DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Eat DT's Dust » Ad ‘em Up!

Ad ‘em Up!

BoeingAD-1-web2.jpg

Gotta do a little DT horn-tootin here.

Youll remember the post we put up on Monday exposing the flub by the folks at Boeing who didnt pay close enough attention to a full-page newspaper advertisement the company sponsored that day.

The ad — which promoted a PBS documentary running that day about the experienced of U.S. troops in Iraq (the documentary was excellent, by the way) — shows what appears to be an Iraqi soldier in place of what clearly should have been an American. Anyone with even basic knowledge of the military should have recognized the AK-47 crooked in the soldiers arm. Not a U.S. weapon, and I dont care how many people perpetuate the myth that American troops carry AKs in Iraq, its extremely rare.

Putting a soldier with an AK in his arm on the full-page ad wasnt what the promoters were going for, Im sure.

Well, after four days of teeth-gnashing, the Washington Post (my local paper) published an article in its In the Loop section pointing out the error and attempting to make some sort of explanation for it. We rest our case, gang

“It could turn out to be that that is an Iraqi soldier,” said Richard Robbins, who directed the film. “We are trying to get to the bottom of it.” But Robbins said Jacob Bailey, the award-winning Air Force photographer who took the picture, “thinks it probably was an Iraqi soldier, as do we.”

A big shout-out should go to all our readers for engaging in the discussion on this one. Im pretty confident we were the only ones on the net to catch this error and our coverage helped move the Post and maybe others to print their story.

Good work folks!

– Christian

Share |

April 19th, 2007 | Eat DT's Dust | 24664 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/04/19/ad-em-up/Ad+%27em+Up%212007-04-19+19%3A34%3A59Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Who’s CSARX? | The PooBahs Speak » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Jay says:
    April 20, 2007 at 10:49 am

    Why can’t it be a US sepcial ops guy with an AK?

    Reply
  2. Christian says:
    April 20, 2007 at 1:10 pm

    Jay,
    Doubtful a spec ops guy. First, the helmet has no comm gear on it, no NOD bracket, the vest comes too far out on the upper shoulders (looks like an old-school flak jacket), no hip holster and…no HK 416 with optical devices attached.
    Just to name a few…
    I’m telling you it’s a myth that special operators carry AKs. Maybe an OGA guy who has no log chain will carry native weapons, but spec ops guys care a lot about accuracy. AK isn’t too accurate.
    Oh, and the photographer said it wasn’t a spec ops guy…

    Reply
  3. Slab says:
    April 20, 2007 at 6:23 pm

    Christian,
    Spot on. The profile of the body armor looks exactly like one a number of our jundi wore. It has a large, high collar, easy to distinguish from IBA. Everything about the guy in the picture, from his gear to his weapons carriage, screams Iraqi Army.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Sorry, previous post meant to say the F16s were to be...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      There will be a reduced buy to save costs. That was...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      We shouldn't even be using STOVL fighters anymore....
      Sean
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes, but the 135 million price for the F35 factors in...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes because USAF logic says older is bad, no matter how...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Agree completely. I also go further though – STOVL...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      You don't need to. The amphibious ships are primarily...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Has anyone calculated out the per unit cost once you...
      Blight
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I have always loved this idea. More survivable,...
      nraddin
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      As an old ex-USAF cop, I am way out of my league...
      Sgt Ken
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage