http://defensetech.org/2007/05/07/doc-ex-on-csar-x/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://defensetech.org/2007/05/07/doc-ex-on-csar-x/#comment-29192 julian bonney Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:20:58 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2500#comment-29192 so what about the vh71 augusta/westland ! so what about the vh71 augusta/westland !

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/05/07/doc-ex-on-csar-x/#comment-160743 Jeff Mon, 07 May 2007 17:05:04 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2500#comment-160743 Boeing withdrew the Ospray because of concerns with its rate of decent caused by the rotar vortex problems. Also, the rotar wash when hovering is said to be very bad. Instead boeing proposed the "medium sized" CH-47. I would like to see how the Air Force reviewed the S-92. Boeing withdrew the Ospray because of concerns with its rate of decent caused by the rotar vortex problems. Also, the rotar wash when hovering is said to be very bad. Instead boeing proposed the “medium sized” CH-47. I would like to see how the Air Force reviewed the S-92.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/05/07/doc-ex-on-csar-x/#comment-160741 Charlie Mon, 07 May 2007 13:48:52 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2500#comment-160741 Don't suppose they looked at the Ospray for this task , did they? Don’t suppose they looked at the Ospray for this task , did they?

]]>