About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Archive for July, 2007

In the Weeds With Eric (Gunsight Edition)

Tuesday, July 31st, 2007

Gunsight.jpg

In the realm of com­bat shoot­ing the stan­dard rule of thumb is, he who hits first wins. Consequentially, for the last cou­ple of hun­dred years, the focus in firearms train­ing has been sight align­ment — the faster you can align the front and rear sights on your tar­get, the faster you can put lethal fire on your target.

Unfortunately, until recently, dark­ness pre­sented a sig­nif­i­cant chal­lenge to this the­ory. If its too dark to see your sights, you can pretty well guar­an­tee that you arent going to be able to align them very well and your accu­racy is going to suf­fer. While there are a num­ber of ways to over­come this con­di­tion (illu­mi­nate the bat­tle­field with flares, illu­mi­nate your sights with tri­tium or sim­i­lar mate­r­ial, or illu­mi­nate your fire by using trac­ers) none has been uni­ver­sally effective.

Electro-​​optical reflex sights have changed all of that. These sights are bat­tery pow­ered, non-​​magnified, sin­gle sight optics that not only allow the shooter to rapidly acquire a good sight pic­ture and align­ment in all con­di­tions (day or night) but also pro­vide the shooter with bet­ter sit­u­a­tional aware­ness since they need not be totally focused on align­ing their sights, but rather need only put the dot on the tar­get, literally.

The first of these sights was the Aimpoint M2 which the Army des­ig­nated the M68 CCO (close com­bat optic.) It was dri­ven by a watch-​​type bat­tery and had a sin­gle on/​off rheo­stat on the side to adjust ret­i­cle brightness.

While the sight did per­form as adver­tised, I had issues with it. First, the on/​off knob was easy to acci­den­tally bump, which could either cause your sight to turn off or go to max power, which not only reduced your bat­tery life, but also pro­duced a vis­i­ble red glow out of the back of the sight. Furthermore, the aim­ing dot was vis­i­ble, at high power, through the front of the sight, which could reveal your loca­tion to an NVG equipped enemy (I am told this has been addressed though I cant con­firm it.)

The sight I liked, and what in addi­tion to the ACOG seems to be the one being cur­rently issued, is the EOTech model 550. The 550 is a non-​​magnified EO sight which dis­plays a 1MOA (minute of angle) dot in the cen­ter of a 65MOA cir­cle. Reticle bright­ness is reg­u­lated by up/​down but­tons on the back of the sight, and the newer ver­sions are equipped with a NVG direct but­ton that auto­mat­i­cally dims the ret­i­cle for use with night vision devices. The 550 is pow­ered by a pair of stan­dard AA bat­ter­ies, has a ret­i­cle life of 1100 hours, and is water­proof to 1 ATM (33 feet).

What I liked about the 550 over the M68 was the bat­tery choice (AAs are much eas­ier to get) the fact that there is no for­ward pro­jec­tion of the beam, even on max power, and that there was more pos­i­tive con­trol of the ret­i­cle bright­ness. The 550 is also mil-​​std 1913 rail com­pat­able and works well with weapon mounted NVGs such as the AN/​PVS-​​10.

While Im sure that there are cer­tainly more mod­ern CCOs out there with many more bells and whis­tles, the 550 does every­thing I need it to and it didnt cost an arm and a leg.

(See much more “beyond stan­dard issue” advice and tricks over at Kit Up!)

Eric Daniel

Is Iran This Cold War’s India?

Tuesday, July 31st, 2007

Su-30.jpg

The Jerusalem Post reports that Israel is look­ing into evi­dence that Russia plans to sell 250 Sukhoi-​​30 fight­ers to Iran in an “unprece­dented billion-​​dollar deal.” The deal also appears to include com­pat­able aer­ial refu­el­ing tankers.

This report comes in the wake of the U.S. sign­ing a deal to sup­ply Saudi Arabia with thou­sands of Joint Direct Attack Munition kits, a move that Iran has called desta­bi­liz­ing to the region. (Israel didn’t care much for the deal either, by the way.)

The U.S. also recently made a big show of destroy­ing its moth­balled fleet of F-​​14s in order to pre­vent Iran from refur­bish­ing its own Tomcats with Black Market parts.

For its part, Russia is unflinch­ing in its for­eign mil­i­tary sales strat­egy. Moscow said it reserved the right to sell Iran weapons, such as the anti­air­craft sys­tem sup­plied a few months ago, that were of a defen­sive nature. However, at a glance strike air­craft afforded long-​​range capa­bil­ity cour­tesy of tankers would appear to be of an offen­sive nature.

So is Iran to this Cold War what India was to the last one?

(Gouge: NC)

(Photo: Indian Su-​​30)

Ward

Israeli Navy Chief Steps Down

Monday, July 30th, 2007

Hanit.jpg

The commander-​​in-​​chief of the Israel Navy, Vice Admiral David Ben-​​Bashat, sub­mit­ted his res­ig­na­tion on July 26, the lat­est of sev­eral senior Israeli mil­i­tary offi­cers who have resigned or been dis­missed in the after­math of last summer’s inva­sion of Lebanon. During oper­a­tions against Hezbollah ter­ror­ists in Lebanon the Israeli mis­sile corvette Hanit was struck by a guided mis­sile and heav­ily damaged.

Admiral Ben-​​Bashat became commander-​​in-​​chief of the Israel Navy in 2004. Previously he had held senior posi­tions ashore and afloat, includ­ing com­mand of sev­eral sur­face ships. He also served as defense attach in Singapore and attended the U.S. Naval War College at Newport, R.I.

The large mis­sile corvette Hanit (“spear”) was struck on July 21, 2006, some ten miles off the coast of Lebanon, by a C-​​802 mis­sile launched from the shore. Apparently two mis­siles were launched, the first fired “high” to dis­tract the ship’s defen­sive sys­tems and the sec­ond aimed at the Hanit.

The first mis­sile struck a small mer­chant ship, reported to be a Cambodian-​​flag cargo ship with an Egyptian crew, steam­ing about 35 miles off the coast. The sec­ond mis­sile hit the stern of the 1,275-ton Hanit. Four sailors were killed.

The Israel Navy appar­ently had no knowl­edge that there was a mis­sile threat in the area. The C-​​802 mis­siles were prob­a­bly pro­duced in Iran, copied from a Chinese weapon, and launched by Syrian specialists.

Previously Israel’s Defense Minister Amir Peretz and the Israel Defense Force chief of staff, Air Force General Dan Halutz, resigned, and other offi­cers were dis­missed in the wake of the poor Israeli mil­i­tary per­for­mance dur­ing the inva­sion of Lebanon.

(Photo: Hanit before she took a hit. The black spot on the water­line is exhaust.)

Norman Polmar

Pork Goes the Engine … JSF Style (Updated)

Monday, July 30th, 2007

F136_STOVL.jpg

I hate to be a con­spir­acy the­o­rist, but my great­est fears about how the defense indus­try oper­ates are being real­ized these days by devel­op­ments sur­round­ing the Joint Strike Fighter’s power plant(s).

When you have an air­plane that is already wrestling with a fly­away unit cost that is well above pro­gram esti­mates ($80 mil­lion ver­sus $65 mil­lion), more than a year behind the devel­op­men­tal test sched­ule for the Navy vari­ant, and increas­ingly over­weight the notion of an “alter­na­tive engine” just reeks of — dare I say it — pork.

Aviation Week reports the fol­low­ing: “The House Appropriations defense sub­com­mit­tee added $480 mil­lion to the Joint Strike Fighter research and devel­op­ment account to fund con­tin­ued work on the alter­nate engine for the F-​​35. The Pentagon argued against fund­ing the alter­nate engine for fear it would reduce the focus and resources nec­es­sary for the pro­gram of record. Lawmakers also add $200 mil­lion to the devel­op­ment account to address ‘unfunded infor­ma­tion assur­ance require­ments’ dri­ven by Defense Dept. pol­icy updates, the committee’s report says.”

Hmmmm … so Pentagon doesn’t want the alter­na­tive engine but law­mak­ers are shov­ing down their throats any­way. How can that be? Don’t con­gress­men get all teary-​​eyed when they talk about how they sup­port the troops?

Well, let’s take a look at how this par­tic­u­lar game is played — which hap­pens to be a nice win­dow into how the defense game is too often played overall.

Representative Jean Schmidt, the hawk­ish Republican from the Ohio dis­trict that hosts a General Electric engine man­u­fac­tur­ing plant has once again re-​​inserted the alter­na­tive engine fund­ing line into the defense bud­get. At the same time, Rolls-​​Royce, the alter­na­tive engine co-​​manufacturer, is call­ing in a cou­ple of mark­ers on the Hill. First, Rolls-​​Royce is a British com­pany run by British peo­ple who have influ­ence over Parliament whose mem­bers want some love because of their sup­port for the Iraq War. Second, Rolls-​​Royce jumped the gun and built a huge JSF engine man­u­fac­tur­ing facil­ity at their plant out­side of Indianapolis and the company’s lobby arm is exe­cut­ing a full court press to ensure that the American tax­payer pays for it (instead of Rolls-​​Royce shareholders).

And while — as a for­mer Tomcat guy — I’m not over­whelmed by engines made by Pratt and Whitney, I have to believe that com­pany is capa­ble of mak­ing an engine that’ll work over the JSF’s ser­vice life.

The scari­est part is all of this is being con­ducted in plain sight. Will GE and R-​​R get their way in an envi­ron­ment that is fund­ing a war that costs $12 bil­lion a month? Stay tuned …

(Photo: F-​​136 being tested in STOVL mode at the GE facil­ity in Ohio.)

(Gouge: NC)

(Updated July 31 at 0016Z.) CBS News is adding Ted Kennedy to the pork list with a report that sug­gests he is try­ing to bring JSF jobs to the GE plant in Lynn, Mass. And check out our favorite edi­tor Christian in this news clip.

Ward

The Sunday Paper (Sports Section)

Sunday, July 29th, 2007

bonds.jpg

Very soon, maybe today, Barry Bonds will tie Hank Aaron’s home run record. When Bonds “goes yard” with Number 755 those who choose to cel­e­brate the achieve­ment will be met with a Greek cho­rus of sports purists who will sug­gest that the mile­stone is tainted if not irrel­e­vant because of alle­ga­tions that Bonds used steroids for part of his career.

So here’s a Sunday Paper ques­tion for the learned DT audi­ence: What should we think about Barry Bonds? And what does his quandry say about the state of base­ball, pro­fes­sional sports, and the nation?

Ward

Line Up at the Pork Trough

Friday, July 27th, 2007

proky-pig.jpg

An astute reader passed along this item to Defense Tech yes­ter­day, and weve only got­ten around to includ­ing it today because its a pretty long list.

What we got, as first reported by the pre­mier polit­i­cal news­pa­per in Washington, DC, The Politico, is a com­pre­hen­sive list of ear­marks included in the House ver­sion of the 2008 Defense Appropriations Bill passed a cou­ple days ago.

Weve pro­vided a link to the list, com­piled by PorkBusters​.org, which out­lines every one of the 1,776 (nice num­ber, huh?) ear­marks and its sponsor.

DT invites its read­ers to dive into the (lengthy) list and pull out par­tic­u­larly egre­gious items for us to include in updated posts. Be that extra set of eyes for us!

– Christian

Army Preps for Sandstorm Test of M4

Friday, July 27th, 2007

M4-test.jpg

After months of heated debate, the Army will con­duct a side-​​by-​​side test shoot next month with its standard-​​issued car­bine to see how well it can with­stand extreme dust and sand environments. 

The tests, which will be con­ducted at the Army’s Aberdeen Test Center in Maryland, will include three other rifles some say are bet­ter con­structed to with­stand the gru­el­ing envi­ron­men­tal con­di­tions often found in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

The ser­vice yielded to crit­ics — par­tic­u­larly law­mak­ers in Congress — who recently ratch­eted up the debate over whether the cur­rent M4 car­bine, man­u­fac­tured by Colt Defense, is more sus­cep­ti­ble to jam­ming in dusty con­di­tions than other weapons used by Soldiers and spe­cial operators. 

“The Army agreed to con­duct test­ing of four car­bine designs in an extreme dust envi­ron­ment,” said Lt. Col. Timothy Chyma, prod­uct man­ager for indi­vid­ual weapons with Program Executive Office Soldier, in an email to Military​.com.

“The test results will inform the U.S. Army Infantry Center in the devel­op­ment of a poten­tial new car­bine require­ment as part of their ongo­ing capa­bil­i­ties based assessment.”

(more…)

I’d Rather be In Philadelphia?

Thursday, July 26th, 2007

Big John, in another life known as USS John F Kennedy, is show below as it is towed out of Naval Station Mayport en route first to Norfolk Naval Station for a bit to await her per­ma­nent berth to the Navy Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility in Philadelphia, PA.
We wrote about the Kennedy decom­mis­sion­ing here on Defense Tech as well as at the Instapinch.
She will slowly make her way up the east coast of the US, pulling into Norfolk for a bit, then will con­tinue her last cruise of any sig­nif­i­cance far­ther up the coast, up the Delaware River to be tied to, for who knows how long, a pier just off Interstate 95 near down­town Philly. You used to be able to see the big “66” of the de-​​commed car­rier America from the inter­state a num­ber of years ago, and you should be able to see the big “67” there in a few months as you drive by, just before you cross the Delaware Expressway/​I-​​95 bridge over the Schuylkill River bridge.
I’ll be in Norfolk for reserve duty in a few weeks. I’ll see about get­ting some pics of her as she makes one last visit to the home­port where she spent most of her years of ser­vice.
070726-N-4565G-005.jpg MAYPORT, Fla. (July 26, 2007) — Decommissioned air­craft car­rier John F. Kennedy (CV 67) departs Naval Station Mayport en route to Norfolk, Va. Homeported at Naval Station Mayport since 1995, the ship will be towed to Hampton Roads until the ship can be trans­ferred to the Navy Inactive Ship Maintenance Facility in Philadelphia. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Tommy Gilligan (RELEASED)
Pinch Paisley

Murtha Irked by CSAR-​​X

Thursday, July 26th, 2007

CSAR-​​X UPDATE:
boeingcsarx.jpg

A source tells Defense Tech that one of the most pow­er­ful law­mak­ers on Capitol Hill in defense mat­ters, Rep. John Murtha (D-​​Pa.), has prob­lems with the way in which the CSAR-​​X deci­sion was made.

Our source tells us that dur­ing a brief press con­fer­ence announc­ing the com­ple­tion of the 2008 appro­pri­a­tions bill yes­ter­day, HAC-​​D chair­man Murtha expressed his frus­tra­tion with the con­tract process.

Murtha report­edly said: “What we were wor­ried about was the way it was bid. They bid [CSAR-​​X] for one com­pany, and we thought it should have been more open.”

Our source also tells DT that Murtha read Air Force chief Moseley the riot act, threat­en­ing to pull all CSAR-​​X fund­ing if the pro­gram wasnt cleaned up. As it stands, the HAC-​​D removed $100 mil­lion of 08 funds due to protest delays.

– Christian

Pimp My Tank!

Thursday, July 26th, 2007

pimp-ride.jpg

Heres one to read over a morn­ing cup of Joe

When you absolutely, pos­i­tively must crash that party you wer­ent invited to, heres your ride.

Its sophis­ti­cated, yet rugged.

The white color scheme and United Nations logo sten­ciled on the side says Im will­ing to be rea­son­able about this. Someone must have for­got­ten to put me on the guest list. But the smooth-​​bore 120 jut­ting from the tur­ret says: Though, if youre not going to let me in, were gonna have a prob­lem.
pimp-ride2.jpg

Comfortable Corinthian leather bench seats that can accom­mo­date all your scantily-​​clad groupies — and thick glass por­tals to keep the paparazzi at bay.
pimp-ride3.jpg

Oh, and did we for­get the bev­er­age cooler and mil­spec cham­pagne bot­tle rack?

So when the pan­sies in Hollywood try to block your entrance to their post-​​production party in the Hills with their girlie-​​man Prius hybrids, just put this chick mag­net in gear and drive right the hell over them.

(Gouge: CM)

Christian