<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Building a New Ford</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/04/07/building-a-new-ford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/07/building-a-new-ford/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: thermopile</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/07/building-a-new-ford/#comment-159012</link> <dc:creator>thermopile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:46:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2436#comment-159012</guid> <description>The propulsion plant came in about 50 long tons under estimate ... so from a WEIGHT perspective, there is margin.  And a few extra tons added due to EMALS is a relative drop in the bucket of a 90,000 long ton carrier. It is *slightly* more worrisome for stability: the propulsion plant is generally below the center of buoyancy, and the EMALS is well above it.  The righting moment takes a small hit. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The propulsion plant came in about 50 long tons under estimate … so from a WEIGHT perspective, there is margin.  And a few extra tons added due to EMALS is a relative drop in the bucket of a 90,000 long ton carrier.<br /> It is *slightly* more worrisome for stability: the propulsion plant is generally below the center of buoyancy, and the EMALS is well above it.  The righting moment takes a small hit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ward</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/07/building-a-new-ford/#comment-159011</link> <dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:58:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2436#comment-159011</guid> <description>Let me try and figure that out for you, Grandjester.  I&#039;m sure it ain&#039;t gonna cost any less. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me try and figure that out for you, Grandjester.  I’m sure it ain’t gonna cost any less.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Grandjester</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/07/building-a-new-ford/#comment-27265</link> <dc:creator>Grandjester</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:56:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2436#comment-27265</guid> <description>OK what are a few hundred tons between friends...  But I am curious as to how much this will add to the cost? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK what are a few hundred tons between friends…  But I am curious as to how much this will add to the cost?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Max in Andover</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/07/building-a-new-ford/#comment-159010</link> <dc:creator>Max in Andover</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:15:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2436#comment-159010</guid> <description>Now there&#039;s a man with real experience in the Navy! Anchors aweigh, my friend! Signed, a former swab jockey </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now there’s a man with real experience in the Navy! Anchors aweigh, my friend!<br /> Signed, a former swab jockey</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 677/681 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 00:12:38 -->
