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/roger-ball-drone-youre-high/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/roger-ball-drone-youre-high/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/roger-ball-drone-youre-high/#comment-158763</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 03:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2424#comment-158763</guid>
		<description>Being in the military is a very rewarding decision that I have made.  Honestly, I think unmanned stealth UAV&#039;s think is very possible.  By 2020, the Airforce, Navy will have the necessary technology for more reliable stealth UAVs.  So I expect this to be a strong possibly of them able to land on aircraft carriers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being in the military is a very rewarding decision that I have made.  Honestly, I think unmanned stealth UAV’s think is very possible.  By 2020, the Airforce, Navy will have the necessary technology for more reliable stealth UAVs.  So I expect this to be a strong possibly of them able to land on aircraft carriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ward</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/roger-ball-drone-youre-high/#comment-158762</link>
		<dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 11:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2424#comment-158762</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not landing, Jerome.  It&#039;s taxiing to Cat 3 or 4.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not landing, Jerome.  It’s taxiing to Cat 3 or 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome Mrozak</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/roger-ball-drone-youre-high/#comment-26973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome Mrozak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 10:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2424#comment-26973</guid>
		<description>I think that the drone project will have problems if it insists on landing on the flattop -- backwards.  Bad photoshop.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the drone project will have problems if it insists on landing on the flattop — backwards.  Bad photoshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solomon</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/roger-ball-drone-youre-high/#comment-26972</link>
		<dc:creator>Solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 09:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2424#comment-26972</guid>
		<description>I would think loss rate alone will keep naval aviation manned...the Air Force loses UAV&#039;s all the time and they don&#039;t have to deal with the changing conditions found at sea...I just think this is another of Rummy and friends wet dreams about RMA.  I guess the people over at PNAC are going to have to rethink their Military Revolution. (God knows they screwed their blueprint for the middle east to high hell)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think loss rate alone will keep naval aviation manned…the Air Force loses UAV’s all the time and they don’t have to deal with the changing conditions found at sea…I just think this is another of Rummy and friends wet dreams about RMA.  I guess the people over at PNAC are going to have to rethink their Military Revolution. (God knows they screwed their blueprint for the middle east to high hell)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sokaka</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/roger-ball-drone-youre-high/#comment-158761</link>
		<dc:creator>sokaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2424#comment-158761</guid>
		<description>The proposal is all show.  No money in the POM for several years (follow the money).  It gives the Navy press that they really want UAVs on their flight decks (</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proposal is all show.  No money in the POM for several years (follow the money).  It gives the Navy press that they really want UAVs on their flight decks (</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pedestrian</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/02/roger-ball-drone-youre-high/#comment-26970</link>
		<dc:creator>pedestrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 01:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2424#comment-26970</guid>
		<description>Any news on the unmanned version of F-35?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any news on the unmanned version of F-35?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

