DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Gadgets and Gear » Make your M9 Meaner

Make your M9 Meaner

Wor4-web.jpg

After nearly two years of effort, and con­stant revi­sions based on feed­back from mil­i­tary and law enforce­ment users, an inven­tor based in Florida has devised a new rail sys­tem that can be retro­fit­ted to the M9 Beretta stan­dard mil­spec pistol.

The rail sys­tem, devel­oped by David Woroner of Survival Consultants Intl., allows the user to fit a wide array of sight­ing sys­tems, laser point­ers, pep­per spray adap­tors and other com­po­nents to the mil­i­tary (and police) issued sidearm. Dave has helped me on a vari­ety of sto­ries over the years deal­ing with weapons devel­op­ment, body armor tech­nol­ogy and pri­vate secu­rity con­trac­tor issues and Im happy to see that his Wor4 TacRail is get­ting good feed­back from users and from the Armys Picatinny Arsenal.

From Survival Consultants

This is the only prod­uct that is specif­i­cally designed for the Beretta “type” pis­tol (M9-​​92FS), though it will fit many other Beretta licensed out designs, such as the Taurus series of pis­tols of sim­i­lar spec­i­fi­ca­tions (as well as a mul­ti­tude of S. African to S. American pis­tol licensees

What our research revealed is that, over­whelm­ingly, shoot­ers wanted the abil­ity to add lower railed devices such as lights, lasers, etc. and the pos­si­bil­ity of adding an “opti­cal sight­ing sys­tem” on the top rail. In the design of the TacRail, SCI rec­og­nized that any “device” (like an optic sys­tem) can fail. So SCI intro­duced a slot into the design so that the iron sights are still com­pletely active and use­able. The other spec­i­fi­ca­tion requested was to make the design so that “the slide can be removed, for field clean­ing, with­out remov­ing the TacRail.”

Im includ­ing this post to see what feed­back our DT read­ers have on this com­po­nent sys­tem. One of the things I like most about Daves TacRail is the strike face on the spe­cial oper­a­tions ver­sion of the Wor4. Its a pointed knob just under the bar­rel that can be used to say that spe­cial hello to a resis­tant bad guy.

I wish him luck and am curi­ous to see what yall have to say about it.

– Christian

Share |

April 25th, 2007 | Gadgets and Gear | 247828 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/04/25/make-your-m9-meaner/Make+your+M9+Meaner2007-04-25+16%3A24%3A51Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « FCLP Field Fights | Are We Sure About the MRAP? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. max says:
    April 25, 2007 at 2:18 pm

    Such crap… if you load 3 or 4 acces­sories onto an M9, it’ll be so heavy that you might as well pull your M4!
    And where are you going to hol­ster that thing?
    And when your sidearm’s cross-​​section has the approx­i­mate shape and size of the cru­ci­fix, how the hell are you going to walk around?

    Reply
  2. mrnitropb says:
    April 25, 2007 at 2:32 pm

    First off, what hol­ster will work with that?
    Secondly, who makes, and who would actu­ally use, a rail mounted pep­per­spray device? Ontop of the whole, not fit­ting into a hol­ster, the idea of mix­ing leathal and LTL force options that close together is ask­ing for a bajil­lion dol­lar acci­den­tal death law­suit.
    And lastly, is there such a thing as a rail-​​to-​​rail adapter so you can mount your M9 on your rifle? Just think, mount it on the forarem, left side, and you no longer need a ver­ti­cle grip, you can just use the bar­reta!, and instant abil­ity to switch to sec­ondary weapon, and could still mount a 203.

    Reply
  3. C-Low says:
    April 25, 2007 at 2:36 pm

    This has to be a joke.
    This looks like one of those use­less util­ity wise but desk ninja’s dream.

    Reply
  4. Thomas says:
    April 25, 2007 at 6:16 pm

    “One of the things I like most about Dave’s TacRail is the “strike face” on the spe­cial oper­a­tions ver­sion of the Wor4. It’s a pointed knob just under the bar­rel that can be used to say that spe­cial “hello” to a resis­tant bad guy.“
    I dont know about you but the “spe­cial hello” I would use is a dou­ble tap to the head.
    Ridiculous. Keep pis­tol optics to the movies

    Reply
  5. RSweeney says:
    April 25, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    I can see this as poten­tially really pop­u­lar at gun shows… old guys can’t see iron sights any­more and a need a place for a red-​​dot /​ holosight.
    So maybe good for the gun-​​in-​​the-​​nightstand crowd, but prob­a­bly over­priced.
    I can’t image a sol­dier or a law offi­cer want­ing to even try to carry this thing with or with­out all the use­less gizmo’s attached. Is there a hol­ster that it won’t snag on?

    Reply
  6. Sven Ortmann says:
    April 25, 2007 at 6:39 pm

    prob­lems:
    – weight with acces­soires
    – hol­ster
    – would inter­fere with Crimson Trace laser­grip
    ( http://​www​.crim​son​trace​.com/​d​e​f​a​u​l​t​.​a​s​p​?​i​d​=​520 )
    – pis­tols are weapons of very, really last resort in the mil­i­tary and imho only for medics, senior offi­cers and chap­lains. You don’t tune your weapon of last resort with bulky & heavy add-​​ons … you want it to be small, light, convenient

    Reply
  7. David Woroner says:
    April 25, 2007 at 7:23 pm

    Hello all…
    I invented the above pic­tured unit with “specops” or other “spe­cial uti­liza­tion” in mind only, and was the “first” of many revi­sions. If you check the web­site, you will see the “first release” ver­sion, due out May 17th, is a top and bot­tom rail sys­tem only. What makes it unique is that it weighs no more than 4/4.7 ounces (tacrail), and how it attaches to the pis­tol with NO need to drill the dust­cover. Utilizing a “joint com­pres­sion” tech­nique that is specif­i­cally cov­ered in the patent.
    SCI is work­ing on the hol­ster at this time.
    We real­ize it is an impor­tant issue, cur­rent think­ing and ini­tial kydex/​nylon hol­sters cre­ated have been shown to work very well when mounted on the chest, uti­liz­ing the Molles’ atchm­nts. It is still some­thing that leaves me per­son­ally think­ing (and I know I’ll recieve “crit­i­cism” for this) is [why should SCI be respon­si­ble for cre­at­ing the hol­ster? Thats a third party concern…right? ] It draws smoothly, points well, is not front end heavy
    (optic sight & lowerlight/​laser attached.) The “entire sys­tem”, with those devices mounted still doesnt weigh much. No more than 14/​17 ounces total…When test­ing with an SLA (never recommended.)unit, 75/​100 yd con­sis­tent hits were no prob­lem, though that is not an “inten­tion” of this “plat­form”. Besides SWAT offi­cers, and other “spe­cial uti­liza­tions”, Armored folks (Tankers) have expressed alot of inter­est. Wearing a “thigh rig” is an awful “snatch/​snag haz­ard”, its alot harder to get some­thing offa fel­las chest. Finally, I’d like to thank the folks who post here, it is always good to get feed­back, of any kind. What SCI can say is that the first “run” already has a wait­ing list of LEO’s and Mil_​Ops folks.
    Feel free to visit the web­site, drop me a line, etc… Again, I invite you to read up at the web­site. Best, David Woroner, Pres. SCI
    (Obviously I’d like to thank Christian Lowe.)

    Reply
  8. Grandjester says:
    April 25, 2007 at 9:20 pm

    David, you are indeed a brave man to come into this den of wolves. Have you seen how the M9 gets sav­aged around here? Welcome to the asy­lum! Keep inventin stuff, is a cheeze wiz dis­penser in the works?

    Reply
  9. Billy Big Spuds says:
    April 25, 2007 at 10:05 pm

    Omg… OK, so i have a bet­ter idea. Instead of invest­ing all that damn money in a peice of crap that is only gonna cause more prob­lems, they might as well try to invent an implant for your eye so you can shoot laser beams out of your head. And 3 things with that rail. 1) weight. the damn m9 is heavy enough. 2) Holster? and 3) who the hell wants to put pep­per spray on their rail, instead of sights? WTF? You gonna aim with the can? Or per­haps use the stream as trac­ers? idk…

    Reply
  10. Billy Big Spuds says:
    April 25, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    Ok, i might buy one. But i want a mount for both an over­sized boy­o­net (Im thing of this really cool katana i saw once), and i want a Skittle dis­penser on mine. (you know, for those time when you just need a lit­tle some­thing to put you in a good mood. Skittles are great for that)

    Reply
  11. Grandjester says:
    April 25, 2007 at 10:32 pm

    Skittles trump cheeze wiz, excel­lent BBS!

    Reply
  12. Warmonger says:
    April 26, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    Why does every­one want to pis­tol­whip the “bad guys.” I teach self-​​defense (empty hand, knife, and pis­tol) and the first thing I tell peo­ple is that firearms are a RANGED weapon. If you can hit the guy with it you are WAY too close! At that range you’re in knife-​​fight ter­ri­tory, you are at a dis­ad­van­tage –even with the hand­gun, and you can be dis­armed!
    Why do you think police get the guy face down the pave­ment, hands behind his head, before they get any­where near him. Naw, I’ll just go up and smack him with my hand­gun… that’ll make him behave. Right before he takes my weapon away and jams it up my @$$!
    Distance is your friend.

    Reply
  13. pjk says:
    April 26, 2007 at 2:27 pm

    Pez?

    Reply
  14. Manny says:
    May 3, 2007 at 11:22 am

    Its a start!! It looks too big, needs to be slimmed down. Special adapters or dif­fer­ent smaller hook ups for acces­sories need to made and they have to be made by non-​​government con­tracted com­pa­nies.
    It appears it is made for stan­dard issue com­po­nents; Those stan­dard issue com­po­nents are too big, espe­cially for a pis­tol.
    Concentrate on rail sys­tems for newer acces­sories that are smaller and that dont use stan­dard mmil­tary rail sys­tems and it may sell.
    This appears to be one of those items that may be pushed onto the troops because a “good idea” fairy pops up in the com­mand cen­ter.
    Issueing and using are two dif­fer­ent things and could just be another waste of gov­ern­ment resources.

    Reply
  15. David Woroner, Pres. SCI says:
    May 10, 2007 at 6:02 pm

    Hi Folks! couldnt help but just chuck in some­thing to think about, what your see­ing pic­tured here IS NOT the first release model.
    This was an SLA, intended for Special Operations
    (SOPMOD)… if you hop over to the site, you’ll see I’ve slimmed it down to a top n bot­tom rail.
    I’ve also made it so you can break down the pis­tol and clean it, all while leav­ing the rail in place.
    *Something I havent said much about. There is one tool that dons/​doffs the rail, it is held FIRMLY and not to be lost by two (2) indus­trial mag­nets. Also, he notch cut under the top rail allows for con­tin­ued use of iron sights should the optics fail. The gen­eral idea, or the way I’d like to see it used is : Docter Optic up top and your choice light below.…On the SLA *(which one should never use in live fire, but I couldnt resist :) .… I was able to make clean and ez rapid hits on tar­gets at 75 yards, no prob. So, its not the end all be all, under­stood.
    But when I roll out the 1911 ver­sion, are you still gonna say no? :) We shall seeeee! It’s great to be in here, I accept all points of view, (even if there from Non-​​Shooters , just kidding..)If you have any ques­tions what­so­ever, con­tact me at the sur­vival­con­sul­tants web­site, and I’d be happy to answer any ques­tions you may have.… Thank you, David Woroner, SCI
    Avail. May 27th, Cost 189.00 Pre Orders being taken now for first 50 piece run.…. (17 left)

    Reply
  16. RT says:
    December 21, 2007 at 9:44 pm

    This does have an impor­tant use. When you wise up and ditch the M9 in the ocean it will sink faster.

    Reply
  17. David Woroner says:
    March 9, 2008 at 5:44 am

    Hi, David Woroner, SCI
    I look at these com­ments now and get a real grin out of it! :)
    Its like the “more you berate and hate me” the bet­ter I do!!!
    Well, it can’t be toooo awful if Beretta licensed the lower rail only ver­sion. I’d sug­gest a nice cup of green tea, clean out the sys­tem, open your mind.
    There is a “weight list” of what stuff would weigh, etc ON THE WEBSITE, why don’t you READ before commenting.…..I have had many peo­ple (whom are far from “key­board commando’s”) Read That “Over There” whom said that they would never run a night op with­out it again.. If that ain’t good enough, well, don’t buy it :) seems like the desk­top commando’s are here? Have a good one!
    Green Tea is good for you! Drink it for two weeks and you’ll never want cof­fee again!
    Best, David Woroner, Pres./CEO SCI

    Reply
  18. ragnarok zeny says:
    August 13, 2008 at 11:51 pm

    Opening num­ber, M4 has been a favorite role, although I was play­ing ID, because the blood and the Ragnarok zeny were less often, but I did not regret it.

    Reply
  19. rappelz gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 11:56 pm

    I rec­og­nized her is an occa­sional, When I was just upgrade and earn rap­pelz gold. She also just through, and she is a new player, she saw me my num­ber is high. So she asked me how to play.

    Reply
  20. rohan gold says:
    August 14, 2008 at 12:08 am

    You upgrade and earn rohan gold the side of the said chat with me. When you said that you are intend to find a girl­friend in real time.

    Reply
  21. james lacombe says:
    July 30, 2009 at 1:34 am

    Ok guys i dont get it,these folks were look­ing for intellingant boos or flowers.You folks are just fill­ing this blog with use­less crap.Here is some real info.I am x Canadain military.carried the Browning for years.I have a very large firearms col­lec­tion and some of the least expen­sive weapons i own and love are my Berrettas.The rail sys­tem is great,Yes its big and bulky .I would never carry my m9 into com­bat with all that bolted to it.But,for Competition shoot­ers its just the ticket.P/s i bought berret­tas because they are big and bulky .If i wanted a der­ranger i would have bought one.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage