DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Iraq Diary » Iranian Techniques Tested in Iraq

Iranian Techniques Tested in Iraq

iran-army.jpg

The recent upsurge on mor­tar attacks against key Iraqi and US gov­ern­ment facil­i­ties in Baghdad could be partly attrib­uted to Iranian train­ing of insur­gents, a top coali­tion com­man­der said late last week.

Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno told reporters at the Pentagon recent sweeps in Diyala province have net­ted around 50 high value ter­ror sus­pects, most of whom are Iraqis whove joined al Qaeda and most of those are IED builders and truck/​car bomb fac­tory facilitators.

Some, how­ever, are Shiite insur­gents who have received train­ing in Iran on mor­tar techniques.

Odierno explained:

We have found a few peo­ple that were Shi’a extrem­ists that were con­nected to — that had some train­ing in Iran — those mostly being the mor­tar and rocket teams inside of Baghdad where they were trained in Iran and came in here to con­duct attacks against not only coali­tion and Iraqi secu­rity forces, but gov­ern­ment of Iraq tar­gets inside of the Green Zone. 

The attacks on the Green Zone bol­ster argu­ments that the Baghdad secu­rity plan is a fail­ure, push­ing America closer and closer to an early with­drawal. Odierno said Iran is con­duct­ing a surge of its own.

I think it’s Iran’s attempt to con­tinue to desta­bi­lize Iraq and inflict as many casu­al­ties as they can, frankly, on U.S. forces who are oper­at­ing in Iraq. … What I have seen, though, is a steady increase in sup­port to Shi’a extrem­ists. I think they are try­ing to surge their sup­port to Shi’a extrem­ists. We’ve seen an increased flow of train­ing to mor­tar teams and rocket teams, we’ve seen an increase in some flow of weapons and muni­tions into Iraq. We are work­ing very hard to cut those lines every day from Iran. 

Though Odierno did tamp down accu­sa­tions that Iran was sup­ply­ing Sunni groups in Iraq to accom­plish the same goal. This, after a top US diplo­mat in Afghanistan claimed evi­dence of direct links to Iranian gov­ern­ment mil­i­tary ship­ments to Taliban insurgents.

And he went on to explain the intri­cate sys­tem of cut-​​outs that help deflect any direct links to the Iranian gov­ern­ments sup­port and train­ing of Shiite insurgents.

I think it’s the Qods Force work­ing with Iraqi sur­ro­gates that work inside of Iraq. It’s prob­a­bly in some cases a net­work that was devel­oped prior to Saddam Hussein’s down­fall and they con­tinue to oper­ate. And so we watch that extremely closely. We think that’s the major­ity of where it’s happening.

I would just say, again, I think some of the rea­son — with the oper­a­tions in Baqubah and Diyala province, we think, we’re hop­ing will affect some of this. We want to put pres­sure also on that net­work, of cut­ting those sup­plies of weapons that are com­ing in from Iran. And that’s one of the other rea­sons why we’re con­duct­ing this operation. 

I under­stand that many DT read­ers strongly debate the Iranian con­nec­tion. But Odierno seemed to indi­cate there would be more con­crete infor­ma­tion emerg­ing from the lat­est Diyala sweeps that would be shared with the media to prove out asser­tions of Iranian com­plic­ity in the deaths of Iraqis and US forces.

And I think, you know, we’ve had some indi­ca­tions of that through some of the peo­ple we’ve detained, and I think in the future here we’re going to lay some of that out for you. So I think — we feel pretty con­fi­dent about those links. 

– Christian

Share |

June 25th, 2007 | Iraq Diary | 358016 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/06/25/iranian-techniques-tested-in-iraq/Iranian+Techniques+Tested+in+Iraq2007-06-25+17%3A43%3A33Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Aerial IED Busters Slammed | UK Regrets Sale of Captured Troops’ Story » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. b says:
    June 25, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    Wonder about the title of the post:
    “Iranian Techniques Tested in Iraq“
    There is noth­ing in the post about “Iranian tech­nics” or their test­ing in Iraq.
    The only thing is Odierno, with­out any proof, mus­ing about mor­tars at the Green Zone by –pos­sivle– Iran sup­ported ele­ments.
    There is not much train­ing needed to use a mor­tar or short range rocket. Why would Iraqis, 100,000 of them kicked out of Saddams old army thanks to Rumsfeld/​Bremer, need any train­ing for these at all?
    This is again sim­ply hyp­ing an assumed “threat” with­out any, any proof.
    May I see those WMDs again please?

    Reply
  2. sglover says:
    June 25, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    Whoever runs this site never should have let this yahoo Christian post arti­cles. Still spread­ing the hys­te­ria, eh boy? For the third time — I’m going to type this slowly so even you can grasp it — look at a map of the Iraq vicin­ity. Then, after you’ve acquainted your­self with some basic geog­ra­phy, you can report back to us about who has a bet­ter claim to try to influ­ence the region, and who’s med­dling.
    Idiot.

    Reply
  3. Wembley says:
    June 25, 2007 at 1:23 pm

    They were pretty con­fi­dent about the non-​​existent WMD in Iraq too.
    Those Austrian sniper rifles did not pan out.
    EFP facoties have been found in Iraq.
    Enough of the alle­ga­tions: let’s see some actual evi­dence rather than just mud-​​slinging.

    Reply
  4. jim says:
    June 25, 2007 at 2:39 pm

    The Iranian involve­ment has been proven time and time again. It’s not seri­ously in doubt. What to do about it is the ques­tion. So far we’ve taken a very restrained approach, which is prob­a­bly the best course of action at the moment.
    Willful igno­rance is not a sub­sti­tute for crit­i­cal thinking.

    Reply
  5. Hoax Meister says:
    June 25, 2007 at 2:42 pm

    “Iranian tac­tics”?? Unless the Iranians invented the mor­tar, it sounds like basic infantry tactics–I see noth­ing that is uniquely Iranian about a mor­tar bar­rage.
    The arti­cle did men­tion one impor­tant aspect to this sit­u­a­tion. These Iranian-​​Iraqi net­works most def­i­nitely date back to the Iran-​​Iraq war, where the Iranians used Shia and even Kurds to under­mine the Baathists. Obviously, US intel knows this and is seek­ing ways to encour­age those groups to drop their Iranian rela­tion­ship in favor of a US one. It would be an inter­est­ing arti­cle that cov­ered the extent of these rela­tion­ships and how they have evolved in post-​​Saddam Iraq.

    Reply
  6. Les H says:
    June 25, 2007 at 3:05 pm

    When are we going to get a stream of arti­cles about the involve­ment of Saudi Arabia and Jordan in the Sunni insur­gency and ter­ror­ist cells? For instance, two-​​thirds of the sui­cide bomb attacks are being car­ried out by Saudi nationals.

    Reply
  7. ellis says:
    June 25, 2007 at 4:17 pm

    Hey sglover,
    With your extra­or­di­nary grasp of geog­ra­phy and your super-​​fast typ­ing skills, you’d be a lock for a job edit­ing a site like this and inform­ing us all of your vaunted opin­ions. Or a valu­able asset to the intel­li­gence com­mu­nity, or even advis­ing the President. So why are you sit­ting in your base­ment shriek­ing at the screen about how unqual­i­fied the guys run­ning this web­site must be? You’re read­ing it. Who’s the idiot?

    Reply
  8. Max says:
    June 25, 2007 at 7:17 pm

    Actually, the sniper rifles DID pan out. We just haven’t pun­ished Iran for it.
    We still haven’t dealt with repeated Iranian incur­sions into Iraqi ter­ri­tory.
    http://​www​.time​.com/​t​i​m​e​/​w​o​r​l​d​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​0​,​8​5​9​9​,​1​6​0​5​4​8​7​,​0​0​.​h​tml
    Iranian Army units shoot­ing at US Army units in Iraq haven’t been dealt with.
    Components for the EFP are com­ing from Iran.
    Today the Sun reported that Iranian heli­copters are fly­ing into Iraq fairly reg­u­larly.
    The Iranians tried to seize Australian Navy per­son­nel before British per­son­nel were taken
    If you don’t think that Iran is fight­ing a war against the US-​​you ARE A FOOL.
    But we knew that about you Glover. You still think John Kerry would have done a bet­ter job.

    Reply
  9. sglover says:
    June 25, 2007 at 11:44 pm

    Look, to all you Clausewitzen talk­ing about how Iran *really is* back­ing prox­ies in Iraq, all I can say is, No shit?!?! The point, geniuses, is that Iraq and Iran are neigh­bors — geo­graph­i­cally, cul­tur­ally, his­tor­i­cally. It’s THEIR part of the world, not ours. If we believed that hos­tile pow­ers were sup­port­ing prox­ies in what we con­sider our sphere of inter­est, we’d be doing *exactly* what the Iranians are doing. In fact, we did, in El Salvador and Nicaragua.
    So how’s about you drop the breath­less moral out­rage about evil Tehran, unless you enjoy look­ing stu­pid, laugh­able, hypocritical.

    Reply
  10. sglover says:
    June 25, 2007 at 11:47 pm

    Look, to all you Clausewitzen talk­ing about how Iran *really is* back­ing prox­ies in Iraq, all I can say is, No shit?!?! The point, geniuses, is that Iraq and Iran are neigh­bors — geo­graph­i­cally, cul­tur­ally, his­tor­i­cally. It’s THEIR part of the world, not ours. If we believed that hos­tile pow­ers were sup­port­ing prox­ies in what we con­sider our sphere of inter­est, we’d be doing *exactly* what the Iranians are doing. In fact, we did, in El Salvador and Nicaragua.
    So how’s about you drop the breath­less moral out­rage about evil Tehran, unless you enjoy look­ing stu­pid, laugh­able, hypocritical.

    Reply
  11. Kniero says:
    June 26, 2007 at 6:54 am

    “ellis said:
    Hey sglover,
    With your extra­or­di­nary grasp of geog­ra­phy and your super-​​fast typ­ing skills, you’d be a lock for a job edit­ing a site like this and inform­ing us all of your vaunted opin­ions. Or a valu­able asset to the intel­li­gence com­mu­nity, or even advis­ing the President. So why are you sit­ting in your base­ment shriek­ing at the screen about how unqual­i­fied the guys run­ning this web­site must be? You’re read­ing it. Who’s the idiot?“
    One is not but a fool for vis­it­ing a trans­fer­rer of infor­ma­tional access, but one is (a fool) when con­sid­er­ing such a thing with­out the level of pru­dence being con­sid­ered “not a fool” war­rants.
    As far as I know, under­stand­ing Iran’s aggres­sive behav­ior as respon­sives to per­ceived threats as some­thing “not evil” is work­able. But, under­stand­ing it as “not evil” when they wish entire, legit­i­mate par­ties “wiped off the map” isn’t workable.

    Reply
  12. ajay says:
    June 26, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    I pre­sume Odierno has some cap­tured Iranian mor­tar­men he can show the media.
    No?
    Or some cap­tured Iranian train­ers?
    How about some mor­tars that can be traced to Iran?
    How about, you know, any evi­dence at all? Because being fed a line of utter bull about Iraqi weapons by a dec­o­rated gen­eral* is what got us into this in the first place, so I’m not exactly keen to make the same mis­take again. (*That would be Powell.)

    Reply
  13. Brian H says:
    June 28, 2007 at 10:31 am

    Training is cheap and portable, and gen­er­ally hard to track, so it’s a good option for increas­ing “friend’s” capa­bil­i­ties. As far as the sim­plic­ity of mor­tar­ing, are there or are there not dif­fer­ent skill lev­els? If there are, train­ing counts. Duh.
    Iran is unques­tion­ably desta­bi­liz­ing Iraq in every way it can; play­ing both ends against the mid­dle is hardly a stretch. It would be sur­pris­ing if it didn’t do so, actu­ally. Figure Mookie’s out­burst recently as pique that he’s not their only or main proxy there.

    Reply
  14. Michael Hank says:
    July 5, 2007 at 11:59 am

    For those of you who have never been in Iraq? How the hell would you know.…We were catch­ing lots of insur­gents mov­ing in and about our AOR being “trained” on the spot by uniden­ti­fied peo­ple, traic­ing them with ROV to their homes, pick­ing them up and then some offi­cer at a check­point not find­ing any evi­dence to hold them. Iranians have been using our weak point to bol­ster and expand their oper­a­tion deep within Iraq for years.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage