DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » MRAPs Settle In — And Head to the Field

MRAPs Settle In — And Head to the Field

MRAP-explosion.jpg

Over the last two days, the Pentagon has pre­sented a detailed plan to the pub­lic on how it intends to equip troops in Iraq with Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehi­cles. As many DT read­ers know, the MRAP debate is a hot topic on Capitol Hill, as law­mak­ers try to earn their sup­port the troops stripes by thun­der­ing head­long into a mas­sive replace­ment pro­gram of the Humvee with the MRAP.

Fortunately though Pentagon chief Robert Gates claims the MRAP pro­gram is his high­est pri­or­ity cooler heads have pre­vailed at the DoD over the field­ing and use of the MRAP. The Pentagons top R&D offi­cial, John Young, explained that the Joint Requirements Oversight Council had finally got­ten its arms around the field­ing plan and decided to hold off replac­ing every sin­gle Humvee in the entire fleet with MRAPS which could have ques­tion­able util­ity in another com­bat environment.

The Congress has clearly leaned for­ward to help us on this pro­gram. Through the end of June, the Defense Department used those funds to order 3,765 MRAPs. Approximately 2,400 of these MRAPs under con­tract as of the end of June are expected to deliver by 31 December of 2007. Yesterday, we asked the Congress to approve the repro­gram­ming of an addi­tional $1.2 bil­lion into the program.

With all of the funds the Congress has pro­vided and the repro­gram­ming of an addi­tional $1.2 bil­lion into the MRAP pro­gram, the Defense Department, as Geoff said, can now pur­chase an addi­tional 2,650 MRAPs, increas­ing our total on order to 6,415.

All of the 6,415 will deliver by March of 2008. Under this accel­er­a­tion, DOD expects to receive an addi­tional 1,500 MRAPs by 31 December, a 63 per­cent increase over that 2,400 I’ve told you about to a total of 3,900 MRAPs deliv­ered from indus­try to the Defense Department by December, December 31st. The repro­gram­ming is urgent because, as you all can see, the rates of pro­duc­tion are ramp­ing sig­nif­i­cantly. We believe 30 to 45 vehi­cles per day will slip into 2008 if we delay.

Under our MRAP accel­er­a­tion plan, the rate of MRAP pro­duc­tion will rise from June’s pro­duc­tion of 82 vehi­cles to 489 vehi­cles in October and roughly 1,300 per month in December that I men­tioned to you ear­lier. So as you can see, it is impor­tant that we work with the Congress quickly to get these funds for the addi­tional MRAPs and put these vehi­cles under con­tract. The use of avail­able funds for the depart­ment and the repro­gram­ming action will give the MRAP Joint Program Office $5.4 bil­lion to imme­di­ately put on con­tract in 2007 for MRAPs. The level — this level of fund­ing makes MRAP the 3rd largest 2007 DOD acqui­si­tion pro­gram, only behind mis­sile defense and Joint Strike Fighter. 

Though Young is push­ing to pro­duce vehi­cles as quickly and smartly as he can, he and the JROC rec­og­nize that the MRAP is not the magic force field many seem to think it is. And it is not a replace­ment for the Humvee, says the Corps top money guy, Lt. Gen. John Castellaw, whos ser­vice is only buy­ing around 4,000 of the mas­sive trucks…

But I’ve got to tell you, you know, oper­a­tional require­ments still trump the — the up-​​armored HUMVEE will not go away. There will be oper­a­tional rea­sons that we will want to use it in addi­tion to the MRAP. So what this does is gives us a very impor­tant ele­ment in our oper­a­tional tool bag that we’ll be using along with a lot of oth­ers to ensure that our forces are pro­tected the best they can, and also, as impor­tantly, that they can do the job that we’re ask­ing them to do. 

And Young adds

I mean, that gets to be a tough issue about which areas really need MRAPs. I think you heard General Castellaw say up-​​armored HUMVEES are very effec­tive in many areas in-​​theater. They’re going to con­tinue to be used. MRAPs need to go in the pri­or­ity places first.

You know, this is a del­i­cate bal­anc­ing act, and I apol­o­gize. It’s hard to have this dis­cus­sion with you. But I’d go back to the com­ment I made ear­lier too of — a very small frac­tion of attacks are under­body, under­belly IEDs, and then an even smaller frac­tion are EFPs right now. That may change over time. That will lead us to make adjustments.

Some of those adjust­ments are tac­tics as well as vehi­cles. Because a key point of this is if we’re try­ing to pro­tect our sol­diers and Marines at the point where they IED went off, we’re late. We’re going to do that, because MRAP — and MRAPs help with that sig­nif­i­cantly, and we are mak­ing that our high­est priority.

But we have a num­ber of other efforts and sig­nif­i­cant dol­lars going into try­ing to stop that IED from ever being planted, to stop it from ever being built, to stop the peo­ple that are decid­ing to build and plant those IEDs. And that’s where a sig­nif­i­cantly greater chance of suc­cess exists to stop all those pieces of the chain. We’re going to take this step because we can’t afford to lose peo­ple once the det­o­na­tion goes off. But we will be far more suc­cess­ful if we can stop the det­o­na­tion from ever occurring. 

And thank good­ness the Pentagon is keep­ing its eye on the ball with regard to the devel­op­ment on the next-​​generation Humvee. The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle holds great promise for increas­ing and tai­lor­ing pro­tec­tion, reduc­ing power con­sump­tion while increas­ing power out­put, up-​​arming and up-​​armoring the mil­i­tarys tac­ti­cal vehi­cle fleet at a frac­tion of the weight of the MRAP.

Right now we’re at — 3,700 is our num­ber. We got some­where in the neigh­bor­hood of 200 plus over there now. We’ll expect to have some­where above a thou­sand by the end of this year, and that’ll go to the units that are in the clos­est combat.

We are con­tin­u­ally look­ing at what our future’s going to be in terms of our ground mobil­ity. We’ve got some assess­ments under way now. Surely MRAP will play a role in there. We’re not exactly sure what it will be in the future. We know that such pro­grams as JLTV will play a role. So as we con­tinue to assist this, then we’ll make resource and deci­sions and for­ward them to OSD. 

And the Armys Lt. Gen. Stephen Speakes adds

We rec­og­nize right now that pri­or­ity is pro­tec­tion of sol­diers and Marines in com­bat — that’s what MRAP is designed to do. We have some impor­tant ques­tions that we’ll have to answer: How much can we pull the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Program for­ward? Can we get the com­bi­na­tion of per­for­mance, pay­load and pro­tec­tion that all of us want in a more man­age­able pack­age? None of us want a vehi­cle that weighs between 40,000 and 60,000 pounds. So what we’d like to do is see capa­bil­ity pro­vided sooner that has more flex­i­bil­ity and more oper­a­tional capa­bil­ity in a vari­ety of spec­trums as you identified. 

Sober heads prevail.

– Christian

Share |

July 20th, 2007 | Ground Vehicles | 362756 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/07/20/mraps-settle-in-and-head-to-the-field/MRAPs+Settle+In+-+And+Head+to+the+Field2007-07-20+11%3A55%3A55Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « War Costs Reach Deeper Into Your Wallet | Russia Testing Brit Response? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. campbell says:
    July 20, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    hmmm. so, we build umpteen bases in a coun­try that we have no intent to stay in.…and now, deliver vehi­cles “in March” just about the time when we are talk­ing of “draw­down”.
    WTF?
    General Odom is the only per­son yet who has spo­ken the truth. Alas, he’s out of the game.…

    Reply
  2. diablotakahe says:
    July 20, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    i find this all so bizarre — why replace jeeps with an armoured truck, when jeeps should be used in the first place?
    how many m113s are in stor­age, and why are they not being burned through?

    Reply
  3. hooded swan says:
    July 20, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    dia­blotakahe, don’t know what you mean by “jeeps should be used in the 1st place“
    The M113, like almost any tracked AFV, takes too much main­te­nance for the kind of miles the troops put on the under-​​armored HMMWVs. The MRAP is faster, qui­eter, has bet­ter pro­tec­tion behind armor, and, most impor­tantly, is more Mine Resistant than the M113.
    The next war is more likely to be a counter insur­gency in an urban envi­ron­ment than the army on army fight in a rural envi­ron­ment that the M113 was designed for. Those MRAPs are likely to plenty use­ful in the future.

    Reply
  4. diablotakahe says:
    July 21, 2007 at 12:23 am

    hooded swan — i meant that i thought it was dumb to drive around hos­tile envions in un/​underarmoured vehi­cles.
    i take your point on the main­te­nance issue, and also espe­cially being qui­eter.
    my point was there are m113s gath­er­ing dust now, surely they would have offered a bet­ter interim solu­tion than the humvee (say mid 2004) — agree that some kind of mrap is required — like the aus­tralian bushmaster.

    Reply
  5. Byron Skinner says:
    July 21, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    Lets see with a total of over 23K MRAP’s on order now, for all ser­vices and at between $2.2-$3.5 Million per copy and deliv­ery out to 2012, does any­body really think we will be leav­ing Iraq any time soon?
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  6. me! says:
    July 23, 2007 at 9:47 am

    Are peo­ple here mis­in­formed or just down­right stu­pid? For starters, MRAPs ARE WHEELED NOT TRACKED. The HMMWV IS NOT TRACKED EITHER. Try look­ing up the def­i­n­i­tion of “tracked vehi­cle.” Second, Jeeps and HMMWVs, unless upgraded, pro­vide no real pro­tec­tion against IEDs, so why should we use them? And for the record, I have no idea where in God’s name you got that fig­ure for how much an MRAP costs, but it’s between $250,000 and $1 mil­lion a piece.

    Reply
  7. diablotakahe says:
    July 25, 2007 at 12:07 am

    would an m113 pro­vide more or less pro­tec­tion than an mrap?

    Reply
  8. demophilus says:
    July 25, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    dia­blo:
    Don’t know whether the 113 offers more or less pro­tec­tion than an MRAP; it’s kind of hard to find hard data on MRAP vul­ner­a­bil­i­ties right now. Ditto on cur­rent 113 mods.
    Extrapolating from 113/​APC his­tory, and sim­ple physics, I’d ven­ture to guess that the 113 offers less pro­tec­tion in cer­tain sce­nar­ios (mines and IEDs directly under­neath the hull, or near track­side), and more in oth­ers (bet­ter cross coun­try per­for­mance, bet­ter hull down/​terrain blend­ing, lim­ited amphibi­ous capa­bil­ity). IIRC, the 113A3 can do a track spin/​360 turn, more or less in place; that might come in handy. Not sure any of the MRAPS can do bet­ter than a U or K turn, and wide at that. IIRC, some arma­ment con­fig­u­ra­tions (e.g., M2 in a front tur­ret, 2 GPMGs behind gun­shields at the 4 and 8 o’clock) offered good sit­u­a­tional aware­ness and RPG suppression/​counterfire options. MRAPs seem to have bet­ter blast/​concussion coun­ter­mea­sures. And air con­di­tion­ing. Cup hold­ers would be nice too.
    I’m under the impres­sion that RPG and EFP vul­ner­a­bil­ity is about the same, but that’s get­ting into clas­si­fied stuff, so it’s hard to say; I don’t NTK, and don’t really want to, unless this thing’s another boon­dog­gle. Then some­body in the know should man up and blow the whis­tle.
    All in all, it seems we need a fleet mix of some kind for both cur­rent and future con­flict. In terms of game the­ory, min­i­max strate­gies tend to be the most prag­matic. That tends to mil­i­tate a blended APC fleet; one size won’t fit all. In a broad task envi­ron­ment (like, try­ing to sta­bi­lize the world’s largest urban/​rural ammo dump), you prob­a­bly want a range of gear, with both over­lap­ping and com­ple­men­tary per­for­mance envelopes.
    And, quan­tity has a qual­ity all its own. And, you want to use the right tool for the job. And, the bat­tle­field tends to fall to those who get there first, with the most.
    I’m sure MRAPs have their place, as do 113s and Humvees. It’s look­ing like the GWOT is going to last a good long while.

    Reply
  9. Jeff says:
    August 6, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    HMMWV is still very use­ful in a tra­di­tional com­bat envi­ron­ment where there is a for­ward line of troops and a tra­di­tional rear area, as might be the case of Korea, Taiwan, ini­tial stages of going ashore in Iran and even in Iraq before the insur­gency got orga­nized. The jeep did quite well in this role dur­ing WW2. The HMMWV was never intended to go into a live fire area except with the armored scout ver­sions, where the mis­sion is to observe but not stand up and swap fire.

    Reply
  10. rohan gold says:
    August 1, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    At first I did not know any­thing, I had no friends and rohan gold, and soon I knew the first play friend, she had been very good to me my belt, also taught me how to make rohan crone. She is like my sis­ter, and later she mar­ried, she did not too much time play­ing games. So I become a per­son again.

    Reply
  11. cheap mabinogi says:
    August 4, 2008 at 11:44 pm

    Mabinogi has very rich fight­ing skills, magic skills. The most char­ac­ter­is­tic is the mon­ster will use the skills, and there are still cer­tain skills of the pas­sen­gers, adding play­ers in the course of the fight­ing in the fun. You can buy cheap mabinogi you tem­porar­ily to ease the tension!

    Reply
  12. cronous cro says:
    August 5, 2008 at 1:39 am

    Afterward my sev­eral school­mates forced me to play; I did not want to sweep their inter­ests, and to play, from the very begin­ning they have given me 100,000,000 cro­nous cro.

    Reply
  13. http://www.buyageofconan.com says:
    August 5, 2008 at 9:45 pm

    And can buy muchAge of Conan gold , the char­ac­ter is one of four arche­types (in bold) and one of three class selec­tions for each arche­type. There have been hints of more playable races with expansions.

    Reply
  14. imvu gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:28 am

    All imvu gold are used up by you because your waste.

    Reply
  15. mabinogi money says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:32 am

    That is first time that I used the ice arrow, I was so excited, and in a week I got 4000 mabinogi money.

    Reply
  16. cheap lastchaos gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:37 am

    The hus­band, for you, I will want to adjust myself dili­gently and I will make cheap lastchaos gold.

    Reply
  17. buy Hellgate Palladium says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:39 am

    However, if it is also under the free name, charge the mas­sive fee to black­mail us, let us buy Hellgate Palladium to con­tinue this game, I will not play this game forever.

    Reply
  18. cheap Lord of the Rings Gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:42 am

    If your atti­tude to me can be slightly good, I will be hav­ing much hap­pi­ness, although I only was 89 lev­els and I only have some cheap Lord of the Rings Gold.

    Reply
  19. 2moon dil says:
    August 13, 2008 at 9:52 pm

    Game is only a game, play the game can let peo­ple get the relax, but now the game no longer can let peo­ple feel the relax, in the game there are many play­ers in intrigue-​​ridden, some peo­ple injur­ing them­selves in putting on a vain show, they com­pare who have the more 2moon dil and who hand­some, I do not know these have make sense.

    Reply
  20. cabal gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 9:57 pm

    Return the home the boy still not under­stand that why the girl like him, all evening he do not get sleep, the boy think that they do not met each other and I was younger than her, after one day and one day, the boy did not play this game again, but the boy very miss the girl and want to play with the girl, together to upgrade and earn the cabal gold, but he in order let them do not felt discomfiture

    Reply
  21. cheap kamas says:
    August 13, 2008 at 10:01 pm

    you often said that I was very stu­pid, in fact you were wrong, I only do not let you know in fact I know all things, in order to play with you, I bought many cheap kamas, only hope that I can play together with you, but now my think is wrong, I really do not know what can I do

    Reply
  22. flyff gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 10:06 pm

    Other play­ers can, I think I can too, many play­ers said that BB can let us get more flyff gold, if you do not have enough flyff gold in the game, and then you can not do many things, in the real­ity world also like this. But I more like through my effort to get the suc­cess, that suc­cess can let me mem­o­rable forever.

    Reply
  23. buy dofus kamas says:
    August 13, 2008 at 10:23 pm

    no time play this game again, although this is net­work, but play­ing together a long time, there is a soul of the same feel­ing, and every time you think of a buy dofus kamas, now also do not see in you.

    Reply
  24. buy NosTale Gold says:
    August 18, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    To buy NosTale Gold win you must not only use your strength as a team, with the new fea­tures they plan to add cheap NosTale gold late. So no player will have to worry about ever los­ing their NosTale money account.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage