DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Eye on China » The Rising Dragon

The Rising Dragon

chinese-parade.jpg

Just in case you didnt see it already, the Pentagon released its annual Chinese Military Power report Friday.

One of the best China reporters in the coun­try, Bill Gertz, wrote in the Washington Times that the report shows a robust effort by the PRC to develop anti-​​satellite weapons that can deliver a knock­out blow to many U.S. mil­i­tary satellites.

Gertz writes:

According to defense offi­cials famil­iar with the report, it also high­lights new strate­gic mis­sile devel­op­ments, includ­ing China’s five new Jin-​​class sub­marines, and states that Beijing con­tin­ues to hide the true level of its mil­i­tary spending.

The offi­cials also said that the report will detail how China is devel­op­ing two new types of strate­gic forces that go beyond what nations have done tra­di­tion­ally using air, sea and land forces by aim­ing to knock out mod­ern com­mu­ni­ca­tions meth­ods on which the U.S. mil­i­tary relies for advanced warfight­ing techniques.

China also is train­ing large num­bers of mil­i­tary com­puter hack­ers to deliver crip­pling elec­tronic attacks on U.S. mil­i­tary and civil­ian com­puter networks. 

– Christian

Share |

May 29th, 2007 | Eye on China | 254137 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/05/29/the-rising-dragon/The+Rising+Dragon2007-05-29+11%3A05%3A48Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Sunday Paper | Bashar Bashes the Competition » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bill Murray says:
    May 29, 2007 at 8:17 am

    Christian,
    I enjoy this web­site tremen­dously and, for the most part, the infor­ma­tion is accu­rate and thought­ful. However, I have to dis­agree with the notion that Bill Gertz is one of the best China reporters. He is def­i­nitely, one of the most pro­lific reporters on the threat (real and imag­ined) of China and he has never met a China threat (again real or imag­ined) that he didn’t embrace fully. Mr. Gertz (and the Washington Times in gen­eral) is one of the most shame­lessy biased (right up there with Fox News) media out­lets in the coun­try. Just my two cents.

    Reply
  2. Christian says:
    May 29, 2007 at 10:12 am

    Bill,
    Glad you enjoy the site.
    Gertz is one of the best sourced on China mil­i­tary buildup. I was not mak­ing a polit­i­cal argu­ment for or against the “threat” posed by China (I’ve learned that the hard way over here at DT).
    The guy digs up stuff on China not reported any­where else.

    Reply
  3. Russell says:
    May 29, 2007 at 11:16 am

    The army from the east is com­ing. We need not to depend on Our tech­nol­ogy. Always have backup. A slip
    up on a com­puter can make us vul­ner­a­ble. It will
    prob­a­bly cre­ate another cold war. We will have to stay ahead. When it comes down to the bat­tle­field we have to remem­ber what the Native Americans taught Our fore­fa­thers. Learn from your enemy.

    Reply
  4. a DC reader says:
    May 29, 2007 at 11:20 am

    Christian — Gertz doesn’t nec­es­sar­ily “dig” up news about the Chinese mil­i­tary. More likely, he’s the favored recip­i­ent of leaks from well placed indi­vid­u­als in the gov­ern­ment. The leaks all paint a very scary pic­ture of the Chinese threat which nat­u­rally calls for more money to be spent to counter the threat.

    Reply
  5. J B says:
    May 29, 2007 at 11:55 am

    Then the sixth [angel] emp­tied his bowl on the mighty river Euphrates, and its water was dried up to make ready a road for [the com­ing of] the kings of the east (from the ris­ing sun). Rev. 16:12

    Reply
  6. Michael says:
    May 29, 2007 at 12:20 pm

    It is cru­cial that we (the U.S) start under­stand­ing the impor­tance of asym­met­ric war­fare and act accordingly.

    Reply
  7. Wren says:
    May 29, 2007 at 1:13 pm

    I

    Reply
  8. taimoor says:
    May 29, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    TECHNOLOGY IS NOT EVERYTHING.I strongly agree.All of us have seen and see­ing what is going on in Iraq and Afghanistan.Well,techology have saved many lives but it is not everything.United States should take strong mea­sures to solid­ify its troops more accu­rately to pre­vent its loss.

    Reply
  9. Bruce says:
    May 29, 2007 at 5:09 pm

    My feel­ing is China is way more scared of the USA than the other way around. A Chinese arms buildup is a nat­ural response to aggres­sive American for­eign inter­ven­tion pol­icy. But I don’t belive they will take the bait, divert­ing bil­lions to weapons is such a waste.

    Reply
  10. James says:
    May 29, 2007 at 6:30 pm

    We have become addicted to our own tech­nol­ogy. Are we sure we can still fight in the mud with sticks and stones? “Stand off” or “Over the hori­zon” is no longer an option for any of us. Do we have the for­ti­tude to get our hands dirty in real war­fare Just ask­ing some hard questions.

    Reply
  11. Elijah says:
    May 29, 2007 at 8:40 pm

    I think it’s a given that no sane per­son is plan­ning on invad­ing main­land China any­time soon. In that case, isn’t being able to fight in the mud irrel­e­vant (in regards to prepar­ing to fight China)?
    Say that this report is true and China is devel­op­ing tech to neu­tral­ize our satel­lite advan­tage and take down our infra­struc­ture via the Internet. In such a sce­nario, con­ven­tional forces are impo­tent — or in other words — tech­nol­ogy is indeed every­thing — tech­nol­ogy to coun­ter­act this assy­met­ric type of war. (I hope that made sense)
    If it’s not true, eh, well a few bil­lion dol­lars down the drain and a lot of employ­ment for some com­puter pro­gram­mers. I remem­ber read­ing an ear­lier post — I think it was about jus­ti­fy­ing the cost of the Raptor — we are so bad at pre­dict­ing and prepar­ing for the next war, so in that case, why not be ready for all of them? It’s not like we can’t afford to. I mean, for instance despite all the sto­ries about how much the Iraq war is cost­ing us, we are still in a peace­time eco­nomic pos­ture so it’s not cost­ing us THAT much. If we really are that stressed by the mil­i­tary expen­di­tures, raise taxes a few points and poof, bud­get surplus.

    Reply
  12. sensui says:
    May 29, 2007 at 8:53 pm

    The prob­lem is we sold a few or a lot of our bonds to china. So if we go against them they might with­draw that bonds and crip­ple our econ­omy, which will ulti­mately affect our war fight­ing capa­bil­ity. As of now we’re los­ing money a lot in WOT.

    Reply
  13. shawn says:
    May 29, 2007 at 9:14 pm

    For years the chi­nese of course has lied about there mil­i­tary spend­ing!! But mil­lions of Americans dont real­ize, if not care about this issue.…They feel that they are safe at home, lests not for­get about pear har­bor and 9/11.…But as nor­mal many are aware, includ­ing the President of the United States, George Bush.… But he takes lit­tle notice with his “fast track trade agree­ments” and “NAFTA”, and cares lit­tle if not at all with the recent scan­dal with the spy­ing some Chinese Americans have done lately.…so give it time and the most pow­er­ful nation in the world, the United States will no longer be the most pow­er­ful and hold the sta­tus as the worlds last stand­ing “Super Power”.…The Chinese will soon walk right over us …

    Reply
  14. Elijah says:
    May 29, 2007 at 10:02 pm

    Sorry, for clar­i­fi­ca­tion — WOT = War on Terror I assume? I’m not say­ing we aren’t spend­ing a lot of money, but the $200 bil­lion+ is a rel­a­tively small amount when your econ­omy is over $10 tril­lion and grow­ing at a healthy pace. We spend far more keep­ing fat alco­holic smok­ers alive — which of course leads to the log­i­cal con­clu­sion that fat alco­holic smok­ers must be ter­ror­ists.
    ******************
    True, they have us by the balls on the bonds thing…but ulti­mately we have them by the heart (and the purse-​​strings). It’s the 21st cen­tury MAD! But you can live with­out balls.

    Reply
  15. JOSEPH DIGGS SR says:
    May 29, 2007 at 10:40 pm

    WHAT ELSE IS NEW THE US. IS LIKE A TROUBLED HUSBAND LOOKING FOR A QUICK LOAN AFTER SQUANDERING HIS PAY CHECK. CHINA IS NOT THE ONLY COUNTRY THAT ARE HOLDING “BONDS” AGAINST THE US.

    Reply
  16. murc says:
    May 29, 2007 at 11:30 pm

    As mem­ory recalls, I believe China has already tested an anti-​​sat weapon last year…successfully I might add.
    As for shut­ting down the internet…I’m not even sure that pos­si­ble, hack­ers in other coun­tries have tried before…I believe its hap­pen twice (that I know of)…obviously, failed both times.
    Is China a threat.…absolutely…but we already out gun them in every scenario…they are not a cur­rent threat…maybe in 20+ years…but cur­rently we need to stay focused on smaller coun­tries like Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Syria, Saudi Arabia, etc. There’s cer­tainly no short­age of ene­mies out there.
    To Bill: Yes, Fox News is slightly biased towards the right wing…but lets be serious…the left wing media dom­i­nates the net, news­pa­pers, & tv (CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, ect.).

    Reply
  17. Byron Skinner says:
    May 30, 2007 at 12:33 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    It’s Federal bud­get time again I see and the Taiwan lobby is back. What is it now, more Destroyers, F-16’s or to make good on the Clinton era promise of five non nuclear sub­marines (the Clintons were not aware that the last non nuclear subm­srine was built in 1958. While many of them were still sh**ting in dia­pers).
    It is a fools folly to try and guess the intent of any coun­try, ref­er­ence England in 1911, when war with ger­many was imposs­able because there was just to much German invest­ment in the Great Britain and the Kaiser was fam­ily to King George V.
    China has many domes­tic as well as regional prob­lems to deal with. A build up of or a shift­ing of mil­li­tary assets of the mil­i­tary such as what it is, is not unrea­son­able. If you are really con­cerned about China’s inten­tions watch where the 2ed. Artillery Corp. is. The new bud­get has 400K more troops and 100 more mis­siles allo­cated to that com­mand but the HQ eli­mate is still 500Km. inland, when it moves again to the coast Chia is try­ing to make a state­ment. But before you get exited there is no increase in the 1.4 mil­lion PLA or in the size of the PLA Missile Force.
    Again this appears to be all about money, U.S. tax pay­ers money to prop up Taiwan, the same story has been being told since 1949.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  18. Willie says:
    May 30, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    Thank God they have most favored nation sta­tus. I need to run down to Wal-​​Mart and send them some more money so they can do us in a few years down the road.

    Reply
  19. john douglas robertson says:
    June 1, 2007 at 2:44 am

    I have yet to read entirely or to fully ingest the cur­rent DOD report on Chinas Milatary Power. However, there never seems to be any men­tion of a lit­tle device called a “Sun-​​Burn Missle” that the Chicoms cooked up a few years back to defeat an entire car­rier bat­tle group with one shot. It is sup­pose to be a nuke tipped skim­mer with lots and lots of range.
    Supposedly, when we were get­ting pretty close to con­firm­ing its actual exis­tence we seem to have lost a snooper P-​​3 in an airel “acci­dent” with a Chicom Mig-​​21.
    How much of this is true? I must admit that I do not know. I only know that the story has had long legs and that I say an exten­sive prayer for our sea ser­vice peo­ple every sin­gle day on the chance that even 1% of it has some merit!

    Reply
  20. PhilLeech says:
    June 1, 2007 at 8:15 am

    Whoever has the most money wins, and China has been buy­ing up most of ours. We need to hold them to their part of the bar­gain on eco­nomic agree­ments. Clinton’s admin­is­tra­tion ini­ti­ated new eco­nomic devel­op­ment for China in the inter­est of peace, but we see now the con­se­quences of “our” naivety. Legislative action to bring their cur­rency to fair-​​market-​​value is long overdue.

    Reply
  21. Mike Schofield says:
    June 1, 2007 at 9:25 am

    I never thought for one minute that the Dragon was asleep. There has been enough arti­cles to con­firm a pre-​​war, or pre-​​strike stance and they are get­ting closer every­day. I believe in the car­rier strike groups, but as it’s pre­dessor the bat­tle­ship, I see the car­rier becom­ing more vurn­able every day. It has not been long since the sur­prise of a chi­nese sub came close enough to the car­rier group to have destroyed half of it before they even knew what hit them. Years ago our fore­fa­thers took steps to keep wars from space, but I am affraid it is already here, and it is only log­i­cal. Aircraft and sur­face ships are in there twi­light, as more pow­er­ful, unstop­pable, space launched weapons become more avail­able every day, with the Russians anounc­ing their unstop­pable pen­e­trat­ing missle just yes­ter­day. It is time the American peo­ple wake up, and real­ize the a pre-​​empted strike of some sort is just across the hori­zon.
    How soon we react may be the bal­ance of power and free­dom. I can see so clearly as though it has already hap­pened, and feel help­less to stop it. Not an alarmist, just a realist.

    Reply
  22. William says:
    June 1, 2007 at 3:06 pm

    Ladies and gen­tle­man make no mis­take the Dragon and the Bear are look­ing to part­ner up in the very,very near future to strike America and her inter­ests world-​​wide. Play this out.……Iran doesn’t use the Bomb in Isreal, but on our 180,000 plus troops in the region.….immediately The Dragon puts its FULL Navy on “alert” but in actu­ally they are steam­ing east.…1 of the 87 miss­ing suit­case nukes from the bear then goes off in LA because we have the most open bor­der in the World.…OPEC sus­pends all oil trade with US.….hackers hit our com­puter systems.…and you can see where this is going. Folks they will try and invade us…question is how far will we go to stop them?????

    Reply
  23. Roy McKenzie says:
    June 1, 2007 at 10:17 pm

    Whats wrong with Fox News Bill ? lol The truth hurt ?

    Reply
  24. John S. Freel says:
    June 2, 2007 at 9:51 am

    THANK GOD! Finally, someone’s say­ing SOMETHING about our real ene­mies!
    Is there any group any­one knows of that I could join to address alert­ing Americans to Chinas immi­nent War on America?
    Secondly, does any­one know of ANY Presidential Candidate will­ing to stand up to these rats?

    Reply
  25. Fred says:
    June 3, 2007 at 9:08 am

    If you really want some inter­est­ing read­ing try a book titled, Unrestricted Warfare. I was writ­ten by two of China’s Col. Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui of the People’s Liberation Army. It is boar­ing as hell but has a lot of inter­est­ing ideas for screw­ing up the world of the US.
    The above repo0rt even falls into one of the catagories cov­ered in this book. READ IT.

    Reply
  26. USS Chalenger says:
    June 3, 2007 at 10:54 am

    Ah what can I say? Another heart break­ing truth to the sad real­ity that the peo­ple in Washington and the Idiot lib­er­als who sup­port them, don’t give a crap about the real dan­gers that we face. We are too busy mak­ing sure that Illegel immer­gents are get­ting good if not bet­ter priv­i­lages than cit­i­zens, Making sure that Imams are not offended when they do their prayers on a pub­lic air­plane, and cut­ting of the fund­ing for troops in the mid­dle of a war. Yup those are the more impor­tant things to worry about. Lets just have peace. Yea thats the answer peace not war. why don’t we just wave the white flag and hand over our nation to the first taker: oh yea that is what we’re doing.

    Reply
  27. samm says:
    June 5, 2007 at 10:19 am

    Historically, once again, the prophe­cies of the bible are about to come true. In all of the future prophe­cies dis­cussing the end times, America is NOT men­tioned because there is NO America to speak of. This is not a dooms­day scream, but a wake up call. In the final min­utes of his­tory, we as a peo­ple, not just Americans, but the whole human race, need to eval­u­ate our spir­i­tual bank­ruptcy and turn to the one true God who will bring us tri­umphantly through this mess we have cre­ated. It will be China and Russia com­bined who will deal America it’s death blow as fore­told in the old tes­ta­ment of the bible, Ezekiel 38,39 writ­ten in 587 b.c.

    Reply
  28. JMMC62 says:
    August 16, 2007 at 11:09 am

    You could call this “Awakening USA” also. For years we have been asleep, had our head in the sand, to many pow­er­ful fig­ures focused on per­sonal greed, or just dead heads. The old USSR was a lim­ited threat, but they knew war was unwin­able sui­side. Since 1954 the PRIMARY THREAT has been Communist China, I pre­fer call­ing it “Occupied China” (criple their police state and see how long they last). Why is it so impor­tant for them to elim­i­nate Formosa and the Chiness Government. We have been at war with them since they invaded Korea and the cease fire in Korea. Year after year they have prac­ticed “War with the United States.” Our gov­ern­ment just pre­tends they’re not… and never ceases to play the fool who pro­vides them tech­nol­ogy and infor­ma­tion. THINK! What one coun­try in the world is capa­ble of engag­ing in ther­monu­cu­lar war? Who can loose hun­dreds of mil­lions of peo­ple and come­out ahead? There was never a time when that answer was the now defunct USSR. Why are they now going for “Boomers” and “Super Carriers?” AND WE ARE FUNDING IT! Lets get some chat­ter going and see if we can get our lead­ers to smell the roses.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage