<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: The Sunday Paper — Style Section</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:18:36 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Ward</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-160415</link> <dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-160415</guid> <description>I think Macaca captured the essence of my motivation in his comments below, Philip.  And what is DT anyway . . . a Fox News doppelganger site? While we could argue all day about intent (and timing), I assure you my choice here was deliberate. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Macaca captured the essence of my motivation in his comments below, Philip.  And what is DT anyway … a Fox News doppelganger site?<br /> While we could argue all day about intent (and timing), I assure you my choice here was deliberate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Philip</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-160414</link> <dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:24:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-160414</guid> <description>I think Gary is right, you have missed the point, u may now claim to get it now that Gary has pointed it out to you but u haven&#039;t justified  why you put hendrix&#039;s rendition of the anthem up in DT </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Gary is right, you have missed the point, u may now claim to get it now that Gary has pointed it out to you but u haven’t justified  why you put hendrix’s rendition of the anthem up in DT</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Macaca</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-160413</link> <dc:creator>Macaca</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:56:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-160413</guid> <description>Jimmy&#039;s rendition of the anthem certainly covers the current foreign policy: all messy and garbled, with a hint of patriotism, absorbed in ones own mindset and intoxicated as hell. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy’s rendition of the anthem certainly covers the current foreign policy: all messy and garbled, with a hint of patriotism, absorbed in ones own mindset and intoxicated as hell.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ward</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-160412</link> <dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:29:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-160412</guid> <description>No, Gary . . . I totally GET the point.  And what&#039;s a DT discussion without someone playing the role of pedant? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Gary … I totally GET the point.  And what’s a DT discussion without someone playing the role of pedant?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-28840</link> <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-28840</guid> <description>You&#039;re kidding! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re kidding!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: campbell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-28839</link> <dc:creator>campbell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:37:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-28839</guid> <description>now THAT&#039;S worth fighting for! Semper Fi </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now THAT’S worth fighting for!<br /> Semper Fi</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 699/703 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:35:54 -->
