DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Gadgets and Gear » A Better Cammo Pattern?

A Better Cammo Pattern?

multicam-for-web.jpg

We posted an excel­lent story today writ­ten by one of our con­trib­u­tors cri­tiquing the Armys new com­bat uni­form. Eric Coulson, who com­mands an engi­neer com­pany doing some IED-​​busting in the sand­box, tack­les the issue of the uni­forms color scheme, con­struc­tion and materials.

One thing he men­tions is the under-​​the-​​radar pop­u­lar­ity among some in the mil­i­tary of a new pat­tern called mul­ti­cam. The Armys Natick Soldier Systems Center is look­ing at mul­ti­cam for its defunct (sort of) Future Force/​Land Warrior ensemble.

While the mul­ti­cam looks good for a wood­land — or even urban — envi­ron­ment, I won­der how it would work in the desert. The most pop­u­lar desert pat­tern in Iraq is the Marine Corps desert MarPat scheme, which blends in well against the mud-​​brick con­struc­tion of Iraqi build­ings and can barely be seen through night vision gog­gles with a desert rock backdrop.

There are some pho­tos out there on the net of oper­a­tors wear­ing the mul­ti­cam in Southwest scrub­land, but thats with a lot of green around. Surely the folks at Natick are hard at work tweek­ing the mul­ti­cam pat­tern for multi-​​environment use.

– Christian

Share |

April 5th, 2007 | Gadgets and Gear | 243417 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/04/05/a-better-cammo-pattern/A+Better+Cammo+Pattern%3F2007-04-05+21%3A55%3A29Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « EMALS: Next Gen Catapult | iPod Armor » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. tsoldrin says:
    April 5, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    I think the ACU pat­tern was selected because it helps offi­cials to hide from reporters against the blue-​​grey back­drop in the pen­ta­gon brief­ing room.

    Reply
  2. BT says:
    April 5, 2007 at 5:50 pm

    Except for covert ops/​SOF/​snipers, blend­ing with the envi­ron­ment is impos­si­ble. If you are on patrol, any­where in the world, you will stick out like a sore thumb, regard­less of the cammo pat­tern.
    One thing that I never under­stood, is not using Kevlar and Nomex for the materials.

    Reply
  3. Sven Ortmann says:
    April 6, 2007 at 2:00 am

    It’s enough if camo makes it very hard to aim at you when dust, veg­e­ta­tion or smoke limit vis­i­bil­ity. Nobody want’s a stealth cloak.
    The whole prob­lem of opti­mum camo pat­tern is very com­plex. It depends on range, back­ground, motions, day­time and use of vision aids, equip­ment worn over the pat­tern, use of addi­tional camo mate­ri­als in addi­tion to the camo pat­tern and so on.
    Distance for exam­ple — a very fine struc­tured pat­tern is a one-​​colour sur­face at long range. A pat­tern with strong con­trasts and large uni­color sur­faces as the 80’s wood­land pat­tern is eas­ily rec­og­niz­able ast small dis­tance.
    In my opin­ion cam­ou­flage should be based on not sus­pi­cious colours for the whole equip

    Reply
  4. Charles says:
    April 7, 2007 at 12:10 am

    The prob­lem sec­ond to camo is break­ing up the human pro­file. Perhaps if hel­mets were irreg­u­larly shaped to look more rocklike…

    Reply
  5. PhilLeech says:
    April 7, 2007 at 2:33 pm

    Color is color. I don’t think you can fix that.

    Reply
  6. Willie says:
    April 11, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    Perhaps the fab­ric should add in cer­tain col­ors depend­ing on tem­per­a­ture. Extreme cold and the uni­form turns mostly grey and white with a camo pat­tern. And when it’s really hot you have more tans and greys.
    A bet­ter scheme would be an induced cur­rent to change the col­ors. So you could dial in desert, trop­i­cal, urban or artic pat­terns. The over­all uni­form would be grey, until the camo pat­terns are dialed in.
    A plan I had years ago involved two sets of reversible pants sewn together at the legs. You could have 4 dif­fer­ent uni­forms avail­able that way. And the shirts would be sewn together at the bot­tom to give you 4 shirt com­bi­na­tions. That way you’d have 4 camo vari­eties per uni­form set.

    Reply
  7. Wren says:
    October 24, 2007 at 3:40 am

    I’m in the army and the ACUs don’t blend with the wood line of Korea or Washington state. ive seen pics of the mul­ti­cam and it great. the way it can really blend in

    Reply
  8. TF2-7 says:
    May 26, 2008 at 3:42 am

    BTDT, not impressed with the ACU’s. “Gray Man”???
    What were they think­ing, Cold war urban? Urban envi­ron­ments over in the war we are fight­ing are olive drab to tans in color and not gray. Digital tones do good with the right col­ors for the envi­ron­ment. The towns over there are not gray shades. If you are look­ing at some one a long way off with smog haze I might buy that approach, since most fights are under 300 meters, I want to blend in and Gray does not do that. If you are fight­ing the Soviets, that could be a dif­fer­ent mat­ter. However, we are fight­ing in mud hut vil­lages and in tans col­ors mostly with olive drab col­ors.
    The MARPAT Desert is nice.
    Multi-​​cam got it right for a best solu­tion role IMHO. If you have to wear this in the jun­gle, it will still be bet­ter than the ACU.
    I’ve found the ACU works best when you lay down on gravel roads in camp on the way to chow hall, other than that, worth­less.
    I hope the boys at Natick Soldier Systems Center fix this prob­lem for our guys. You don’t wear a Combat Uniform because of fash­ion, you wear it for blend­ing to the envi­ron­ment we are war in.

    Reply
  9. Archlord money says:
    August 6, 2008 at 1:53 am

    In the Beach City is such fear­ful­ness, I am own­ing many Archlord money in my pocket.

    Reply
  10. SGT Boggs says:
    September 23, 2008 at 5:11 pm

    The dig­i­tal pat­tern is good, but I don’t under­stand the grey. I think the rebs of the south would like it though. It needs to go. The Army needs to stay green with dif­fernt shades of green.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage