DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » MRAPs Settle In — And Head to the Field

MRAPs Settle In — And Head to the Field

MRAP-explosion.jpg

Over the last two days, the Pentagon has presented a detailed plan to the public on how it intends to equip troops in Iraq with Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles. As many DT readers know, the MRAP debate is a hot topic on Capitol Hill, as lawmakers try to earn their support the troops stripes by thundering headlong into a massive replacement program of the Humvee with the MRAP.

Fortunately though Pentagon chief Robert Gates claims the MRAP program is his highest priority cooler heads have prevailed at the DoD over the fielding and use of the MRAP. The Pentagons top R&D official, John Young, explained that the Joint Requirements Oversight Council had finally gotten its arms around the fielding plan and decided to hold off replacing every single Humvee in the entire fleet with MRAPS which could have questionable utility in another combat environment.

The Congress has clearly leaned forward to help us on this program. Through the end of June, the Defense Department used those funds to order 3,765 MRAPs. Approximately 2,400 of these MRAPs under contract as of the end of June are expected to deliver by 31 December of 2007. Yesterday, we asked the Congress to approve the reprogramming of an additional $1.2 billion into the program.

With all of the funds the Congress has provided and the reprogramming of an additional $1.2 billion into the MRAP program, the Defense Department, as Geoff said, can now purchase an additional 2,650 MRAPs, increasing our total on order to 6,415.

All of the 6,415 will deliver by March of 2008. Under this acceleration, DOD expects to receive an additional 1,500 MRAPs by 31 December, a 63 percent increase over that 2,400 I’ve told you about to a total of 3,900 MRAPs delivered from industry to the Defense Department by December, December 31st. The reprogramming is urgent because, as you all can see, the rates of production are ramping significantly. We believe 30 to 45 vehicles per day will slip into 2008 if we delay.

Under our MRAP acceleration plan, the rate of MRAP production will rise from June’s production of 82 vehicles to 489 vehicles in October and roughly 1,300 per month in December that I mentioned to you earlier. So as you can see, it is important that we work with the Congress quickly to get these funds for the additional MRAPs and put these vehicles under contract. The use of available funds for the department and the reprogramming action will give the MRAP Joint Program Office $5.4 billion to immediately put on contract in 2007 for MRAPs. The level — this level of funding makes MRAP the 3rd largest 2007 DOD acquisition program, only behind missile defense and Joint Strike Fighter.

Though Young is pushing to produce vehicles as quickly and smartly as he can, he and the JROC recognize that the MRAP is not the magic force field many seem to think it is. And it is not a replacement for the Humvee, says the Corps top money guy, Lt. Gen. John Castellaw, whos service is only buying around 4,000 of the massive trucks…

But I’ve got to tell you, you know, operational requirements still trump the — the up-armored HUMVEE will not go away. There will be operational reasons that we will want to use it in addition to the MRAP. So what this does is gives us a very important element in our operational tool bag that we’ll be using along with a lot of others to ensure that our forces are protected the best they can, and also, as importantly, that they can do the job that we’re asking them to do.

And Young adds

I mean, that gets to be a tough issue about which areas really need MRAPs. I think you heard General Castellaw say up-armored HUMVEES are very effective in many areas in-theater. They’re going to continue to be used. MRAPs need to go in the priority places first.

You know, this is a delicate balancing act, and I apologize. It’s hard to have this discussion with you. But I’d go back to the comment I made earlier too of — a very small fraction of attacks are underbody, underbelly IEDs, and then an even smaller fraction are EFPs right now. That may change over time. That will lead us to make adjustments.

Some of those adjustments are tactics as well as vehicles. Because a key point of this is if we’re trying to protect our soldiers and Marines at the point where they IED went off, we’re late. We’re going to do that, because MRAP — and MRAPs help with that significantly, and we are making that our highest priority.

But we have a number of other efforts and significant dollars going into trying to stop that IED from ever being planted, to stop it from ever being built, to stop the people that are deciding to build and plant those IEDs. And that’s where a significantly greater chance of success exists to stop all those pieces of the chain. We’re going to take this step because we can’t afford to lose people once the detonation goes off. But we will be far more successful if we can stop the detonation from ever occurring.

And thank goodness the Pentagon is keeping its eye on the ball with regard to the development on the next-generation Humvee. The Joint Light Tactical Vehicle holds great promise for increasing and tailoring protection, reducing power consumption while increasing power output, up-arming and up-armoring the militarys tactical vehicle fleet at a fraction of the weight of the MRAP.

Right now we’re at — 3,700 is our number. We got somewhere in the neighborhood of 200 plus over there now. We’ll expect to have somewhere above a thousand by the end of this year, and that’ll go to the units that are in the closest combat.

We are continually looking at what our future’s going to be in terms of our ground mobility. We’ve got some assessments under way now. Surely MRAP will play a role in there. We’re not exactly sure what it will be in the future. We know that such programs as JLTV will play a role. So as we continue to assist this, then we’ll make resource and decisions and forward them to OSD.

And the Armys Lt. Gen. Stephen Speakes adds

We recognize right now that priority is protection of soldiers and Marines in combat — that’s what MRAP is designed to do. We have some important questions that we’ll have to answer: How much can we pull the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Program forward? Can we get the combination of performance, payload and protection that all of us want in a more manageable package? None of us want a vehicle that weighs between 40,000 and 60,000 pounds. So what we’d like to do is see capability provided sooner that has more flexibility and more operational capability in a variety of spectrums as you identified.

Sober heads prevail.

– Christian

Share |

July 20th, 2007 | Ground Vehicles | 362756 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/07/20/mraps-settle-in-and-head-to-the-field/MRAPs+Settle+In+-+And+Head+to+the+Field2007-07-20+11%3A55%3A55Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « War Costs Reach Deeper Into Your Wallet | Russia Testing Brit Response? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. campbell says:
    July 20, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    hmmm. so, we build umpteen bases in a country that we have no intent to stay in.…and now, deliver vehicles “in March” just about the time when we are talking of “drawdown”.
    WTF?
    General Odom is the only person yet who has spoken the truth. Alas, he’s out of the game.…

    Reply
  2. diablotakahe says:
    July 20, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    i find this all so bizarre — why replace jeeps with an armoured truck, when jeeps should be used in the first place?
    how many m113s are in storage, and why are they not being burned through?

    Reply
  3. hooded swan says:
    July 20, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    diablotakahe, don’t know what you mean by “jeeps should be used in the 1st place“
    The M113, like almost any tracked AFV, takes too much maintenance for the kind of miles the troops put on the under-armored HMMWVs. The MRAP is faster, quieter, has better protection behind armor, and, most importantly, is more Mine Resistant than the M113.
    The next war is more likely to be a counter insurgency in an urban environment than the army on army fight in a rural environment that the M113 was designed for. Those MRAPs are likely to plenty useful in the future.

    Reply
  4. diablotakahe says:
    July 21, 2007 at 12:23 am

    hooded swan — i meant that i thought it was dumb to drive around hostile envions in un/underarmoured vehicles.
    i take your point on the maintenance issue, and also especially being quieter.
    my point was there are m113s gathering dust now, surely they would have offered a better interim solution than the humvee (say mid 2004) — agree that some kind of mrap is required — like the australian bushmaster.

    Reply
  5. Byron Skinner says:
    July 21, 2007 at 1:18 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    Lets see with a total of over 23K MRAP’s on order now, for all services and at between $2.2-$3.5 Million per copy and delivery out to 2012, does anybody really think we will be leaving Iraq any time soon?
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  6. me! says:
    July 23, 2007 at 9:47 am

    Are people here misinformed or just downright stupid? For starters, MRAPs ARE WHEELED NOT TRACKED. The HMMWV IS NOT TRACKED EITHER. Try looking up the definition of “tracked vehicle.” Second, Jeeps and HMMWVs, unless upgraded, provide no real protection against IEDs, so why should we use them? And for the record, I have no idea where in God’s name you got that figure for how much an MRAP costs, but it’s between $250,000 and $1 million a piece.

    Reply
  7. diablotakahe says:
    July 25, 2007 at 12:07 am

    would an m113 provide more or less protection than an mrap?

    Reply
  8. demophilus says:
    July 25, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    diablo:
    Don’t know whether the 113 offers more or less protection than an MRAP; it’s kind of hard to find hard data on MRAP vulnerabilities right now. Ditto on current 113 mods.
    Extrapolating from 113/APC history, and simple physics, I’d venture to guess that the 113 offers less protection in certain scenarios (mines and IEDs directly underneath the hull, or near trackside), and more in others (better cross country performance, better hull down/terrain blending, limited amphibious capability). IIRC, the 113A3 can do a track spin/360 turn, more or less in place; that might come in handy. Not sure any of the MRAPS can do better than a U or K turn, and wide at that. IIRC, some armament configurations (e.g., M2 in a front turret, 2 GPMGs behind gunshields at the 4 and 8 o’clock) offered good situational awareness and RPG suppression/counterfire options. MRAPs seem to have better blast/concussion countermeasures. And air conditioning. Cup holders would be nice too.
    I’m under the impression that RPG and EFP vulnerability is about the same, but that’s getting into classified stuff, so it’s hard to say; I don’t NTK, and don’t really want to, unless this thing’s another boondoggle. Then somebody in the know should man up and blow the whistle.
    All in all, it seems we need a fleet mix of some kind for both current and future conflict. In terms of game theory, minimax strategies tend to be the most pragmatic. That tends to militate a blended APC fleet; one size won’t fit all. In a broad task environment (like, trying to stabilize the world’s largest urban/rural ammo dump), you probably want a range of gear, with both overlapping and complementary performance envelopes.
    And, quantity has a quality all its own. And, you want to use the right tool for the job. And, the battlefield tends to fall to those who get there first, with the most.
    I’m sure MRAPs have their place, as do 113s and Humvees. It’s looking like the GWOT is going to last a good long while.

    Reply
  9. Jeff says:
    August 6, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    HMMWV is still very useful in a traditional combat environment where there is a forward line of troops and a traditional rear area, as might be the case of Korea, Taiwan, initial stages of going ashore in Iran and even in Iraq before the insurgency got organized. The jeep did quite well in this role during WW2. The HMMWV was never intended to go into a live fire area except with the armored scout versions, where the mission is to observe but not stand up and swap fire.

    Reply
  10. rohan gold says:
    August 1, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    At first I did not know anything, I had no friends and rohan gold, and soon I knew the first play friend, she had been very good to me my belt, also taught me how to make rohan crone. She is like my sister, and later she married, she did not too much time playing games. So I become a person again.

    Reply
  11. cheap mabinogi says:
    August 4, 2008 at 11:44 pm

    Mabinogi has very rich fighting skills, magic skills. The most characteristic is the monster will use the skills, and there are still certain skills of the passengers, adding players in the course of the fighting in the fun. You can buy cheap mabinogi you temporarily to ease the tension!

    Reply
  12. cronous cro says:
    August 5, 2008 at 1:39 am

    Afterward my several schoolmates forced me to play; I did not want to sweep their interests, and to play, from the very beginning they have given me 100,000,000 cronous cro.

    Reply
  13. http://www.buyageofconan.com says:
    August 5, 2008 at 9:45 pm

    And can buy muchAge of Conan gold , the character is one of four archetypes (in bold) and one of three class selections for each archetype. There have been hints of more playable races with expansions.

    Reply
  14. imvu gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:28 am

    All imvu gold are used up by you because your waste.

    Reply
  15. mabinogi money says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:32 am

    That is first time that I used the ice arrow, I was so excited, and in a week I got 4000 mabinogi money.

    Reply
  16. cheap lastchaos gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:37 am

    The husband, for you, I will want to adjust myself diligently and I will make cheap lastchaos gold.

    Reply
  17. buy Hellgate Palladium says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:39 am

    However, if it is also under the free name, charge the massive fee to blackmail us, let us buy Hellgate Palladium to continue this game, I will not play this game forever.

    Reply
  18. cheap Lord of the Rings Gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 2:42 am

    If your attitude to me can be slightly good, I will be having much happiness, although I only was 89 levels and I only have some cheap Lord of the Rings Gold.

    Reply
  19. 2moon dil says:
    August 13, 2008 at 9:52 pm

    Game is only a game, play the game can let people get the relax, but now the game no longer can let people feel the relax, in the game there are many players in intrigue-ridden, some people injuring themselves in putting on a vain show, they compare who have the more 2moon dil and who handsome, I do not know these have make sense.

    Reply
  20. cabal gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 9:57 pm

    Return the home the boy still not understand that why the girl like him, all evening he do not get sleep, the boy think that they do not met each other and I was younger than her, after one day and one day, the boy did not play this game again, but the boy very miss the girl and want to play with the girl, together to upgrade and earn the cabal gold, but he in order let them do not felt discomfiture

    Reply
  21. cheap kamas says:
    August 13, 2008 at 10:01 pm

    you often said that I was very stupid, in fact you were wrong, I only do not let you know in fact I know all things, in order to play with you, I bought many cheap kamas, only hope that I can play together with you, but now my think is wrong, I really do not know what can I do

    Reply
  22. flyff gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 10:06 pm

    Other players can, I think I can too, many players said that BB can let us get more flyff gold, if you do not have enough flyff gold in the game, and then you can not do many things, in the reality world also like this. But I more like through my effort to get the success, that success can let me memorable forever.

    Reply
  23. buy dofus kamas says:
    August 13, 2008 at 10:23 pm

    no time play this game again, although this is network, but playing together a long time, there is a soul of the same feeling, and every time you think of a buy dofus kamas, now also do not see in you.

    Reply
  24. buy NosTale Gold says:
    August 18, 2008 at 8:27 pm

    To buy NosTale Gold win you must not only use your strength as a team, with the new features they plan to add cheap NosTale gold late. So no player will have to worry about ever losing their NosTale money account.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Is General Dynamics LCS still in the...
      Wildcard
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      NLOS-PAM is important to the LCS for some...
      Will
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Well, that's a lot more stable than any AV-8B...
      Cranky Observer
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      Isn't this the reason why the Navy went with a...
      @Earlydawn
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      It's a reduction in spending compared with...
      gmanaz
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Perfect, just in time for the program's cancellation.
      John
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I don't doubt that...
      Wildcard
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      It looked like a Transformer at the end!
      Wes
    • New F-35B Hover Video
      Harrier has been transonic and stealthy for decades?
      Matt
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      If this system is so important to...
      DennisBuller
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage