<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sunday Paper — Style Section</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:04:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ward</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-160415</link>
		<dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-160415</guid>
		<description>I think Macaca captured the essence of my motivation in his comments below, Philip.  And what is DT anyway . . . a Fox News doppelganger site?
While we could argue all day about intent (and timing), I assure you my choice here was deliberate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Macaca captured the essence of my motivation in his comments below, Philip.  And what is DT anyway … a Fox News doppelganger site?<br />
While we could argue all day about intent (and timing), I assure you my choice here was deliberate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-160414</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-160414</guid>
		<description>I think Gary is right, you have missed the point, u may now claim to get it now that Gary has pointed it out to you but u haven&#039;t justified  why you put hendrix&#039;s rendition of the anthem up in DT
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Gary is right, you have missed the point, u may now claim to get it now that Gary has pointed it out to you but u haven’t justified  why you put hendrix’s rendition of the anthem up in DT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macaca</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-160413</link>
		<dc:creator>Macaca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-160413</guid>
		<description>Jimmy&#039;s rendition of the anthem certainly covers the current foreign policy: all messy and garbled, with a hint of patriotism, absorbed in ones own mindset and intoxicated as hell.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy’s rendition of the anthem certainly covers the current foreign policy: all messy and garbled, with a hint of patriotism, absorbed in ones own mindset and intoxicated as hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ward</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-160412</link>
		<dc:creator>Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-160412</guid>
		<description>No, Gary . . . I totally GET the point.  And what&#039;s a DT discussion without someone playing the role of pedant?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Gary … I totally GET the point.  And what’s a DT discussion without someone playing the role of pedant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-28840</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-28840</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re kidding!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re kidding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: campbell</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/04/29/the-sunday-paper-style-section/#comment-28839</link>
		<dc:creator>campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2485#comment-28839</guid>
		<description>now THAT&#039;S worth fighting for!
Semper Fi
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now THAT’S worth fighting for!<br />
Semper Fi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

