DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Jarhead Jazz » Snake Eaters for Life?

Snake Eaters for Life?

Force-Recon-web.jpg

MarSoc Update:

Yesterday Defense Tech reported a little-​​noticed line in Vice Adm. Eric Olsons writ­ten tes­ti­mony regard­ing the career path for Marines in spe­cial oper­a­tions forces.

DT read­ers will remem­ber that one of the main sell­ing points par­tic­u­larly for oppo­nents of the new MarSoc force within the Corps with the ser­vices entry into the spec ops world was that once Marines fin­ish with a stint in the snake eater world, theyd return to the reg­u­lar Corps with new knowl­edge, tac­tics and spe­cial­ized skills that could help make main­stream grunts better.

But Olsons answer to law­mak­ers that he wants a spec ops for life career path for Marines like the other ser­vices flies in the face of that logic.

MarSoc offi­cials have backed away from that ear­lier argu­ment, say­ing instead that, although Marines assigned to MarSoc may serve in the com­mand for longer than the usual three-​​year assign­ment because of the train­ing invest­ment, the ser­vice wants to make sure Marines who do a stint there are com­pet­i­tive for pro­mo­tion; mean­ing they still need to do Marine things to advance in the Marines.

Heres a state­ment from MarSoc spokesman, Maj. Cliff Gilmore:

MARSOC is work­ing with Marine Corps Manpower to deter­mine the best model for per­son­nel assign­ment and career paths within MARSOC and the SOF com­mu­nity. Our intent is to bal­ance three fac­tors: First, we must ensure we build and main­tain our SOF capa­bil­i­ties; Second, we must ensure a good return on time and money invested to train SOF per­son­nel; Third, we must ensure our Marines remain com­pet­i­tive for pro­mo­tion within the Corps.

Because it was given such short shrift in Olsons tes­ti­mony, maybe the issue wont come to any kind of con­flict. But there is a lin­ger­ing doubt within the legacy SOF that the Corps spe­cial oper­a­tors are imma­ture and inex­pe­ri­enced. One thing the old SOF has been proud of is the matu­rity and expe­ri­ence of its per­son­nel, the kind of exper­tise that comes only from spend­ing an entire career in the community.

Will the Corps be will­ing to give up its best leath­er­necks for­ever? Ill bet that will be a tough sell.

– Christian

Share |

June 14th, 2007 | Jarhead Jazz | 35657 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/06/14/snake-eaters-for-life/Snake+Eaters+for+Life%3F2007-06-14+20%3A36%3A41Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « A BEAR on the Battlefield | Chinese Cyberwar Alert! » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. sharp-tongued SSG says:
    June 15, 2007 at 2:25 pm

    What’s the mat­ter, Christian?
    No sto­ries about the way your loser neo-​​clown bud­dies shit-​​canned General Casey after he opposed their lat­est bril­liant “surge” strat­egy? Nothing on how your loser neo-​​clown bud­dies shit-​​canned Shinseki when he TOLD their deluded asses BEFORE the war, what it was actu­ally going to take to secure the PEACE after the ini­tial con­flict? Or how about the way your loser new-​​clown bud­dies just ‘retired’ Peter Pace’s ass? What about General White? Or General Eaton? Or General Batiste? Nothing? Not even a men­tion?
    OK, what about when Bush claimed again and again that we didn’t need more troops in Iraq (coin­ci­den­tally dur­ing the 2004 Presidential cam­paign when John Kerry was call­ing for more troops

    Reply
  2. sharp-tongued SSG says:
    June 15, 2007 at 3:18 pm

    sorry. I haven’t yet learned to con­trol my anger, obvi­ously… It’s not your fault. But I wish some­one would start talk­ing some truth. and I see none of it.

    Reply
  3. SOF supporter says:
    June 16, 2007 at 10:45 am

    Anyway.…
    It’s a long-​​standing tenet of SOCOM’s that SOF can­not be mass-​​produced and take years to reach matu­rity. Despite VADM Olson’s assur­ance that MarSOC is devel­op­ing ahead of sched­ule, a rota­tion plan will effec­tively stunt devel­op­ment of MarSOC to a cer­tain stage with lim­ited growth after the first cadre of Marines are replaced.
    The AF does rotate some of its SOF per­son­nel in and out of AFSOC (ex. C-​​130 pilots rotat­ing in and out to “slick” units from AFSOC sqds), but it is lim­ited and only for those selected for long-​​term devel­op­ment by their per­for­mance. It’s not a nor­mal track nor a long-​​term one. Eventually, they (AFSOC) pull you back in, to quote M. Corleone.
    All in all, that’s nec­es­sary (imo). SOF skills take time to develop and then must be con­stantly refined, sharp­ened and prac­ticed. That’s not because the skills them­selves can’t be learned by GPF. It’s because those skills must be sec­ond nature when imple­mented so that SOF can use the best weapon they have (i.e. 10-​​lb brain) to win hearts and minds or direct pre­ci­sion fire­power (and usu­ally both) in ways that GPF aren’t accus­tomed to.

    Reply
  4. Chris Morgan says:
    June 20, 2007 at 8:50 am

    It seems to me what the Marine Corps wants to do with their “spe­cial forces ” Marines sounds right and looks good. But and this is a big but , after 3 years in this capac­ity, a real SOF oper­a­tor is just fin­ish­ing their train­ing! to send them back to the Fleet would be a waste of time and train­ing!
    I was in the Corps for 6 years, I can under­stand the Corps reluc­tance to lose qual­ity war­riors, but what is the trade­off in the long run? It sounds to me like their SOF forces will always be filled with young Marines always in a state of training.Certainly this will lead to a “poor” qual­ity sof force.
    The Marine Corps needs to under­stand that these Marines are going to be an elite force within an elite force wether the Corps accepts this is some­thing else all together. { note: if they were not an elite force within an elite force , then all Marines should be able to make it thru this exten­sive train­ing, this is some­thing I rather doubt though,}.

    Reply
  5. matt hood says:
    April 18, 2008 at 1:12 pm

    All the other ser­vices is angry because they can not be a Marines so they do want the Marines to have any­thing that would make them more bet­ter than what they are now. I know false pride when I see it-​​go Marines get all you can get. What you can not get then steal it!

    Reply
  6. Lane Ezell says:
    August 28, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    Hey, these Marsoc oper­a­tors aren’t some kids who signed up to be Spec op’s. They are the most sea­soned men to come out of Force Recon.
    There is not a fast path to Marsoc. You have to be in Force Recon for at least two years before you are eli­gi­ble to try out for Marsoc, and it ain’t that easy to get into Recon in the first place. All of these men have been in Recon and then gone through selec­tion for Marsoc. which almost all of them have been in for more than three years before thay start oper­at­ing for Marsoc. Calling them imma­ture is as child­ish of the Army as it was for them to kick Marsoc out of A-​​stan on false charges just to pre­serve there cov­eted sta­tus as “special”.

    Reply
  7. SpotTheFraud says:
    December 24, 2008 at 10:05 am

    Sharp-​​tongued SSG? More like foul-​​mouthed dolt… Perhaps you could make a point instead of half-​​baked insin­u­a­tions, red-​​herrings and spew­ing Daily Kos non­sense. As for pro­pa­ganda, “war czar?” Gee, how crypto-​​leninist can one get. I guess we neeeded to toss our toys out of the crib and did we get busted in a piss test, per­haps? Is this why we’re a bit cranky? As for “some of our best Americans are get­ting cut to pieces every damned day

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage