<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Army’s Greatest Inventions for 2006</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/06/19/armys-greatest-inventions-for-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/06/19/armys-greatest-inventions-for-2006/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: alan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/06/19/armys-greatest-inventions-for-2006/#comment-163312</link> <dc:creator>alan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:44:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3574#comment-163312</guid> <description>Greetings, Knowing this is a long-shot and it&#039;s likely that this is the wrong site, but I have an idea on how to save live&#039;s in the field of IED&#039;s. It&#039;s rather simple and no doubt inexpensive. Could you get back to me on where/how I can offer this concept to the US Military? Thanks, A. Williams </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings,<br /> Knowing this is a long-shot and it’s likely that this is the wrong site, but I have an idea on how to save live’s in the field of IED’s. It’s rather simple and no doubt inexpensive. Could you get back to me on where/how I can offer this concept to the US Military?<br /> Thanks,<br /> A. Williams</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Demophilus</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/06/19/armys-greatest-inventions-for-2006/#comment-163309</link> <dc:creator>Demophilus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:14:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3574#comment-163309</guid> <description>Richard: Looks like the Army&#039;s ordering more M1117s: http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2007/06/usa-orders-369-more-m1117-asvs/index.php Not for nothing, but what&#039;s your opinion on the old M113? I mean, I realize it&#039;s got a checkered past, but then again, so many of us do. There&#039;s a whole brouhaha over the 113 vs. Humvee vs. Stryker vs. Bradley, etc., etc. between various sites and blogs (for example, www.combatreform.com).  AFAICS, the big argument against the 113 is it&#039;s not a Bradley, or a Stryker.  Is it better than a Humvee? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard:<br /> Looks like the Army’s ordering more M1117s:<br /> <a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2007/06/usa-orders-369-more-m1117-asvs/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2007/06/usa-orders-369-more-m1117-asvs/index.php</a><br /> Not for nothing, but what’s your opinion on the old M113?<br /> I mean, I realize it’s got a checkered past, but then again, so many of us do.<br /> There’s a whole brouhaha over the 113 vs. Humvee vs. Stryker vs. Bradley, etc., etc. between various sites and blogs (for example, <a href="http://www.combatreform.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.combatreform.com</a>).  AFAICS, the big argument against the 113 is it’s not a Bradley, or a Stryker.  Is it better than a Humvee?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jimbo</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/06/19/armys-greatest-inventions-for-2006/#comment-62402</link> <dc:creator>Jimbo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:36:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3574#comment-62402</guid> <description>there are some good photos of these devices here: http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-91790-1.html </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are some good photos of these devices here:<br /> <a href="http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-91790-1.html" rel="nofollow">http://content.zdnet.com/2346-9595_22-91790–1.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Demophilus</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/06/19/armys-greatest-inventions-for-2006/#comment-163308</link> <dc:creator>Demophilus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3574#comment-163308</guid> <description>Sweet Jesus, Nestor -- what kind of doctor ARE you? Sure hope you&#039;re not a pediatrician.  Or, a proctologist. Oncologist, maybe.  Yeah, that works. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet Jesus, Nestor — what kind of doctor ARE you?<br /> Sure hope you’re not a pediatrician.  Or, a proctologist.<br /> Oncologist, maybe.  Yeah, that works.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Forrest Langley</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/06/19/armys-greatest-inventions-for-2006/#comment-163306</link> <dc:creator>Forrest Langley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 18:09:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3574#comment-163306</guid> <description>We have spent billions of dollars trying to defeat ieds. I was in youseffiah, Iraq and we hit ieds almost every day. The ieds were set off most of the time from behind the reeds. When we were ambushed it came from behind the reeds because we cant see what behind them. No one ever burned the reeds down or use pesticide on them. A cost effective way of lowering your exposure to ieds and rpgs and ambushes would be to burn the reeds down. Why we are not doing that I dont know. All the reeds do is provide cover for the terrorists. They would have much less places to launch there attacks from if the reeds were burned to the ground after using a herbacide to kill them. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have spent billions of dollars trying to defeat ieds. I was in youseffiah, Iraq and we hit ieds almost every day. The ieds were set off most of the time from behind the reeds. When we were ambushed it came from behind the reeds because we cant see what behind them. No one ever burned the reeds down or use pesticide on them. A cost effective way of lowering your exposure to ieds and rpgs and ambushes would be to burn the reeds down. Why we are not doing that I dont know. All the reeds do is provide cover for the terrorists. They would have much less places to launch there attacks from if the reeds were burned to the ground after using a herbacide to kill them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Denham</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/06/19/armys-greatest-inventions-for-2006/#comment-163305</link> <dc:creator>Richard Denham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3574#comment-163305</guid> <description>The Blowtorch was a bloody failure, we drove around with those stupid things leading the convoy and it turns out they DID NOT work!! They were finally removed by the EWO. While I am on the subject of things that dont work, how about a replacement for the sorry excuse of a fighting vehicle HMMWV. It is horribly overladen with armor, so underpowered it&#039;s embarassing and the electrical system is taxed to the max. I do see Iraqi Army using the newer Mine Resistant Vehicles and loads of M1117&#039;s, must be nice. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Blowtorch was a bloody failure, we drove around with those stupid things leading the convoy and it turns out they DID NOT work!! They were finally removed by the EWO. While I am on the subject of things that dont work, how about a replacement for the sorry excuse of a fighting vehicle HMMWV. It is horribly overladen with armor, so underpowered it’s embarassing and the electrical system is taxed to the max. I do see Iraqi Army using the newer Mine Resistant Vehicles and loads of M1117’s, must be nice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 699/703 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 06:07:50 -->
