Comments on: DS Multi-media Update

By: Chris T

Chris T — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:49:36 +0000

Pinnacle now has to see soon to be Level IV + X-SAPI I created .….MAPA I call it. Modular Armor Plate Attachment.

By: Chris T

Chris T — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:47:39 +0000

New form of X-SAPI is soon to be Public from CBA…Modular and far advanced of any SAPI or ESAPI out on market today. This is revolutionary and already proven 7.62x39 AP and 7.62x54R AP tested and passed.

By: Chris T

Chris T — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:44:54 +0000

Bottom line Dragon Skin has it’s purpose in many critical situations. However as of this Holiday What I tewsted as a new form of Body Armor plate
has now been downsized and tested at 7.62x39mm Armor pierciong rounds with excellent results. It will be tested with 7.62x54R Ap rounds and 30.06 APM2. If it goes then a whole new form of X-SAPI on mY terms not any military or Government or any
Company can dictate how it is built or too much weight ..Why becasue the science to build it is Solid State and it can be built to any size. I can make them 4“x4” or 4ft x4ft . 12x12 ” will come in at 6 to 7 lbs and stop multiple hits from all Level IV rounds due to design. Added part is they are Modular and strong attachment to current vests.

By: JMMC62

JMMC62 — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:13:34 +0000

This is a realy late comment. I was in the process of clearing out old stuff and happened to pull this “test” up. I don’t know if anyone else did a frame by frame on this video. I know they did a good job of holding the date=time index. I wondered why the cuts in the video, so I checked closer — a frame by frame. There are problems!
Frames before and after the blackouts don’t match. I always get sceptical when they are in CYA mode. The balistic matterial before and after are way different, the impacked indentations are different, I just don’t think this video is of value.

By: Randy

Randy — Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:30:53 +0000

Why test with 5.56. Thats our ammo and it’s quite a bit smaller than their 7.62. In my eyes, the test is invalid.

By: Dave

Dave — Thu, 31 May 2007 15:42:08 +0000

Perhaps they should make a lightweight, flexible and working level 4 armor before investing more time and money in a project with no real world use and more TV shows..

By: patriot

patriot — Mon, 28 May 2007 15:34:24 +0000

Check out Pinnacle’s Level 5 body armor!

this is no joke, see for yourself!

By: txzen

txzen — Thu, 24 May 2007 20:09:13 +0000

I asked on another forum but maybe some of you know the answer. Why does the .pdf say 4 of 8 tests failed when only 2 tests were passed, the 60 degree test had 0 failures and the salt water test had 0 failures? It would seem that 6 out of 8 vests had penetrations and even one of the “successes,” the 60 below 0 test there where no penetrations were but the discs seem really discombobulated after the testing. There is some weird stuff there or maybe I just missed something.

By: Moose

Moose — Thu, 24 May 2007 16:42:32 +0000

Sorry I don’t buy that. They show quite clearly afterward where the “penetrations” where in relation to the vest, and they’ve banned DS from active units. I don’t see what in that 4-minute gap could be giving the Insurgents any more info than they already got.

By: Foreign.Boy

Foreign.Boy — Thu, 24 May 2007 04:26:37 +0000

“For my own $.02: Wonder what’s with the 4-minute gap in the vid?“
Probably to protect those that are wearing it now. The Insurgents learned how to find the weak points of interceptor.. and started training snipers to do so.…
What about the ‘Trojan Armour’ by Troy Hurtubise? I’m shocked no one is asking questions about it…