DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Eat DT's Dust » Boeing Says “Doh!”

Boeing Says “Doh!”

Heres a test

Tell me whats wrong with this picture?
BoeingAD-1-web.jpg

Its a full page advertisement that ran today in the Washington Post (and maybe other papers) sponsored by the Boeing Co. that calls attention to a program running tonight on PBS called Operation Homecoming.

From the ad:

Operation Homecoming is a unique documentary that explores the first-hand accounts of American troops who have participated in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

the film opens a profound window into the experiences of those serving in Americas Armed Forces

AMERICAN troops and AMERICAN armed forces

Now look at the picture again

The soldier is holding an AK-47

Doesn’t look to me like it’s of an American Soldier

A Boeing spokeswoman said the photo was provided by the documentary maker. She said they hadnt gotten any calls about it and had never noticed that it was not of an American serviceman.

Now, let me get this straight. Boeing makes practically every weapon the U.S. military uses today (I know Im exaggerating, but keep with me here). Theyre one of the lead systems integrators for the Armys Future Combat System program, so they know what todays troopers carry. With all that experience, youd think at least someone would have enough insight to raise their hand and say: Wait a minute guys, this isnt an American?

Thats a big oops for the folks over at Boeing

(Thanks to PC for the scan)

– Christian

Share |

April 16th, 2007 | Eat DT's Dust | 245736 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/04/16/boeing-says-doh/Boeing+Says+%22Doh%21%222007-04-16+19%3A39%3A44Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « What’s Going on at JIEDDO? | The Water Wars of 2050 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Army Brat says:
    April 16, 2007 at 4:23 pm

    DOH!
    Can recognize that damn AK muzzle a mile away.
    They SHOULD have caught that.

    Reply
  2. Pete Kirkham says:
    April 16, 2007 at 4:24 pm

    What about http://​www​.defensetech​.org/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​0​0​0​5​4​1​.​h​tml ?

    Reply
  3. C says:
    April 16, 2007 at 5:08 pm

    chances are, whatever line producer at boeing’s creative department wouldn’t know an AK from an M16, and possibly wouldn’t know an ass from an elbow. a goof to be sure, but not that difficult to go unnoticed. unfortunately for them, the prime demographic for this show WILL be noticing.

    Reply
  4. bobbymike says:
    April 16, 2007 at 5:20 pm

    Many special ops troopers use AK’s to blend in and look native. Also, because of the distinctive sound of the AK over the M4 it won’t give them away when firing.
    Nah, they blew it!!

    Reply
  5. Charles says:
    April 16, 2007 at 5:30 pm

    They wouldn’t know, AK’s aren’t in their purview. AK’s dont cost a few thousand a pop each, so they don’t appear on their radar.

    Reply
  6. Charles says:
    April 16, 2007 at 5:33 pm

    This may be a stretch, but I think the vest looks a bit less bulky than the IBA: It may be one of those ‘90s era PASGT (or is it PAGST) vest thingys nowadays found on Iraqi army troopers.

    Reply
  7. FiftyFive says:
    April 16, 2007 at 5:49 pm

    The photo was taken by a US combat photographer — you can find it on flickr — and seems right at home with a project designed to see the war through the eyes of troops. This image was captured by an American serviceman, and thereby seen quite literally through his eyes.
    Also the number of US troops who have stopped to pose for a picture with an AK has got to be in the tens of thousands. You can find many dozens on the net in a matter of seconds.
    This guy may or may not be an American (or a guy) but if that’s what seems noteworthy out of today’s Washington Post, you guys should start reading and not just looking at the pictures.

    Reply
  8. MzK says:
    April 16, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    Could it be an Iraqi soldier ?

    Reply
  9. lurch says:
    April 16, 2007 at 6:51 pm

    by any chances they could Spcial Forces.

    Reply
  10. COCHISE says:
    April 16, 2007 at 8:34 pm

    Only in america do we have dumb dumb’ Withnothing to do, like our reps in Washington.
    Boeing is a leader in their prfession,

    Reply
  11. Motive25 says:
    April 16, 2007 at 8:53 pm

    I noticed this in today’s Washington Post. To me it doesn’t matter if it was an American soldier posing with an AK (although I think was more likely an Iraqi), if you’re going to advertise to an AMERICAN audience, about AMERICAN soldiers, then you should have a picture with an AMERICAN weapon.

    Reply
  12. WALLACE MCNABB says:
    April 16, 2007 at 9:30 pm

    well by the helmet outline and the way the soldier is pictured it could be an iraqi soldier. but all is speculation. i know of some u.s. soldiers who carried ak’s when they could because they didn’t trust their m-4’s.

    Reply
  13. D18 says:
    April 16, 2007 at 9:36 pm

    Anyone who has been in Afghanistan knows that it is not uncommon to see the varieties of M-16s, AR-15s, and AK-47/74, and even PKM carried by regular foot soldiers.

    Reply
  14. US Marine says:
    April 16, 2007 at 10:30 pm

    Well the pants are tucked into the boots, the Iraqi Army does that. The helmet is on crooked, they do that as well. There is a scarf around his neck, IA does that so they can quickly disguise themselves from locals. It is an old-school flack, not a plate carrier. The AK is slung over his neck in a way that makes it unemployable unless removed from around his neck, thats an IA thing too. No gloves, most US troops wear them because its a requirement. And finally, its an AK. So no, there is no way thats anything but IA. End of speculation otherwise. As for the debate on if thats offensive or not, I find it offensive as a US Marine just because I don’t like those guys — not really for any other reason.

    Reply
  15. Alex says:
    April 17, 2007 at 12:00 am

    could be an SF operator (Green Beret or sumthin)… the helmet sillhouete looks pretty American

    Reply
  16. P. Turpin says:
    April 17, 2007 at 5:05 am

    Anyone who has been in Afghanistan knows that it is not uncommon to see the varieties of M-16s, AR-15s, and AK-47/74, and even PKM carried by regular foot soldiers.
    Posted by: D18 at April 16, 2007 09:36 PM
    What he said, along with Spec Ops also carry the same, so not a big surpise.… And the stance doesn’t look to me as any different than those I’ve seen on our guys.
    But then, Boeing was never big on the military until they assumed MDD’s apron and assets, so competence in advetising isn’t an expectation.…

    Reply
  17. Jonathan says:
    April 17, 2007 at 6:04 am

    I think Boeing with all their billions of dollars can afford a picture of a person who is no doubt an American soldier with A Eugene Stoner designed weapon.

    Reply
  18. Jonathan says:
    April 17, 2007 at 6:05 am

    I think Boeing with all their billions of dollars can afford a picture of a person who is no doubt an American soldier with A Eugene Stoner designed weapon.

    Reply
  19. Jonathan says:
    April 17, 2007 at 6:05 am

    I think Boeing with all their billions of dollars can afford a picture of a person who is no doubt an American soldier with A Eugene Stoner designed weapon.

    Reply
  20. Jonathan says:
    April 17, 2007 at 6:06 am

    I think Boeing with all their billions of dollars can afford a picture of a person who is no doubt an American soldier with A Eugene Stoner designed weapon.

    Reply
  21. Earl says:
    April 17, 2007 at 9:07 am

    Yes, almost anyone with a brain would have noticed the AK-47 immediately, without the necessity for explanation.
    Having worked at a corporation almost as large as Boeing (Pfizer), I’m pretty certain that no one but a few corporate execs. in advertising ever saw this ad. And advertising people are responsible for our advertising–so you know how smart they are.
    I’ve sent e-mail to Boeing, wwwmail.boeing2@boeing.com, telling them in no uncertain terms how insulted I am, and how stupid I think they are.
    If we all do that, I am certain that Boeings Corpoarte leadership will never hear about it, and they will continue to give a damn less about the opinions of American veterans and citizens.

    Reply
  22. Andrew says:
    April 17, 2007 at 10:00 am

    Allow me to clarify … US Special Forces who train foreign fighters ALWAYS use the weapon that the foreign fighter uses. He is a US soldier who is either embedded with an Iraqi army unit or with Iraqi police.

    Reply
  23. Brian says:
    April 17, 2007 at 10:02 am

    Earl, anyone with a brain WHO KNOWS WHAT AN AK-47 LOOKS LIKE would have recognized it immediately. 99% of people in the world can’t tell the difference between the silhouette of an AK-47 and any of the various US combat rifles.
    Seriously, when people get offended over things like this, it makes me think they haven’t been REALLY insulted in far too long.

    Reply
  24. C says:
    April 17, 2007 at 10:44 am

    Brian, i think you’re better at recognizing assault rifles than you are at sarcasm!

    Reply
  25. whocares says:
    April 17, 2007 at 10:51 am

    dont some special forces use enemy weapons so that they can get extra ammunition off the bad guys’ dead bodies.
    i know in south africa the special forces were paradropped into enemy territory with enemy weapons (ie: AK’s) so that they could replenish ammunition off their kills.
    that is an american special forces soldier using an enemy weapon.
    i cant believe you guys missed it.

    Reply
  26. Jon says:
    April 17, 2007 at 11:32 am

    Obviously, you haven’t seen the thousands of photos of American servicemen carrying AKs. When we seize weapons caches, pick up dead enemies’ weapons, etc. we are usually picking up AK-47s or AK-74s, along with RPG-7s, etc. Most people prefer the 7.62 round over the 5.56, therefore, it is not uncommon to see an American carrying an AK in Iraq. Come on man, get over the picture.

    Reply
  27. Joe says:
    April 17, 2007 at 11:37 am

    Could be an Iraqi Army soldier, or Iraqi policeman. But, I would not be surprised if it was an American either. Could be anyone of those three, but who really cares? We are all on the same side. I mean who says it has to be a picture of an American anyway? I know for a fact that it is not the enemy, because the enemy does not wear helemts and body armor.

    Reply
  28. snakeeater says:
    April 17, 2007 at 3:58 pm

    George Bush did it! He took the picture. When did he do it? When did he know it? Some poor moogh died just so he could look good!

    Reply
  29. Bill says:
    April 18, 2007 at 7:52 pm

    Picture of the average person who gets worked up over this image:
    http://​img178​.imageshack​.us/​i​m​g​1​7​8​/​3​3​5​5​/​d​o​n​t​2​0​w​o​r​r​y​2​0​s​i​r​2​0​i​m​2​0​f​r​o​m​2​0​t​h​e​2​0​i​n​t​e​r​n​e​t​u​i​7​.​jpg

    Reply
  30. Grayskull says:
    May 3, 2007 at 4:22 am

    I agree that it deserves the ultimate Doh! Although I contend that it is no less reckless to assume that just because “Maybe” the Boeing production of the image was done Stateside,by one of their employee’s…Does not in anyway.…mean that it was Done by an AMERICAN !

    Reply
  31. HaloStrike says:
    August 31, 2007 at 11:33 pm

    Come on! Even a teenager who plays video games could figure that one out! That guy looks more like the new Iraqi Soldiers. Maybe the picture was done stateside with hmmm a airsoft gun and a guy that bought some surplus gear?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Hey if it works for the troops on the...
      Marshall Tall Eagle
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      If you are going to do close air support (CAS),...
      LTCMike69
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The Air Force has got it backwards again. Here it...
      gmanaz
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Damn it! I thought this hole tanker BS was over with...
      Thunder350
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      my bad… i misread your second to last...
      Project Thor
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      excuse me… were you reading what i...
      Project Thor
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Welfare and warfare are necessary. The argument on...
      calw
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      Get out of wheeled CrapMobiles and get off the roads...
      IEDDEFEAT
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Nope. Crash a Harrier every other flight and it would still be...
      Hx2
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      That's a misleading response – the issue...
      Why
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage