DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » The Defense Biz » The Low, Low Price of $49.9 Million …

The Low, Low Price of $49.9 Million …

used_car_salesman.jpg

Aviation Week is report­ing the following:

“Boeing is offer­ing the Navy what one Pentagon source calls a ‘tempt­ing’ deal for an all-​​time-​​low fly­away price of $49.9 mil­lion for new F/​A-​​18E/​F Super Hornets. The cost is guar­an­teed for a third multi-​​year buy of 170 air­craft, but this is nearly dou­ble the Navy’s stated com­mit­ment for 92 more. Still, the deal ‘is going to be pretty tough for the Navy to turn down,’ says a Pentagon official.

“The pro­posal comes as Defense Dept. lead­ers worry that the cost of Lockheed Martin’s Joint Strike Fighter will con­tinue to grow. The Navy has told Congress it has a short­fall of 50 fight­ers, due in part to two factors–an accel­er­ated burn rate of fighter hours com­bined with decreased pro­jec­tions of the design life of exist­ing air­craft. Boeing could begin deliv­er­ing the first air­craft from this deal two years after the award date. The offer would carry the pro­duc­tion line to 2013; cur­rent work ends in 2009.”

Damn, what a steal. How is Boeing going to make ends meet? (I’ll bet they’re scrimp­ing on food at the Paris Air Show chalets.) Although I swore I’d never be caught dead in a Hornet (wouldn’t fly an air­plane that didn’t have a front seat), at that price I might just have to get a cou­ple for me and the missus.

(Gouge: NC)

– Ward

Share |

June 18th, 2007 | The Defense Biz | 357133 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/06/18/the-low-low-price-of-49-9-million/The+Low%2C+Low+Price+of+%2449.9+Million+.+.+.2007-06-18+15%3A55%3A39paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « More Tomahawks May Fly | A U.S. — China Hotline Coming » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nicholas Weaver says:
    June 18, 2007 at 11:39 am

    a: All the tool­ing and NRE is already paid for, so the low addi­tional fly­away cost makes sense.
    b: Boeing will prob­a­bly make con­sid­er­able money ser­vic­ing the planes, even if they made $0 on build­ing them.
    c: Don’t you mean “back seat”? And I think alot of the super-​​hornets the Navy is buy­ing are 2-​​seaters.

    Reply
  2. Ward says:
    June 18, 2007 at 12:30 pm

    It was a joke refer­ring to the sin­gle seat model, Nicholas. Stick with me, boy.

    Reply
  3. campbell says:
    June 18, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    Ward?.……Foghorn Leghorn?
    AW’RIGHT!!!!!!

    Reply
  4. Grandjester says:
    June 18, 2007 at 3:07 pm

    Yeah, but how many cup-​​holders (and can they han­dle a Big Gulp)? These are the impor­tant ques­tions…
    Seriously, this is a great hedge bet for the Navy, keeps the line open for Boeing and might light a fire under Lockheed Martin’s ass.

    Reply
  5. Jonathan says:
    June 18, 2007 at 7:45 pm

    Hmm let’s see. The unit cost of an F-​​14A/​B in 2006 dol­lars is $46.4 mil­lion. The unit cost of a F-​​14D in 2006 dol­lars is $126.6 mil­lion. You could buy two and a half Super Hornets for the price of a new Tomcat. Is the Super Hornet THAT bad?

    Reply
  6. Mike says:
    June 18, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    F18 Super Hornet is one of the best fight­ers in the world today.. Also as Johnathan stated, that is a very good price when com­pared to pre­vi­ously pur­chased fight­ers in todays dol­lars.
    One thing I do won­der about is if they buy more Hornets, then obvi­ously they will cut back on JSF, thus increas­ing the price. This will not make the Airforce and Marines to happy. The Marines are defently rely­ing on the JSF due to them think­ing ahead to save money by not buy­ing the super hor­net and stick­ing with the more pri­ma­tive models.

    Reply
  7. Demophilus says:
    June 20, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    Boeing’s been push­ing for this for some time. JANES reported on a more stealthy Block 3 Super Hornet a while ago; AVIATION WEEK’s Ares blog reported some­thing sim­i­lar yes­ter­day. Apparently, a Boeing spokesman says that com­put­ing advances allow the mod­el­ing of radar scat­ter­ing of exter­nal stores, which might make it pos­si­ble to cut the Super Hornet’s RCS by mak­ing ord­nance, etc. more stealthy. You would basi­cally hang RAM on the pylons, etc.
    FWIW, I saw a sim­i­lar state­ment about com­puter mod­el­ing and stores attrib­uted to an EADS spokesman. Maybe it’s for real; or maybe, it’s just another way of flack­ing legacy airframes.

    Reply
  8. sandiegan says:
    June 20, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    Win win for Boeing and the US econ­omy. Boeing, should they sell the super hor­nets at the low cost, just cov­ered their cost of over­head, thus mak­ing it pos­si­ble for them to bring down the cost of other air­craft … beat­ing aer­obus with a smart flank­ing move… love it. GO USA!

    Reply
  9. Mike says:
    June 20, 2007 at 6:18 pm

    Plan is for the Airforce to get some F-22’s while the JSF goes to the Navy, USMC, and Airforce to replace some of the F-18’s, and All of the USMC F-18’s and Harriers. I believe the JSF will also replace most of the Airforces F16’s and some F15.
    The F-22’s in the Airforce will be few, but like the Spartans were to the Greaks.

    Reply
  10. Grandjester says:
    June 21, 2007 at 9:19 am

    Max,
    The 22 isn’t suited for Naval ops, but the ini­tial squadrons are being deployed in the Pacific (first one’s in Okinawa or back in Hawaii now) prob­a­bly to keep the NORKs and CHICOMS hon­est while we are, um, occu­pied else­where.
    Boeing is laugh­ing their asses to the bank and most likely couldn’t be hap­pier that the lost the JSF com­pe­ti­tion to Lockheed Martin.

    Reply
  11. rohan money says:
    August 2, 2008 at 12:06 am

    Now I really do not know is that I sym­pa­thize with him, or sym­pa­thy for myself. Sometimes I still can buy some rohan money to send her. I really do not know what to say, but the mind is really a lot of words to say, I love with me, if we do not love to direct that white, why do we have to say is I do not love you, ignore you.

    Reply
  12. http://www.buyageofconan.com says:
    August 5, 2008 at 11:41 pm

    Buycheap aoc gold , Therefore we’ve been mind­ful from the out­set to cre­ate a world which is true to Howard’s writ­ing. There is majesty in Hyboria but it’s of a mono­lithic, bru­tal and prim­i­tive kind — it cer­tainly isn’t “high fairie” where every­thing appears as though it was built only yes­ter­day and is devoid of context.”

    Reply
  13. Shaiya gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    I believe that if you look the text you will want to try play­ing Shaiya at once and to buy Shaiya gold.

    Reply
  14. 2moons dil says:
    August 15, 2008 at 10:22 pm

    I and the

    Reply
  15. dofus kamas says:
    August 15, 2008 at 11:05 pm

    I played this game already have more than one year, at that time I do not want to spend my time to the game, but later I met her, in my life she was very impor­tant, we together to earn the dofus kamas, I think this life­time I will never forget.

    Reply
  16. eve isk says:
    August 15, 2008 at 11:24 pm

    I was play­ing EVE more than a year, but I feel it was already had a long time, the feel­ing seems was many. In this more than one year I already for­got that I spend how much money to buy the eve isk, I already for­got in order to played the game how many things happened.

    Reply
  17. Netanya says:
    July 11, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    Hi every­one. I have enjoyed greatly the sec­ond bloom­ing… sud­denly you find — at the age of 50, say — that a whole new life has opened before you.
    I am from Brunei and also am speak­ing English, tell me right I wrote the fol­low­ing sen­tence: “You might be sur­prised to learn that there are few sur­gi­cal options for the treat­ment of exces­sive sweat­ing avail­able.” 8-) Thanks in advance. Netanya.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage