DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Strategery » SEAL Mission Creep

SEAL Mission Creep

With a mandated boost in special operations forces manpower imposed by Congress over the past couple of years, the services are predictably having a tough time getting the right people in the numbers they require.
SEALs-web.jpg

What the Virginian Pilot reported today about the difficulty the SEAL community is facing finding frogmen to fill out their teams isnt really all that new. But theres a line in there that should raise some concerns and some interesting questions — over the roles and missions of the SEALs.

The article noted the SEAL community cant meet its recruiting goal, and for good reason. The demanding nature of BUD/S comes with an exorbitant wash-out rate: only one in four will make it through. That, coupled with the expansion of the special operations ranks throughout the services has made it tough to pin on more SEAL badges.

The 14 young men gathered in a parking lot at Little Creek
Naval Amphibious Base came in two basic shapes: thin and muscular, and thick and muscular. Huddled on a patch of grass, they stretched backs, legs and arms as they braced for a physical and mental onslaught intended to test their bodies and psyche.

The calm erupted when a chiseled special operations sailor dashed toward the group with the speed and malice of an NFL linebacker.

“You’re going to fail!” he screamed.

But why is it that the Navy needs more SEALs?

According to the report, its because the SEALs most crucial mission of training foreign militaries is causing a strain on the Teams, leaving them less time to train and sending veterans out of the service for more predictable and lucrative assignments with private military companies.

SEALs are stretched so thin and strained by the most vigorous deployment schedule in their 45-year history that defense experts warn about their readiness and ability to contain hot spots around the world. These days, nearly 90 percent of Special Forces deployments are focused in the Middle East, leaving other volatile areas unchecked.

Special Forces are needed to train small foreign units to quell terrorist threats within their national borders, Vice Adm. Eric Olson, deputy commander of Special Operations Command, told senators during an April hearing.

It’s perhaps the commandos’ most crucial mission, he said: “We know that we cannot kill or talk our way to victory.“

Now, I understand that training foreign troops — whats known in the spec ops world as foreign internal defense — to head off the rise of insurgencies and extremist alternatives is a mission for all commandos, including SEALs. But Army Special Forces was founded on this mission and is one of their key strengths.

That mission, coupled with unconventional warfare raising insurgent armies and employing them to meet U.S. national security goals have been the Green Berets stock in trade since the 60s.

While they are acutely trained to play in a wide realm of spec ops missions, the SEALs are undoubtedly one of the most skillful direct action forces in the U.S. military. If you want to take down an oil platform or execute a raid in the maritime realm, its the SEALs you call. I know theyve played a not insignificant role in training foreign militaries, but to call that their most crucial mission in the global war on terrorism seems like overkill.

The Marine Corps has a new cadre of special operators trained specifically to work low-risk foreign internal defense missions. The so-called Foreign Military Training Units have deployed to Africa, South America and Eastern Europe and as they continue to stand up, should be able to take the strain off of other special operations communities so others can concentrate on the hard cases and on hunting bad guys.

If the SEALs continue to suffer such potential mission creep, stand by for more hardship in recruiting and lets hope the pressure from on high doesnt result in a relaxation of standards. SEALs are finely-tuned instruments and its worrisome if their optempo is suffering for jobs others could do with less strain.

– Christian

Share |

May 7th, 2007 | Strategery | 250116 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/05/07/seal-mission-creep/SEAL+Mission+Creep2007-05-07+19%3A38%3A57Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Doc-ex on CSAR-X | The COIN Aircraft Comeback » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Grandjester says:
    May 7, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    Frogmen of the Desert.
    Just doesn’t roll of the tongue.

    Reply
  2. C says:
    May 7, 2007 at 3:47 pm

    i think that would be “toadmen”, which also does not roll off the tongue

    Reply
  3. Foreign.Boy says:
    May 7, 2007 at 4:03 pm

    Lizardmen?

    Reply
  4. Joe says:
    May 7, 2007 at 4:07 pm

    Seems that the Marines need to pick up some of the SEAL mission. Since it appears that most SEAL missions are traditional Marine missions anyway.
    At least in every other fleet in the world.

    Reply
  5. Kevin says:
    May 7, 2007 at 11:35 pm

    When a SOCOM flag officer talks about Special Forces doing something I’d tend to assume that he means exactly what he says. Is there any evidence when he talked about Special Forces he didn’t mean Army Special Forces? Unlike some journalists he probably can remember just what each is called, what they do and can probably use the terminology correctly.
    It’s possibly that he can’t (which would be interesting in itself) but assuming that the deputy commander of SOCOM is an idiot seems like a pretty big assumption.
    As I haven’t been hired to write this stuff I don’t have time to go look up exactly what he did say to the Senate, but you might consider that instead of taking a 3rd hand interpretation of what someone claims he said it might make sense for those who are doing this professionally to LOOK IT UP before writing stories based on the assumption that the guy doesn’t know the difference between SF and SEAL missions.

    Reply
  6. Rick F says:
    May 8, 2007 at 6:40 am

    Army Special Forces (aka Green Berets) are the folks supposed to be training foreign militaries. That’s been one of their core missions since the early 1960s.
    SEALS, unless something’s changed, are more of a special-mission force for specific “shooting” tasks.
    But this is another case of how our SOF capabilities are being misused in the so-called GWOT: The Army SF is being used as “door kickers” and the SEALs are used for military training. Talk about role-reversals!

    Reply
  7. Matt says:
    May 8, 2007 at 8:12 am

    Good old Leathernecks!

    Reply
  8. Camp says:
    May 8, 2007 at 10:06 am

    I recall an incident at Patilla Airfield during Operation Just Cause, highlighting the problems of mission overlap.
    http://​www​.specwarnet​.net/​m​i​s​c​i​n​f​o​/​p​a​t​i​l​l​a​.​htm
    .
    Wasn’t USSOCOM created to define such boundary’s & coordinate SOFs to prevent mission overlap? I wonder if this story should be more about force management by USSOCOM & the branch services. Or maybe it’s just that everyone wants to be ‘Special’ these days.

    Reply
  9. Mburumba says:
    May 8, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    Judging by what’s in the public domain over these past fews years since the beginning of the GWOT training foreign militaries aka FID is mission somewhere between bottom and bottom-last of publicly acknowledged SEAL missions. The primary cause of burn-out in the SEAls, as in other branches of the US military involved in the “bayonet-point” of the GWOT, is the very high op-tempo this new type of war has engendered.

    Reply
  10. Masterguns says:
    May 9, 2007 at 11:11 pm

    After 35 years of being swift,silent and deadly
    old school force recon.I can say with certainty
    that idiots at the top is not that big of an assumption.The huge budget that these ready action forces have and the fact that their all
    dressed up and have no place to go and whinning
    about it,they need to earn their keep,they need to work or its wasted talent and dedication.We can
    not afford to water down the training,we cannot in good faith waste their talents.Have not said this much since the last butter bar I ate for lunch! Guns Gone

    Reply
  11. stephen russell says:
    December 31, 2007 at 1:03 am

    Maybe relive the WW2 movie DIRTY DOZEN– use Convicts for Spec Forces
    Problem: Gang ties & other issues.
    Otherwise Ideal for SEAL Ops.
    Have implant for Tracking
    NO Leave or Liberty
    Or under tight control.
    Same training as other SEALs.
    Dine seperate from Main SEAL Units.
    Might help Manpower alone.
    Empty some US prisons of inmates alone.
    Do the Mission & Live OR Die.

    Reply
  12. Danish Special Operations Forces says:
    July 30, 2008 at 4:29 am

    Very interesting reading. Both our Army Special Operations Forces and our Navy Special Operations Forces (SEALs) needs more soldiers too.
    Seems like there just isn’t a way to suddenly produce twice as many SOF operators as the year before?

    Reply
  13. Joel says:
    August 26, 2008 at 9:26 am

    I’d say one of the biggest causes of attrition is that once you’re a SEAL, re-enlisting could literally cost you a million dollars in salary differential from working for a PMC. Even a consulting job from Halliburton or any of thousands of security conscious countried could be deep into 6 figures without the risk that your family never gets to see you again.
    My brother is a Naval Nuclear Engineer, think he’s re-enlisting? He can make 150k a year in any nuclear power plant in the country when he gets out.

    Reply
  14. Bruce Schlesman says:
    December 18, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    The SEALS are the invincible. THey’re like ghosts you don’t find them unless they decide to let you. They are suffering from low recruitment, stress and mission creep bit they don’t need much men to get the job done. The government can’t take any more SEALS because they are very high upkeep.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
    • Cancel Cyber Command
    • Rough Week for F-35
    • Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer (Part 3)
    Recent Comments
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      Given the Taiwanese can't even work up the political...
      STemplar
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      One must love how a plane that is not designed to really excel at...
      Vitor
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      The headline aloge is a CLEAR representation of MISREPORTING on the...
      pfcem
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      An increase from 50 million to 95 million is not a 50% increase....
      Steve
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      China and the U.S. will not be going to war in the forseeable...
      Romeo
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Cant use unmanned tech because they can make choices like a man...
      Carlos
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      @Brandon No kidding. I don't even understand why we need this...
      gmanaz
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Scrap the entire thing and make Lockheed pay us back they fubared...
      Brandon
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
      Is the 95 mill figure with or without the research and...
      Thunder350
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      I wouldn't believe a word Andrew Krepinevich has to...
      bdwilcox
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage