<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Prez Helo First Flight</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: ant</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163691</link> <dc:creator>ant</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:12:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163691</guid> <description>Re the danish returned a/c:  I think that the RAF and joint helo command are screaming for airframes and the danes new build eh101s are the best that we can get.  The danes were having some difficulty coordinating their roll out, and spare and training were running about 2 years behind delivery for the utility variant, so they&#039;ve very kindly indicated that they&#039;ll take delivery of another batch sometime around 2009 and let us play with the new toys now.  Note that they are holding on to their SAR birds though- the danes like the eh101, they&#039;re just being very helpful to a slightly overstretched RAF tactical airlift community. One argument I have heard against the eh101 is that its higher disk loading means it puts down a phenomenal down draft.  Some claim this puts it at greater risk of brown out and makes it less suitable for FIBUA support.  However, this is hardly a problem limited to this a/c- pace the stats for brown out incidents for chinnies in the &#039;ghan. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the danish returned a/c:  I think that the RAF and joint helo command are screaming for airframes and the danes new build eh101s are the best that we can get.  The danes were having some difficulty coordinating their roll out, and spare and training were running about 2 years behind delivery for the utility variant, so they’ve very kindly indicated that they’ll take delivery of another batch sometime around 2009 and let us play with the new toys now.  Note that they are holding on to their SAR birds though– the danes like the eh101, they’re just being very helpful to a slightly overstretched RAF tactical airlift community.<br /> One argument I have heard against the eh101 is that its higher disk loading means it puts down a phenomenal down draft.  Some claim this puts it at greater risk of brown out and makes it less suitable for FIBUA support.  However, this is hardly a problem limited to this a/c– pace the stats for brown out incidents for chinnies in the ‘ghan.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcase</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163690</link> <dc:creator>Marcase</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163690</guid> <description>D K Simpson, it concerns us ;) Cheers. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D K Simpson, it concerns us ;)<br /> Cheers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marcase</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163689</link> <dc:creator>Marcase</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:15:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163689</guid> <description>George, I remembered the Canadian (political) choice regarding the S-92 / EH-101, but didn&#039;t want to bring it all up. Thanks anyway for your clarification mate. (Off topic - we Dutchies are mighty glad the past Canadian government decided to sell your Chinooks to us, they provide sterling service in Afghanistan - bugger that we now are forced to sell our Leopards to you) Interesting point brought up: IS the EH-101 being reconsidered for the CSAR role? The bid has been reopened hasn&#039;t it? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George,<br /> I remembered the Canadian (political) choice regarding the S-92 / EH-101, but didn’t want to bring it all up. Thanks anyway for your clarification mate.<br /> (Off topic — we Dutchies are mighty glad the past Canadian government decided to sell your Chinooks to us, they provide sterling service in Afghanistan — bugger that we now are forced to sell our Leopards to you)<br /> Interesting point brought up: IS the EH-101 being reconsidered for the CSAR role? The bid has been reopened hasn’t it?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wren</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163688</link> <dc:creator>Wren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:08:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163688</guid> <description>Many readers seem to be arguing the point about the helicopter being British rather than American in origin without looking at the bigger picture, the aircraft performance and capabilities, the ability to keep the crew and passengers safe etc. Surely there the biggest considerations? After all the relevant organisations looked at everything on the market and decided on the best helicopter to do the job. Look at the facts, the British have been flying Merlin successfully now for a few years with little problem, the helicopter has performed well and is presently the most advanced aircraft of its type, bar none. Every argument on here seems to have been about the choice of the Merlin over the S-92, so let</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many readers seem to be arguing the point about the helicopter being British rather than American in origin without looking at the bigger picture, the aircraft performance and capabilities, the ability to keep the crew and passengers safe etc. Surely there the biggest considerations? After all the relevant organisations looked at everything on the market and decided on the best helicopter to do the job.<br /> Look at the facts, the British have been flying Merlin successfully now for a few years with little problem, the helicopter has performed well and is presently the most advanced aircraft of its type, bar none.<br /> Every argument on here seems to have been about the choice of the Merlin over the S-92, so let</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wren</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163687</link> <dc:creator>Wren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163687</guid> <description>Many readers seem to be arguing the point about the helicopter being British rather than American in origin without looking at the bigger picture, the aircraft performance and capabilities, the ability to keep the crew and passengers safe etc. Surely there the biggest considerations? After all the relevant organisations looked at everything on the market and decided on the best helicopter to do the job. Look at the facts, the British have been flying Merlin successfully now for a few years with little problem, the helicopter has performed well and is presently the most advanced aircraft of its type, bar none. Every argument on here seems to have been about the choice of the Merlin over the S-92, so let</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many readers seem to be arguing the point about the helicopter being British rather than American in origin without looking at the bigger picture, the aircraft performance and capabilities, the ability to keep the crew and passengers safe etc. Surely there the biggest considerations? After all the relevant organisations looked at everything on the market and decided on the best helicopter to do the job.<br /> Look at the facts, the British have been flying Merlin successfully now for a few years with little problem, the helicopter has performed well and is presently the most advanced aircraft of its type, bar none.<br /> Every argument on here seems to have been about the choice of the Merlin over the S-92, so let</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-62835</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 18:53:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-62835</guid> <description>Is this platform being considered at all for CSAR? It looks like it would be a good size fit. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this platform being considered at all for CSAR?<br /> It looks like it would be a good size fit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: D K Simpson</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163686</link> <dc:creator>D K Simpson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:14:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163686</guid> <description>To whom it might concern.  I flew in the test EH-101 in Patuxent River Maryland and dealt with the S-92 Helicopter.  I have flown over 6000 hours as a helicopter crewman in the Navy in several platforms (SH-3/VH-3/HH-60/MH-60).  In my 23 years of flying I HAVE NEVER flown in an overall better built aircraft then the EH-101. No, repeat no U. S. made aircraft comes close to the EH-101 for it flight handling or proformance.  To this day I wish the U. S. Navy had bought the maritime version instead of the MH-60R. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To whom it might concern.  I flew in the test EH-101 in Patuxent River Maryland and dealt with the S-92 Helicopter.  I have flown over 6000 hours as a helicopter crewman in the Navy in several platforms (SH-3/VH-3/HH-60/MH-60).  In my 23 years of flying I HAVE NEVER flown in an overall better built aircraft then the EH-101. No, repeat no U. S. made aircraft comes close to the EH-101 for it flight handling or proformance.  To this day I wish the U. S. Navy had bought the maritime version instead of the MH-60R.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alistair</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163685</link> <dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:25:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163685</guid> <description>Why do Americans think that somthing buildt in the UK is not worthly to consider for there troops or President. Sometimes I wonder why they can not look outside the USA and think that, maybe once in a while the best bit of equipment might be buildt somwhere else. I noticed similar talk when the tankers for the airforce contracts were being started. Please America stop being so insular, it looks terrible to read some comments thats been written. In case you think this is somone who hates America you would be so wrong. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do Americans think that somthing buildt in the UK is not worthly to consider for there troops or President. Sometimes I wonder why they can not look outside the USA and think that, maybe once in a while the best bit of equipment might be buildt somwhere else. I noticed similar talk when the tankers for the airforce contracts were being started.<br /> Please America stop being so insular, it looks terrible to read some comments thats been written. In case you think this is somone who hates America you would be so wrong.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nick</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163684</link> <dc:creator>nick</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:39:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163684</guid> <description>Once again, the Bushes and Saudi&#039;s show who really rules the USA. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, the Bushes and Saudi’s show who really rules the USA.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ajay</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/05/prez-helo-first-flight/#comment-163683</link> <dc:creator>ajay</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:37:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3600#comment-163683</guid> <description>It&#039;s a shame when the most modern, technologically advanced and safest helicopter in the world today, the S-92, was not chosen for the most critical mission out there. Jim, VIP transport is very, very far from the most critical mission out there. If a VIP helo can&#039;t do its job, the president has to travel by limousine convoy instead, and might be a few minutes late getting to the airport. If a SAR bird (for example) can&#039;t do its job, people die. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a shame when the most modern, technologically advanced and safest helicopter in the world today, the S-92, was not chosen for the most critical mission out there.<br /> Jim, VIP transport is very, very far from the most critical mission out there.<br /> If a VIP helo can’t do its job, the president has to travel by limousine convoy instead, and might be a few minutes late getting to the airport.<br /> If a SAR bird (for example) can’t do its job, people die.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 03:21:30 -->
