DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Strategery » SEAL Mission Creep

SEAL Mission Creep

With a man­dated boost in spe­cial oper­a­tions forces man­power imposed by Congress over the past cou­ple of years, the ser­vices are pre­dictably hav­ing a tough time get­ting the right peo­ple in the num­bers they require.
SEALs-web.jpg

What the Virginian Pilot reported today about the dif­fi­culty the SEAL com­mu­nity is fac­ing find­ing frog­men to fill out their teams isnt really all that new. But theres a line in there that should raise some con­cerns and some inter­est­ing ques­tions — over the roles and mis­sions of the SEALs.

The arti­cle noted the SEAL com­mu­nity cant meet its recruit­ing goal, and for good rea­son. The demand­ing nature of BUD/​S comes with an exor­bi­tant wash-​​out rate: only one in four will make it through. That, cou­pled with the expan­sion of the spe­cial oper­a­tions ranks through­out the ser­vices has made it tough to pin on more SEAL badges.

The 14 young men gath­ered in a park­ing lot at Little Creek
Naval Amphibious Base came in two basic shapes: thin and mus­cu­lar, and thick and mus­cu­lar. Huddled on a patch of grass, they stretched backs, legs and arms as they braced for a phys­i­cal and men­tal onslaught intended to test their bod­ies and psyche.

The calm erupted when a chis­eled spe­cial oper­a­tions sailor dashed toward the group with the speed and mal­ice of an NFL linebacker.

“You’re going to fail!” he screamed. 

But why is it that the Navy needs more SEALs?

According to the report, its because the SEALs most cru­cial mis­sion of train­ing for­eign mil­i­taries is caus­ing a strain on the Teams, leav­ing them less time to train and send­ing vet­er­ans out of the ser­vice for more pre­dictable and lucra­tive assign­ments with pri­vate mil­i­tary companies.

SEALs are stretched so thin and strained by the most vig­or­ous deploy­ment sched­ule in their 45-​​year his­tory that defense experts warn about their readi­ness and abil­ity to con­tain hot spots around the world. These days, nearly 90 per­cent of Special Forces deploy­ments are focused in the Middle East, leav­ing other volatile areas unchecked.

Special Forces are needed to train small for­eign units to quell ter­ror­ist threats within their national bor­ders, Vice Adm. Eric Olson, deputy com­man­der of Special Operations Command, told sen­a­tors dur­ing an April hearing.

It’s per­haps the com­man­dos’ most cru­cial mis­sion, he said: “We know that we can­not kill or talk our way to victory.“ 

Now, I under­stand that train­ing for­eign troops — whats known in the spec ops world as for­eign inter­nal defense — to head off the rise of insur­gen­cies and extrem­ist alter­na­tives is a mis­sion for all com­man­dos, includ­ing SEALs. But Army Special Forces was founded on this mis­sion and is one of their key strengths.

That mis­sion, cou­pled with uncon­ven­tional war­fare rais­ing insur­gent armies and employ­ing them to meet U.S. national secu­rity goals have been the Green Berets stock in trade since the 60s.

While they are acutely trained to play in a wide realm of spec ops mis­sions, the SEALs are undoubt­edly one of the most skill­ful direct action forces in the U.S. mil­i­tary. If you want to take down an oil plat­form or exe­cute a raid in the mar­itime realm, its the SEALs you call. I know theyve played a not insignif­i­cant role in train­ing for­eign mil­i­taries, but to call that their most cru­cial mis­sion in the global war on ter­ror­ism seems like overkill.

The Marine Corps has a new cadre of spe­cial oper­a­tors trained specif­i­cally to work low-​​risk for­eign inter­nal defense mis­sions. The so-​​called Foreign Military Training Units have deployed to Africa, South America and Eastern Europe and as they con­tinue to stand up, should be able to take the strain off of other spe­cial oper­a­tions com­mu­ni­ties so oth­ers can con­cen­trate on the hard cases and on hunt­ing bad guys.

If the SEALs con­tinue to suf­fer such poten­tial mis­sion creep, stand by for more hard­ship in recruit­ing and lets hope the pres­sure from on high doesnt result in a relax­ation of stan­dards. SEALs are finely-​​tuned instru­ments and its wor­ri­some if their optempo is suf­fer­ing for jobs oth­ers could do with less strain.

– Christian

Share |

May 7th, 2007 | Strategery | 250116 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/05/07/seal-mission-creep/SEAL+Mission+Creep2007-05-07+19%3A38%3A57Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Doc-​​ex on CSAR-​​X | The COIN Aircraft Comeback » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Grandjester says:
    May 7, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    Frogmen of the Desert.
    Just doesn’t roll of the tongue.

    Reply
  2. C says:
    May 7, 2007 at 3:47 pm

    i think that would be “toad­men”, which also does not roll off the tongue

    Reply
  3. Foreign.Boy says:
    May 7, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    Lizardmen?

    Reply
  4. Joe says:
    May 7, 2007 at 4:07 pm

    Seems that the Marines need to pick up some of the SEAL mis­sion. Since it appears that most SEAL mis­sions are tra­di­tional Marine mis­sions any­way.
    At least in every other fleet in the world.

    Reply
  5. Kevin says:
    May 7, 2007 at 11:35 pm

    When a SOCOM flag offi­cer talks about Special Forces doing some­thing I’d tend to assume that he means exactly what he says. Is there any evi­dence when he talked about Special Forces he didn’t mean Army Special Forces? Unlike some jour­nal­ists he prob­a­bly can remem­ber just what each is called, what they do and can prob­a­bly use the ter­mi­nol­ogy cor­rectly.
    It’s pos­si­bly that he can’t (which would be inter­est­ing in itself) but assum­ing that the deputy com­man­der of SOCOM is an idiot seems like a pretty big assump­tion.
    As I haven’t been hired to write this stuff I don’t have time to go look up exactly what he did say to the Senate, but you might con­sider that instead of tak­ing a 3rd hand inter­pre­ta­tion of what some­one claims he said it might make sense for those who are doing this pro­fes­sion­ally to LOOK IT UP before writ­ing sto­ries based on the assump­tion that the guy doesn’t know the dif­fer­ence between SF and SEAL missions.

    Reply
  6. Rick F says:
    May 8, 2007 at 6:40 am

    Army Special Forces (aka Green Berets) are the folks sup­posed to be train­ing for­eign mil­i­taries. That’s been one of their core mis­sions since the early 1960s.
    SEALS, unless something’s changed, are more of a special-​​mission force for spe­cific “shoot­ing” tasks.
    But this is another case of how our SOF capa­bil­i­ties are being mis­used in the so-​​called GWOT: The Army SF is being used as “door kick­ers” and the SEALs are used for mil­i­tary train­ing. Talk about role-​​reversals!

    Reply
  7. Matt says:
    May 8, 2007 at 8:12 am

    Good old Leathernecks!

    Reply
  8. Camp says:
    May 8, 2007 at 10:06 am

    I recall an inci­dent at Patilla Airfield dur­ing Operation Just Cause, high­light­ing the prob­lems of mis­sion over­lap.
    http://​www​.specwar​net​.net/​m​i​s​c​i​n​f​o​/​p​a​t​i​l​l​a​.​htm
    .
    Wasn’t USSOCOM cre­ated to define such boundary’s & coor­di­nate SOFs to pre­vent mis­sion over­lap? I won­der if this story should be more about force man­age­ment by USSOCOM & the branch ser­vices. Or maybe it’s just that every­one wants to be ‘Special’ these days.

    Reply
  9. Mburumba says:
    May 8, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    Judging by what’s in the pub­lic domain over these past fews years since the begin­ning of the GWOT train­ing for­eign mil­i­taries aka FID is mis­sion some­where between bot­tom and bottom-​​last of pub­licly acknowl­edged SEAL mis­sions. The pri­mary cause of burn-​​out in the SEAls, as in other branches of the US mil­i­tary involved in the “bayonet-​​point” of the GWOT, is the very high op-​​tempo this new type of war has engendered.

    Reply
  10. Masterguns says:
    May 9, 2007 at 11:11 pm

    After 35 years of being swift,silent and deadly
    old school force recon.I can say with cer­tainty
    that idiots at the top is not that big of an assumption.The huge bud­get that these ready action forces have and the fact that their all
    dressed up and have no place to go and whin­ning
    about it,they need to earn their keep,they need to work or its wasted tal­ent and dedication.We can
    not afford to water down the training,we can­not in good faith waste their talents.Have not said this much since the last but­ter bar I ate for lunch! Guns Gone

    Reply
  11. stephen russell says:
    December 31, 2007 at 1:03 am

    Maybe relive the WW2 movie DIRTY DOZEN– use Convicts for Spec Forces
    Problem: Gang ties & other issues.
    Otherwise Ideal for SEAL Ops.
    Have implant for Tracking
    NO Leave or Liberty
    Or under tight con­trol.
    Same train­ing as other SEALs.
    Dine seper­ate from Main SEAL Units.
    Might help Manpower alone.
    Empty some US pris­ons of inmates alone.
    Do the Mission & Live OR Die.

    Reply
  12. Danish Special Operations Forces says:
    July 30, 2008 at 4:29 am

    Very inter­est­ing read­ing. Both our Army Special Operations Forces and our Navy Special Operations Forces (SEALs) needs more sol­diers too.
    Seems like there just isn’t a way to sud­denly pro­duce twice as many SOF oper­a­tors as the year before?

    Reply
  13. Joel says:
    August 26, 2008 at 9:26 am

    I’d say one of the biggest causes of attri­tion is that once you’re a SEAL, re-​​enlisting could lit­er­ally cost you a mil­lion dol­lars in salary dif­fer­en­tial from work­ing for a PMC. Even a con­sult­ing job from Halliburton or any of thou­sands of secu­rity con­scious coun­tried could be deep into 6 fig­ures with­out the risk that your fam­ily never gets to see you again.
    My brother is a Naval Nuclear Engineer, think he’s re-​​enlisting? He can make 150k a year in any nuclear power plant in the coun­try when he gets out.

    Reply
  14. Bruce Schlesman says:
    December 18, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    The SEALS are the invin­ci­ble. THey’re like ghosts you don’t find them unless they decide to let you. They are suf­fer­ing from low recruit­ment, stress and mis­sion creep bit they don’t need much men to get the job done. The gov­ern­ment can’t take any more SEALS because they are very high upkeep.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage